Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Rookie rocky roadie looser

4 views
Skip to first unread message

David D Ruff

unread,
Feb 17, 2004, 9:11:27 PM2/17/04
to
Why do you find it necessary to post every little bullshit item that happens
in your day? Are you trying to change our opinion on how we feel you screwed
up? Or are you going to extreme leghts to show us your just a regular guy?
Well none of it is working. You would change our opinion by doing your job
and give us a post like "I did my job today and had no problems and I will
try to do the same tomorrow.


Zeke

unread,
Feb 17, 2004, 9:26:09 PM2/17/04
to

"David D Ruff" <sword...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KNKdnSiOt_J...@comcast.com...

agreed


Richard Jones

unread,
Feb 17, 2004, 9:40:23 PM2/17/04
to
I agree with David. I'm also wondering why Rocky has got to post everyday
concerning his daily events. Seems to me that most of us already know the
daily life and routine of a trucker's life. We don't need a daily post.

"David D Ruff" <sword...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KNKdnSiOt_J...@comcast.com...

tscottme

unread,
Feb 18, 2004, 6:10:32 AM2/18/04
to
Ricky is just a screen name for Bullis, Richard Bullis. He has no job
other than creating new screen names and making up stories. I guess
it's better than preying on children.

--

Scott
--------
"Mr. President, can you offer any proof that it wasn't your clone that
served in the Texas Air National Guard during the 1970s?"

Richard Jones <rj2...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:rgAYb.1713$3J....@news01.roc.ny...

Richard Jones

unread,
Feb 18, 2004, 10:59:23 AM2/18/04
to
Please Don't get me confused with Bullis. I am not him.
I have my own small Trucking company and I don't want to confused with him
nor do I want people to ASSume that I'm "Bullis" trying to use another
screen name.
"tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in message
news:Naedne0CRr2...@comcast.com...

Roadwytch

unread,
Feb 18, 2004, 1:55:15 PM2/18/04
to
Who cares what the kid wants to post...
If we don't like what he's posting just look at the top of the window where
it says ""messages" click on that then click "block sender" then Voila, no
more Ricky Mail.
Even a truck driver can figure it out....

Roadwytch


"Zeke" <4242 at cableone dot net> wrote in message
news:1035j9c...@corp.supernews.com...


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

tscottme

unread,
Feb 18, 2004, 5:09:00 PM2/18/04
to
I'm referring to the soap opera star that claims to be working as a
rookie driver and posting every detail of his life to MTT.

--

Scott
--------
"Mr. President, can you offer any proof that it wasn't your clone that
served in the Texas Air National Guard during the 1970s?"

Richard Jones <rj2...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message

news:vZLYb.1923$qb3....@news01.roc.ny...

A. Cain

unread,
Feb 18, 2004, 5:40:17 PM2/18/04
to

"Richard" <anon...@127.000> wrote in message
news:c10e8...@enews3.newsguy.com...

> Richard Jones wrote:
>
> > I agree with David. I'm also wondering why Rocky has got to post
everyday
> > concerning his daily events. Seems to me that most of us already know
the
> > daily life and routine of a trucker's life. We don't need a daily post.
>
> Because he mister billy big rigger rookie!
> In less than 4 months he's "been there done that".
> "Hey look at me. I can back into a dock!"
> No shit sherlock. How else do you get the next load?


PKB, Bullis.


>
> I can't wait to hear how he has to blindside back into an alley, blindside
> back into another alley, then blindside back into the world's tightest
> docking area.
> And it's an indoor dock.
>
> It's a wonder he hasn't crashed yet.


And how many times have you crashed in the past, hypocrite? What about
when you ran that tractor off the road?

> I will say this, he has the guts to tough it out as a rookie in this
shitty
> weather.


Coming from someone like you who craps himself with two inches of snow on
the ground that doesn't mean much Bullis.

ld

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 12:35:55 AM2/19/04
to

tscottme wrote:
>Ricky is just a screen name for Bullis, Richard Bullis. He has no job
>other than creating new screen names and making up stories. I guess
>it's better than preying on children.
>
>--
>
>Scott
>--------
>


Nah... Richard ain't Rookie.. but there is a guy on the Trucknet forums
who sounds VERY familiar in all his "a local cop wouldn't DARE ask for
my logbook or he'd be in court" statements.... goes by
"lostforevermore".. sounds SO familiar... just can't place who talks
like that....


<grin>

Dave


--
Posted at http://www.layover.com/
Trucking jobs, news, features, chat rooms, and more!

Rocky Roads on week 19

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 12:10:58 AM2/19/04
to
"Richard" <anon...@127.000> wrote in message @enews3.newsguy.com...
> And I sure as hell wouldn't pay some damn high price for the privilege.


I pay absolutely NOTHING for my wireless internet. I got the $10 a month
vision on my Sprint PCS because I liked things I could do with it.

When I found out I could also use it for the internet, I did not have to pay
any extra for that.

Basically, I am getting free unlimited wireless internet because I had it on
my phone and didn't even know it until after I started driving a truck.

Rocky

A. Cain

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 12:18:34 AM2/19/04
to

"Richard" <anon...@127.000> wrote in message
news:c10eg...@enews3.newsguy.com...

