To School Boards and
the public: A group of computer software personnel
who serve the wireless industry posed itself as a
consumer protection watchdog. This group
called Bad Science Watch recently issued a report1 to attack
concerned scientists and citizens who raise
awareness about the well-documented health impacts2 of WiFi and
wireless technology, especially on children.
The
committee chair of this report, Gem Newman, is the
lead developer at Invenia Technical Computing3. Invenia's customers are utility
companies who are rolling out radiating wireless
smart meters4. Committee member Adrian Powell is a
software contractor. No one in this committee has any credential
regarding the interaction between
electromagnetic radiation and human biology.
Just like the
tobacco and asbestos industries have done in the
past, this group diligently promotes the myth that
there is no risk from WiFi radiation. They ignore
all peer-reviewed scientific studies showing harm
of microwave and electromagnetic fields on animals
and humans, and ignore the calls for precaution by
legitimate doctors associations5, the
International Agency for Research on Cancer6, the European
Parliament7, the Council of
Europe8 as well as
scientists around the world who conduct research
on electromagnetic radiation.
Swisscom,
Switzerland's largest IT services provider,
recognized the genotoxic effects of WiFi routers.
The science behind was elaborated in Swisscom's
patent filed in 2003 when they attempted to reduce
such danger through an automatically-deactivated
router design18. Unfortunately,
North American manufacturers have not adopted this
patent, but continue to produce WiFi routers which
bombard humans and all living beings with
microwave beacon signals, 24/7.
In December, 2012,
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP),
representing 60,000 pediatricians and pediatric
surgeons, warned against "the potential dangers of
RF energy exposure" on children and pregnant
women: "The differences in bone density and the
amount of fluid in a child’s brain compared to an
adult’s brain could allow children to absorb
greater quantities of RF (radiofrequency) energy deeper into their brains than
adults... the current exposure
limits may not reflect the latest research on RF
energy".9
In October, 2011,
Health Canada encouraged parents to reduce
children's radiofrequency exposure, because
“children are typically more sensitive" and "there
is currently a lack of scientific information
regarding the potential health impacts of cell
phones on children".10
Industry
propagandists have no regards for the health
of children as long as the negative health
impact of WiFi and wireless devices remains
inconclusive, as long as the archaic radiation
exposure limits of Health Canada doesn't
change, and the profits from the sale of such
technology is not affected. They even exploit
low income families, making up an absurd
excuse that these families “rely on wireless networks”. Any
experienced professional can instantly debunk
this lie. Wireless is a convenience (at the
expense of health), but not a necessity. Children from
low-income families, just like children from any
family, need a safe and healthy environment for
them to grow and learn. Wired connection
provides fast and secure access to the internet
and educational resources, without the risk of
radiation. In most instances, wireless mobile
devices such as smartphones and tablets cost
more than wired equipment and are designed with
planned obsolescence to drive product sales.
Follow
the $ MONEY $
As more and more voices
around the world draw the public's attention to
the potential danger of WiFi and wireless
technology, it is not surprising that the industry
makes extra efforts to obfuscate the picture18. This report
called Investigation of Anti-WiFi
Activism claimed to “investigate the motivations, funding
sources, agendas, and conflicts of interest”. Ironically, it is the report's own
publishers who are full of conflicts of
interest.
Executive
Director of
Bad Science Watch, Jamie Williams, is a software developer for
Layer 7 Technologies which supplies software for
smartphones, tablets, wireless smart meters as
well as Cisco WiFi routers (access points) which
are aggressively marketed to school boards
across Canada11. Also, BSW
is a spin-off organization of Center for Inquiry12 which is
financed by electronic tycoon Lorne Trottier.
Trottier has multi-million dollar investments in
a variety of wireless technologies13. RF/EMF
emitted by wireless devices has been classified
by the World Health Organization as a 2B
possible cancer risk while Trottier's Oncocyme
Pharma specializes in selling cancer treatment14. Shall we
ask: who has “financial motives”?
Conflict
of interest is a rampant problem that hinders the
science on electromagnetic radiation15.
Instead of following profit-driven corporate
agendas, school boards and parents must examine
non-industry funded, independent research16
and professional opinions of genuine experts17.
In
2010, Dr. Annie Sasco - Teaching fellow of Harvard
University and former Chief of the World Health
Organization's Cancer Control Programme -
testified to the Canadian Parliament Standing
Committee on Health, “With regard to
electromagnetic fields, we have, of course. more
than plenty of evidence of exposure... We may
never have the absolute final proof, but if our
goal is to reduce somewhat the burden of cancer
and other chronic diseases in the years to come,
we have enough data to go ahead with a
precautionary principle to avoid unnecessary
exposure.”19
We
as parents support the use of technology as a tool
in education, and believe that wired connection to
the internet is the best way to provide
educational benefits without long-term health
risks for children. Unfortunately, avoiding
unnecessary exposure for health is not the
priority of trillion-dollar corporations.
21st Century Learning was a
marketing scheme invented by IT giants Cisco, Bill
Gates and Promethean through their Global
Education Leaders' Program (GELP)20.
Aptly stated by Tara
Ehrcke, President of Greater Victoria
Teachers' Association: “To sell more IT
products, the 21st Century Learning advocates create a need for those
products. No longer should schools spend their
resource and IT budgets only on textbooks and
computer labs. Anytime, anywhere, collaborative,
integrated, blended learning requires a massive
infusion of new IT products.”21
If children need SMART wireless gadgets to make them smarter, why do Silicon
Valley executives send their children to no-tech
Waldorf schools?22
Increasing profits and market share are
the priorities of corporations. Their marketing
machines crawl through commercial, political and
educational institutions.
They crawl through the
internet and the media, even disguised as consumer advocates, citing industry-funded studies to
mitigate the harm of wireless technology shown
in non-industry-funded studies, attacking
citizens' right to take precaution, and mocking
parental protection of children's health. These are the
same shameful tactics employed by tobacco
companies for decades, while numerous deaths
resulted from their delay and denial:
Nobody but parents has
the biggest stake in our children's health and
well-being. We refuse industry propaganda
which promotes their business but pretends to speak as our watchdog. NO, THANKS!
Sincerely,
Parents
for Safe School and SafeinSchool.Org