Phony War Heroes Under Investigation
Towse
Phony War Heroes Under Investigation
On Veterans Day, FBI Focusing on Hundreds of False Claims
By VIC WALTER and ANNA SCHECTER
November 11, 2008
<http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6231452>
--
Sal
Ye olde swarm of links: thousands of links for writers, researchers and
the terminally curious <http://writers.internet-resources.com>
$Zero
> Phony War Heroes Under Investigation
> On Veterans Day, FBI Focusing on Hundreds of False Claims
> By VIC WALTER and ANNA SCHECTER
> November 11, 2008
>
> <http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6231452>
you beat me to the punch, Sal.
i just saw that very article on huffpo.
of course, the biggest phony war "hero" is "graciously" trembling in
the white house right now.
as well he should.
and for the rest of his despicable days.
oops, i guess i can still be arrested and jailed for speaking the
truth.
i better shut the fuck up until February.
because, you know, i've always been sooo afraid these fuckers.
LOL
-$Zero...
POLL -- How do you plan to change for the better?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/f167803036545bec
$Zero
> On Nov 12, 2:22 am, Towse <s...@towse.com> wrote:
>
> > Phony War Heroes Under Investigation
> > On Veterans Day, FBI Focusing on Hundreds of False Claims
> > By VIC WALTER and ANNA SCHECTER
> > November 11, 2008
>
> > <http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6231452>
>
> you beat me to the punch, Sal.
>
> i just saw that very article on huffpo.
>
> of course, the biggest phony war "hero" is "graciously"
> trembling in the white house right now.
>
> as well he should.
>
> and for the rest of his despicable days.
>
> oops, i guess i can still be arrested and jailed for speaking the
> truth.
and let's not forget harassed, smeared, sabotaged, etc..
no no.
let's not forget that.
> i better shut the fuck up until February.
>
> because, you know, i've always been sooo afraid
> [of these cowardly fuckers].
>
> LOL
-$Zero...
when optimism lets you down, look on the bright side...
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/0dd7e25c69b713a6
john.ku...@sympatico.ca
I say, why put them in jail? Send them to the front.
Stan (the Man)
>
> Phony War Heroes Under Investigation
> On Veterans Day, FBI Focusing on Hundreds of False Claims
> By VIC WALTER and ANNA SCHECTER
> November 11, 2008
>
> <http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6231452>
Quick, Haddad! Under the bed!
--
Stan
Merle Finch
"Koolc...@smurfsareus.xxx" <john.ku...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:fd140af5-2698-44c9...@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
That's what I say. Send them to Iraq and Afghanistan and make them fight
their own damn war.
Cheryl
"Koolc...@smurfsareus.xxx" <john.ku...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:fd140af5-2698-44c9...@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
*****************
That would solve the problem, wouldn't it? I say perhaps we could solve
prison over crowding in the same manner. After all, if some people want to
be violent, why not put the violence to use?
Grand Mal
"Koolc...@smurfsareus.xxx" <john.ku...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:fd140af5-2698-44c9...@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> Phony War Heroes Under Investigation
> On Veterans Day, FBI Focusing on Hundreds of False Claims
> By VIC WALTER and ANNA SCHECTER
> November 11, 2008
>
> <http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6231452>
> --
> Sal
>
> Ye olde swarm of links: thousands of links for writers, researchers and
> the terminally curious <http://writers.internet-resources.com>
-I say, why put them in jail? Send them to the front.
The guys already there might have an opinion on that.
Ray Haddad
Heh. Those same guys hate seeing others falsely accused, Stan.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
Of course, that hasn't happened here. You're a valor thief and utter
scum. You're a liar. You lied about your involvement in military
exploits. You're a phony who's made military claims about yourself that
aren't true. You've been unable to provide specifics that any real
serviceman could and would provide in order to back up your absurd
claims. And where are those FOIA responses and USS Ranger logs that were
"winging their way" to you as we spoke -- what is it now? -- 2 yrs ago?
