Newsgroups: uk.railway, misc.transport.urban-transit, uk.transport.london
From: Andy <andyp...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Feb 24 2012 4:27 am
Subject: Re: Plans to start Croxley Rail Link services in 2016
On Feb 24, 2:07 am, Charles Ellson <char...@ellson.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:33:38 -0800 (PST), Andy <andyp...@gmail.com>You seemed to be making a different point than none of the stations
> >> >> > On Feb 23, 11:59 am, boltar2...@boltar.world wrote:
> >> >> > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:14:47 -0000
> >> >> > > >> Plans to start Croxley Rail Link services in 2016
> >> >> > > >The formal (Railways Act 2005) closure notice for Watford LUL station has
> >> >> > > I expect the residents of the new estate next to the station who no doubt
> >> >> > And even more miffed with their solicitors, if the plans for the
> >> >> The nearest tube station is quite some distance. I guess it would be
> >> >Not that I mentioned tube stations but, if you are going to be
> >> But while generally frequented by tube trains is not a tube station.
> >Of course, if we are going to get silly, then not too far from Watford
> >Very few stations are tube stations anyway, even in central London, as
> So ? Does repetition make something any more true ?
mentioned are in underground tubes. I was pointing out that there are
very few stations which are tubes even when underground. However, if
TfL are happy to call them tube stations, then why aren't you?
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.