Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
#16 Colloquy Vuln
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  14 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
William A. Carrel  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Jan 17 2007, 3:12 am
From: "William A. Carrel" <willia...@carrel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:12:07 -0800
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 3:12 am
Subject: #16 Colloquy Vuln
Good show by the Colloquy team getting a fix out in short order!

Colloquy -> Check for updates... if you happen to be a user.
--
wac


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
alfrednb...@aol.com  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2007, 3:25 am
From: alfrednb...@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:25:45 -0800
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 3:25 am
Subject: Re: #16 Colloquy Vuln

> Colloquy -> Check for updates... if you happen to be a user.

It seems that Colloquy General preference "automatically check for new
versions" is on by default. I didn't even know about #16, but when
Colloquy launched, it found new version, and, with a single click of
myacceptance, downloaded the new version, installed it, put old version
in trash, and relaunched. Nice.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rosyna  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2007, 3:27 am
From: Rosyna <ros...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:27:25 -0700
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 3:27 am
Subject: Re: [moabfixes] #16 Colloquy Vuln
They actually fixed it before the exploit was even published because
lhm/kf were actively using it on IRC to disconnect users.

Ack, at 1/17/07, William A. Carrel said:

>Good show by the Colloquy team getting a fix out in short order!

>Colloquy -> Check for updates... if you happen to be a user.
>--

--

Sincerely,
Rosyna Keller
Technical Support/Carbon troll/Always needs a hug

Unsanity: Unsane Tools for Insanely Great People

It's either this, or imagining Phil Schiller in a thong.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
st...@info-pull.com  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2007, 3:53 am
From: st...@info-pull.com
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:53:25 -0000
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 3:53 am
Subject: Re: #16 Colloquy Vuln

On Jan 17, 9:27 am, Rosyna <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:

> They actually fixed it before the exploit was even published because
> lhm/kf were actively using it on IRC to disconnect users.

You should be very careful before going around like an internet tough,
accusing people with nothing more than your own speculation. Unless you
can prove that (that is, using proofs you can't tamper with, which
makes pasting something out of your Text Edit window plain invalid), we
request you to keep away of any future claims like these.

It's the second time we ask you politely to stop the malicious
non-sense you're getting into. We aren't going to enter any
claims/counter-claims cycle with you, given that you are neither
technically nor personally qualified for keeping good manners (that
excludes insulting, fallacies and false claims like these, without any
supporting argument other than your personal issues).

There are many people out there interested on making a fool out of
yourself and complicating your day. We aren't the only ones you've been
insulting, but you obviously know that. The fact that someone has
targeted the IRC channel where you rant is just another proof.

Given your skill base, lack of care of any type and definitive
malicious attitude, developing more hostilities with people out there
isn't really the best thing for you. It's a suicidal path, literally.
And this is sincere, friendly advice. We have nothing personal against
you, besides being a malicious retard from times to times.

Anyway, back on topic (Rosyna, you manage to include a rant in every
e-mail you send): the Colloquy development team has done a *great* job
on the fix (preventing that prank from continuing). Probably one of the
most timely fixes released during the MoAB, including OmniGroup's one.
None credited their finding, though. Certainly better than Apple, for
instance.

Cheers.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rosyna  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2007, 4:40 am
From: Rosyna <ros...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:40:15 -0700
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 4:40 am
Subject: [moabfixes] Re: #16 Colloquy Vuln
Ack, at 1/17/07, st...@info-pull.com said:

>On Jan 17, 9:27 am, Rosyna <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  They actually fixed it before the exploit was even published because
>>  lhm/kf were actively using it on IRC to disconnect users.

>You should be very careful before going around like an internet tough,
>accusing people with nothing more than your own speculation. Unless you
>can prove that (that is, using proofs you can't tamper with, which
>makes pasting something out of your Text Edit window plain invalid), we
>request you to keep away of any future claims like these.

Here's the proof. http://tachibanalabs.com/tmp/MOAB-16-01-2007.html
Compare and contrast to the current
http://projects.info-pull.com/moab/MOAB-16-01-2007.html Notice the
missing pieces?

