1 message - Collapse all

news.omega@googlemail.com

More options Jul 10, 4:01 am

From: "news.om...@googlemail.com" <news.om...@googlemail.com>

Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:01:29 +0200

Local: Fri, Jul 10 2009 4:01 am

Subject: Government response to school WiFi petition panned

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward
  | Print
  | Individual message
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

[ noname.html 7K ]

Government response to school WiFi petition panned

Critics claim the technology has been implemented without a proper assessment of its potential adverse health effects. Exposure to the electromagnetic radiation emitted by WiFi and its masts can make those who are electrosensitive – three in 100 of us – ill. There are also continuing fears about the cancers and tumours associated with mobile phone use and telephone masts.

‘WiFi is an untested and under-regulated technology,’ the petition read. ‘[HPA chairman] Sir William Stewart called for government and regulators to apply the precautionary principle and to review the use of Wi-Fi in schools. The German government is advising its citizens to limit their exposure to WiFi. It is time to stop putting corporate profit over the health of UK citizens – especially the youngest who are most likely to feel the adverse effects of WiFi and are least able to defend themselves.’

In its response, the Government said it was up to schools to use their professional judgement on the deployment of a technology that could ‘support the use of ICT by raising standards in provision’.

The Government body that advises schools on the safe use of technology, Becta, itself follows the advice of the HCA, which argues that wireless signals are low-power (0.1 watt), and as such fall within guidelines accepted by the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).

However a signatory to the petition, Andrew Goldsworthy, a former lecturer in biology at Imperial College London, warned the guidelines were ‘dangerously out of date’.

He said WiFi affected the stability of cell membranes ‘at levels thousands of times lower than those specified in the ICNIRP guidelines, which are relevant only to heating effects’, and called the Government’s response to the petition ‘an insult to my intelligence and that of my cosignatories’.