Hi Bram,
I heard about some interesting research regarding serif vs. san-serif
fonts in a Stanford ETL talk given by Marissa Mayer (http://
ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1554, go to around
33:40 in the podcast.)
In essence, the research showed that serif fonts are more "readable"
and san-serif fonts are more "legible".The serif fonts create a
horizontal guide across the page that guides the eyes, so they are
easiest to read when reading long pieces of text. San-serif fonts are
more legible because, without the serif adornments, you can recognize
the characters more quickly.
I actually used this in deciding what default font to use in
QuickReader. I chose a san-serif font because when you are reading
fast you want to be able to recognize the characters quickly and, as
the app's guided reading mode provides a guide that guides your eye
across the page anyway, the serif adornments become redundant. (Note,
that is just the default, the user is free to choose any font they
like, serif or sans-serif.)
-Patrick
On Nov 13, 3:41 pm, Bram Pitoyo <
brampit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your app is very intriguing!
>
> As a typographer who consult on fonts to use on desktop and mobile UIs, I wonder as to the extent that hardware and type settings play an impact in how fast people can read?
>
> The Droid phone, for instance, has 267 PPI density, which is larger than the iPhone’s 163 and will make text of the same physical size more readable. In my discipline, too, things like line length, justified/ragged right text setting, as well as font family, size and leading also plays a role.
>
> But to how much, and to what extent, I don’t know. My hunch is that, at fairly high resolution (ie. higher than a monitor’s 72dpi), tweaking type won’t impact much readability.
>
> I wonder if you have more information about this?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Bram Pitoyohttp://brampitoyo-> infohttp://bram.me-> labhttp://linkenfuego.wordpress.com-> blog
>
> On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Patrick wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Everyone,
>
> > Thought I'd let you know that I released QuickReader a few weeks ago
> > and it is starting to get some traction. I've had some great reviews
> > (e.g.,
http://www.148apps.com/reviews/quickreader/) and this week