You just piled lie upon lie upon lie. Fortunately for you, it would
appear you haven't attempted to apply for any insurance benefits based
on your lies. You've simply attempted to make yourself into someone
respectable by lying. You're not respectable. You never will be. You'll
always be known in this ng as an unbalanced shitwad and the lying scum
you are.
And, while we're at it, this is as good a time as any for the
irregularly scheduled notice/reminder to mw participants. As promised,
you will *never* post here without people knowing what utter scum you are:
For those of you who are new here or who may have forgotten, this piece
of shit, Ray Haddad, is the repulsive scum who has bragged about his
relationship with an 11-yr old (or 14-yr old, depending on whose math
you accept) girl, a relationship most normal adults would, based on his
description alone, consider inappropriate at the very least. In
addition to whatever else may have occurred between them, he has written
about how he provided the means for her to participate in a mostly adult
usenet ng and then encouraged other adults to bother her, while
admitting she was too young for such attention.
Ray "scum-boy" Haddad is also well known to be a liar, so it's possible
everything he wrote about this little girl was a complete fabrication
designed to give him an edge in one of his many, many usenet arguments.
Nevertheless, he has insisted that every word he has written here has
been the truth, and he has claimed the relationship he described with
that little girl was perfectly appropriate. So, either he's telling the
truth about his disgusting relationship with that little girl or he's
lying about it, but defends an inappropriate relationship between an
adult male and an 11-yr old (or 14-yr old) girl as acceptable. Whichever
it is, he's a nauseating piece of shit who should *never* be allowed
near little girls.
And this doesn't even touch upon his absurd attempts at valor thievery.
All can be found in full context in the archives.
So, newbies beware of this scum. MIGs, don't forget.
--
Stan
Ray Haddad
<newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>Ray Haddad wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:41:58 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>> Towse <se...@towse.com> wrote in news:gfe073$jld$1...@registered.motzarella.org:
>>>
>>>> Phony War Heroes Under Investigation
>>>> On Veterans Day, FBI Focusing on Hundreds of False Claims
>>>> By VIC WALTER and ANNA SCHECTER
>>>> November 11, 2008
>>>>
>>>> <http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6231452>
>>> Quick, Haddad! Under the bed!
>>
>> Heh. Those same guys hate seeing others falsely accused, Stan.
>
>Of course
Then you'd best watch those lying, false accusations of yours,Stan.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
Name one, scum-boy. Here, I'll help you out by putting back all the
embarrassing stuff you snipped:
Ray Haddad
<newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>Ray Haddad wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:23:09 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>
>>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:41:58 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Towse <se...@towse.com> wrote in news:gfe073$jld$1...@registered.motzarella.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Phony War Heroes Under Investigation
>>>>>> On Veterans Day, FBI Focusing on Hundreds of False Claims
>>>>>> By VIC WALTER and ANNA SCHECTER
>>>>>> November 11, 2008
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6231452>
>>>>> Quick, Haddad! Under the bed!
>>>> Heh. Those same guys hate seeing others falsely accused, Stan.
>>> Of course
>>
>> Then you'd best watch those lying, false accusations of yours,Stan.
>
>Name one, scum-boy.
They just are, Stan. Prove any of them. Never have, never will.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
Every one of your lies has been proven to be a lie. It's all there in
the archive for all to see. Your own words have accomplished that quite
adequately, even though known facts and common sense alone suffice. Not
one of them is disputable anyone with a brain. You're lying scum. That's
not up for debate. It's fact. And, since I do so enjoy posting it, I'll
just put it all back again, although it's quite understandable that you
continue your desperate and laughable attempts to make it all go away by
snipping:
Ray Haddad
<newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>Ray Haddad wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:43:50 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>
>>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:23:09 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:41:58 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>>>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Towse <se...@towse.com> wrote in news:gfe073$jld$1...@registered.motzarella.org:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Phony War Heroes Under Investigation
>>>>>>>> On Veterans Day, FBI Focusing on Hundreds of False Claims
>>>>>>>> By VIC WALTER and ANNA SCHECTER
>>>>>>>> November 11, 2008
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6231452>
>>>>>>> Quick, Haddad! Under the bed!