> Richard Jones wrote:
>
> > Please Don't get me confused with Bullis. I am not him.
> > I have my own small Trucking company and I don't want to confused with
> > him nor do I want people to ASSume that I'm "Bullis" trying to use
> > another screen name.
>
> He wasn't speaking of YOU. He was speaking of "Ricky the rookie" and
saying
> that I am him.


Great attitude there, Bullis.


> Sorry to burst your egotistical bubble scott, but I ain't "rookie ricky"
> either.
> When I'm on the road driving for a living,


Not for over a year now, Bullis.

> I don't play around on the
> internet unless I have plenty of time to kill.


> And I sure as hell wouldn't pay some damn high price for the privilege.


You couldn't afford it if you tried, st00pid.

Amy D

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 12:48:33 AM2/19/04
to

I thought about getting Ron an Email Station <by Earthlink> -- he
despises the internet <thinks it's satan's spawn> but we could have fun
with email. Both Best Buy and SPrint told me it's not possible to hook
the cell phone up to it. True?? I don't see what the problem is.....

amy

Rocky Roads on week 19

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 7:25:43 AM2/19/04
to
"tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in message
news:cNKdnay8SdH...@comcast.com...

> I'm referring to the soap opera star that claims to be working as a
> rookie driver and posting every detail of his life to MTT.
>
> --
>
> Scott


While you have great advise, your common sense is lacking.

If you are so smart. Read my post on the "Fatal accident closes I-65 and
then go to indystar.com and tell everybody how I managed to get that story
correct.

Here is the URL
http://www.indystar.com/articles/4/122042-5774-092.html


And here is a quote from the article. This is for truck. It is possible
for a wreck to block traffic over 2 hours.

"The crash happened in Boone County just south of the interchange with Ind.
267 and tied up traffic for almost six hours."


Now for shooting at point blank range. Rocky is not Richard


Rocky Roads on week 19

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 7:04:46 AM2/19/04
to
"Amy D" <amy...@joimail.com> wrote in message
news:1038jlt...@corp.supernews.com...

> I thought about getting Ron an Email Station <by Earthlink> -- he
> despises the internet <thinks it's satan's spawn> but we could have fun
> with email. Both Best Buy and SPrint told me it's not possible to hook
> the cell phone up to it. True?? I don't see what the problem is.....
>
> amy

I've seen little gadgets, where the sole purpose was just e-mail.

It is basically an e-mail only computer that hooks up to a phone line.

In other words, it is phone line only and they are not fancy enough to add
the software needed to support a USB connection to a cell phone. I can not
even say for sure if it had a USB port on it.


tscottme

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 7:33:55 AM2/19/04
to

Rocky Roads on week 19 <NotARealEm...@sorry.org> wrote in message
news:c129vf$8...@library1.airnews.net...

Uh, you want me to explain that your story and the newspaper story
corroborate each other? How could that happen? Of course the only
logical explanation is that time-traveling alien space bats plucked you
out of the driver's lounge and carried you to view the scene from high
overhead. I guess it's possible you read the story, but I like the
space bat explanation better.

In case you don't know, you can post a message with your clock set to
any time and date you wish.

What's the frequency Kenneth!

tscottme

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 7:41:25 AM2/19/04
to
Amy look for "pocketmail". My brother had the first version that only
worked on analog cell phones and any landline. Their newer version
works on digital cell phones as well as any other type of phone. My
brother's until cost about $100 and service was $10 a month. You could
send and receive unlimited email. It worked with any telephone by
holding it to the handset of the phone and sending acoustic signals
across the line. It's been highly reviewed, it's cheaper than a
conventional ISP and will work over cell phones, now.

http://www.pocketmail.com/us/

I don't think it will increase your fuel mileage. ;-)

--

Scott
--------
"Mr. President, can you offer any proof that it wasn't your clone that
served in the Texas Air National Guard during the 1970s?"

Amy D <amy...@joimail.com> wrote in message
news:1038jlt...@corp.supernews.com...
>
>

Rocky Roads on week 19

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 8:15:07 AM2/19/04
to
"tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in message
news:WLmdnbet36C...@comcast.com...

>
> Rocky Roads on week 19 <NotARealEm...@sorry.org> wrote in message


You keep up your denial, and people will start to think that you are crazier
than Richard.

BTW, the article about the wreck, did not mention anything about the wreck
having TWO SWIFT trucks involved. I heard that on the CB.

The first I heard of it was, if the log book of the Swift driver was not
correct, he would be going to jail. The other driver said that, even
though, the car went over onto his side of the interstate.


Roger

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 10:26:21 AM2/19/04
to
And some days I would agree with him ... :>)

Amy D wrote:

<snip>

> ... he despises the internet <thinks it's satan's spawn> ...

<snip>
>
> amy
>

Roger

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 10:43:39 AM2/19/04
to
If the only function of the devive is to send/receive email and you need
a phone line to use it, why noy just use the phone? I would much rather
have my wife call me than send me an email.

Rocky Roads on week 19 wrote:

Roger

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 10:49:57 AM2/19/04
to
Ok, but will it stop my wife from nagging me? :>)

Rock Salt

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 12:09:48 PM2/19/04
to
>BTW, the article about the wreck, did not mention anything about the wreck
>having TWO SWIFT trucks involved. I heard that on the CB.

