Begin forwarded message:
From: Angela Flynn
Date: May 19, 2008 10:04:11 AM PDT
To:
georgineh@co.lake.ca.us,
C...@co.lake.ca.us
Cc:
reception@harbin.org,
Elke Murphy ,
ewilson@record-bee.com
Subject: Proposed cell tower by US Cellular on Harbin Springs Road
Dear Lake County Board of Supervisors,
I write to you in reference to the proposed cell tower by U.S. Cellular
on Harbin Hot Springs Road. I request that this application be denied
as not only is the proposed cell tower unnecessary and unsightly, but
also the microwave radiation from cell towers cause harm to humans,
animals and plants and the FCC guidelines for exposure are not adequate.
In addition, the siting of a cell tower so close to the Harbin Hot
Springs Resort will result in a loss of business. I go to Harbin to get
away from my busy life and for a much-needed break from the high
electromagnetic radiation that is found in our cities.
GSM is already available throughout Harbin.
http://antennasearch.com/
GSM. There is no need for additional cellular antennas. U.S. Cellular
must prove a need for the cell tower and they cannot do this.
The FCC has set a limit for thermal effects for electromagnetic
radiation. They deferred the setting of biological non-thermal limits
to the nations health agencies. At the same time they cut the funding
of research into these health effects to zero.
The BioInitiative, published in August 2007, reviews over 2,000 studies
that show evidence of the non-thermal bio effects from this non
ionizing radiation.
Two-time Nobel Prize nominee Dr. Gerald Hyland, a physicist and board
member of the International Institute of Biophysics has said that the:
"Existing safety guidelines for cell phone towers are completely
inadequate.
and , People living near mobile phone masts are
effectively involuntary subjects in a mass experiment.
Norbert Hankin, of the Radiation Protection Division of the EPA says:
"The FCCs current exposure guidelines
are thermally based, and do not
apply to chronic, non-thermal exposure situations
Therefore, the
generalization that the guidelines protect human beings from harm by
any or all mechanisms is not justified."
Dr. Bruce Lipton, Ph.D., in the "The Biology of Belief", explains that
electromagnetic radiation causes the electrons to flip [twist]in our
cells proteins. This interferes with entire biological processes as
the receptors in the cell's membranes are not able to function
properly. He says:
"
proteins are the most important single component for living
organisms
The final shape
of a protein molecule reflects a balanced
state among its electromagnetic charges. However, if the protein's
positive and negative charges are altered the protein backbone will
dynamically twist and adjust itself to accommodate the new distribution
of charges. The distribution of electromagnetic charge within a protein
can be selectively altered by a number of processes including
interference
from electromagnetic fields such as those emanating from cell phones.
[Tsong 1989]"
Dr. Henry Lai of the University of Washington has shown that the
effects appear to be cumulative and can affect DNA. Leukemia, cancer,
sleeplessness and depression are just a few of the effects. Dr. Lai
also points out that current U.S. guidelines for electromagnetic
radiation exposure are not up-to-date and are based on research data
only up to 1985. Dr. Lai has said he would not live next to a cell
tower.
And, Dr. Andrew Weil, MD., says that "Electromagnetic pollution may be
the most significant form of pollution human activity has produced in
this century!"
I
Many people on this planet, est. 2 3%, have Electro-Hyper-Sensitivity
(EHS). This makes them extremely sensitive to microwave frequency
radiation. Often this occurs when someone has been exposed to higher
than normal levels at some point causing them to now be overly
sensitive to exposure. Many of these people experience some symptoms of
radiation poisoning. Many people are suffering harm from living near
cell towers without realizing what is causing the harm.
Recent studies confirm that cell and cordless phone and wireless
internet microwave can:
cause headaches and induce extreme fatigue, cause memory loss and
mental confusion, precipitate cataracts, retina damage and eye cancer,
create a burning sensation and rash on the skin, damage nerves in the
scalp, induce ringing in the ears, impair sense of smell, create joint
pain, muscle spasms and tremors, cause digestive problems and raise bad
cholesterol levels, alter the brain's electrical activity during sleep,
open the blood-brain barrier to viruses and toxins, cause blood cells
to leak hemoglobin, reduce the number and efficiency of white blood
cells, stimulate asthma by producing histamine in mast cells, and
stress the endocrine system - especially the pancreas, thyroid,
ovaries, and testes.
This harmless radiation is beaming at us 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week. This is particularly dangerous for children and for people while
sleeping, as children are more susceptible to electromagnetic radiation
and the body needs to be able to repair itself while asleep.
The microwave radiation from cellular antennas trespasses onto
neighboring property. This is a taking of property rights without
compensation.
Lloyds of London recently declined to issue insurance for liability to
wireless companies. These companies are changing to limited liability
corporations to avoid liability. Cell phone users and the owners of the
property where the antennas are left as the only ones not protected
from liability.