>>>>>> Heh. Those same guys hate seeing others falsely accused, Stan.
>>>>> Of course
>>>> Then you'd best watch those lying, false accusations of yours,Stan.
>>> Name one, scum-boy.
>>
>> They just are, Stan. Prove any of them. Never have, never will.
>
>Every one of your lies has been proven to be a lie.
No, Stan. You've never had "proof" and you know it. If you had, you'd
present it. Instead, you have the ravings of a madwoman. Deal.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
news:nicph4dbghts0jk47...@4ax.com:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:57:04 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>
>>Ray Haddad wrote:
>>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:43:50 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:23:09 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:41:58 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>>>>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Towse <se...@towse.com> wrote in news:gfe073$jld$1
@registered.motzarella.org:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Phony War Heroes Under Investigation
>>>>>>>>> On Veterans Day, FBI Focusing on Hundreds of False Claims
>>>>>>>>> By VIC WALTER and ANNA SCHECTER
>>>>>>>>> November 11, 2008
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6231452>
>>>>>>>> Quick, Haddad! Under the bed!
>>>>>>> Heh. Those same guys hate seeing others falsely accused, Stan.
>>>>>> Of course
>>>>> Then you'd best watch those lying, false accusations of yours,Stan.
>>>> Name one, scum-boy.
>>>
>>> They just are, Stan. Prove any of them. Never have, never will.
>>
>>Every one of your lies has been proven to be a lie.
>
> No, Stan. You've never had "proof" and you know it. If you had, you'd
> present it. Instead, you have the ravings of a madwoman. Deal.
> --
> Ray
It's all right there in the archive, scum-boy. Fortunately, most everyone
who participates in mw already knows you're a liar and utter scum. Anyone
else can simply look it up. Why don't you tell everyone again about your
little 1970 Hanoi bombing campaign, scum-boy? That's always good for a
laugh. Or it would be, if it wasn't so pathetic. Then try again to claim
there's no proof of you being a liar. But, let's not distract too much
from your little problem with children. You're one very ugly little
package, scum-boy.
Anyway, thanks for yet another opportunity for me to advise/remind
everyone what utter scum you are:
Ray Haddad
<stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>It's all right there in the archive, scum-boy.
Exactly. The proof that you believe an insane woman over a fellow
veteran is in the archives, all right. Unless you really aren't the
veteran you claim to be. Is that the fact of it, Stan?
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
No one with a brain needs anyone's words but yours to know what a piece of
lying scum you are, scum-boy. You're your own worst enemy. Next to
everyone else, that is. Anyway, for anyone who just joined us, I'll just
put back what you again snipped:
Ray Haddad
<stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>No one with a brain
Grow up, Stan.
--
Ray
$Zero
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:40:13 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>
> >No one with a brain
>
> Grow up, Stan.
translation:
P = Popeye (The Sailor Man)
dancing with glee on the graves of hundreds of thousands of blah blah
blah.
only wishing it were "more".
bravely eating a hamburger on the deck of the Titanic.
presto!
-$Zero...
the universe is funny.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/12444f47147f1f3a
Stan (the Man)
I can't think of many more things that are more grown up than outing scum
like you. You seem to keep forgetting that you will *never* post in this
ng without everyone knowing and remembering exactly what you are.
Ray Haddad
<stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>I can't think
No kidding. Grow up, Stan.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
You can keep tying to float your bullshit all you like, either by your
lies or by your lying snippage, but it won't do you a bit of good. Or do
you really think you're fooling anyone?
Skipper
<stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
> Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
> news:fdq3i452q8nihm53o...@4ax.com:
>
> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:05:53 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
> > <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> >>I can't think
> >
> > No kidding. Grow up, Stan.
>
> You can keep tying to float your bullshit all you like, either by your
> lies or by your lying snippage, but it won't do you a bit of good. Or do
> you really think you're fooling anyone?
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
Hamlet Act 3, scene 2, 222230
Ray Haddad
<stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>news:fdq3i452q8nihm53o...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:05:53 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>>I can't think
>>
>> No kidding. Grow up, Stan.
