Multi-cluster support is sort of mentioned in the docs here:
http://code.google.com/p/mysql-master-master/wiki/HowToUse
Notice the mention of config file here:
# mmm_control @C1 show
Config file: mmm_mon_C1.conf
Kevin, it would be great if you would add some information to the
wiki. I think it wouldn't be a bad thing if it had its own wiki page.
I've added you to the project with commit rights. This lets you edit
the wiki too, I believe.
Regards
Baron
http://code.google.com/p/mysql-master-master/wiki/HowToUse
Kevin, it would be great if you would add some information to the
wiki. I think it wouldn't be a bad thing if it had its own wiki page.
I've added you to the project with commit rights. This lets you edit
the wiki too, I believe.
I'm confused, Pascal mentioned the he had registered mysql-mmm.org but
there was some question as to whether there was going to be some
problem with Mysql and trademarks. So now, all of a sudden, that's
the definitive home page for MMM even though there was no discussion
in the group. Is this another decision made between Open Query and
Percona done behind the scenes?
I don't have a problem with having a decent home page but we now have
google groups, google code, mysql-mmm.org, kovyrin.net/mysql-master-
master-replication-manager and launchpad. That's 5 different sites
with bits and pieces of information scattered all over the place.
Yes, mysql-mmm.org has better documentation then google code but how
is anyone supposed to find mysql-mmm.org if they don't read the
group? And what's gained by fracturing this project into so many
different web sites? It's already small enough as it is.
Example, the lastest 1.x release is 1.2.5 which is only on google
code, the one on launchpad is 1.2.3. The latest 2.x release is 2.0.9
on launchpad but it's 2.0.3 on google code. Am I the only one
wondering what's going on here?