Safety
regarding growing and rogue techno-emissions into bodies,
within private homes
This
very thoughtful letter was recently submitted to the Auditor
General of Canada, Environmental Petitions Manager.
Martin
From:
Marilyn Idle L.L.B.
Counsellor,
Mediator
Wellness
Advocate
April
15, 2008
To: Mr.
Hiller, Petitions Manager for the Office of the Auditor General
of Canada
Safety
regarding growing and rogue techno-emissions into bodies,
within private homes; public airways and buildings
and waterways.
Dear
Mr. Hiller,
This
is an easy letter for me to write because I love technology and
wireless technologies and I know they can be made much safer, as
Europe is demonstrating for us.
Various
and growing frequencies are now emitting through
wireless and wired technologies 24/7 at an rapid and
escalating rate daily. These multiple emissions, various
rogue; and various inappropriate and conflicting frequency
emission are harming over time, people's ability to preserve
natural and healthy human functioning in neural,
brain, blood, the blood-forming organs and within cellular
processes. -Simply put, many too many technological
frequency emissions are being received and "read" by
our cells, without appropriate safety measures in place.
These emissions go beyond our ability to see, hear or feel
them -are very real to the human body and cells, which they pass
right through. As a result cells can get frequency
affected, confused, damaged, mutated or shut down (killed)
over time.
I
am paraphrasing this note to you, as a wellness advocate and as a
layperson. If you require current referenced scientific papers,
please let me know and I will forward them to you. At this time,
I am assuming that you will be presented with papers from
the formal petitioner's contributions to you.
It
is my experience and opinion after 20 years as a wellness
advocate that leading non-industry scientists and doctors
(who are now petitioning all over the world) need to be listened
to. Leading non-industry scientists and doctors who are on the
front line and unpaid by industry, must be equally relied
upon (along side of industry and governments) for
up-to-date emission and emitter tower placements and
safety standards.
During
rapid technological growth government standards become
obsolete too quickly to be inappropriately carved into
(Health Canada) stone for too long. These levels based on data
that quickly becomes "old", provide inadequate
protection. Injury feedback of the real effects in the
public are fast growing as are new techno-emission
developments and placements. The invisible
emissions are now in most cases, emitting 24/7 in
public "airways"; within buildings and from
towers on public buildings, even schools. Invisible
frequencies are easy to
ignore. Emissions are vibrations that are
invisible -but proven to be damaging and even lethal at the
wrong frequency or prolonged exposure levels, or as a result
of long-term or intense or multiple bombardments.
It
is my opinion those who "test" for safety,
often behind-closed-door, compartmentalized
Industrialists and lab-or-specific-field-environment
scientists (those who set standards for all people) are often
not "whole visioned" enough. Nor do they respond
well or take into account adequately the longer-term cumulative
injury feedback as readily from the public, from independent
scientists and from doctors who are treating new techno-caused
cell damage or death.
Government
officials who regulate industry frequently
job-switch and often get lost in slow-turning processes
with little follow-ups on safety and public
effects processes, once they set a health or safety
standard in place. "Off the record" some
admit, that they honestly, openly and ethically -need
help, to protect and prevent techno-injuries over the long
run to the people, children and babies, whom they wish to
protect. Those who think freely, know that new
techno-emissions-human cell injuries and emissions related
deaths -are astonishingly on the rise. This is most
especially occurring in mothers -invetro babies
whose cells are differentiating at high rates; in children with
cells rapidly dividing and adults (often technology
workers and police and military personnel with attached
technology as part of uniform) who are frequency
bombarded 24/7, causing their cells and cell processes to be
excited, confused, stunned or involved in early cell
death. Natural gas is invisible and it has added
to it, for safety, an odor. Techno-emissions and emission
towers which are vibrating into our cells, have no such
discernable safety alarm.
The
only thing more obsolete or non-existent in Canada and the US
than current adequate emissions safety standards and the policing
of those standards are adequate laws to ethically
guided techno-corporations. Old industrial-corporate laws in
Canada are currently being used to guide
technologic corporations. They are wholly inadequate to
protect the population given the new technologies and their
all-pervasive and unique airway "pollutions" which are
persistent 24/7.
As
you may know, corporate law in Canada and the US, currently
supports, the unbridled expansion and growth of corporations
with few restrictions, except for gross negligence. The law
supports corporate profit and ease of operations for
corporations and their productions, as paramount. This has been
so, since the industrial revolution -and for the last 100 years.
In the old days, 100 years ago when these laws were being formed
for corporations, judges were of the opinion that the
wide-open earth was big enough to allow any physical damage
to nature or to humans to likely be minimal as compared to social
good. Pollutions of airways, waterways, soil and harms to some
humans were allowed to "lay". There were few
corporate responsibilities and almost none to require
clean-up or to prevent damage to, -or to protect people
from, short-term or long-term harm. The greater (perceived)
social good to humanity from the products and services
corporations were producing, moving us away from the
horse-and-buggy era to the modern, vehicles and furnaces for
every home era, were seen as worthy of forgiving the extreme
harms that may have been done to the
wide-open environment. Diseases and ails to humanity,
that the corporations chemical emissions and by-products may have
been caused by dumping and airborne emissions of chemicals were
left to the doctor's and to the consumer and their family budget,
to take care of.
