This becomes extremely interesting in light of George
Michaelides's sudden
departure, stealing unknown millions in trust funds (some
estimates put the
amount stolen at over R100 million). This sudden flight also
brought to light
extensive connections between Michaelides and a number of
known criminals, and
in fact the killing committed by Michaelides in his office was
just the
beginning of a
series of murders that occurred within
this criminal
circle. There have been several more killings since the report
referenced here,
and I have evidence of an even earlier murder that may have
been connected with
this. I posted details of this alleged murder
here -- see the post marked "Warning:
Graphic
Content".
We subsequently received information from a reliable source
within Vodacom
(described as "Source B" in the above post) who informed us
that
there was a major money-laundering operation being run by
Vodacom and
Michaelides Attorneys. Front companies owned by the latter
were buying
properties, using money that Vodacom was writing off as "legal
fees".
This source produced documents showing other extremely
questionable property
deals being done through the same channels.
In 2009 I became aware of a "secret" KPMG investigation into
wrongdoing at Vodacom involving the then-CEO, Alan
Knott-Craig. I phoned KPMG,
and was referred to their "Vodacom expert". He denied any
knowledge
of such an inquiry. I told him that I knew for a fact that
there was indeed
such an inquiry, and told this "expert" to pass on some of the
above
information to the relevant investigators, particularly about
George
Michaelides and the shady front companies he was operating,
buying properties
on Vodacom's behalf.
Later, when this KPMG inquiry was
publicly confirmed, it became apparent
that serious
evidence of nepotism by Alan Knott-Craig had been uncovered,
but it was all
quietly hushed up by the Vodacom shareholders who commissioned
the inquiry. I
am certain that KPMG took no action on my information, even
when it became
evident that George Michaelides was indeed very crooked.
And we do know for a fact now that George Michaelides was up
to no good. The
Law Society has seized his files and is trying to unravel the
tangled web of
criminality in which he was involved. No information has been
forthcoming from
the Society as to what they have found. But there is no
question that top
Vodacom executives were deeply involved in extremely
questionable business with
this man.
Also interesting in this regard is that a third lawyer was
also charged with
misconduct before the Law Society in the Anastassiou case, one
Eleni
Christodoulou, who was a senior executive at Vodacom before
she suddenly
departed. It is now clear that she had been
charged with perjury following
serious lies she apparently told the
competition
authorities in South Africa on behalf of Vodacom, and this was
why she suddenly left the company.
In the Law Society hearing into George Michaelides, Leslie
Cohen and Eleni
Christodoulou, Michaelides stated that it was "common
knowledge" that
his wife was in fact Eleni Christodoulou. This was news to me,
but it made
certain connections very clear. While the husband, George
Michaelides, was
given Vodacom money to buy up properties using various front
companies, his
wife was right at the top of Vodacom's legal services, and
until her hasty
departure from Vodacom when perjury charges were laid against
her, would have
been in an excellent position to make sure that any wrongdoing
was covered up.
During this long-drawn-out legal saga with the Anastassious,
Vodacom used the
attorney Leslie Cohen extensively. I just want to put one last
comment from
Cohen on record.
On the day the Anastassious were bullied into selling their
home, much against
their wishes, a high-powered delegation, including the Chief
Operating Officer, Pieter Uys, senior
legal executive Eleni Christodoulou, and the Chief
Communications Officer,
Dorothy Field, arrived completely unexpectedly at the house,
to begin the
browbeating. At one point, Dino Anastassiou was outside with
Leslie Cohen, while
negotiations were proceeding within with the rest of the
family. Cohen actually said the following to Dino:
"Dino, I want to thank you. I've made a lot of money from
you."
This saga shows just how corrupt and venal Vodacom has been
since its very
inception, and how it deploys its enormous resources to use
the legal system to
browbeat and crush people who get in its way. It is a very sad
indictment of
the state of corporate governance and the legal profession in
South
Africa.
In 2009, Dino Anastassiou made the essence of this information
available
directly to the CEO of Vodafone, and
there is absolutely no
way that Vodafone can say they were unaware of allegations of
major, systematic
illegality with Vodacom's infrastructure. Nor can Vodacom deny
its extensive
involvement with the now-fugitive lawyer, George Michaelides.
How much of
Vodacom's money disappeared with him will probably never be
known. This is what
happens when thieves fall out ...
So: what does Vodafone plc intend to do about allegations of
systematic
criminality among executives of its subsidiary?
Perhaps Vodafone can begin by looking at the
criminal charges I laid against one Jannie van Zyl, one of Vodacom's
present executives,
dating from when he was CEO of the company iBurst in South
Africa.
(Incidentally, one of the charges of nepotism that the KPMG
report detailed,
was Alan Knott-Craig's installation of his son, Alan
Knott-Craig Jr, as MD of
iBurst, so there was a very close connection between these
companies).
Van Zyl's ignominious departure from iBurst saw him return
directly to Vodacom,
where he was originally employed. Please examine this criminal
charge sheet to
see what a track record of lies and deceptions this top
Vodacom executive has
left behind him. These criminal charges stand. Is this the
kind of person
Vodafone endorses as a senior executive?
Below, now, is the document we drew up to pursue fraud charges
against Leslie
Cohen. Again: it must be emphasised that for one reason or
another, the
prosecuting authorities decided not to follow up on these
charges. But the
facts below all stand, and you can make up your own mind as to
whether Vodacom
acted legally and ethically in this case.
Again: this is a terribly complicated case, and I am grateful
to anyone who has
read this far. But these charges below took us months of
painstaking work to
draw up, and I do not wish this effort to go to waste. Since
there is nothing
sub judice here, there is no impediment on my releasing the
full background
history of the extremely dodgy purchase of the Anastassiou
family home by
Vodacom -- or rather, by the front company it used, Scarlet
Ibis Investments
23.