At
last week's Congressional hearing on cell phone cancer risks, Dr.
Ronald Herberman testified that the incidence of brain cancer has
been increasing over the last ten years, particularly among 20-29
year-olds. This could have major implications for the cell phone
health controversy.
Read
our coverage of Congressman Dennis Kucinich's hearing at:
http://www.microwavenews.com/kucinich.html
Louis Slesin, PhD
Editor, Microwave News
A Report on Non-Ionizing Radiation
Phone: +1 (212) 517-2800; Fax: +1 (212) 734-0316
E-mail: <mwn@pobox.com>
Internet: <http://www.microwavenews.com>
Mail: 155 East 77th Street, Suite 3D
New York, NY 10075, U.S.A.
September
30, 2008
Are Brain Cancer Rates Rising Among
Young Adults?
Striking
Increase Cited at Congressional Hearing
Download
a pdf of this news and comment
In
many ways, last Thursday's Congressional hearing on cell phone
cancer risks, called by Rep. Dennis
Kucinich (D-OH), brought few surprises. David
Carpenter and Ronald
Herberman made the case for precaution, especially for children,
while National
Cancer Institute's Robert
Hoover countered that he is not persuaded that there's anything
to worry about.
One piece of compelling news did emerge,
however —though it never made it into the mainstream press:
Brain cancer appears to be on the rise among young adults. Herberman
testified that, on looking at government statistics, he was "struck"
by the fact that the incidence of brain cancer has been increasing
over the last ten years, particularly among 20-29 year-olds. If the
latency for brain tumors is more than ten years and cell phone are
in fact responsible for the increase, cancer rates might not peak
for at least another five years, according to
Herberman.
Herberman's analysis stands in sharp contrast to
Hoover's assessment of the same data. Government statistics show no
increase from 1987 to 2005, Hoover said at the hearing. If Herberman
is right, he would puncture a central, albeit indirect, argument in
favor of the safety of cell phone. The NCI, among others, argues
that brain cancer rates are stable, and therefore that cell phones
are not doing any harm. "Thus far, brain cancer incidence
trends in the U.S. are unrelated to patterns of cell phone use,"
Hoover told Kucinich. In response to Herberman, Hoover offered to
provide the subcommittee with the most recent government cancer
statistics.
Herberman, the director of the University of
Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, and his colleague Devra
Davis have prepared a paper on their interpretation of the
cancer data. "We're submitting it for publication," Davis
told Microwave
News.
"We're looking at increasing trends in brain tumors among those
under the age of 39, between 1995 and 2005," she said.
An
uptick in brain cancer among 20-29 year-olds would also add weight
to the findings of Sweden's Lennart
Hardell. At a conference
held in London earlier this month, Hardell reported that those who
started using cell phones before the age of 20 were five times more
likely to develop a glioma, a type of brain tumor. The U.K. press
had a field day. The Independent
warned of a looming brain cancer "epidemic" while the
Telegraph
reported that the country was facing a "health time bomb."
In their prepared statements, both Carpenter and Herberman
cited Hardell's new finding. "This observation is consistent
with a large body of scientific studies that demonstrate that
children are more vulnerable than adults to carcinogens,"
Carpenter said. When Kucinich asked what should be done, Carpenter
replied that "the evidence is certainly strong enough for
warnings that children should not use cell phones." He warned
that, "The failure to take [strong preventive action] will lead
to an epidemic of brain cancer." Carpenter is the director of
the Institute for Health and Environment in Albany, NY.
Herberman
criticized the NCI and Hoover for failing to cite the Hardell
studies. He called this omission in the NCI
Cancer Bulletin,
released just before the hearing, a "major lapse" (see
September
23).
"Certainly Dr. Hardell's studies have made
important contributions," Hoover said. But he then went on to
assert that Hardell had left out many cases of brain tumors in his
early studies. "To Dr. Hardell's credit, he attempted to do
something very fast, [but] he used a method…that effectively
ended up eliminating everybody who died quickly." As a result,
Hoover said, Hardell's first study included "less than 30% of
the total number of cases."
When asked about this,
Hardell told Microwave
News
that he does not know where the 30% figure comes from. "It is
not correct," he said. "We have published all the numbers
in different papers."
Hardell first published his
finding that the young have higher brain tumor risks from cell
phones back in 2004. Writing in the Archives
of Environmental Health,
he <A
...