Emissions
of the vibratory-frequency type, emitted 24/7 from wireless
emitter towers and wired technologies are a greater threat
to unconsenting people, than the last 100 industrial years of
corporate chemical smog which you could at least avoid because
you could see it in the airways waterway pollutions. These
new emission can't be avoided, they are invisible. You can't
smell and see them and then choose to leave the area. The
harms or death's caused by techno- emissions are more stealthy.
It is almost impossible for the average person to
prove gross, extreme or any negligence from a
corporation.
In
the last 10 years anti-depressant prescriptions in England, the
US and Canada are at 31 million, 118 million and 19 million
respectively. If things are getting better socially, we must ask
why have prescriptions tripled and quadrupled, during the rise
of techno-frequency emissions in the airways and
buildings? The effects of these emission must be looked at with
more precaution and care. We as Canadians are trying to
undo the damage of chemically polluted water-ways and
air-ways conditions caused by free corporation. While we are
all trying to clean up (or recover we see in the last century
more and more medical disorders grow and expensive medical
dependencies on pharmaceuticals, surgeries, medical implant
devices and organ transplants required. Our once well-meaning but
now innocently, out-of-control, billion-dollar, profitable
power and emissions-corporations need our help. They
need our help to prevent further escalating crippling costs
to government health programs from more emissions related
disorders and injuries caused by inadequate safety
emissions levels standards and multiple and poorly
placed emitter towers in Canada. Perceived social good
of corporate techno-industries is now out-of-balance with the
realities of human need and safety today.
Corporate
law in Canada and the US is obsolete. Health Canada
"industry" are quickly out of date and cannot be set in
stone. These standards do not currently protect people,
children and babies whose cells are radiated more and
more with inadequately safe 24/7 multiple wire-less
techno-frequencies in their homes, buildings and
airways. -Independent
doctors and non-industry scientist with no financial
interests must be relied on to create adequate ongoing and
updated Canadian safety standards.
We
are not learning from Europe’s mistakes and injuries it
seems. However, as you are receiving more and more petitions from
Canadians now, please listen to the non-industry doctors and
scientists equally to industry and governors. Let non-industry
doctors and scientists work together to help Canadians find
the right levels and placements of emissions. As new data
arrives please insist that teams work together to
update Canada's health and safety emissions standards. Make
Canada's homes, schools, publicly-used emission
techno-wireless products; public buildings and airways an
example for the world during this technological era, in
keeping with Canada's highest degree of wise,
preventative safety.
Thank
you for receiving opinion and input.
Sincerely,
Marilyn
Idle L.L.B.
Counsellor,
Mediator
Wellness
Advocate
The
following information FYI is from the Mercola.com website. Dr
Mercola is a Naturopath and Medical Doctor.
Are Cell Phones More Dangerous Than
Smoking?
Award-winning
cancer expert Dr. Vini Khurana [see orginal 69 page document at
brain-surgery.us] has concluded that mobile phones may kill
far more people than smoking or asbestos. The latest study,
which is being called the “most devastating indictment
yet” for the safety of mobile phones, draws on growing
evidence that using handsets for 10 years or more can double
your risk of brain cancer.
Professor Khurana reviewed
more than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones, and
concluded that "there is a significant and increasing body
of evidence for a link between mobile phone usage and certain
brain tumors."
"We are currently experiencing a
reactively unchecked and dangerous situation," he
added.
Earlier this year, the French government warned
against the use of mobile phones, particularly for children.
Germany also advises people to minimize handset use.
Khurana
urges people to avoid using mobile phones whenever possible, and
believes that governments and the mobile phone industry must
take immediate steps to reduce exposure to this radiation.
If
nothing is done, Khurana believes the rate of malignant brain
tumors and the associated death rate will rise around the world
within a decade, and by then it may be too late to intervene
medically.
You may think this headline sounds like a bit of a
stretch, or perhaps even a major stretch. Well, I urge you
to think again, as this headline, and the research behind
it, is spot on.
Professor Khurana based the notion
that cell phones are more dangerous than smoking on the
following logic: 3 billion people use cell phones
worldwide, which is three times more than the amount of
people who smoke.
Of course, smoking doesn’t
immediately show any deadly signs either. But wait a decade
or so, and the evidence is there right before your eyes.
According to Khurana, the "incubation time" or
"latency" (the time from the start of regular
mobile phone usage to the diagnosis of a malignant
solid brain tumor) is around 10-20 years. In the years
2008-2012, he says, “we will have reached the
appropriate length of follow-up time to begin to
definitively observe the impact of this global technology
on brain tumor incidence rates.”
There is VERY
solid evidence that the number of brain tumors will
increase to 500,000 per YEAR in 2010 -- and this will
double to 1 million every year by 2015 if the causes are
not addressed.
Folks, this is the real deal and
represents an impending health care crisis.
