http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jSvKwQU-w3j6Gp8PWHRzV2hnh54QD9C97FPG1
Forgot one:
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2009/11/2009112912250816889.html
Well, now you know how the Swiss feel about YOU.
And I'm sure they're really glad if you STAY AWAY.
Melanie
I hope all that Islamic money stays away too.
Muslims are retarded.
Your link seems to be as dead as yor brain.
http://www.cafepress.ca/+stop_christo_fascism_jesus_would_white_tshirt,97537019
These linked articles want to mischaracterize as "right-wing
extremism" this mainstream Swiss backlash against what is seen by the
majority of Swiss for a serious issue of cultural pollution--but there
can be nothing "extreme" about the mainstream, majority position, as
made manifest by victory at the polls. This relegates the opposition
position to that of the "extreme" which in this case happens to be on
the Left.
The "right-wing" stigma stuck to this vote is nothing but the snot and
spit of left-wing journalistic slander. Your average Swiss citizen
likes the Zurich skyline the way it is; and they show by this vote
that they will not stand for seeing it invaded by forms they see as
clashing with, and destructive to its distinctively Swiss appearance;
they want Switzerland to look like Switzerland NOT Cairo.
If you think there's something "wrong" with that, there has got to be
something wrong with you--something pushy and totalitarian that would
foist upon others what they otherwise refuse to have. Only an
extremist of an extraordinarily terrible order would think to deny the
Swiss a right for Switzerland to look like Switzerland, for the
Christ's Sake!
There's never been such an objection to the erection of Jewish
synagogues because Jews have always had respect for the traditions of
the nations in which they too are citizens, so their architects keep
that in view when it comes to the design of their sacred structures.
A Swiss synagogue looks Swiss, and a French one looks French. It
doesn't stand as an insult to the skyline of which it forms a part.
You may say that this Swiss vote constitutes disrespect for the
traditions of others--and you'd be dead right, but the disrespect
comes not from the Swiss but from the obstinate appearance of that
mosque, which all in itself constitutes an affront to the
architectural styles among which it would come to squat, like some
ugly gnome over some stink-hole out of Hell.
Even previous to this vote, it has not been permitted for these
minarets to be used to their structural purpose, being a high platform
for the five times daily broadcast of the muezzin's homely, tortured
moaning of the Muslim call to prayer. Nobody in Switzerland wants to
hear that racket clashing with a properly Swiss chiming of clocks and
cathedral bells and so it has not been permitted. Because those
minarets are to no other purpose than to produce such noise pollution,
they have no purpose to be built at all. Since nobody other than a
Muslim or a crack-brained multiculturalist geek wants to hear that
horrible noise, they are told to keep it among themselves.
Observe this photo of a Sephardic synagogue in New York, with its Neo-
Classical lines that would not look out of place next to any bank on
Wall Street or the Lincoln Monument in Washington . . .
http://www.sephardicstudies.org/csi.html
No cultural invasion going on there, no stubborn stylistic affront to
the harmony of forms around it; no hulking implication of threat that
it has come not to fit in, but therefore to attack and supplant all
that for centuries had been there before it.
For the Swiss, a big resounding HURRAH! For all the world a sigh of
relief that when we visit Davos and Gstaad, it will be Davos and not
Damascus. It will be Gstaad and not Baghdad. Damn it!
--
JM http://whosenose.blogspot.com
http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
My biggest hope is that there is a nice tit-for-tat here and all the
followers of Islam, world wide, pull all their money out of Swiss
Banks. I'm sure that if you don't want the muslims in Europe, you most
certainly don't want them tp put their filthy money ther either.
> My biggest hope is that there is a nice tit-for-tat here
I heard Muslim countries are going to change the names of Swiss
chocolate and Swiss cheese to Freedom chocolate and Freedom cheese.
In view of the all too well known character and scope of Arab/Muslim
duplicity ("taqiyya") don't be too surprised if they do nothing of the
sort and continue to put their money where they can get the best
security and cover for it, which is nowhere other than in a Swiss
bank. And since when do the Rich ever put any concern, whether sacred
or secular above that of their riches? Sure, the Swiss might stand to
lose some of that carefully laundered al Qaeda coin but what is that
compared to the Saudi oil billions, other than a drop in the blood
bucket?
You make the mistake of applying a standard of Western principle to
Islam where it does not apply. When will you inform yourself?
http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/the-doctrine-of-deceit/
Duplicity, Duality and Deceit, the 3 dimensions of Islamic doctrine.
You need your Muslim 3-D glasses on or you will not be able to see it,
to the full height, width and depth of what they do. Discover the
meaning of TAQIYYA . . .
Ishaq 771: After the conquest of the Jews at Khaybar, al Hajjaj asked
Mohammed if he could go to Mecca and get money owed to him by
merchants there. He told Mohammed that he would have to tell lies in
order to get his money. Mohammed told him to tell the lies.
Bukhari 4,52,267 Mohammed: "The king of Persia will be destroyed, and
no one shall assume his throne. Caesar will certainly be destroyed and
no Caesar will follow him; his coffers will be spent in Allah's cause
[jihad]." Mohammed cried out, "Jihad is deceit."
You are a funny little man-goy
I see big piles of cuckcoo clocks, burning in the streets.
You need your 3-D glasses on, for you are not be able to see to the
full height, width and depth of what is before you.
By MICHAEL SLACKMAN (NY Times)
Published: August 2, 2008
CAIRO — A monastery was ransacked in January. In May, monks there were
kidnapped, whipped and beaten and ordered to spit on the cross.
Christian-owned jewelry stores were robbed over the summer. The rash
of violence was so bad that one prominent Egyptian writer worried it
had become “open season” on the nation’s Christians.
Egypt's Christians Face Attacks
Does Egypt face a sectarian problem?
Or http://tinyurl.com/yl8mm6c
--
Now, are we going to hear Mr. Pinkochicki calling for a boycott on the
Pyramids and the Sphinx? Or will we see many boxes of Egyptian dates
burning in the streets?
Not. As usual, this FAKE sympathy for the "downtrodden and oppressed"
is not for ALL the downtrodden and oppressed, and that's why it's
fake--especially when the oppressor of his enemy (the Israeli and the
Christian) is his friend; and is his very dear and beloved friend, but
only because of his delight in his friend's oppression of his enemy.
But when his enemy rises up in defense against that oppressor, Mr.
Pinkochicki cries "oppression!" And the more he may cry "oppression"
the better he likes it. There's some compassion for you.
--
JM http://whosenose.blogspot.com
(Latest Entry: 11/30/09)
http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
I have no Egyptian pyramids or spinx in my house. I've never dated an
Egyptian.
Funny that you should compare Egypt to Yodelland.
So are you going to start the movement to boycott Islamic originating
petroleum?
Given ther Christians have been raping and pillaging Egypt for almost
200 years........ Proof is in the museums world wide.
What money? Dubai is bankrupt, haven't you heard?!!!
So obviously you are not working in banking for the Swiss.
If it's ok to regulate the appearance of a church or a McDonald's...?
Surely a mosque doesn't have to have minarets to be a mosque.