>
>You
Grow up, Stan.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
You're a valor thief and utter scum. You're a liar. You lied about your
Ray Haddad
<stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>news:mh34i4h3h5euoj2db...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:34:51 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>>>news:fdq3i452q8nihm53o...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:05:53 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I can't think
>>>>
>>>> No kidding. Grow up, Stan.
>>>
>>>You
>>
>> Grow up, Stan.
>
>You're
Grow up, Stan. Worry about yourself for a change.
--
Ray
Alan Hope
>In article <Xns9B59C7308C7...@199.45.49.11>, the Man
><stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>> news:fdq3i452q8nihm53o...@4ax.com:
>>
>> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:05:53 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>> > <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>> >
>> >>I can't think
>> >
>> > No kidding. Grow up, Stan.
>>
>> You can keep tying to float your bullshit all you like, either by your
>> lies or by your lying snippage, but it won't do you a bit of good. Or do
>> you really think you're fooling anyone?
>
>The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
>Hamlet Act 3, scene 2, 222230
Oh, how hilarious. He gives his little reference, right down to the
little line-numbers (which seem rather wide for one line).
And then misquotes the line.
What a maroon.
Here's what she really says:
QUEEN GERTRUDE The lady protests too much, methinks.
Check it out:
http://www.shakespeare-online.com/plays/hamlet_3_2.html
And thus doth Skippy fuck it up again;
The reading bungled, and the quote awry.
His rank incompetence, once more, is plain;
Poor Cult-Boy really is one fucked-up guy.
EXUENT
Stan (the Man)
I'll worry about the children you pose a threat to and true hero veterans,
who wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.
All can be found in full context in the archive.
Ray Haddad
<stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>I'll worry
Grow up, Stan. Worry about yourself, mate.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
Ray Haddad
<stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>news:a486i412r2f6bem6u...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:11:35 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>>I'll worry
>>
>> Grow up, Stan. Worry about yourself, mate.
>
>I'll worry
You really ought to worry about yourself, Stan. You've got some
serious issues, mate.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
Which, unlike yours, don't include stalking children or lying about my
military service. Poor scum-boy. How desperately you wish I'd go away and
leave you alone. But, do try to get this through your head, scum-boy: That
ain't gonna happen. I'm going to continue to see to it that you *never*
post here without everyone knowing exactly what you are, just as I
promised. So, once again, let's just put back what you keep snipping in
your failing attempts to stop your humiliation:
Ray Haddad
<stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>Which, unlike yours, don't include stalking children or lying about my
>military service.
Stan, grow up.
I never stalked any children. I never lied about my military service.
That would be you doing the lying.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
The archive is not your friend, scum-boy; Your own words condemn you.
That's why you keep snipping the truth. Although, why you think that'll do
you any good is beyond me. I'll just put it back:
Ray Haddad
<stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>The archive
Stan (the Man)
Poor scum-boy. So desperate to get me to stop showing what lying scum
you are. Can't seem to get it through your pin head -- you keep
snipping, I'll keep restoring. So, here again is the embarrassing truth
you think you can simply snip away:
The archive is not your friend, scum-boy; Your own words condemn you.
That's why you keep snipping the truth. Although, why you think that'll
do you any good is beyond me.
You're a valor thief and utter scum. You're a liar. You lied about your
Ray Haddad
<newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>Ray Haddad wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:42:16 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>> The archive
>>
>> Grow up, Stan.
>
>Poor scum-boy.
Grow up, Stan.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:05:31 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>
>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:42:16 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The archive
>>> Grow up, Stan.
>> Poor scum-boy.
>
> Grow up, Stan.
Poor scum-boy. So desperate to get me to stop showing what lying scum
Ray Haddad
<newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>Ray Haddad wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:05:31 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>
>>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:42:16 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The archive
>>>> Grow up, Stan.
>>> Poor scum-boy.
>>
>> Grow up, Stan.
>
>Poor scum-boy.
Grow up, Stan.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:43:43 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>
>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:05:31 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:42:16 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The archive
>>>>> Grow up, Stan.
