Google News moving in with the worst
SplitImage
news.
Fox News is not a news bureau. It is bought and paid for by the
greediest among us, the bigots, the racists and the religious
right.... the coalition that controls the Republican Party. Fox News
is a propaganda network in it's purest sense.
dilecticon
> ....I see Faux News all over the place when going to current Google
> news.
What's Faux News", never seen it there...
> Fox News is not a news bureau.
Ah, you mean FOX news... I see...
Well, to be accurate:
http://wapedia.mobi/en/Fox_News_Channel
In May 1985, Australian publisher Rupert Murdoch announced that he and
American industrialist and philanthropist Marvin Davis intend to develop
"a network of independent stations as a fourth marketing force" to
compete directly with CBS, NBC and ABC through the purchase of six
television stations then owned by Metromedia. [10] In July 1985, 20th
Century Fox announced that publisher Rupert Murdoch had completed his
purchase of 50 percent of Fox Filmed Entertainment, the parent company
of 20th Century Fox Film Corporation. [11] A year later, Twentieth
Century Fox Film Corp. earned $5.6 million in its fiscal third period
ended May 31, 1986, in contrast to a loss of $55.8 million in the
year-earlier period. [12]
Prior to founding FNC, Murdoch had gained significant experience in the
24-hour news business when News Corp.'s BSkyB subsidiary started
Europe's first 24-hour news channel, Sky News, in the United Kingdom in
1989. [13] With the success of his fourth network efforts in the United
States, [14] [15] experience gained from Sky News, and turnaround of
20th Century Fox, Murdoch announced on January 31, 1996 that News Corp.
would be launching a 24-hour news channel to air on both cable and
satellite systems as part of a News Corp. "worldwide platform" for Fox
programming, reasoning that "The appetite for news � particularly news
that explains to people how it affects them � is expanding enormously." [16]
> It is bought and paid for by the
> greediest among us, the bigots, the racists and the religious
> right....
Mbwhahahahaha!!!!
Those evil cable conservatives!
> the coalition that controls the Republican Party. Fox News
> is a propaganda network in it's purest sense.
As opposed to the left-leaning MSM who regularly shill out for the DNC?!?!?
Who can forget Brian Matthews summer-long Obama Nightly News commercial.
Or Chris Matthews' "tingle" .
Sod off, libitard, you're scum.
Scott Smith
>Sod off, libitard, you're scum.
*PLONK*
dilecticon
levi
Yawn.
Sanders Kaufman
"SplitImage" <Split...@nospam.frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:9ltfi5dhdqs50r4fl...@4ax.com...
> ....I see Faux News all over the place when going to current Google
> news.
What you're seeing is a flurry of press releases - not news articles.
Where you go wrong is in being too stupid to to tell the difference between
the news, and the commercials.
Once you do that, if you CAN do that, you'll find yourself much less
confused by what happens around you.
Gandalf
....and now, a statement from the chairman of the Department of the
Bloody Obvious....
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 091216-2, 12/16/2009
Tested on: 12/16/2009 11:29:32 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
Jamir Quay
levi
> Gandalf should be vivisected and packed in salt.
I love "Minesota Nice".
Andy Yee
news:hg8ubu$vb9$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
> Sod off, libitard, you're scum.
Kook. *PLONK*
Andy Yee
september.org:
> Gandalf should be vivisected and packed in salt.
Kook. *PLONK*
Craig A. Finseth
>> Gandalf should be vivisected and packed in salt.
So, how does one go about vivisecting a fictional character? Any why
bother packing the remains in salt?
More to the point, why bother? I, for one, don't particularly want to
have to wash off fictional blood, especially considering the problems
that Lady Macbeth and King Verence (different genre) had.
(:-)s for the humor-impaired.
Craig
catpandaddy
"Craig A. Finseth" <ne...@finseth.com> wrote in message
news:EO6dnX9a7_XXwrfW...@posted.visi...
> >On Dec 17, 12:25=A0am, Jamir Quay <s...@00.ter> wrote:
>>> Gandalf should be vivisected and packed in salt.
>
> So, how does one go about vivisecting a fictional character? Any why
> bother packing the remains in salt?
Salt is my favorite veggie, next to ketchup!
Jamir Quay
tee hee ;-)
dilecticon
Commie. ^plink^
Jamir Quay
Shithead.
<SMACK!>
Jamir Quay
>> On Dec 17, 12:25=A0am, Jamir Quay <s...@00.ter> wrote:
>>> Gandalf should be vivisected and packed in salt.
>
> So, how does one go about vivisecting a fictional character?
With layers of allegorical derision and a tincture of irony!
> Any why
> bother packing the remains in salt?
Preservative archival fealty.
> More to the point, why bother?
Why ask why?
> I, for one, don't particularly want to
> have to wash off fictional blood, especially considering the problems
> that Lady Macbeth and King Verence (different genre) had.
I "spotted" that up front ;-)
> (:-)s for the humor-impaired.
>
> Craig
On to London!
D.A.Tsenuf
"Andy Yee" <yee...@rr.comcastRR.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9CE45ABC2D0FDa...@216.196.97.131...
Why do you need to announce that you're plonking someone
Far better to just killfile it and ignore it in the future
levi
> Andy Yee wrote:
> > september.org:
>
> >> Gandalf should be vivisected and packed in salt.
>
> > Kook. *PLONK*
>
> Shithead.
>
> <SMACK!>
Well, now folks let me introduce Jamir!
4364 message across 95 groups.
A quick sampling shows us that his
level of discourse trends to what
you've seen here.
Welcome to mn.general, Jamir
When hoisted by his own petard, would
that be Jamir-on-a-stick?
(newsgroups mn.politics and
tx.politics trimmed)