Oh, and the CB is the ultimate source of knowledge?

---Now, take ten hrs off and call me in the morning.
I'm not a real doctor, I don't even play one on the CB.
But someone already stole my CB handle "RockSalt" on aol, so Dr is what I
decided to add.

Rocky Roads on week 19

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 6:31:27 PM2/19/04
to
"Rock Salt" <drroc...@aol.compressor> wrote in message
news:20040219120948...@mb-m28.aol.com...

> >BTW, the article about the wreck, did not mention anything about the
wreck
> >having TWO SWIFT trucks involved. I heard that on the CB.
>
> Oh, and the CB is the ultimate source of knowledge?

If you looked close at that photo, you can tell it is the back end of a
SWIFT Van.

The CD did real well at describing the accident. But once someone got on
there and said there where 3 trucks involved. I stated I heard before it
was only two, then someone else got on the CB and said, it keeps growing.
Then the joke went on from there...

Rocky


David D Ruff

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 7:48:02 PM2/19/04
to
I think you're right Scott. The aliens had him but realized what a bullshit
artist he is then threw him back. Hey "Sir Bullis Rocky" do you ever get any
work done? If you don't bad month your company then why not let them read
your post. PLEASE do it on week 22.

"Rocky Roads on week 19" <NotARealEm...@sorry.org> wrote in message
news:c12csg$c...@library2.airnews.net...

David D Ruff

unread,
Feb 19, 2004, 7:50:51 PM2/19/04
to
I've never had a CD talk to me. And I've never been there where. I hope the
aliens don't get a bad impression.

"Rocky Roads on week 19" <NotARealEm...@sorry.org> wrote in message
news:c13h92$g...@library2.airnews.net...

Rocky Bullis Roads on week 19

unread,
Feb 20, 2004, 7:48:31 AM2/20/04
to
"David D Ruff" <sword...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:n7-dnVTzubP...@comcast.com...

> I think you're right Scott. The aliens had him but realized what a
bullshit
> artist he is then threw him back. Hey "Sir Bullis Rocky" do you ever get
any
> work done? If you don't bad month your company then why not let them read
> your post. PLEASE do it on week 22.


Well, if I can not beat it, I'll join it. If you really want to believe I
am Richard, so be it.

How do you like my new name?

Rocky Bullis Roads

Richard, I hope you do not mind the joke.

Rocky Bullis Roads on week 19

unread,
Feb 20, 2004, 7:57:45 AM2/20/04
to
"Richard" <anon...@127.000> wrote ...

> I will say this, he has the guts to tough it out as a rookie in this
shitty
> weather.


Sorry to disappoint you, but the last time the weather got bad, I took a
load to Ft. Pierce, Florida and spent the weekend in Marianna, Florida.

Backing is no big deal anymore. I realize a lot of my time was spent
backing, so I work harder at getting it right the first time.

This one is for you. I hope you do not mind my new name. Since Scott and
David want to believe we are the same person, I decided, I would really
throw them for a curve. ;-)

Rocky . . . on the end of my 19th week.


tscottme

unread,
Feb 20, 2004, 8:19:30 AM2/20/04
to

Rocky Bullis Roads on week 19 <NotARealEm...@sorry.org> wrote in
message news:c1507r$c...@library2.airnews.net...

>
>
> Sorry to disappoint you, but the last time the weather got bad, I took
a
> load to Ft. Pierce, Florida and spent the weekend in Marianna,
Florida.
>
> Backing is no big deal anymore. I realize a lot of my time was spent
> backing, so I work harder at getting it right the first time.
>
> This one is for you. I hope you do not mind my new name. Since Scott
and
> David want to believe we are the same person, I decided, I would
really
> throw them for a curve. ;-)
>
> Rocky . . . on the end of my 19th week.

He was talking to himself long before you started. Maybe you can go
into the name change business, or we can start a pool on whether you
will go a full week with the same screen name. Hey, here's a suggestion
for a screen name that may last for ya, Cybil.

--

Scott
--------
Anyone notice that all the people that were having a fit over Alabama
Judge Roy Moore defying the law are silent over the illegal circus
happening in San Francisco?


Brian Smith

unread,
Feb 20, 2004, 11:27:18 AM2/20/04
to

"tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in message
news:_5udnRtRL8z...@comcast.com...

>
> He was talking to himself long before you started. Maybe you can go
> into the name change business, or we can start a pool on whether you
> will go a full week with the same screen name. Hey, here's a suggestion
> for a screen name that may last for ya, Cybil.

LOL!


realitytrucker

unread,
Feb 20, 2004, 4:40:15 PM2/20/04
to
"Rocky Bullis Roads on week 19" <NotARealEm...@sorry.org> wrote in message news:<c1507r$c...@library2.airnews.net>...

Probably not real smart including "Bullis" in your screen name. Alot
of people are already accusing you of being Bullis so if you're really
not I'd lose that new addition.

Rocky Roads on week 20

unread,
Feb 20, 2004, 6:52:32 PM2/20/04
to
"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message @posting.google.com...

> Probably not real smart including "Bullis" in your screen name. Alot
> of people are already accusing you of being Bullis so if you're really
> not I'd lose that new addition.


