Petition to the Government of Canada
Cell Tower Petition
See the attached petition document.
The
petition is to the federal government to change current
legislation
on how and where cell towers are erected. It was tabled
and presented
to the federal government in March, 2011, but signatures
will
be accepted on an ongoing basis.
We
need to get as many signatures as possible nationwide
for it to be
effective.
-petition
should be printed out on legal size 8" x 14" paper if
possible. If that's not possible, 8" x 11" paper will
do,
there's just less room for signatures. Each page must
remain in
format submitted.
-signatures should appear in blue ball point
ink. Only original signatures can be submitted, no
photocopies. You
may print and fill as many pages as you like.
-filled
petitions to be sent to:
Matthew
Kellway, M.P
House of Commons
Parliament Hill
Ottawa,
Ontario
K1A 0A6
*no
postage necessary
Michelle
--------
BC Hydro is stoking reefer madness
BC Hydro's answer to the problem: spend $1 billion on smart meters to stop pot-producing power poachers. It's hard to know where to begin explaining how screwed up and illogical this is. But first, let's review Hydro's recent history of estimating ...
http://www.theprovince.com/technology/Hydro+stoking+reefer+madness/5007200/story.html
--------
Concerns raised over safety, pricing
Kendall
said a recent study from the World Health Organization's
International Agency on Research on Cancer
that labelled the electromagnetic
fields caused by cellphones and the like as "a possible
human
carcinogen," suggested the EMF level is ...
http://www.timescolonist.com/health/Concerns+raised+over+safety+pricing/5008077/story.html
Response to above article:
Dear
Editor,
Duffy
quotes Provincial Health officer Dr Perry Kendall. I
don't think
there is any convincing evidence that the levels [of
(rfr) radio
frequency radiation] that we are being exposed to are in
fact causing
harm. I find this statement strange as there are
thousands of peer
reviewed studies that show adverse health effects as a
result of
exposure at the levels experienced when immersed in a
WI-FI hot spot,
or when using a cell phone, and when you head is just
inches from a
so called smart meter. For starters I ask readers to
visit;
http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/studies.asp#phones
Therein
you will find what is considered by scientists as
credible evidence
that rfr at everyday levels of exposure as being
harmful.
Kendall claims according to Hydro the meters are only reporting back, on average, less than a minute a day; it is not 24/7. I ask readers to visit and click on to the video of a Smart meter while operating. You will see it is operating 24/7.
http://www.youaretheanswer.ca/radiation-sources/smartmeters/
Kendall
claims that the recent designation by the World Health
Organizations,
International Agency on Research on Cancer that placed
radio
frequency radiation as a possible carcinogen as being
based upon one
study with weak evidence. This statement is also
strange. The
committee themselves said. The working group considered
hundreds of
articles. I recomend visiting the official IARC web site
at to read
their full statement.
http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf
The
one finding that Kendall refers to was from the
Interphone study.
This study was included in the IARC analysis. I also
find it strange
he not mention a publication titled "Public health
implications
of wireless technologies" cites that Lennart Hardell
found age
is a significant factor. The report repeated the finding
that the use
of cell phones before age 20 increased the risk of brain
tumors by
5.2, compared to 1.4 for all ages. A review by Hardell
et al.
concluded that current mobile phones are not safe for
long-term
exposure.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_radiation_and_health.
One
would think a medical doctor would consider this as
credible
evidence. Not absolute proof perhaps but sufficient to
warrant some
precautionary guidelines.
Kendall
also claims that the possible association between mobile
phone use
and cancer risk warrents further study [the consensus of
public
health practiconers is that the current exposure levels
to EMF's does
not constitute a threat to the health of the public].
This
statement is also strange given the division of opinions
within the
public health community on this issue. Dr. John
Blatherwick, ex chief
medical health officer of the city of Vancouver BC is
shown in the
link below in a BC Hydro information meeting in March as
saying,
Safety Code 6 is grossly out of date because it is based
upon tissue
heating. The health effects we are discussing are a
result of what is
called non thermal effects. He claims safety Code Six
needs to be
updated and upgraded.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFaTpkTx-oA&feature=player_embedded
Indeed,
Dr, Shelia Basrur, Kendall's successor in the position
as medial
health officer of the City of Toronto called for
guidelines to rfr
exposure 100 times stricter than Canada's standards.
http://www.toronto.ca/health/hphe/pdf/cell_tower_conference.pdf
In
a London Telegraph article on May 21, 2007, the chairman
of Great
Briton's Health Protection Agency called for a review of
WI FI risks
in schools.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1552205/Wi-Fi-risks-in-schools-must-be-reviewed.html [Speaking about his review of the evidence for health risks linked to mobile phones and masts published in the year 2000, Sir William said: "There may be changes, for example in cognitive function... there were some indications that there may be cancer inductions... there were some molecular biology changes within the cell and these were issues that we had to bear in mind."]
The
above statements seem to contradict Kendall's claims of
unanimity
amongst heath professionals that the rfr such as that
emitted from a
wireless hydro meter is safe. In my opinion the opposite
seems to be
the case.
Walter Patrick McGinnis co chair EM Radiation Health Alliance of BC
iPads Consume 400% More Wi-Fi Data Than Other Mobile Device
(More data, more radiation, more danger?)
http://mashable.com/2011/06/23/ipad-wifi-data/
William
Informant: Martin Weatherall
[ http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=electromagnetic+field
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electromagnetic+field
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=wireless+technologies
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=wireless+technologies
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=mobile+device
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=mobile+device
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Wi-Fi
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Wi-Fi
http://freepage.twoday.net/search?q=Wi-Fi
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=smart+meter
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=smart+meter
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=exposure
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=exposure
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=precaution
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=precaution
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=guidelines
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=guidelines
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=health
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=health
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=carcinogen
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=carcinogen
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=cancer
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=cancer
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=tumor
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=tumor
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Interphone
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Interphone
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Hydro
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Safety+Code+6
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=IARC
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=IARC
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=World+Health+Organi
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=World+Health+Organi
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Blatherwick
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=Hardell
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Hardell ]