Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

we're already past 1,000 mw posts and still 7 days left in November.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

$Zero

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 8:57:51 PM11/23/09
to
we're already past 1,000 mw posts and still 7 days left in November.

as of a few minutes ago, the google groups tallying thinger reports
that there's already 1,048 mw posts so far this month.

looks like we'll meet the projected minimum of 1,200 for the month,
no?

things are picking up.

645 posts so far and it's only the middle of November...
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/8987dbf4b4a33725

over 400 mw posts so far and it's only November 10th?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/576ba43bafc0d2a4

549 mw posts in September? Lowest in 16 years.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/c5cd78d7665d58b2

so, after dodging a likely October total of less than 400 posts, do
you think that the very last month of our still nameless decade will
get back up into at least the 2,000 monthly posts range, or not?

-$Zero...

what have you been wrong about?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/b3ba3a2fad831e5e

john.ku...@sympatico.ca

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 9:52:08 PM11/23/09
to

So do we like get bonus cash if we meet the quota?

$Zero

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 10:05:41 PM11/23/09
to
On Nov 23, 9:52 pm, "Koolchi...@smurfsareus.xxx"

no.

-$Zero...

so, _can_ Mark count to 2?
let's test this out and see:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/2170a7c6ac73bca1

Piet de Arcilla

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:39:25 AM11/24/09
to
On Nov 23, 8:57 pm, "$Zero" <zeroi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> we're already past 1,000 mw posts and still 7 days left in November.

Only because I was dumb enough to argue with you about Unicornian Math.

Ray Haddad

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 4:05:36 AM11/24/09
to

xero is trying to imply that he's responsible for an alleged rebirth
of MW. He fails to note the increase in cross postings from the loony
bin crowd and his own nonsenst posts in which he replies to himself by
citing his own loony posts.
--
Ray

$Zero

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 7:05:12 AM11/24/09
to
the "inductive leap" occurred only when i first noticed
the existence (and effects) of the inexorable differences
between odd and even numbers. after that, it's completely
deductive, forever more.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/eb34e4e8d7aa6942

yes, that was pretty dumb.

but that's not why the monthly mw post count has been rescued from
obscurity.

that happened because of the re-introduction of non-brainwash.

but again, yes, arguing against the pure indisputable logic of
Unicornian Math _was_ pretty dumb of of you.

because somewhere in the back of your mind you fully realize that
there is no possible way to dispute the logical inexorable truth of
Unicornian Math. but it's hard for you to just come out and admit that
you were wrong and brainwashed about the whole matter. it's human
nature to live in denial. and to protect your ego and/or your
brainwashes.

yet, again, you fully realize that there is no possible way to dispute
the logical inexorable truth of Unicornian Math.

hence why you were totally unable to come up w/ not even one logically
and consistently "alternate" way to make 2+2=5 a true statement -- to
make it a true statement where two plus two actually does equal five
under the conditions set forth in the assumptions. because other than
the inexorable differences between odd and even numbers, there is no
other way to make 2+2=5 a consistently logically true statement in
base ten.

and probably because of this post:

"There was truth and there was untruth, and if you
clung to the truth even against the whole world,
you were not mad." -- The Thoughtless Police
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/2f343e88668486ad

or one related to it, where i quoted someone laughing at loud at my
wit, you'd like to think that i'm just joking around about 2+2=5 in
order to argue just for the sake of arguing -- for the creation of
more wit:

i quote myself because i'm the wittiest person i know.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/cdbcaa977ba1985d

probably based on this hilariously true statement:

because these facts which you are
having bizarre trouble accepting
are 100% consistent, 100% rational,
and 100% logical -- give or take 0%.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/ef28634590e4e70f
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/dad39cba4f8c22d3

as you reread it in a different context in this post:

The Thoughtless Police
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/cdbcaa977ba1985d

where i effortlessly slapped down the unending stupid boring empty-
headed thoughtlessness of Ray, yet again.

but your actual intelligence (and high reasoning ability) _knows_ that
that arguing just for the wit of it is NOT the case here because of
how easily i proved that your supposed alternate "ways" of getting
2+2=5 in base ten were not the least bit logical or consistent, hence
your waving the white flag by pretending that it was all just a dumb
joke.

> Therefore there is no unique answer to the problem.

then go ahead and show one other possible answer which
is perfectly logical and consistent. if what you're saying
is true, that should be a snap. good luck w/ that.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/ef28634590e4e70f
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/dad39cba4f8c22d3

anyway, nice try.

but you can't argue against what's true and expect to make it false.

sorry, but it just doesn't work that way.

although, it _is_ quite amusing to watch you try.

but that's part of the beauty of it all.


"He wondered, as he had many times wondered
before, whether he himself was a lunatic.
Perhaps a lunatic was simply a minority of one."
-- The Narrator
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/ef28634590e4e70f

"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four.
If that is granted, all else follows."
-- The Thoughtless Police
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/ef28634590e4e70f

and you "accuse" me of being the only one to see the truth
of the inexorable relationship between odd and even numbers
which allows for 2 + 2 = 5?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/ef28634590e4e70f


-$Zero...

again, your PiesAlt1 claim is that there's
no difference at all between the quantities
4, 5, 6, 7, etc., but Unicornian Math
definitely does NOT do that. on the contrary,
it fully recognizes the correct (base ten)
value of all numbers.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/c23924b79d4d1fe8

$Zero

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 7:58:10 AM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 4:05 am, Ray Haddad <r...@perthmagic.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:39:25 -0800 (PST), Piet de Arcilla
>
> <dearci...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 23, 8:57 pm, "$Zero" <zeroi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> we're already past 1,000 mw posts and still 7 days left in November.
>
> >Only because I was dumb enough to argue with you about Unicornian Math.
>
> xero is trying to imply that he's responsible for an alleged rebirth
> of MW.

why does such a thought trouble you so much?

LOL.

> He fails to note the increase in cross postings from the loony
> bin crowd

bzzzt.

those have actually gone down.


> and his own nonsenst posts

watch those nervous typos, Ray.

> in which he replies to himself by
> citing his own loony posts.

nothing would please you more than to see mw posts = 0, huh?

spit.

> --
> Ray

-$Zero...

Q: what have you been wrong about?
not much. but i'm pretty lucky that way.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/a5355be60198e102

john.ku...@sympatico.ca

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 11:55:30 AM11/24/09
to

Well that sucks.

$Zero

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 12:34:12 PM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 11:55 am, "Koolchi...@smurfsareus.xxx"

think of it as an investment.

heh.

-$Zero...

if we expand this out long enough,
eventually, we may just come up w/ a few items.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing/msg/b3ba3a2fad831e5e

Ray Haddad

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 2:54:53 PM11/24/09
to
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:58:10 -0800 (PST), "$Zero" <zero...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>nothing would please you more than to see mw posts = 0, huh?

Not at all. The quality is what needs improvement. Your flooding of
the newsgroup runs counter to that. The numbers mean nothing.

>spit.

Yet another example of your hallmark.
--
Ray

0 new messages