That names was used for two post, and there will probably be some fall out
because of it.

Since David does not want to see me get past 22 weeks, I am thinking of
going straight to "Rocky Roads on week 23" a few weeks early.

What do you think of that?

thanx


SloRide9430

unread,
Feb 20, 2004, 7:11:00 PM2/20/04
to
>From: Rookie

>Since David does not want to see me get past 22 weeks, I am thinking of
>going straight to "Rocky Roads on week 23" a few weeks early.
>
>What do you think of that?


Who gives a rat's ass?

y'know, Scott, I don't think he's Bullis.... to be that juvenile, it must be
Alex Cain.


Safe truckin' !

Slo

Rocky Roads on week 20

unread,
Feb 20, 2004, 7:19:46 PM2/20/04
to
"SloRide9430" <slori...@aol.common> wrote in message
news:20040220191100...@mb-m18.aol.com...


Man is that a low blow. Ouch.


tscottme

unread,
Feb 21, 2004, 7:57:54 AM2/21/04
to

SloRide9430 <slori...@aol.common> wrote in message
news:20040220191100...@mb-m18.aol.com...
>
>
> Who gives a rat's ass?
>
> y'know, Scott, I don't think he's Bullis.... to be that juvenile, it
must be
> Alex Cain.
>
>
> Safe truckin' !
>
> Slo

You're probably right.

TurboTrucker

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 2:20:45 PM2/22/04
to
"tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in news:Naedne0CRr221a7dRVn-
h...@comcast.com:

> Ricky is just a screen name for Bullis, Richard Bullis. He has no job
> other than creating new screen names and making up stories. I guess
> it's better than preying on children.

Is this really true?

I can usually spot a Bullis nym in a New York second...

If this is true, then I have been duped....

I kinda like the Rookie myself, and I feel he is misunderstood by many in
here....

We really ought to be helping him rather than dumping on him....unless it
IS Bullis....

~Tony~

TurboTrucker

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 2:23:09 PM2/22/04
to
"Richard" <anon...@127.000> wrote in
news:c10eg...@enews3.newsguy.com:

> When I'm on the road driving for a living, I don't play around on the


> internet unless I have plenty of time to kill.

Well....since your introduction into this group....you've managed to keep
your post count right up there and on a daily basis....which negates
everything you just said.

> And I sure as hell wouldn't pay some damn high price for the
> privilege.

Kinda hard to....on YOUR income....

~Tony~

Rocky Roads on week 20

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 2:41:32 PM2/22/04
to
TurboTrucker wrote in message ...


No no no. In reality, I am just another screen name for Scott. Or is he
just one of my screen names. I forget. ;-)

I can not figure it out. As bright as Scott is, how he could he miss that
one by miles. Maybe he was holding his atlas upside down. ;-)

Signed,
Rocky who just rolled over 4½ months.

For those of you who might have a Macintosh, 4½ means 4 1/2.

truckinsp

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 3:00:49 PM2/22/04
to

"TurboTrucker" <Dr...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:Xns94979248BA6...@216.77.188.18...

Tony, we TRIED helping him, but the only advice he wanted was
Bullis's.....which is another reason I am pretty sure he is Bullis...which
is why he is in my Killfile.... Another thing, he only showed up after we
all pretty much killfiled Bullis and wouldn't respond to his rants
anymore....I think he was using that free AOL offer.....haven't seen much of
him lately and before he was posting every couple of hours.....but then I do
have him killfiled


Rocky Roads on week 20

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 3:13:33 PM2/22/04
to
truckinsp > wrote in message ...

Oh truck. The person that can not admit traffic jams can last for over 2
hours.

If he looked at the URL I posted on the jam in I65 in Indiana, he would see
it lasted for over 6 hours.

I went by there about 4½ hours later, and the road condition signs were
still warning drivers about "All lanes closed."

Rocky


truckinsp

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 3:19:14 PM2/22/04
to

"Rocky Roads on week 20" <NotARealEm...@sorry.org> wrote in message
news:N38_b.72208$hR.14...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
I unblocked this dork to see how many messages he has made lately (not
many!!) and he comes back with this....well, Stoopid, then you weren't
CAUGHT in that traffic jam were you and YOU CANNOT claim it on your
log.....DID YOU SEE trucks sitting at the scene? My guess is you didn't,
because emergency personnel would have gotten them out of there.....NOW THIS
was the point of the original message, Bullis, and I am sorry if you aren't
smart enough to figure that out.....so go ahead, spread your spam....call me
any name you like, Bullis, like I care....back to the killfile!


TurboTrucker

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 4:15:39 PM2/22/04
to
"truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com> wrote in
news:RT7_b.3870$yZ1....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

> Tony, we TRIED helping him, but the only advice he wanted was
> Bullis's.....which is another reason I am pretty sure he is
> Bullis...which is why he is in my Killfile.... Another thing, he only
> showed up after we all pretty much killfiled Bullis and wouldn't
> respond to his rants anymore....I think he was using that free AOL
> offer.....haven't seen much of him lately and before he was posting
> every couple of hours.....but then I do have him killfiled

Hmmm....let me do some digging tonight....

~Tony~

informant

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 5:45:28 PM2/22/04
to

"TurboTrucker" <Dr...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9497A66BCB7...@216.77.188.18...

