Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

So you think I'm a sick bastard?

4 views
Skip to first unread message

A. Cain

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 7:21:29 PM3/26/04
to
Yes I do think you're a sick bastard, Bullis. Thanks for asking. By the
way, I also think you're a loser and a jerkwad for net.nazing around on your
"message board" and deleting every post that you find even remotely
offensive towards your person.


"Richard" <Anon...@127.000> wrote in message
news:c42c3...@enews4.newsguy.com...
> http://www.cbc.ca/storyview/MSN/2004/03/26/childporn040326
>
> This guy was busted by the Toronto Police department.
> The shithead was pimping out a 6 year old girl who he also kept in a cage
> like a dog.


How in the HELL do you find these things, Bullis? No, no -- don't answer
that. PLEASE don't answer that.


>
> You highly professional assholes harass me over my statements and beliefs,


Beliefs that include raping a child is okay?


> while at the same time, some jackass right in your own area is actually
> committing the crime. And what do you do about it?
> Nothing. Because it's safe to hide behind a keyboard.


And you should know, right?

Dave Smith

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 7:15:57 PM3/26/04
to

Richard wrote:

> http://www.cbc.ca/storyview/MSN/2004/03/26/childporn040326
>
> This guy was busted by the Toronto Police department.
> The shithead was pimping out a 6 year old girl who he also kept in a cage
> like a dog.

Jeese Stoopid. Can you even read?
The guy was arrested in North Carolina. The Toronto police tracked the images
and passed the information on to the FBI.

> You highly professional assholes harass me over my statements and beliefs,

> while at the same time, some jackass right in your own area is actually
> committing the crime. And what do you do about it?
> Nothing. Because it's safe to hide behind a keyboard.

That's right in YOUR country, not mine. Guys like that pervert wouldn't have
much of a market for their sick pictures if it weren't for the people who
download the stuff. Anyone who views and downloads images of children is at
the same low end of the scale.

Cainman

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 7:36:40 PM3/26/04
to

"Dave Smith" <adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4064C7BD...@sympatico.ca...

>
>
> Richard wrote:
>
> > http://www.cbc.ca/storyview/MSN/2004/03/26/childporn040326
> >
> > This guy was busted by the Toronto Police department.
> > The shithead was pimping out a 6 year old girl who he also kept in a
cage
> > like a dog.
>
> Jeese Stoopid. Can you even read?

Of course he can't.


> The guy was arrested in North Carolina. The Toronto police tracked the
images
> and passed the information on to the FBI.
>
> > You highly professional assholes harass me over my statements and
beliefs,
> > while at the same time, some jackass right in your own area is actually
> > committing the crime. And what do you do about it?
> > Nothing. Because it's safe to hide behind a keyboard.
>
> That's right in YOUR country, not mine. Guys like that pervert wouldn't
have
> much of a market for their sick pictures if it weren't for the people who
> download the stuff. Anyone who views and downloads images of children is
at
> the same low end of the scale.

Uh-oh. Now you've done it. St00pid is going to accuse you of being a
"witch hunter."

Bill Jackson

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 7:46:17 PM3/26/04
to
"Richard" <Anon...@127.000> wrote in message
news:c42c3...@enews4.newsguy.com...

I guess without that job at Panther you have nothing better to do other than
find what pedophile buddy of yours gets busted this week, right Bullis? How
long before you run off crying about how you are being treated worse than
the children you exploit this time?


Bzzzt!

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 7:56:07 PM3/26/04
to
Richard wrote:
> http://www.cbc.ca/storyview/MSN/2004/03/26/childporn040326
>
> This guy was busted by the Toronto Police department.
> The shithead was pimping out a 6 year old girl who he also kept in a cage
> like a dog.
>
> You highly professional assholes harass me over my statements and beliefs,
> while at the same time, some jackass right in your own area is actually
> committing the crime. And what do you do about it?
> Nothing. Because it's safe to hide behind a keyboard.
>
>
>

Bullis, try to comprehend. We *know* all pedophiles, including
YOU ARE SICK BASTARDS! Normal people do not fantasize about
the perverted things that you do. Normal people do not search out
those even more warped to use as an excuse - "Hey look, I'm normal
compared to this sicko!"

Get a new song, Bullis, this one has been played out.

Brian Belliveau

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 8:12:14 PM3/26/04
to
Just imagine ...

He got busted due to the work of LEO's and computer geeks that was done from
several hundred miles away. Makes the tobacco stained curtains in your
smelly back room seem a little less secure than you thought?


"Dave Smith" <adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4064C7BD...@sympatico.ca...
>
>

Dave Smith

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 8:13:02 PM3/26/04
to
Bill Jackson wrote:

> I guess without that job at Panther you have nothing better to do other than
> find what pedophile buddy of yours gets busted this week, right Bullis? How
> long before you run off crying about how you are being treated worse than
> the children you exploit this time?

You have to wonder how he happened to come across a CBC news article

GOOGLE key word...... child porn

Skateboard'n

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 8:36:29 PM3/26/04
to
"Dave Smith" <adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4064C7BD...@sympatico.ca...
><snip>

Dear Mr. Dave of the Great White North......

My "block sender" function refuses to work when you keep responding to
Bull-shit's totally clueless post's & pasting them to your reply!


