Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
BEWARE: Fade In Magazine & Related Contests
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Expand all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Todd  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8 2002, 5:23 pm
Newsgroups: misc.writing.screenplays
From: Zeu...@aol.com (Todd)
Date: 8 Nov 2002 14:23:09 -0800
Local: Fri, Nov 8 2002 5:23 pm
Subject: BEWARE: Fade In Magazine & Related Contests
Hello,

In a posting on the Done Deal Message Board, someone asked if the Fade
In Screenwriting Contest was worthwile. I have no personal experience
with the contests -- although there have been complaints on
misc.writing.screenplays -- but I've had some horrific experiences
with Audrey Kelly, the woman who runs the magazine and the contests,
and I want to warn as many people as possible.

Below is my posting from the Done Deal Message Board:

My advice is to avoid anything connected with Fade In Magazine. Audrey
Kelly, the woman who runs the operation is very, very bad news. She's
stiffed me and at least one other writer for articles written for
magazine. The story, Slush Pile, appeared in the Winter 2002 issue of
Filmmaker and has been mentioned several times on this discussion
board. In the meantime, she used a humorous questionnaire I wrote
without permission (or credit) and refused to pay me for that, too.

The other guy (whose suit predates mine) collected after a long, drawn
out struggle. [Kelly does business through a mail drop. You have the
sheriff serve the people who run the mail office – perfectly
legitimate –and she acts like she wasn't served, fails to appear,
defaulting, then appeals, etc., wasting hours and hours of your time.
It happened to both of us.] After two lawsuits, I have a judgment
against her that she baldly refuses to pay, claiming that she no
longer has anything to do with the corporation I won the judgment
against.

To save myself some time, I'll paste a piece of an e-mail I sent to
Kelly on July 9th, 2002, before I filed my second suit against her:

"In our court appearance on June 25th, 2002, you said that I needed to
file suit against T.W.N., Inc., and the proper agent for service of
process. Yet you refused to divulge who that agent is, in spite of
that fact that you are still editor/publisher of Fade In Magazine
(your web site promises a new issue next month) and, it seems, its
sole full-time employee, and would certainly be privy to this
information. My subsequent investigation into the matter revealed that
you resigned as the registered agent for T.W.N., Inc., on October 1st,
2001, and, as far as I can tell, no one has taken your place
[According to the State of California, she was once again listed as
the agent of service as of August 2002]. If someone has, I need you to
give me his or her name, in writing, immediately.

It's a common practice for those trying to avoid lawsuits to hide
behind various different corporations. In the last year and a half,
you have also incorporated under the names FI Ventures, Ltd.
(3/15/2001) and Fade In Publishing Group, Inc. (4/12/2002). The latter
lists Sarah A. Kelly as the registered. Is this, in fact, you? And has
Fade In Publishing Group absorbed TWN, Inc., becoming the proper
entity for me to file my suit against?"

Of course, she never responded.

If anyone wants to know how Kelly does business, I will gladly forward
you our e-mail correspondence. It's long and, at times, hilarious. In
the meantime, like the other writer (I know of) who won a judgment
against Kelly, I'm going to have to sic a collection agent on her,
which will probably cost me 50% of what I won in the lawsuit, but I am
tired of dealing with this woman.

Oh, and BTW, one of the prizes in the Fade In contest is a one-year
subscription to the magazine. There was more than a year between the
current issue and the previous one, making it doubly worthless.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google