It's not Bullis, just a wannabe-Bullis.


realitytrucker

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 6:04:32 PM2/22/04
to
"truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com> wrote in message news:<RT7_b.3870$yZ1....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> have him killfiled\

I disagree with Tscott. As I said in a previous post it seems as if
Rookie has at least a little common sense whereas Bullis is a
blathering idiot in every sense of the word.
Rookie's problem is arrogance. He gets a little experience under his
belt and, like alot of newbies, thinks he's super trucker. It'll take
some kind of incident, perhaps a minor accident, to bring him to his
knees but it'll happen sooner or later.

Rocky Roads on week 20

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 6:33:07 PM2/22/04
to
"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote ...

> I disagree with Tscott. As I said in a previous post it seems as if
> Rookie has at least a little common sense whereas Bullis is a
> blathering idiot in every sense of the word.
> Rookie's problem is arrogance. He gets a little experience under his
> belt and, like alot of newbies, thinks he's super trucker. It'll take
> some kind of incident, perhaps a minor accident, to bring him to his
> knees but it'll happen sooner or later.


Thanks and I mean that.

While the company I work for has always been pretty good on payroll, I have
some questions about last weeks check. It looks like one trip is missing.

Who knows, I still might not make it to week 23, especially if David gets
his way.

Signed
Mr. Roads


David D Ruff

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 6:54:49 PM2/22/04
to
We think (including the turd) you're a liar.
"Rocky Roads on week 20" <NotARealEm...@sorry.org> wrote in message
news:c166i1$g...@library2.airnews.net...

realitytrucker

unread,
Feb 24, 2004, 3:25:26 AM2/24/04
to
> "Richard" <anon...@127.000> wrote in
> news:c10eg...@enews3.newsguy.com:
>
> > When I'm on the road driving for a living, I don't play around on the
> > internet unless I have plenty of time to kill.


Well, since you DON'T have a job and are living off of welfare and
relative's handouts that explains why you post day in and day out.

tscottme

unread,
Feb 24, 2004, 7:27:27 AM2/24/04
to

TurboTrucker <Dr...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:Xns94979248BA6...@216.77.188.18...

He may not be Bullis but one of his groupies, or more pathetically a
groupie's groupie.

--

Scott
--------
"One person can make a difference. But most of the time they probably
shouldn't."
Marge Simpson


Trai' La Trash

unread,
Feb 24, 2004, 3:08:08 PM2/24/04
to
This guy is so plonked.
Everytime I come here all I ever see him post is replies to bullshit.
Am I wrong? Does this guy even drive? or just respond to trolls every post?


"tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in message

news:Y_mdnYio_-6...@comcast.com...

Amy D

unread,
Feb 24, 2004, 4:44:39 PM2/24/04
to
LOL--thanks, Scott. Wasn't looking to increase fuel mileage -- only
phone minutes. :)

amy

tscottme wrote:

> Amy look for "pocketmail". My brother had the first version that only
> worked on analog cell phones and any landline. Their newer version
> works on digital cell phones as well as any other type of phone. My
> brother's until cost about $100 and service was $10 a month. You could
> send and receive unlimited email. It worked with any telephone by
> holding it to the handset of the phone and sending acoustic signals
> across the line. It's been highly reviewed, it's cheaper than a
> conventional ISP and will work over cell phones, now.
>
> http://www.pocketmail.com/us/
>
> I don't think it will increase your fuel mileage. ;-)
>
> --
>
> Scott
> --------
> "Mr. President, can you offer any proof that it wasn't your clone that
> served in the Texas Air National Guard during the 1970s?"
>
> Amy D <amy...@joimail.com> wrote in message
> news:1038jlt...@corp.supernews.com...
>
>>
>>Rocky Roads on week 19 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Richard" <anon...@127.000> wrote in message
>
> @enews3.newsguy.com...


>
>>>>And I sure as hell wouldn't pay some damn high price for the
>
> privilege.
>
>>>
>>>

>>>I pay absolutely NOTHING for my wireless internet. I got the $10 a
>
> month
>
>>>vision on my Sprint PCS because I liked things I could do with it.
>>>
>>>When I found out I could also use it for the internet, I did not
>
> have to pay
>
>>>any extra for that.
>>>
>>>Basically, I am getting free unlimited wireless internet because I
>
> had it on
>
>>>my phone and didn't even know it until after I started driving a
>
> truck.
>
>>>Rocky
>>>
>>
>>I thought about getting Ron an Email Station <by Earthlink> -- he
>>despises the internet <thinks it's satan's spawn> but we could have
>
> fun
>
>>with email. Both Best Buy and SPrint told me it's not possible to
>
> hook
>
>>the cell phone up to it. True?? I don't see what the problem is.....
>>
>>amy
>>
>
>
>

Amy D

unread,
Feb 24, 2004, 4:45:55 PM2/24/04
to
Agreed -- he'd rather the phone call -- sometimes I want to send him MTT
posts....... :)

amy

Roger wrote:

> If the only function of the devive is to send/receive email and you need
> a phone line to use it, why noy just use the phone? I would much rather
> have my wife call me than send me an email.