The first link is hosting the original unmodified file. It's also why
thinks like CSS don't show up. Nothing about it was modified. Also,
it's not being hosted by me or anyone affiliated with me.

Furthermore, there's about 20+ people that can verify that the
tachibanalabs.com link has the original text of the advisory.

FWIW, the original Ruby file's header said "the great #macdev raid".

>There are many people out there interested on making a fool out of
>yourself and complicating your day. We aren't the only ones you've been
>insulting, but you obviously know that.

That kind of seems a little like a threat.

>  The fact that someone has
>targeted the IRC channel where you rant is just another proof.

That's funny, I don't seem to remember ever mentioning the IRC
channel or the fact I was on such an IRC channel....

>Given your skill base, lack of care of any type and definitive
>malicious attitude, developing more hostilities with people out there
>isn't really the best thing for you. It's a suicidal path, literally.
>And this is sincere, friendly advice. We have nothing personal against
>you, besides being a malicious retard from times to times.

Again, this seems like a threat...
--

Sincerely,
Rosyna Keller
Technical Support/Carbon troll/Always needs a hug

Unsanity: Unsane Tools for Insanely Great People

It's either this, or imagining Phil Schiller in a thong.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
purrb...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2007, 4:44 am
From: purrb...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:44:16 -0800
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 4:44 am
Subject: Re: #16 Colloquy Vuln
I seen the original post. That is exactly what it was. They DID modify
it shortly after they realized what they had posted.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rosyna  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2007, 5:02 am
From: Rosyna <ros...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:02:46 -0700
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 5:02 am
Subject: [moabfixes] Re: #16 Colloquy Vuln
Ack, at 1/17/07, st...@info-pull.com said:

>Unless you
>can prove that (that is, using proofs you can't tamper with, which
>makes pasting something out of your Text Edit window plain invalid),

Also, there's a screenshot.
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/123/360396261_05ca8f43b9_b.jpg
--

Sincerely,
Rosyna Keller
Technical Support/Carbon troll/Always needs a hug

Unsanity: Unsane Tools for Insanely Great People

It's either this, or imagining Phil Schiller in a thong.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jens Ayton  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Jan 17 2007, 5:40 am
From: "Jens Ayton" <jens.ay...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:40:20 +0100
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 5:40 am
Subject: Re: [moabfixes] Re: #16 Colloquy Vuln
st...@info-pull.com:

> Rosyna:
>> They actually fixed it before the exploit was even published because
>> lhm/kf were actively using it on IRC to disconnect users.

> You should be very careful before going around like an internet tough,
> accusing people with nothing more than your own speculation. Unless you
> can prove that (that is, using proofs you can't tamper with, which
> makes pasting something out of your Text Edit window plain invalid), we
> request you to keep away of any future claims like these.

As you are well aware, the concept of "proof" is essentially
inapplicable to something as ephemeral as internet communications.
However, I witnessed the events to which Rosyna refers and can attest
to the following:

* At or about 0800 this morning (Wed Jan 17 2007), Central European
time, several persons on the #macdev channel on Freenode IRC were
repeatedly disconnected with unusual quit messages.
* Several of these persons attested they were using Colloquy.
* It was established that the disconnects were immediately preceeded
by invitations to channels with names along the lines of #%n%n%n%n.
* At least one of these persons was able to catch the name of the
person sending the invitation.
* The whois command (or possibly whowas) showed that said person's
host mask was kfinisterre@..., a name that is familiar to watchers of
the MoAB spectacle.
* There was a small amount of speculation at the time as to whether
this was in fact a MOAB crew stunt, or someone attempting to dirty Mr.
Finisterre's name.
* The bug was quickly identified and fixed; offhand, I believe this
was done by Alexander Strange.
* At approximately 0845 CET I saw the MOAB-16 advisory. At that time,
the page included a list of people "pwned" using this exploit. The
list closely matched those who had been disconnected using the very
vulnerability described in the advisory.

Unfortunately I am missing some details as I do not currently have
access to my IRC logs. This can be rectified in an hour or so.