Thank you for your entrusting co-operation,
Mr. Skateboard'n of the Mid-West


xlzt

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 9:02:04 PM3/26/04
to
Richard wrote:

> http://www.cbc.ca/storyview/MSN/2004/03/26/childporn040326
>
> This guy was busted by the Toronto Police department.
> The shithead was pimping out a 6 year old girl who he also kept in a cage
> like a dog.
>

> You highly professional assholes harass me over my statements and beliefs,
> while at the same time, some jackass right in your own area is actually
> committing the crime. And what do you do about it?
> Nothing. Because it's safe to hide behind a keyboard.

the very fact that you go looking for this kind of shit signifies an
interest in it, you sick sick, son of a bitch.

thats right trailor boy, your mother was a bitch. Do something about it.

Bill Jackson

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 9:11:30 PM3/26/04
to

"Bzzzt!" <no...@notgonnadoit.com> wrote in message
news:4064D1...@notgonnadoit.com...

More like "I haven't been caught in five years doing what I do vs. what
these dumb assholes do!" Its almost as if Bullis is proud he still hasn't
been caught yet.


Cainman

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 10:33:25 PM3/26/04
to

"Bill Jackson" <jackson_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:lp59c.29514$Yj6....@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...

He *is* proud of it, go check out misc.legal and see if you can find the
post he made where he practically brags about "being investigated" by the
FBI twice and has yet to be arrested.

Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 10:54:45 PM3/26/04
to
"Richard" <Anon...@127.000> wrote in message
news:c42c3...@enews4.newsguy.com...
> http://www.cbc.ca/storyview/MSN/2004/03/26/childporn040326
>
> This guy was busted by the Toronto Police department.
> The shithead was pimping out a 6 year old girl who he also kept in a cage
> like a dog.
>
> You highly professional assholes harass me over my statements and beliefs,
> while at the same time, some jackass right in your own area is actually
> committing the crime. And what do you do about it?
> Nothing. Because it's safe to hide behind a keyboard.


Richard. It should be obvious, a lot of the posters here flunked out of
Romper Room and they have to keep going back until they get it right.

The problem with one of them was he kept calling the teacher sweetie,
another one cussed in class and third one keeps trying to tell people that
you can be two places at the same time. I think the last one is
informentalproblem now.

I'm not real sure on this, but I think one of the kids was eating the dogs
bones and it went to his head. After that, people started calling him
bonehead.

I haven't bothered looking at all the reports from others in the class,
after seeing how bad they treat the ladies.

I guess I really am a Smartass know it all Rookie. And to think, you were
the one to call me that first. ;-)


kieran donahue

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 11:47:50 PM3/26/04
to
yes

Rocky Roads - 25th week

unread,
Mar 27, 2004, 10:43:57 AM3/27/04
to
"Bill Jackson" <jackson_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:lp59c.29514$Yj6....@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
> Its almost as if Bullis is proud he still hasn't
> been caught yet.


Duh. Until it happens, if ever, he can keep shoving that fact in people's
faces.

The more people try to put him down, the more you will probably see him do
that. It is an endless chain of events, if you can not tell that by now.

The laws are to protect the innocent. If we start locking up people because
of what we think someone might do, then what does that makes us?

I am not defending a "pedo" and if people knew why I oppose the "Guilty
until proven innocent" mentality, they would not give me any crap at all.

thanx


RobZip

unread,
Mar 27, 2004, 10:52:00 AM3/27/04
to

"Rocky Roads - 25th week" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c447e9$m...@library2.airnews.net...

> I am not defending a "pedo" and if people knew why I oppose the "Guilty
> until proven innocent" mentality, they would not give me any crap at all.

Lemmee guess.... you put yourself in a position of reasonable suspicion of
something somehow related and endured a period of distress ? Elaborate
please.


RobZip

unread,
Mar 27, 2004, 11:30:28 AM3/27/04
to

"Richard" <Anon...@127.000> wrote in message
news:c42c3...@enews4.newsguy.com...
> http://www.cbc.ca/storyview/MSN/2004/03/26/childporn040326
>
> This guy was busted by the Toronto Police department.

Wrong. Toronto police initiated an investigation that revealed her location.

Lets underscore the basic differences between you and the normal male
population. I'll use my own development curve as a baseline.

At the point in my life where I became sexually aware, early adolescence, I
was attracted to girls of approximately the same age. This would have placed
the subjects of my developing interests at around age 13 or 14. Since a
sexually charged developing adolescent male can sprout wood with the
slightest acceleration in wind speed, my interests were broad ranging and
near constant. The age range of my female interests were about 80% the same
age as myself, perhaps 5% older within a range of 6 months to 1 year of my
own age, and the remaining 10% no more than a year younger than myself.

With the passage of each year, my interest range in females aged
accordingly.

At this point in my life, age 50, I am happily married to a woman who is a
few years younger than myself. I recognize that just as in my youth when
there were 14 or 15 year old girls around with incredibly hot looking young
bodies, there are indeed many around today who have developed physically at
an even younger age. Do I still lust and slobber over them? No. Do I still
desire them physically? No. What has changed? Quite simple - my own level of
mental, sexual, and emotional development. Pre-teen and up children -
regardless of physical development - are the domain of similar aged boys and
the shotgun wielding fathers of those girls, perhaps another attribute you
should consider in selecting lust targets.

A 14 or 15 year old child simply has nothing to offer me. I require a level
of compatible emotional and mental maturity, coupled with a similar range of
life experience to go along with a physical relationship. Even the idea of
'18 is legal' has little appeal to me. At that young age there simply isn't
a degree of life experience and personal development to give me any common
ground for emotionally connecting with someone of that age.