>
> Rocky Roads on week 19 wrote:
>
>> "Amy D" <amy...@joimail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1038jlt...@corp.supernews.com...
>>

>>> I thought about getting Ron an Email Station <by Earthlink> -- he
>>> despises the internet <thinks it's satan's spawn> but we could have fun
>>> with email. Both Best Buy and SPrint told me it's not possible to hook
>>> the cell phone up to it. True?? I don't see what the problem is.....
>>>
>>> amy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>> I've seen little gadgets, where the sole purpose was just e-mail.
>>
>> It is basically an e-mail only computer that hooks up to a phone line.
>>
>> In other words, it is phone line only and they are not fancy enough to
>> add
>> the software needed to support a USB connection to a cell phone. I
>> can not
>> even say for sure if it had a USB port on it.
>>
>>
>

Amy D

unread,
Feb 24, 2004, 4:50:36 PM2/24/04
to

No, no, no, t'ain't Scott........Scott is too honest .....a little "out
there" but honest....... :)

amy

Amy D

unread,
Feb 24, 2004, 4:54:55 PM2/24/04
to
Are you plonking Scott? No....he shouldn't be.....but.......ya know.... :)

amy

Trai' La Trash

unread,
Feb 25, 2004, 11:21:00 PM2/25/04
to
Well ya know I just try chop out the BS post incase there is something
posted that I might really like to know or read.

At this point I think I'm ready to die!
I ran an auto auction today and forgot what kind of chaos those places are!
6 full loads of cars in one day and my azz is beat.
Of course showing off to the newer drivers that a trailer can be loaded
allot faster than they do it was kinda fun.

Trai'

Amy D

unread,
Feb 25, 2004, 11:57:52 PM2/25/04
to

Trai' La Trash wrote:

> Well ya know I just try chop out the BS post incase there is something
> posted that I might really like to know or read.
>
> At this point I think I'm ready to die!
> I ran an auto auction today and forgot what kind of chaos those places are!
> 6 full loads of cars in one day and my azz is beat.
> Of course showing off to the newer drivers that a trailer can be loaded
> allot faster than they do it was kinda fun.

LOL--get a good night's sleep. Getting old sucks don't it? :)

amy

Rocky

unread,
Apr 25, 2007, 6:54:30 PM4/25/07
to

"tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in message
news:Naedne0CRr2...@comcast.com...

> Ricky is just a screen name for Bullis, Richard Bullis. He has no job
> other than creating new screen names and making up stories. I guess
> it's better than preying on children.
>
> --
>
> Scott


In my "Flamebait" documentation I have been looking for the above piece of
the "Flamebait Puzzle" for a long time.

It shows where Tim found the "Flamebait" that he used on March 25, 2004.

It is the "Rocky is Richard" Flamebait that would help run MTT into the
ground.

Do not forget, shortly after Tim reposted Scott's "Flamebait"
Jeff/Zčke/Habda would add his own "Flamebait" by posting with my name and
e-mail address for almost 2 months.

TNX
Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net

bbelly

unread,
Apr 25, 2007, 9:11:30 PM4/25/07
to
Document away ...

waste of effort

I can see you are obviously not Richard Bullis, and as has been stated
several times by several others, he comes across much better than you do.

It's an old thread ... just let go of the past.

I'll bet you can't

Ed Propes

unread,
Apr 25, 2007, 10:29:52 PM4/25/07
to

What the hell are you doing?

Top

Dave Smith

unread,
Apr 26, 2007, 7:38:38 AM4/26/07
to
Ed Propes wrote:
> >
> > TNX
> > Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net
>
> What the hell are you doing?


he is basking in the light of all the attention you are giving him.

Rocky

unread,
Apr 26, 2007, 4:44:57 PM4/26/07
to

"Ed Propes" <e...@linux-e7a8.site> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.04.26...@linux-e7a8.site...


Don't look at me.

You were the one that posted "On Topic vs Flames" only to find out that
every single poster that replied to you wants to continue with the bullshit
and FLAMES.

How can we even try to put an end to all the flamebait/trollshit that Dave
Ruff constantly throws around if nobody sees it for what it is?

Plus I see that Tim is up to his old status of posting nothing but bullshit
himself. If he could be honest about my personal life I wouldn't mind Tim
talking about it, but all he does is twist the facts and turns it into
"Flamebait."

Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net


Rocky

unread,
Apr 26, 2007, 4:52:54 PM4/26/07
to

"bbelly" <brian-be...@SPAMshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:6%SXh.129299$aG1.30343@pd7urf3no...


Dave Ruff and realitytrucker try to change the past all the time so I'd do
my best not to let them change the past with their bullshit. I know where
the flamebait was started and I know who continues to post it.

If anybody on this newsgroup decides that "Flamebait" is as real as the
Trolls that use it, then this group may learn from the past. Instead all
they do is post more "Flamebait."

Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net


Rocky

unread,
Apr 26, 2007, 6:01:21 PM4/26/07
to

"David D Ruff" <sword...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KNKdnSiOt_J...@comcast.com...
> Why do you find it necessary to post every little bullshit item that
> happens
> in your day? Are you trying to change our opinion on how we feel you
> screwed
> up? Or are you going to extreme leghts to show us your just a regular guy?
> Well none of it is working. You would change our opinion by doing your job
> and give us a post like "I did my job today and had no problems and I will
> try to do the same tomorrow.


