Where's Interphone? Cardis
Speaks
What's the status of the long-awaited Interphone study? In an interview
with Microwave News, IARC's Elisabeth Cardis, who is leading this large cell
phone-brain tumor study, brings us up to date.
Read all about it at: http://www.microwavenews.com
Louis Slesin, PhD
Editor, Microwave News
A Report on Non-Ionizing Radiation
Phone: +1 (212) 517-2800; Fax: +1 (212) 734-0316
E-mail: mwn@pobox.com
Internet: http://www.microwavenews.com
Mail: 155 East 77th Street,
Suite 3D
New York, NY 10075, U.S.A.
October 9... Why is the Interphone study not finished yet? "The
interpretation is not straightforward," Elisabeth Cardis told Microwave
News in an interview from her office at IARC in Lyon, France. The data are
"very difficult to interpret because of the potential problems of recall
and selection bias," she explained.
Cardis is leading the Interphone project, an international epidemiological
study investigating the possible link between the use of cell phones and brain
tumors. The study was originally slated to be completed years ago.
Asked when the paper with the combined data from all 13 countries would be out,
Cardis replied, "Soon, I hope."
IARC has posted an update on the study on its Web site. It includes a
table with the key results from individual countries as well as those from two
combined analyses. The update also provides a list of the more than 30 papers
published by various members of the Interphone team.
The update addresses the most widely discussed —and provocative— findings: The
significantly increased risks of gliomas and acoustic neuromas, by up to 40%
and 80% respectively, among those who used mobile phones for ten years or more
on the side of the head the tumors developed. These results came out of pooled
analyses of data from five northern European countries (see our January 22 post). Cardis noted that these elevated risks
"might either reflect a true causal association or be artifactual, related
to recall bias among the cases."
One unexpected finding that has emerged from a number of Interphone study
groups is that using a cell phone appears to protect against developing a
tumor. (See for example, the letters from Sam Milham, a Washington state
epidemiologist, to the American Journal of Epidemiology and the British
Journal of Cancer.) This
result, Cardis explained, may be due to selection bias, that is, the controls
and/or the cases may not be completely representative. "It's hard to
believe the use of a phone for a few minutes a month could be protective against
brain cancer," Cardis said. If selection bias is in fact at work, it may
mean that the published results underestimate the true cancer risks.
The analysis of the Interphone data continues and may provide some
clarification, especially with respect to long-term users. "Manuscripts
presenting results of the international analyses, based on much larger numbers
of long-term and heavy users, are in preparation," the IARC update states,
adding that, "More detailed analyses are also underway, focusing on more
precise localization of tumors using 3-dimensional radiological images, and on
the analysis of the effect of RF exposure at the location of the tumor."