On the other hand - you as a 50+ year old man who readily confesses to
lustily admiring the attributes of children from age 12 or so on, instantly
registers with a normal male as someone who isn't quite right. To go to
whatever lengths you do at the level of risk required to collect their
pornographic images indeed instantly translates as sick and depraved to the
normal male with a normal degree of emotional, sexual, and mental
development.
To openly defend your preferences for these images further underscores that
fact that despite what relevant U.S. Code defines as pornographic,
slobbering over the images of pre-teen females regardless of compliance with
U.S.Code definitions is simply perverted. It is a major deviation from the
norm expected of development in a male your age - thus the interpretation as
DEVIANT behavior.

Sick bastard you ask? Yup - that fits I reckon.


RobZip

unread,
Mar 27, 2004, 11:36:41 AM3/27/04
to

"RobZip" <robzip.ta...@eudoramail.com> wrote in message
news:E_h9c.74830$8G2....@fe3.columbus.rr.com...

> and the remaining 10% no more than a year younger than myself.
Make that 15%


Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 27, 2004, 11:37:07 AM3/27/04
to
"RobZip" <robzip.ta...@eudoramail.com> wrote in message
news:Aqh9c.74288$8G2....@fe3.columbus.rr.com...

Rob,

Since you seem like one of the better posters here, and as much as I want to
stay away from the facts, let me put it this way.

See:
http://www.askmen.com/dating/dating_top_ten_60/80_dating_list.html

I could write a whole book on that subject. Specifically the second
paragraph of "Number 1."

How far things went, from the truth, because not everybody knows about #1,
was worth a web site.

<BS=on>
I am really Richard.
<BS=off>

thanx


Bill Jackson

unread,
Mar 27, 2004, 1:38:52 PM3/27/04
to

"Rocky Roads - 25th week" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c447e9$m...@library2.airnews.net...
> "Bill Jackson" <jackson_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:lp59c.29514$Yj6....@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
> > Its almost as if Bullis is proud he still hasn't
> > been caught yet.
>
>
> Duh. Until it happens, if ever, he can keep shoving that fact in people's
> faces.

Well its no surprise you think it is perfectly OK for Bullis to flaunt his
desires to fuck a little boy or girl.

> The more people try to put him down, the more you will probably see him do
> that. It is an endless chain of events, if you can not tell that by now.

Especially when his little pedo-groupie continues to come to his defense.

> I am not defending a "pedo" and if people knew why I oppose the "Guilty
> until proven innocent" mentality, they would not give me any crap at all.

Yes you are defending him and I could care less how you attempt to justify
what you say. By telling Bullis it is OK for him to fanaticize about
fucking little boys and girls because they are just thoughts, that is part
of the problem, not the solution. You continue to hide from the facts that
Bullis to this day thinks it is OK and legal to view child porn in the
privacy of his own home or travel to foreign countries that caters to
pedophiles. You are an enabler at best but seeing as how you seem a little
bit to eager to defend Bullis and his inclination to fuck little boys and
girls, I'd say you probably share some of his thoughts. It is the only
reasonable conclusion to come to going by your own words here.

Hurry up and killfile me now, its all you can do.


Rocky Roads - 25th week

unread,
Mar 27, 2004, 1:56:24 PM3/27/04
to
"Bill Jackson" <jackson_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0Tj9c.43389$sR1....@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...


I read your input. I do not see any outright name calling, so I can deal
with it.

I know I have said somewhere else that it is the people most opposed to the
word 'pedo' that scare me.

I am not saying it is OK and I never have. The more someone tries to put
him down, the greater the chances are that it will backfire on them.

I have seen that in my own life, where attorneys, cops and judges have tried
to pull one over on me and they end up disbarred, fired or dead. I do not
have to worry about justice, it takes care of itself.

Point blank shooting, where people stoop to fictitious stories, about
Richard being on Cops is when it has gone too far. That happens too much.

thanx


Bill Jackson

unread,
Mar 27, 2004, 4:26:44 PM3/27/04
to
"Rocky Roads - 25th week" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c44in3$u...@library2.airnews.net...

Further showing what a hypocrite you are. You claim you have killfiled some
people yet outright call them names to boot.

> I know I have said somewhere else that it is the people most opposed to
the
> word 'pedo' that scare me.

There was a time that being called a "pedo" or pedophile was standard
operation procedure for most kooks. What Bullis has done though is hide
behind that "you ain't nobody until you are called a pedophile on usenet"
and you buy into it. Without clueless newbies Bullis would never have
somebody cry for him and his victimhood. What Bullis can't stand is the
majority of the time, the clueless newbies find out he is the real thing.
Some figure this out right away and you have proven yourself to be
especially clueless. Time will tell with I guess. Then again I fail to see
you denying time and time again that you don't share the same thoughts as
Bullis which brings me back to my main point, you seem to agree more with
Bullis than not. You claim others must be closet pedophiles because they
appose Bullis so what does that make you, someone going way out of his way
to defend Bullis?

> I am not saying it is OK and I never have. The more someone tries to put
> him down, the greater the chances are that it will backfire on them.

Actually what you do is ignore the facts on Bullis and focus on those who
make fun of him or never give him a inch on his Bullishit. Each and every
time you are presented with the facts and his own words you dismiss it or
play it off as harmless. This is a free board and you a free to associate
and take up friendship with whomever you want, just don't expect others to
approve or support what you do. Bullis not being welcomed here vs. his
right to be here are two very different things. I find a man in his mid
50's who wants to fuck little boys and girls repulsive and inappropriate
whereas you seem to welcome it. If Bullis is the type of folk you wish to
associate with that is your choice, just don't expect me to ignore the fact
that the only person openly seeking you out and enjoying your support is the
resident pedophile.