PURE FLAMEBAIT

What good did the above post do for this newsgroup? <EOT>

Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net


realitytrucker

unread,
Apr 27, 2007, 12:06:59 AM4/27/07
to
On Apr 26, 5:01 pm, "Rocky" <wook...@att.net> wrote:
> "David D Ruff" <swordfi...@comcast.net> wrote in messagenews:KNKdnSiOt_J...@comcast.com...

And what good did the four or five response to a two year old thread
that you made do except show everyone once again how patheticly
desperate you are. There was nothing at all wrong with Daves original
post except that it may have offended poor little Roger. Why do you
rhink I said that kind of crap belonged in a 'blog and not a
newsgroup? Because none of us cared then and we STILL don't.

You're a sick fuck, loser. You have nothing going on in your life at
all, do you. You mustn't if you have enough time on your hands to go
thru the archives and dig out stuff like this. If you weren't such an
arrogant piece of shit one might actually feel sorry for you and might
possibly try and befriend you. But it wouldn't last long...not once
you showed your true colors .

(Wonder how long before I see THAT phrase thrown back at me)

realitytrucker

unread,
Apr 27, 2007, 12:36:12 AM4/27/07
to
On Apr 26, 3:44 pm, "Rocky" <wook...@att.net> wrote:
> "Ed Propes" <e...@linux-e7a8.site> wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2007.04.26...@linux-e7a8.site...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:54:30 -0600, Rocky wrote:
>
> >> "tscottme" <blahb...@blah.net> wrote in message

> >>news:Naedne0CRr2...@comcast.com...
> >>> Ricky is just a screen name for Bullis, Richard Bullis. He has no job
> >>> other than creating new screen names and making up stories. I guess
> >>> it's better than preying on children.
>
> >>> --
>
> >>> Scott
>
> >> In my "Flamebait" documentation I have been looking for the above piece
> >> of
> >> the "Flamebait Puzzle" for a long time.
>
> >> It shows where Tim found the "Flamebait" that he used on March 25, 2004.
>
> >> It is the "Rocky is Richard" Flamebait that would help run MTT into the
> >> ground.
>
> >> Do not forget, shortly after Tim reposted Scott's "Flamebait"
> >> Jeff/Zèke/Habda would add his own "Flamebait" by posting with my name and

> >> e-mail address for almost 2 months.
>
> >> TNX
> >> Rocky -http://wookiee.home.att.net

>
> > What the hell are you doing?
>
> Don't look at me.

"It wasn't me. It wasn't me"

>
> You were the one that posted "On Topic vs Flames" only to find out that
> every single poster that replied to you wants to continue with the bullshit
> and FLAMES.

"You did it. He did it. They did it but it wasn't me"


And you really expect any of us to believe that you are mature enough
to pass ANY states CDL examination?

Rocky

unread,
Apr 27, 2007, 2:08:20 AM4/27/07
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177646818....@n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

It is a new day and you are a sick fuck loser.

I saw what you said on Top's thread and I will not answer it there, but it
is clear you are infected by flamebait and that is all you are is flamebait.

This newsgroup does not need Trolls like you.

Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net


Ed Propes

unread,
Apr 27, 2007, 1:26:45 AM4/27/07
to

It is truly sad to see how weak you are.

Top


Rocky

unread,
Apr 27, 2007, 2:45:20 AM4/27/07
to

"Ed Propes" <e...@linux-e7a8.site> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.04.27....@linux-e7a8.site...

It would have been easy for me to handle if you had given me some sort of
indication that you knew Tim was still bullshitting the group.


Ed Propes

unread,
Apr 27, 2007, 2:17:04 PM4/27/07
to

Do you remember me talking about this wasn't going to happen over
overnight? How you had to have patience? How you had to give everyone time
to find out what was going on? Remeber all that? How long was before was
it before you were right back doing the same old crap?

Top

Rocky

unread,
Apr 28, 2007, 4:36:01 AM4/28/07
to

"Ed Propes" <e...@linux-e7a8.site> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.04.27...@linux-e7a8.site...


not quite the "same old crap." That was more along the lines of documenting
for future reference.

While you might not like those post, I might refer to 4/26/07 as the day I
exposed a bunch of crazy flame-war post from a Troll.

Now to quote Dim Jones: Hey everybody lets all post the word "Ignore"
together so we can stop posting about the poster we can't stop posting
about.

IMHO the first cure for this newsgroup will be for it to recognize how much
useless flamebait it has taken on.

BTW I got to do something neat yesterday. I got to drive my truck through
a State Park.

Rocky @ http://wookiee.home.att.net


Zeke

unread,
Apr 28, 2007, 7:49:47 AM4/28/07
to

"Rocky" <woo...@att.net> wrote in message
news:EeWdndlzAZG4mq7b...@giganews.com...

>
>
> BTW I got to do something neat yesterday. I got to drive my truck
> through
> a State Park.
>

Nobody but you cares.

bbelly

unread,
Apr 29, 2007, 10:50:39 AM4/29/07
to
Rocky wrote:

> not quite the "same old crap." That was more along the lines of documenting
> for future reference.

It's weird enough that you spend so much time and effort dredging up the
past.

