[
noname.html ]
Ortendahl and Högstedt
The unnatural presence of microwaves in urban centers throughout
the world is a criminal practice of Medicine endorsed by the World
Health Organization and intended to benefit private companies in the
United States and Europe.
Apart from the fact that no MEDICAL STUDIES were conducted by any
government in the world, the WHO or any company in order to introduce
cell phone telephony and its derivatives, the total evidence against
an environmental use of microwaves is in excess of several million
medical references dating back to the 19th century.
Amongst these crimes that were cooked by Michael Repacholi, the
dental amalgam issue is preeminent in regards to the scientific fraud
needed to introduce cell phone telephony.
Ortendahl and Högstedt have demonstrated how millions of
human beings are slowly getting intoxicated through the deleterious
action of microwaves on dental amalgams. This chronic intoxication
has the potential of modifying the human genome of the human
generations to come. Even bacteria seem to be affected.
The Histoly Department of Gothenburg University in Sweden has
concluded: "Potentiostatic analyses were performed on amalgam
samples exposed to AC and DC magnetic fields. Morphologic changes
were analyzed using differential interference light microscopy and
scanning electron microscopy. Chemical changes on the surface of the
amalgam samples were analyzed with secondary ion mass spectrometry.
Results demonstrated that dental amalgams exposed to a specific AC
magnetic field underwent morphologic and chemical changes in the
superficial amalgam layers".
Again, he who is guilty will remain in silence. No explanations
will come from the World Health Organization. Guilt by association
with the ICNIRP.
Dr. CARLOS SOSA, MD
--------
Re: Ortendahl and Högstedt
Take a careful look, and you'll see that the World Health
Organisation's EMF Project sees as one of its goals -- "Facilitating
public acceptance of microwave standards." (I think that's
exactly how it's phrased.)
Now ask yourself -- what the h... does a so-called public health
organisation have to do, with facilitating public acceptance of
microwave technology? How can this possibly be part of their
"mission"? I believe this is the smoking gun here. It is a
dead giveaway.
That being said, having spoken in some length to the new director
of the EMF Project, Emilie van Deventer, I honestly believe that she
is not at all in the same camp as her predecessor Michael Repacholi,
and I believe she has a much more open mind on all this. She told me
in an aside -- "The cellphone companies aren't interested in
your health. They're only interested in making sure that their
networks operate". That was a very interesting thing to hear.
Let's see. It's all becoming very interesting.
karlmuller30
--------
Re: Ortendahl and Högstedt
Beyond what Emilie Perkins van Deventer says, what is important in
WORLD HEALTH is what she does. Emilie Perkins van Deventer is an
Electrical Engineer. This is to say, she lacks both the Medical
Expertise and the Academic Credentials in order to take concrete
actions to protect the PHYSICAL INTEGRITY of millions throughout the
planet. Emilie Perkins van Deventer lacks the capacity to send out an
international epidemiological alert concerning the clinical injuries
caused by EMF. Her critical immobility was granted from the root to
favor the status quo.
Thanks to the prostitution, the decadence and the phariseeism
inside the World Health Organization, we have replaced a criminal
fraud by another one. Both Michael Repacholi and Emilie Perkins van
Deventer lack the academic background in Medicine needed to work in
such a position. And this is just part of the vested interests that
the WHO defends. Cell phone economical interests cannot and will not
be touched on medical grounds by the WHO.
The conduct of this type of WHO officials is responsible for the
death and disease of millions in the world. Within this framework of
structural and systematic falsehood, key positions inside the World
Health Organization are occupied by people who cannot do anything at
all to protect World Health. That is the whole issue. It is an
intrinsic fraud which was thought with a complete evil intention.
It's like placing a carpenter inside NASA in order to construct the
next generation of rockets to Mars. This is done so that things don't
get done.
In a movement that a few decades ago would be incredible, the
policies of the World Health Organization are a warranty to cause
death, suffering and disease in the five continents. There is no
difference whatsoever between the Coca Cola company and the World
Health Organization. I have the slight suspicion that the moral
integrity of both Michael Repacholi and Emilie Perkins van Deventer
does not add up to even half of the moral background of Pablo
Escobar. Is the Cartel actually in Colombia or in Geneva?
Dr. Carlos Sosa, MD
--------
Re: Ortendahl and Högstedt
And on an interesting note, a PubMed search of "van Deventer
E" returns only 10 papers, of which there is a very clear trend
of papers regarding RF related EMF effects on the public. Most of
these also share Repacholi as an author (excluding the '88 stuff
which appears to be a different van Deventer), and presumably are
after her appointment within the WHO "framework".
It doesn't appear that she has published any real science
whatsoever out of her involvement within WHO, and that which she has
since published are hardly qualification required science, nor is she
a primary author of anything.
I am inclined to agree with Carlos here, regardless of how she may
be different (or not, as the case may be) to Repacholi, what
qualifies her to sit in her current role at WHO? How, may I ask, did
she get appointed to the position? By whom, and on what criteria did
she beat the competition to the place?
It would be interesting to see some justification from WHO.
Graham
--------
Re: Ortendahl and Högstedt
Carlos,
well put. Emilie Perkins van Deventer is an electrical engineer,
which has nothing to do with health. I see there was a meeting at
Geneva early this year with her and it looks as if Eileen O'Conner
who is on this list has attended the meeting:
http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/who_meeting_geneva_(2).doc
Perhaps Eileen can give some more insight?
It seems this was just another alibi disposition. Telling we take
your concerns very serious, which in reality means, you'll be
radiated at our wills, resistance is futile...;(
Concerning Pablo Escobar, one could at least say the dangers of
drugs handled by this cartel are pretty well know. Those endorsed by
WHO targeting far more people are told be safe, by lying about
scientific evidence telling about the dagers, which are available
since very long time.
Criminal energy by WHO seems to outweight those of Pablo Escobar
in order of magnitudes. Though one injustice doesn't justify another,
but I am sure this wasn't your point?
Tom
--------
Re: Ortendahl and Högstedt
I was at a two-day conference in Johannesburg, Oct 8/9, hosted by
the SA Bureau of Standards and the Finnish govt radiation protection
board, on mobile phones and health. This is where we met Emilie van
Deventer.
After her presentation, I questioned her on adopting the
precautionary principle -- why the WHO did not take this very basic
step. Where there is evidence of particular risk, even if it has not
been "proven", one takes precautions. Her very woolly reply
was to the effect that we didn't know enough to know that we didn't
know enough to adopt the principle. My heart really sank, and I
thought, there truly is no hope here.
However, in speaking with her in private later, it became clear
that she really is on a huge learning curve, and is not
unsympathetic. The question as to why an engineer is put in a public
health position is extremely relevant. The whole field has
traditionally been dominated by physicists and engineers with no
health background at all. This is actually a colossal indictment of
the medical profession, which has completely abrogated its
responsibilities, and left it to the engineers (while they prescribe
Ritalin and anti-epileptic drugs etc for EMR-induced illnesses).
But this is ALL politics now. I think the most important thing is
to have something approximating a human being in that position at
WHO, who is actually willing to listen. I felt that this was the case
with her. I went with a very hard and sceptical attitude, and left
feeling that there was someone there who was in fact prepared to
listen and learn.
What **completely** stunned me at this conference was the
absolutely blind "science" that was presented. Without
trying to
...
read more »