Cainman

unread,
Mar 27, 2004, 5:18:43 PM3/27/04
to

"Rocky Roads - 25th week" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c447e9$m...@library2.airnews.net...
> "Bill Jackson" <jackson_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:lp59c.29514$Yj6....@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
> > Its almost as if Bullis is proud he still hasn't
> > been caught yet.
>
>
> Duh. Until it happens, if ever, he can keep shoving that fact in people's
> faces.


Despite what you and Bullis think, it will happen.


>
> The more people try to put him down, the more you will probably see him do
> that. It is an endless chain of events, if you can not tell that by now.
>
> The laws are to protect the innocent. If we start locking up people
because
> of what we think someone might do, then what does that makes us?

The U.S.A. under the current Patriot Act. But that's another subject
altogether. The point is, you're an idiot.


>
> I am not defending a "pedo" and if people knew why I oppose the "Guilty
> until proven innocent" mentality, they would not give me any crap at all.


Actually they would, just a lot more.

Cainman

unread,
Mar 27, 2004, 5:20:17 PM3/27/04
to

"Rocky Roads - 25th week" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c44in3$u...@library2.airnews.net...


So that means when you DO see it, you can't? Rocky, how the fuck did you
even make it to adulthood? No wonder you don't like living in reality. In
real life, that's going to happen to you.

Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 5:14:48 AM3/28/04
to
"Bill Jackson" <jackson_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:okm9c.15384$mo1....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...

> Further showing what a hypocrite you are. You claim you have killfiled
some
> people yet outright call them names to boot.


Most the time, I will only stoop to giving someone a new name that has used
one against me. Dave 'R' Bonehead's remark was something about I will
always be 'Rookie." Even though the definition I had for it was "less than
a year."

It was easier for me to think of a name back instead of trying to argue with
him. That is fighting fire with fire. I am sorry if it looked one sided to
you.

You failed to comment on this line, from my last post.


"I have seen that in my own life, where attorneys, cops and judges have
tried to pull one over on me and they end up disbarred, fired or dead. I do
not have to worry about justice, it takes care of itself."

It was a cop that taught me that. His exact words were, "Leave him to his
own devices." The troublemaker, I complained about, ended up skipping town
because someone kept threatening him. It was just like the cop said would
happen. From the paragraph above, I have seen stuff like that happen a lot.

From my experiences, it doesn't matter to me if someone is evil or not. I
will leave them to their own devices. I have enough problems of my own, as
if you can't tell.

thanx


Cainman

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 7:05:10 AM3/28/04
to

"Rocky Roads" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c468dp$b...@library1.airnews.net...

> "Bill Jackson" <jackson_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:okm9c.15384$mo1....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
> > Further showing what a hypocrite you are. You claim you have killfiled
> some
> > people yet outright call them names to boot.
>
>
> Most the time, I will only stoop to giving someone a new name that has
used
> one against me.


That's a real mature attitude for someone who claims to be an adult.

John Morgan

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 8:23:17 AM3/28/04
to

"Dave Smith" <adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4064D51E...@sympatico.ca...

He's on several of the "legal" boards, and you'll never believe it, but the
opinions he gives on them are as accurate as the ones he posts here.

You should be under 50 left now, correct?

John


Bill Jackson

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 11:14:21 AM3/28/04
to
"Rocky Roads" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c468dp$b...@library1.airnews.net...

> "Bill Jackson" <jackson_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:okm9c.15384$mo1....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
> > Further showing what a hypocrite you are. You claim you have killfiled
> some
> > people yet outright call them names to boot.
>
>
> Most the time, I will only stoop to giving someone a new name that has
used
> one against me. Dave 'R' Bonehead's remark was something about I will
> always be 'Rookie." Even though the definition I had for it was "less
than
> a year."

So another words you complain about this romper room group but do nothing to
elevate yourself from it. At least we can both agree you are a hypocrite.

> It was easier for me to think of a name back instead of trying to argue
with
> him. That is fighting fire with fire. I am sorry if it looked one sided
to
> you.

I could care less what you call others. I'm am merely pointing out your
hyporicrisy here.

> You failed to comment on this line, from my last post.
> "I have seen that in my own life, where attorneys, cops and judges have
> tried to pull one over on me and they end up disbarred, fired or dead. I
do
> not have to worry about justice, it takes care of itself."

I won't comment because I don't care. It is irrelevant and has nothing to
do with your claims that you are not supporting Bullis or do not share the
same type of thoughts that he has. You have chosen to defend Bullis and his
wanting to fuck little boys and girls. That is what you should be
explaining why it is appropriate for a 50+ year old man to be having
fantasies about fucking little boys and girls and how it is OK and legal for
Bullis to view child porn in the privacy of his own home.


Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 12:07:28 PM3/28/04
to
"Bill Jackson" <jackson_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:xRC9c.29993$5C7....@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...

> > You failed to comment on this line, from my last post.
> > "I have seen that in my own life, where attorneys, cops and judges have
> > tried to pull one over on me and they end up disbarred, fired or dead.
I
> do
> > not have to worry about justice, it takes care of itself."
>
> I won't comment because I don't care. It is irrelevant and has nothing to
> do with your claims that you are not supporting Bullis or do not share the
> same type of thoughts that he has. You have chosen to defend Bullis and
his
> wanting to fuck little boys and girls. That is what you should be
> explaining why it is appropriate for a 50+ year old man to be having
> fantasies about fucking little boys and girls and how it is OK and legal
for
> Bullis to view child porn in the privacy of his own home.