--
Jens Ayton

Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Colin Barrett  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2007, 1:27 pm
From: Colin Barrett <tim...@lava.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:27:36 -0800
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 1:27 pm
Subject: Re: [moabfixes] Re: #16 Colloquy Vuln

On Jan 17, 2007, at 12:53 AM, st...@info-pull.com wrote:

> Probably one of the most timely fixes released during the MoAB,  
> including OmniGroup's one.
> None credited their finding, though. Certainly better than Apple, for
> instance.

If you expect Apple, a huge corporation, to release patches every time  
you publish an exploit, you're more deranged than I thought -- I had  
you pegged as the type to include annoying sounds on his web page for  
no good reason, and to overuse internet cliché's like PWN.

Hubris indeed.

Seriously, LMH, you're not winning any hearts OR minds by posting  
here. Your overly defensive attitude towards Rosyna on this pretty  
much solidifies it in my mind that you WERE in fact using it to  
disconnect users.

Why do you bother posting here except to troll, anyway?

-Colin


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Remy Porter  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2007, 1:32 pm
From: "Remy Porter" <t3knoman...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:32:53 -0500
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 1:32 pm
Subject: Re: [moabfixes] Re: #16 Colloquy Vuln
Children, please. Let's ignore everyone's extra-curricular activities
and focus on our main goal- contributing to a more secure and reliable
operating system.

I love this mailing list, but it's rapidly decaying into LMH posturing
and people getting offended. Let's please keep it technical?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
William A. Carrel  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2007, 1:43 pm
From: "William A. Carrel" <willia...@carrel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:43:39 -0800
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 1:43 pm
Subject: Re: [moabfixes] Re: #16 Colloquy Vuln
I'm going to take this opportunity to interject with the charter of this group:

"This group serves as a gathering place to discuss the technical and
coding issues for MOAB bug fixes."

This conversation has taken a turn which doesn't have anything to do
with the work required analyzing or preparing fixes. People are
welcome to engage in conversations about who is or isn't trying to
attacking who and who hates who's freedom... somewhere else. Please do
not bait each other (or be baited) into attacks and accusations here,
there are plenty of other forums for the circus sideshow antics of all
sides.

On 1/17/07, Colin Barrett <tim...@lava.net> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eric Hall  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2007, 1:50 pm
From: Eric Hall <g...@ghosthound.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:50:06 +0000
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 1:50 pm
Subject: Re: [moabfixes] Re: #16 Colloquy Vuln

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:32:53PM -0500, Remy Porter wrote:

> Children, please. Let's ignore everyone's extra-curricular activities
> and focus on our main goal- contributing to a more secure and reliable
> operating system.

> I love this mailing list, but it's rapidly decaying into LMH posturing
> and people getting offended. Let's please keep it technical?

        Indeed.  I was just getting ready to write something similar...
The only addition is:

        Please remember that others may not follow short-circuits in your
logic/thinking, and that others may say (write) things in a way that
doesn't match the way you would.  Keep a more open mind to what people
are saying and, if you don't think they're on the right track, indicate
so rather than saying they just don't get it or that they're morons.
Cut the absolutes and you might just find that people are smarter and
more aware than you think they are.

                -eric


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alexander Strange  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2007, 2:01 pm
From: "Alexander Strange" <astra...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:01:27 -0800
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 2:01 pm
Subject: Re: #16 Colloquy Vuln

On Jan 17, 5:40 am, "Jens Ayton" <jens.ay...@gmail.com> wrote:

> * The bug was quickly identified and fixed; offhand, I believe this
> was done by Alexander Strange.

I wish to disclaim responsibility for this; Timothy Hatcher, the author
of Colloquy, fixed it and I just linked to the trac changeset.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Landon Fuller  
View profile  
 More options Jan 17 2007, 2:06 pm
From: Landon Fuller <land...@macports.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:06:07 -0800
Local: Wed, Jan 17 2007 2:06 pm
Subject: Re: [moabfixes] Re: #16 Colloquy Vuln

Let's close down this thread. There is very little to be gained in  
recriminations besides acrimony and tumult.

-landonf

  PGP.sig
< 1K Download

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google