In addition the federal government does not have jurisdiction over
local governments on such matters. The rights granted to the wireless
companies by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 were not granted to it
by the constitution and the local governments did not give up those
rights.
Again, I request that this application be denied. I would also like to
suggest that Lake County organize a task force to research the issue of
microwave radiation.
Thank you for your time on this crucial matter. I have included
reference material below.
Best regards,
Angela Flynn
204 Gault Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95062
831-469-4399
Below are six studies showing adverse health effects from cell phone
towers and some reference websites.
http://ezinearticles.com/index.php?Cell-Phone-Towers-And-Mobile-Phone-Masts---Beacons-Of-Harm&id=10030
1. Santini et al. found significant health problems in people living
within 300 meters of a cell phone base station or tower.
2. A Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research study
entitled, "Effects of Global Communications System Radio-Frequency
Fields On Well Being and Cognitive Function of Human Subjects With and
Without Subjective Complaints" found significant effects on well being
including headaches, muscle fatigue, pain, and dizziness from tower
emissions well below the "safety" level.
3. Gerd, Enrique, Manuel, Ceferino and Claludio conducted a Spanish
study called "The Microwave Syndrome" and found adverse health effects
from those living near two cell phone base stations. The health effects
included fatigue, a tendency toward depression, sleeping disorders,
difficulty in concentration and cardiovascular problems.
4. From an Israeli study published in the International Journal of
Cancer Prevention, reported a fourfold increase in the incidence of
cancer in people living within 350 meters of a cell phone tower as
compared to the Israeli general population.
5. In the Naila Study from Germany, November 2004, five medical doctors
collaborated to assess the risk to people living near a cell phone
tower. The results showed that the proportion of newly developed cancer
cases was significantly higher in those patients living within the
400-meter distance and that the patients became ill on average eight
years earlier.
6. An Austrian Study released in May 2005, showed that radiation from a
cell phone tower at a distance of 80 meters causes significant changes
of the electrical currents in the brains of test subjects. Subjects
reported symptoms such as buzzing in the head, tinnitus, palpitations
of the heart, lightheadedness, anxiety, shortness of breath,
nervousness, agitation, headache, heat sensation and depression.
Following are some useful websites with information on this matter.
1. The International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (ICEMS) held
an international conference entitled "The Precautionary EMF Approach:
Rationale, Legislation and Implementation", hosted by the City of
Benevento, Italy, on February 22, 23 & 24, 2006
http://www.icems.eu/benevento_resolution.htm
2. Wi-Fis Electric Shock _Wireless Net Hoopla Masks Growing Concern
over Frequency Pollution
http://www.nowtoronto.com/issues/2006-03-09/news_story.php
3. Thailand and Vietnam require shielding from emr.
http://www.radiationresearch.org/newsletter170606.htm
4. Health fears lead schools to dismantle wireless networks
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article642575.ece
5. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT _Directorate General for Research-Directorate
A
STOA - Scientific and Technological Options Assessment _Options Brief
and Executive Summary _PE nr. 297.574 March 2001
THE PHYSIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF NON-IONISING
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
http://www.goodhealthinfo.net/radiation/eu_report_2001.pdf
6. Telecom Towers Tsunami by B. Blake Levitt
http://www.emrnetwork.org/faq/tsunami.pdf
7. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves
from GSM mobile phones.
http://www.protectingourhealth.org/newscience/learning/2003/2003-0129salfordetal.htm
8. ISRAELI RESEARCH: CELL PHONE RADIATION MAY CAUSE VISUAL DAMAGE
http://www.isracast.com/Articles/Article.aspx?ID=57
9. You Don't Deserve Brain Cancer - You Deserve Facts - Amy Worthington
http://www.goaegis.com/articles/amy_worthington_012003_o3s6g4k8q2.html
10. FEB - The Swedish Association for the Electro Sensitive
http://www.feb.se/index_int.htm
11. Letter from the EPA (7/16/02) stating that the FCCs guidelines are
not adequate.
http://www.emrnetwork.org/position/noi_response/noi_epa_response.pdf
12. My war on electrosmog: Julia Stephenson sets out to clear the
airwaves_How one woman fought back after being diagnosed by her
naturopath with overexposure to Wi-Fi and mobile phone frequencies
http://environment.independent.co.uk/lifestyle/article2600308.ece
13. Dr. Andrew Weil, MD
http://www.drweil.com/drw/u/id/QAA26193
14. The Freiburger Appeal
http://www.emrnetwork.org/news/IGUMED_english.pdf
Websites to Research:
http://www.bioinitiative.org
http://www.emrnetwork.org
http://www.safewireless.org/
http://www.noodlenak.com/the-courts-are-delivering-blows-against-mobile-masts-and-cell-towers.htm