You had better start cut and pasting, and let me know EXACTLY what post I
said what.

I will tell you this much. If the post has sorry.org as my e-mail address,
you can not use it, since Walker and Mike Dobony have changed some of my
viewpoints since I used that e-mail address.

BTW I also defend Amy and support Joyce, so I guess that makes me bad. Now
who is being the Hypocrite? Hypocrite.

Now get to work finding those post.

thanx

Cainman

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 12:46:19 PM3/28/04
to

"John Morgan" <removem...@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:9lA9c.2876$FB1....@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...


Wait, wait, wait. Bullis is on "legal" boards? Do tell! Addresses please?
This should prove to be most amusing.
>

Brian Belliveau

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 1:07:19 PM3/28/04
to
misc.legal is a riot !

"Cainman" <noe...@there.invalid> wrote in message
news:ZcE9c.7241$ol3....@fe03.usenetserver.com...

realitytrucker

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 2:19:08 PM3/28/04
to
"Rocky Roads - 25th week" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message news:<c44in3$u...@library2.airnews.net>...

>
>
> I have seen that in my own life, where attorneys, cops and judges have tried
> to pull one over on me and they end up disbarred, fired or dead. I do not
> have to worry about justice, it takes care of itself.

Look at that quote, will ya? That's Classic Bullis bullshit! Sounds
like Richard's young "Grasshopper" is becoming more and more like his
mentor.

Cainman

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 2:53:04 PM3/28/04
to

"Brian Belliveau" <brian-be...@SPAMshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:rvE9c.36296$li5.701@pd7tw3no...

> misc.legal is a riot !

I know about Bullis's attempts at playing Matlock in misc.legal but the way
he phrased it I was under the impression there were other boards out there,
such as truck.net is for Bullis right now to play truck driver on.

truckinsp

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 3:00:45 PM3/28/04
to
>"Rocky Roads - 25th week" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
>news:<c44in3$u...@library2.airnews.net>...
>>
>>
>> I have seen that in my own life, where attorneys, cops and judges have
tried
>> to pull one over on me and they end up disbarred, fired or dead. I do
not
>> have to worry about justice, it takes care of itself.

My God, I don't think this guy is drunk, I think he is "tweaking"......that
is just about the most bizarre thing I have ever heard come out of someone's
mouth.....cops, judges, attorneys are "dead" because they messed with
you?????

Realitytrucker wrote:
>Look at that quote, will ya? That's Classic Bullis bullshit! Sounds
>like Richard's young "Grasshopper" is becoming more and more like his
>mentor.

I think he has gone WAY OVER the edge.....but yea, it is definitely a
classic Bullis type post....


xlzt

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 6:11:05 PM3/28/04
to
truckinsp wrote:


any doubt of Richard's "hobbies" are at best, moot...

The Original Archie Leach

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 8:26:32 PM3/28/04
to
"truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com> wrote in message news:<N9G9c.4923$lt2....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...

I think somebody's itching for an award...........?

Amy D

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 8:43:18 PM3/28/04
to

Rocky Roads wrote:

Listen here, bucko, I can defend myself. :) Don't drag me into your
squabbles!

amy

Bill Jackson

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 9:40:27 PM3/28/04
to
"Amy D" <amy...@joimail.com> wrote in message
news:106evqf...@corp.supernews.com...

Personally I don't even know what he is talking about. I don't recall ever
saying anything about you or Joyce. But I guess you knowing that your
knight and shining armor is here for you no doubt you and your husband can
sleep better!


Amy D

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 9:56:44 PM3/28/04
to

LOL..apparently he wasn't talking about YOU when defending us and just
using it as a blanket statement.....I don't recall you saying anything
about Joyce or I either. :) But I gotta admit, I ignore most of the
"bash bullis" stuff....not that I defend him....it's just all so damn
ignorant......

amy

Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 10:06:07 PM3/28/04
to
"Amy D" <amy...@joimail.com> wrote in message
news:106evqf...@corp.supernews.com...
> Listen here, bucko, I can defend myself. :) Don't drag me into your
> squabbles!
>
> amy


Amy,

I am sorry to mention your name now.

I was only trying to point out that Billy Jerk is so inebriated with the
word 'pedo' he has missed other things.

After seeing a post that uses my return address and was not from me, I know
someone will fabricate


Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 10:13:24 PM3/28/04
to
"Amy D" <amy...@joimail.com> wrote in message
news:106f448...@corp.supernews.com...

> LOL..apparently he wasn't talking about YOU when defending us and just
> using it as a blanket statement.....I don't recall you saying anything
> about Joyce or I either. :) But I gotta admit, I ignore most of the
> "bash bullis" stuff....not that I defend him....it's just all so damn
> ignorant......
>
> amy


I fully agree, but look where it got me.

It is odd, how when you can prove something, someone has to falsify post
with my name.

I will not have to post when I get to 6 months, I'll let one of the
fabricators do that for me.


Amy D

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 10:25:12 PM3/28/04
to

What post was "fabricated"?

amy

Bill Jackson

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 10:52:35 PM3/28/04
to

"Amy D" <amy...@joimail.com> wrote in message
news:106f448...@corp.supernews.com...

Well I don't recall anyone saying anyone had to pay attention. Plenty of
people saying don't pay attention to Bullis while harping on Bullis though
:) Personally I don't care either way what people talk about in this group.
I find it very easy to ignore what I don't feel like reading vs. harping
about what I don't like reading. Somebody here once said Bullis is like
24/7 truck accident or something like that. Something about the carnage of
lies and idiocy he leaves behind is hard to not rubberneck on!