Cell
Phones Appear to be a MAJOR Health Risk
I
am absolutely convinced that the explosion of cell phone
usage around the world is a major contributor to a host of
diseases ranging from autism
to cancer
to insomnia.
I am in the final editing phases of my next book,
which is dedicated to this very topic and will be released
in the spring or summer of 2009, or possibly sooner.
You
are fortunate, though, as you are receiving this
information today, while there is still time to circumvent
some of the damage. Please do not wait another 10 years for
the “definitive” link to be found and
publicized in the mainstream circles before you take action
to protect yourself, and your children, from the
electromagnetic radiation and information-carrying radio
waves emitted by cell phones and many other wireless
devices.
If you’re looking for some type of
indication that cell phones are causing you harm, consider
that all of the following ailments have been scientifically
linked to information-carrying radio waves:
Fatigue
Headaches
Sleep disruptions
Altered memory function,
poor concentration and spatial awareness
Meanwhile, here is a sample of what Professor Khurana
found after reviewing over 100 studies:
Electromagnetic radiation such as that emitted by
mobile and cordless phones can heat the side of your
head or pulse it non-thermally, and potentially
thermoelectrically interact with the organic electrical
currents of your brain.
Bluetooth devices and unshielded headsets can
convert your head into an effective, potentially
self-harming antenna.
Exposure is long-term and its effects on your body,
particularly its electrical organ, your brain, are
compounded by numerous other simultaneous long-term
exposures including continuous waves from radio and TV
transmitter towers, cordless phone base stations, power
lines, and wireless/WiFi computing devices.
Do You STILL Believe That Cell
Phones are Safe?
Well, if you’re
finding it hard to believe that a widely used technology
such as cell phones and wireless technologies could be
causing you harm, it may help to compare it to other
“technologies” that were once widely accepted:
The shoe-fitting
fluoroscope, an X-ray machine used to look at the
bones of your foot in order to judge your shoe size.
Information-carrying radio waves
are all around us -- especially from cell phones, but also
from WiFi, WiMax, BlueTooth, and other wireless devices.
And you are likely receiving exposure to them 24/7.
It’s
important to understand that the danger from most
land-based portable phones, cell phones and WiFi routers is
NOT from the microwave carrier wave, for which typical SAR
ratings are given on phones.
This SAR rating
indicates the thermal effect emitted by your phone, which
is totally insignificant, unless you have massive exposures
like you might expect in a microwave oven. This is why the
discussion about lowering the allowable SAR is pointless,
as it will NOT make cell phones safer.
Instead,
nearly all your biological damage comes from the modulated
signals that are carried ON the carrier microwave.
These
modulated information-carrying radio waves resonate
(vibrate) in the same frequencies as many of your cellular
receptors; frequencies of a few to a few hundred cycles per
second. These are biological frequencies and, unlike
ionizing radiation (X-rays), which you can tolerate in
small doses, there is NO dose of these radio waves that are
safe. They cause damage at ANY dose, no matter how
low.
This concept is called zero threshold, and that
is precisely what you have with cell phones, most portable
phones, and WiFi routers.
These information-carrying
radio waves can stimulate or confuse your cellular
receptors, causing a whole cascade of pathological
consequences that can culminate in fatigue, sleeplessness,
anxiety, neurological decline, and ultimately cancers.
The
reason why children
should NOT use cell phones is because they have
developing nervous systems and thinner skulls than adults,
making them especially vulnerable to this type of
damage.
Can Cell Phones be
Used Safely?
In the best-case scenario,
you would turn off your cell phone, put it in the glove
compartment of your car or in a briefcase, and only use it
in emergencies. Obviously, many of you have come to rely on
your cell phone for much more than this, but remember it
wasn’t long ago that we all got along fine without
them -- and it’s not too late to go back to that
point.
Remember, kids should NOT be using cell
phones. As a parent, it’s up to you to protect them
from this avoidable risk.
Assuming you do choose to
use a cell phone for more than just emergences, here are
the tips to increase your safety level (for cell phones and
other radio-wave exposures):
Limit the amount of time you spend on a cell phone
or cordless
phone.
Use a wired headset to limit your exposure to the
cell phone -- ideally, an air tube headset that conducts
sound but prevents any radiation from traveling up the
wire to your brain. Also, make sure the wire is SHIELDED,
which prevents it from acting as an antenna that could
attract more information-carrying radio waves directly to
your brain. Wireless BlueTooth headsets should be avoided.
Limit your exposure to WiFi routers. Find out where
they are located in your work environment and stay away
from them.
If you have any land-based (non-cellular) portable
phones, do NOT use anything other than the 900 MHz phones,
as the Gigahertz phones stay on continuously, blasting you
with information-carrying radio waves 24/7.
Use the speakerphone instead of putting the phone
to your ear; this is probably one of the single most
important steps you can take other than not using your
cell phone.
Limit calls inside buildings.
Use your cell phone only where the reception is
good. When the reception is poor, your phone has to work
harder, and therefore emits a much stronger radiation
signal.
|