>>>> Poor scum-boy.
>>> Grow up, Stan.
>> Poor scum-boy.
>
> Grow up, Stan.
Poor scum-boy. So desperate to get me to stop showing what lying scum
Ray Haddad
<newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>Ray Haddad wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:43:43 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>
>>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:05:31 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:42:16 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>>>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The archive
>>>>>> Grow up, Stan.
>>>>> Poor scum-boy.
>>>> Grow up, Stan.
>>> Poor scum-boy.
>>
>> Grow up, Stan.
>
>Poor scum-boy.
Grow up, Stan. See a shrink. Get some help, mate. Your compulsive
lying will eat at your soul.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
Poor scum-boy. Now reduced to mental health lames. And still stupid enough
to think he can project his own lying onto others or that I'll debate with
him. Here are the facts yet again, in spite of your idiotic attempts to
snip away your humiliation, scum-boy:
Ray Haddad
<stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>news:f889i4hmofaa9j25e...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:54:35 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>
>>>Ray Haddad wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:43:43 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:05:31 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>>>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ray Haddad wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:42:16 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
>>>>>>>> <stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The archive
>>>>>>>> Grow up, Stan.
>>>>>>> Poor scum-boy.
>>>>>> Grow up, Stan.
>>>>> Poor scum-boy.
>>>>
>>>> Grow up, Stan.
>>>
>>>Poor scum-boy.
>>
>> Grow up, Stan. See a shrink. Get some help, mate. Your compulsive
>> lying will eat at your soul.
>
>Poor scum-boy.
Grow up, Stan.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
I'm absolutely loving your desperation, scum-boy. You deserve so much
more than the humiliation you're getting here, but it'll do for now.
Here it is again:
Ray Haddad
<newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>I'm absolutely loving your desperation
Grow up, Stan.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
Stay away from children and own up to your lies, scum-boy.
Ray Haddad
<stanI...@rvckids.us.INVALID> wrote:
>Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote in
>news:emmbi4tg0bma46qcc...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:17:03 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>
>>>I'm absolutely loving your desperation
>>
>> Grow up, Stan.
>
>Stay away
Grow up, Stan.
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
Nothing more grown up than protecting children from people who put them
at risk and outing lying scum like you. Stay away from children and own
Ray Haddad
<newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>Nothing
See? How hard was that, Stan?
--
Ray
Stan (the Man)
Do you truly think yourself clever, scum-boy? Do you truly believe
anyone thinks you're clever? Are you truly that self-deluded? Do you
truly enjoy retaining your place as the most despised and repulsive
poster in the ng, scum-boy? Do you? You are, you know.
Ray Haddad
<newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>Do you truly think yourself clever
Absolutely.
Stan (the Man)
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:42:07 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>
>> anyone thinks you're clever? Are you truly that self-deluded? Do you
>> truly enjoy retaining your place as the most despised and repulsive
>> poster in the ng, scum-boy? Do you? You are, you know.
>
Then, you're almost as much an idiot as you are repulsive scum.
Recognizing it, though, is a good first step.
> Grow up, Stan.
--
Stan
Ray Haddad
<newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>Ray Haddad wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:42:07 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>> <newsN...@rvcidsINVALID.us> wrote:
>>
$Zero
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:42:07 -0500, "Stan (the Man)"
>
>
> Absolutely.
you needn't lie about that too, Ray.
_everybody_ knows how unclever you know yourself to be.
duh.
you demonstrate it with every single dull-headed scumboy post.
HTH.
(not really) *
* the HTH thinger, just so we're clear, cleverless-boy).
-$Zero...
invasion of privacy -- the new paradigm in democracy, etc..
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/7fd872220bf4ca64
Ray Haddad
wrote:
>duh
Xero, demonstrating his . . . who knows.
--
Ray
$Zero
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:43:20 -0800 (PST), "$Zero" <zeroi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >duh
>
> Xero, demonstrating his . . . who knows.
certainly not you.
-$Zero...
POLL -- how good is your attitude?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/759b87db1dbf9ff5