That said, I'm sure if you have any beef with me regardless of the subject
you are perfectly capable of speaking up for yourself.


Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 10:53:01 PM3/28/04
to
"Amy D" <amy...@joimail.com> wrote in message
news:106f5ph...@corp.supernews.com...


There are 3 post that use my return e-mail address, maybe more. I pointed
one of them out in a new thread.

Amy, I will miss you, but people like Bill Jackson have gone ballistic and
will never be able to play fair. I will try to sit out for a while.

The Billy Jack Challenge, I had for him, was too much and he had to, or one
of his "Pedo on the Brain" buddies had to start playing dirty.

Thanks for your post.


Amy D

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 11:09:52 PM3/28/04
to

Rocky Roads wrote:

Call me dense. Why are you going to "miss me". Am I going somewhere?
Your famous "kill-file"?

I honestly don't have time to keep track of addy's, etc......this whole
bullis war crap keeps me deleting more than reading...I detest
killfiles although I have a number there......<finally figured out how
to use it> :)

I detest the fact this group has turned into a pedo battleground and
have a really hard time NOT HATING anyone that participates in the
nonsense....

amy

Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 11:10:34 PM3/28/04
to
"Bill Jackson" <jackson_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:74N9c.30149$4s4....@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...

> That said, I'm sure if you have any beef with me regardless of the subject
> you are perfectly capable of speaking up for yourself.


Of course Amy can talk for herself and so can Richard, that is why you will
never find a current post where I defend Richard.

You have to use your warped mind and say it is in the timing and not
anything that was said.

You have said the words at least a 100 times today. Maybe this post isn't
really from you, maybe it is from another fabricator. Could be.

BTW the clock for the Billy Jack Challenge is still ticking. tick tick
tick.


Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 11:24:30 PM3/28/04
to
Okay, okay, okay I am a sick bastard. I just have to cum clean.
Richard and I are homosexual lovers and we've been such for about a year
now. He has this thing about truckers, so I went to truck driving
school and became a truck driver. Richard has this thing about
servicing/being serviced by truck drivers.

What really makes this great is that I look like a little boy. No
muscles mass to speak of, no body hair. So he get's his truck driver
kicks in and he also has me act like a little boy.

We love each other sooooooo much. When the supreme court gets this same
sex marriage thing cleared up in our favor, we're gonna take the plunge!

Bill Jackson

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 11:27:39 PM3/28/04
to

"Rocky Roads" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c487i4$h...@library2.airnews.net...

> "Bill Jackson" <jackson_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:74N9c.30149$4s4....@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
> > That said, I'm sure if you have any beef with me regardless of the
subject
> > you are perfectly capable of speaking up for yourself.
>
>
> Of course Amy can talk for herself and so can Richard, that is why you
will
> never find a current post where I defend Richard.

According to you though it was you on your shiny white horse that saved the
day for Amy and Joyce. What you say now sure is different now that Amy
spoke up for herself. Something I never doubted her being able to do in the
first place, unlike you. Nice little plug for Bullis though, glad to see
that he is always on your mind for a little defense on what he can do.

> You have to use your warped mind and say it is in the timing and not
> anything that was said.

> You have said the words at least a 100 times today. Maybe this post isn't
> really from you, maybe it is from another fabricator. Could be.

I have said what 100 times? If you are going to blather on be sure to back
up your own bullishit before you make the claim. Before you came into the
"Beau Gritz" thread whining/defending Bullis I responded to you once at
8:14AM. You then went ape-shit and have been whining about everything
since.

> BTW the clock for the Billy Jack Challenge is still ticking. tick tick

Good for you, you keep watching the clock instead of thinking about things
that only Bullis and you can appreciate.


Amy D

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 11:29:09 PM3/28/04
to

Rocky Roads wrote:

Geez, you aren't even going to prompt me to get evil and mean. :)

You are either trolling on behalf of Richard or just plain ignorant. I
don't believe you ARE Richard.

But listen, baby, you bring my name up in one more pedo-squabble and I
will be worse than your mama ever warned you about.

amy


Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 11:32:33 PM3/28/04
to
Blow it out your phat ass you trailer trash hoe.

Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 11:33:33 PM3/28/04
to
"Amy D" <amy...@joimail.com> wrote in message
news:106f8dc...@corp.supernews.com...

>
> Rocky Roads wrote:
> > There are 3 post that use my return e-mail address, maybe more. I
pointed
> > one of them out in a new thread.
> >
> > Amy, I will miss you, but people like Bill Jackson have gone ballistic
and
> > will never be able to play fair. I will try to sit out for a while.
> >
> > The Billy Jack Challenge, I had for him, was too much and he had to, or
one
> > of his "Pedo on the Brain" buddies had to start playing dirty.
> >
> > Thanks for your post.
> >
> >
>
> Call me dense. Why are you going to "miss me". Am I going somewhere?
> Your famous "kill-file"?
>
> I honestly don't have time to keep track of addy's, etc......this whole
> bullis war crap keeps me deleting more than reading...I detest
> killfiles although I have a number there......<finally figured out how
> to use it> :)
>
> I detest the fact this group has turned into a pedo battleground and
> have a really hard time NOT HATING anyone that participates in the
> nonsense....
>
> amy


I stated right after that. "I will try to sit out of a while." I meant, I
was going to try and remove myself from this NG for a while.

I wish Mr. Bill would just take the challenge I have given him. It would
save a lot of bandwidth.


Amy D

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 11:43:23 PM3/28/04
to


LOL.........spontaneous combustion.........

