1 in 100 Autism Rate, a Startling 50% Jump in Just Two Years: Evidence Points to an Environmental Trigger
omeg...@gmx.de
CDC Study Expected to Announce 1 in 100 Autism Rate�A Startling 50% Jump in Just Two Years. Evidence Points to an Environmental Trigger.
December
16, 2009
http://www.ageofautism.com/2009/12/cdc-study-expected-to-announce-1-in-100-autism-ratea-startling-50-jump-in-just-/comments/page/2/#comments
Readers comments:
�
�And why does it take so long? My son is 13. And NOW I know that when he "got" autism he was 1 in 100 (born late 96) NOT the 1 in 10,000 I was reading back then.
What people need to be thinking is, what is the number now?
They need to look at the 2004 birth cohort. My second child was born
in 2004. He is not autistic... but a CRAP TON of his friend are.
History WILL show that autism rate in the 2004 cohort are in the 1 in
25 ball park.
Mark my words.
Posted by: Jenny W | December 16, 2009 at 09:42 PM
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, Jenny W. I'm sure it's now much more than 1 in 100. Out of the 9 kids on my street whom I know, 2 are autistic, and 2 have ADHD/sensory disorders. So on my street, autism is 2 in 9, or 1 in 4.5.
Posted by: kristina | December 17, 2009 at 12:42 AM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that these bad news are being embargoed and given in slow-release caplet form tells a lot about the intent to missinform and confuse the population. In contrast, stories about the latest H1N1 somewhat related death is published on first page on Monday if need to be.
At the end you can try to put an embargo around that mountain but that won't hide it. It's not only that 1 out of 100 kids has autism, the story is much worse. On a hypothetical american classroom with 100 kids showing normal averages for certain conditions (text in parenthesis comes from different "official" websites, not from "hysterical parent" blogs):
1 kid would have autism (as per CDC)
9 would have ADD/ADHD
9 would have asthma (prevalence of asthma increased 75% from 1980-1994. Asthma rates in children under the age of five have increased more than 160% from 1980-1994 - source American academy of allergy, asthma and immunology)
4 kids would have food allergies (according to the CDC, more children than ever are being diagnosed with allergies. It has been reported that about 3 million children in the U.S. have a food or digestive allergy, which represents an 18% increase over the past 10 years)
1 kid would have diabetes (The Centers for Disease Control report that diabetes is ranked as one of the leading chronic illnesses for younger children and teens. Normally when children get diabetes, it is Type 1, also called juvenile diabetes. Yet in the past 20 years, this has been changing. Type 2 diabetes, traditionally called adult-onset diabetes, is increasing in incidence in the United States).
No kid would have leukemia but the increase in rates is worrying enough to parents (Over the past 20 years, there has been some increase in the incidence of children diagnosed with all forms of invasive cancer, from 11.5 cases per 100,000 children in 1975 to 14.8 per 100,000 children in 2004)
If you work for the CDC and you connect the dots, as I'm sure they
have, you'd want to hide yourself too under the embargo. XXI century
medical science is proving to be a crying shame. For the first time in
history, you can safely say that at least with regards to children's
health we were better off 40 years ago.
Posted by: we shall overcome | December 17, 2009 at 09:44 AM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
�
I agree that mercury is a terrible substance to be injecting into children. I believe that it is part of the autism problem but, I think you are missing the most significant cause - cell phones, DECT cordless phones, WiFi,DECT baby monitors, wireless devices, broadcasting antennas and other emitters of electro magnetic radiation (EMR).
Mercury has been used widely for many years but the increase in autism has only occurred during the time that electro magnetic radiation has increased (by millions of times higher), during the last thirty years!
If you look at the Bio Initiative Report - www.bioinitiative.org �you will see many scientific reports linking serious adverse health effects to EMR exposure.
Some autistic children react to electro magnetic radiation in a way that indicates they are upset by that exposure.
The health effects of microwave radiation have been known for sixty years. You will be shocked if you learn what has been hidden from you.
Posted by: Martin Weatherall
�
[ http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=autism
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=autism
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=BioInitiative
]
