Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Paddington Station H&C Platforms

Received: by 10.204.132.81 with SMTP id a17mr377430bkt.4.1339690632710;
        Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Path: e27ni47849bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s9g2000vbg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: amogles <amog...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
Subject: Re: Paddington Station H&C Platforms
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <856847b1-47ef-41dd-b368-413b24a55606@s9g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>
References: <36e6bf6b-90e7-485a-a31c-814ccd5dc4fa@m10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
 <WaGdnX0dzOJtwCfSnZ2dnUVZ7vWdnZ2d@bt.com> <RM-dnS92lY7u9yfSnZ2dnUVZ8mWdnZ2d@bt.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.75.196.222
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1339424776 14144 127.0.0.1 (11 Jun 2012 14:26:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:26:16 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: s9g2000vbg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.75.196.222; posting-account=sKLxzwoAAABvF-9fhd924ELbjrveFCxU
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 chbad-s-sa2px02-eth1.ch.abb.com:8082 (squid)
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR
 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR
 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 21 Mai, 18:12, "Paul Scott" <pmnotscottva...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> AFAIAA they are going to convert P12/P13 into a full length platform, but=
 I
> haven't seen it in anything official yet. =A0With P14 then ending up as t=
he
> only short platform. =A0As you suggest, with most of the relief service
> diverted to Crossrail, and the Greenfords removed, and electrification
> allowing for EMUs (probably in multiple so 8 car) covering the remaining
> semi-fast services, there is hardly any practical advantage to the OP's
> proposal.
>
> Paul S


What is happening to the Greenfords? Are these also using Crossrail?
What terminating seices (if any) are likely to remain that use the
relief lines?

On another note, where precisely will Crosrail join the GWML? On the
relief line side or on the main?