Welcome to the new kill-file.....

amy

Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 28, 2004, 11:55:22 PM3/28/04
to
Amy D wrote:
>

>
> LOL.........spontaneous combustion.........
>
> Welcome to the new kill-file.....
>
> amy
>

OH YEAH! I'm putting you in my killfile now! What do you think of that
b*tch?

Rocky Roads

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 12:09:31 AM3/29/04
to
"Amy D" <amy...@joimail.com> wrote in message
news:106fac8...@corp.supernews.com...

> LOL.........spontaneous combustion.........
>
> Welcome to the new kill-file.....
>
> amy


OK YOU JERKS. You did it, you removed one of the reasons I stayed on this
NG.

Since she has sent that post to the kill file, and the jerk was using my
name and return address, that means she will not see any of my post now.

thanx


Joyce

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 8:23:16 AM3/29/04
to
Richard,

If it were in my neighborhood, and it's not
thank God,,,,,,,He'd need a new method
of eliminating the liquids.....

Remember the old BOB IT, BOB IT...
story.......

I couldn't get into the post, think I'm having a problem with the
keyboard.
or something with the web.

joyce

Joyce

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 8:29:02 AM3/29/04
to
Richard,

Well I was able to see the story from
Dave's post,,,,and yup......it's N.C
Good old Raleigh, and Cary,NC...

But not near us,,,,,that is quite a bit away
from us.....still, they ought ot do some
surgery on this guy so he won't bother
anyone, or be tempted to do so in the
future.......joyce

Joyce

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 8:36:53 AM3/29/04
to
Re: kook,,,,

I think it's a case of some" loco weed"
gone bad.....
or too much of it.....can kill your brain,
and I think it's a bit of alcohol also....
bad mixture.
They all get this "I'm above it all"
attitude eventually, and then face reality
that they end up in the"Crapper"

joyce

Dave Smith

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 9:27:12 AM3/29/04
to

Joyce wrote:

And my point was, not only did Richard the Stoopid screw up the story,
but that he was most likely using a search engine to look for kiddie
porn to have come across CBC news story.

Cainman

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 11:44:33 AM3/29/04
to

"Joyce" <JoyceI...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:16868-406...@storefull-3255.bay.webtv.net...


Joyce please try not to respond like an idiot. Thanks.

Cainman

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 11:45:11 AM3/29/04
to

"Meat-->Plow" <Me...@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:tl4g6096mk2akvf1l...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:00:45 GMT, "truckinsp" <truckinsp@
nowhere.com>,wrote:
>
> >>"Rocky Roads - 25th week" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in
message
> >>news:<c44in3$u...@library2.airnews.net>...

> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have seen that in my own life, where attorneys, cops and judges have
> >tried
> >>> to pull one over on me and they end up disbarred, fired or dead. I do
> >not
> >>> have to worry about justice, it takes care of itself.
> >
> >My God, I don't think this guy is drunk, I think he is
"tweaking"......that
> >is just about the most bizarre thing I have ever heard come out of
someone's
> >mouth.....cops, judges, attorneys are "dead" because they messed with
> >you?????
>
> He's a troll. Nobody that is still roaming free among law abiding citizen
writes
> the things he does. I've been at this way more than long enough to tell
genuine
> stupidity as in Bullis's case, from Rocky's made up stupidity. I enjoy a
good
> troll as long as they don't try too hard to tug at your strings. But Rocky
has
> allowed his troll to become way to bizarre even for the most naive to
believe. I
> ignore his idiotic posts. Reading genuine stupidity from Bullis is hard
enough
> to swallow let alone reading some turd lacing his bizzarro posts with
content
> barely meeting quasi-topical criteria.


I'm beginning to agree with you.

Cainman

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 11:48:03 AM3/29/04
to

"Rocky Roads" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c487i4$h...@library2.airnews.net...

> "Bill Jackson" <jackson_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:74N9c.30149$4s4....@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
> > That said, I'm sure if you have any beef with me regardless of the
subject
> > you are perfectly capable of speaking up for yourself.
>
>
> Of course Amy can talk for herself and so can Richard, that is why you
will
> never find a current post where I defend Richard.


There are plenty where you've done that, nimrod. And you've also spoken for
Amy as well.

>
> You have to use your warped mind and say it is in the timing and not
> anything that was said.
>
> You have said the words at least a 100 times today. Maybe this post isn't
> really from you, maybe it is from another fabricator. Could be.

If you are indeed a troll, you really, really suck at it.

Cainman

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 11:49:51 AM3/29/04
to

"Rocky Roads" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c48at2$2...@library1.airnews.net...

> "Amy D" <amy...@joimail.com> wrote in message
> news:106fac8...@corp.supernews.com...
> > LOL.........spontaneous combustion.........
> >
> > Welcome to the new kill-file.....
> >
> > amy
>
>
> OK YOU JERKS. You did it, you removed one of the reasons I stayed on this
> NG.


LOL

John Morgan

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 3:54:25 PM3/29/04
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.04032...@posting.google.com...
> "Rocky Roads - 25th week" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in
message news:<c44in3$u...@library2.airnews.net>...

> >
> >
> > I have seen that in my own life, where attorneys, cops and judges have
tried
> > to pull one over on me and they end up disbarred, fired or dead. I do
not
> > have to worry about justice, it takes care of itself.
>
> Look at that quote, will ya? That's Classic Bullis bullshit! Sounds
> like Richard's young "Grasshopper" is becoming more and more like his
> mentor.

