At the Bioelectromagnetics Society meeting next week, Lloyd will
be presenting the paper,“Re-evaluation
of the Interphone Study: Applications of a Correction Factor”, co-authored with
Prof. Michael Kundi of
the Medical University of Vienna and Michael Carlberg of the Dept of
Oncology, Oreboro Hospital in Sweden, that shows how the
underestimation of risk in the Interphone study, due to design flaws,
can be QUANTIFIED. They have provided examples of the
corrected results for 6 of the Interphone studies (see Table), the
results of which are important.
Where the Interphone study showed no risk of meningioma, in one
example, recalculated using the correction factor shows a 24% risk
of meningioma for every year of use. The statistical correction
factor applied was based on the skew in the odds ratios reported in the
Interphone study itself.
Morgan says, “What we have discovered
indicates there is going to be one hell of a brain tumor pandemic
unless people are warned and encouraged to change current cell phone
use behaviors. Governments should not soft-peddle this critical public
health issue but instead rapidly educate citizens on the risks. People
should hear the message clearly that cell phones should be kept away
from one’s head and body at all times.”
Michael Kundi, Professor of Occupational
Health and Epidemiology at the Medical University of Vienna, says, "The Interphone study, the largest
epidemiological investigation on brain tumors ever conducted, was
thought to give the final answer to the issue of a potential brain
tumor risk from mobile phone use. It turned out to raise more questions
than providing answers. Flaws in the design and problems during conduct
of the study led to biased estimates of the risk. We tried to assess
the magnitude of this bias and correct the most important risk
estimates. It turned out that after correction the risk from mobile
phone use is quite substantial and warrants precautionary activities."
Michael Carlberg, M.Sc. of the Department
of Oncology, University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden, says, “The
original Interphone results have severe problems with bias which
results in underestimations of risks. Applying the correction factor
shows that the actual risk is higher than the originally presented odds
ratios, with several statistically significant results.”
I will be sending
this out under embargo over the weekend. We'd like to see the truth
come out about this study. While, as you know, the Interphone study
showed risk of brain tumors after 10 years of use (buried in Appendix
2), the current recalculation by Morgan, Kundi and Carlberg paints an
entirely different picture of risk--one that requires urgent societal
attention.
Please consider
covering this important news story coming out next week.
I
will send you a press release complete with links for posting, if you
choose, next week. In the mean time, Lloyd wanted you to have an early
heads up on this. Many, many thanks for your
interest
in helping us to communicate this important public health information.
Please
be in touch with me in Lloyd's absence should you want to discuss this
or email him in Korea at
Bilo...@aol.com
Remember the attached is confidential
and embargoed until June 17th at 12:00 a.m. (New York time)
All the best,
Camilla Rees
Camilla Rees, MBA
Co-Author,
"Cellphones and Brain Tumors: 15 Reasons for Concern, Science, Spin
and
the
Truth Behind Interphone"
Co-Author,
"Public Health SOS: The Shadow Side of the Wireless Revolution"
Founder,
Campaign for Radiation Free Schools (Facebook)
Author,
"Alzheimer's Mouse Study--Do We Smell a Rat?"
Co-author,
Campaign for Safer Cell Phones, Briefing Book
EMF
Advisor to Citizens for Health, Mercola.com and FrankLipmanMD.com
Radio
Host KGNU Boulder/Denver on health and environmental issues