Either that or he had Bullis do it for him while he visited in Plover.

Doktor DynaSoar

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 3:41:45 PM3/29/04
to
On 28 Mar 2004 17:26:32 -0800, master_b...@hotmail.com (The
Original Archie Leach) wrote:

} "truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com> wrote in message news:<N9G9c.4923$lt2....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...


} > >"Rocky Roads - 25th week" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
} > >news:<c44in3$u...@library2.airnews.net>...
} > >>
} > >>
} > >> I have seen that in my own life, where attorneys, cops and judges have
} > tried
} > >> to pull one over on me and they end up disbarred, fired or dead. I do
} > not
} > >> have to worry about justice, it takes care of itself.
} >

} > My God, I don't think this guy is drunk, I think he is "tweaking"......that
} > is just about the most bizarre thing I have ever heard come out of someone's
} > mouth.....cops, judges, attorneys are "dead" because they messed with
} > you?????
} >

} > Realitytrucker wrote:
} > >Look at that quote, will ya? That's Classic Bullis bullshit! Sounds
} > >like Richard's young "Grasshopper" is becoming more and more like his
} > >mentor.
} >

} > I think he has gone WAY OVER the edge.....but yea, it is definitely a
} > classic Bullis type post....
}
} I think somebody's itching for an award...........?

This bears watching. We've had tag team kooks before (Edmo and
Kettler; The Freedumb Kooks) but never a teacher/student pair.

justanobserver

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 10:14:20 PM3/29/04
to

>>
>> I think it's a case of some" loco weed"
>> gone bad.....
>> or too much of it.....can kill your brain,
>> and I think it's a bit of alcohol also....
>> bad mixture.
>> They all get this "I'm above it all"
>> attitude eventually, and then face reality
>> that they end up in the"Crapper"
>>
>> joyce
>
>
>Joyce please try not to respond like an idiot. Thanks.
>
> She can't help herself. None of her previous posts, for
as long as I've been reading this NG, are anything more than
semi-literate rants, complete with bad spelling, fractured grammar,
and incomprehensible sentence structure.. Such is the nature of
Usenet, idiots and geniuses can use it on an equal basis.
Sadly, Joyce appears to belong to the "idiot" group.

Hennevar

The Original Archie Leach

unread,
Mar 29, 2004, 11:40:53 PM3/29/04
to
Doktor DynaSoar <targ...@OMCL.mil> wrote in message news:<sd2h605ft1jed749j...@4ax.com>...

What about Speedbump and Skidmark?

Archie Leach

RobZip

unread,
Mar 30, 2004, 8:48:43 AM3/30/04
to

"Phoenix" <pe...@hail.ming> wrote in message
news:c4amln$87j$5...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> Please tell me Bullis is the student. It's not going to be easy
> thinking he's more intelligent than someone else.

I'll make this easier for you. Being more experienced at netkooking and
kiddie porn collecting does not automatically confer greater intelligence.
It merely means that someone else wishes to follow the path of one who has
wasted more oxygen on this planet for a greater period of time.


Doktor DynaSoar

unread,
Mar 30, 2004, 9:32:07 PM3/30/04
to

Zackly. Richard is, of course, The St00pid. The student would have to
become more st00pid over time.

Doktor DynaSoar

unread,
Mar 30, 2004, 9:31:14 PM3/30/04
to
On 29 Mar 2004 20:40:53 -0800, master_b...@hotmail.com (The
Original Archie Leach) wrote:

Another tag team, IMO. Similar intent but different styles, and
Skiddy's didn't change to match Bumpie's over time.

realitytrucker

unread,
Mar 31, 2004, 4:02:53 AM3/31/04
to
Doktor DynaSoar <targ...@OMCL.mil> wrote in message news:<0cbk60p2g5619t8k7...@4ax.com>...

Oh, don't you doubt Rocky Rickey the Rookie. Although still pretty
green he shows promising signs of Bullisism in every single post.

The Original Archie Leach

unread,
Mar 31, 2004, 1:37:39 PM3/31/04
to
Doktor DynaSoar <targ...@OMCL.mil> wrote in message news:<r9bk609dhpjkc4c0u...@4ax.com>...

Oooh! Oooh! How about Bertie Hoff and his foul "little" catamite
and mayonaise-enthusiast Scottie Abraham?

Peter J Ross

unread,
Mar 31, 2004, 5:28:42 PM3/31/04
to

I'm looking forward to the results of the first meeting (at least, the
first I've seen in AUK) between Barbara Schwartz and the newbie kook
Nelson. He's showing promise on his own, but with help from such a
raving loon who knows what he might achieve?

I just hope we don't have to invoke the law against kook marriages at
the end of it.
--
PJR :-)

(Remove NOSPAM to reply.)

realitytrucker

unread,
Mar 31, 2004, 6:52:31 PM3/31/04
to
"Cainman" <noe...@there.invalid> wrote in message news:<2pY9c.7563$ol3....@fe03.usenetserver.com>...

Cain, please try not to respond like an abosule asshole. Thanks.

Joyce

unread,
Apr 1, 2004, 9:53:36 AM4/1/04
to
Dave,

So what else is new with Richard.
joyce

Joyce

unread,
Apr 1, 2004, 9:55:10 AM4/1/04
to
Cainman,

Who died and left you boss.....

Bug off.....joyce

Troublemaker

unread,
Apr 1, 2004, 10:52:42 PM4/1/04
to

"Rocky Roads" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c488pk$b...@library1.airnews.net...

Or you could just stop posting so much crap about it and get on with your
sorry little life.


0 new messages