Now you are actively planning to dredge up the present in the future
which will become the past in the present ... oh this is too confusing ...

Grow up in the meantime. Get over yourself. Don't go away mad ... just
go away.

Rocky

unread,
Apr 29, 2007, 11:09:54 AM4/29/07
to

"bbelly" <brian-be...@SPAMshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:3h2Zh.144109$DE1.19485@pd7urf2no...


Why? I'm here to protect posters from being Trolled to death by the likes
of you, Dave Ruff, Scott and the UsenetBomber.

Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net


realitytrucker

unread,
Apr 29, 2007, 7:07:02 PM4/29/07
to
On Apr 29, 10:09 am, "Rocky" <wook...@att.net> wrote:
> "bbelly" <brian-bellivea...@SPAMshaw.ca> wrote in message

No you're not. You're here to troll...plain and simple...a fact that
is obvious to everyone here except your. As far as new posters are
concerned you are only here to be the first to respond to their posts
so you can kiss some ass and try to make allies. But it never works,
does it. They can see who the problem is in just a few posts. And
they recognize that the problem is YOU.

>
> Rocky -http://wookiee.home.att.net


Rocky

unread,
Apr 29, 2007, 10:22:09 PM4/29/07
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177888022.5...@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

> On Apr 29, 10:09 am, "Rocky" <wook...@att.net> wrote:
>> "bbelly" <brian-bellivea...@SPAMshaw.ca> wrote in message
>>
>> news:3h2Zh.144109$DE1.19485@pd7urf2no...
>>
>> > Rocky wrote:
>>
>> > > not quite the "same old crap." That was more along the lines of
>> documenting
>> > > for future reference.
>>
>> > It's weird enough that you spend so much time and effort dredging up
>> > the
>> > past.
>>
>> > Now you are actively planning to dredge up the present in the future
>> > which will become the past in the present ... oh this is too confusing
>> > ...
>>
>> > Grow up in the meantime. Get over yourself. Don't go away mad ... just
>> > go away.
>>
>> Why? I'm here to protect posters from being Trolled to death by the
>> likes
>> of you, Dave Ruff, Scott and the UsenetBomber.
>
> No you're not. You're here to troll...plain and simple...


Tim, open your eyes. I've had more on-topic replies just today than you get
for an entire month. And if it weren't for you lover boy Davfraud Ruff you
might not get any replies at all. If Davfraud Ruff would just quit feeding
you my task would be easy.

It should be obvious that you are just a Flame-eating, Flame-throwing Troll
in Denial K00k who appears to be ready to lose it again.

< more trash from Tim flushed >

Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net


Gashauler

unread,
Apr 30, 2007, 1:26:04 PM4/30/07
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177888022.5...@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> No you're not. You're here to troll...plain and simple...a fact that
> is obvious to everyone here except your. As far as new posters are
> concerned you are only here to be the first to respond to their posts
> so you can kiss some ass and try to make allies. But it never works,
> does it. They can see who the problem is in just a few posts. And
> they recognize that the problem is YOU.
>
Yeah, why doesn't he put up all those old posts that proves that point. Can
you imagine if we all stooped to his level and posted old posts about him.
It would paint a clear picture on how delusional he really is. That's ok
people are watching!


Rocky

unread,
Apr 30, 2007, 4:03:19 PM4/30/07
to
On Apr 30, 12:26 pm, "Gashauler" <swordfi...@comcast.net> wrote:
> "realitytrucker" <timp1...@gmail.com> wrote in message


Dave that was done so people would remember the past properly and not
the way you try to make it look.

As for Tim. When I get around to it, I'll turn most my web sites off,
and redo my wookiee site a bit so there is no mention of a "Flame-war"
on the main screen.

If Tim is willing to play cool, I will do my best at playing cool
myself.

Rocky

realitytrucker

unread,
Apr 30, 2007, 8:23:17 PM4/30/07
to
On Apr 30, 12:26 pm, "Gashauler" <swordfi...@comcast.net> wrote:
> "realitytrucker" <timp1...@gmail.com> wrote in message

He's already wasting bandwidth by posting useless crap from the past.
If we did the same thing with his old posts there wouldn't be any room
for legit OT posts.

Rocky

unread,
Apr 30, 2007, 10:47:52 PM4/30/07
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177978997.4...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...


Remember when you posted this: "Call me "RealityLessTrucker" if you want,
Sweetie. Most of us here at MTT think your real name is RICHARD BULLIS!
Take the challenge, COWARD, prove us wrong. I, for one, don't think you
can!"

"Most?" Tim, you know I can dig up old post and to date all I see to
support your "Most" is a post from Scott and you know that Amy flat out
disagreed with Scott because I found a post that proves that.

In other words, when you started this everlasting flame-war on March 25,
2004, with the word "Most" you were bullshit and you continue to be bullshit
to this day..

Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 4:49:36 PM5/1/07
to

"Richard" <anon...@127.000> wrote in message
news:c10eg...@enews3.newsguy.com...
> Richard Jones wrote:
>
> > Please Don't get me confused with Bullis. I am not him.
> > I have my own small Trucking company and I don't want to confused with
> > him nor do I want people to ASSume that I'm "Bullis" trying to use
> > another screen name.
>
> He wasn't speaking of YOU. He was speaking of "Ricky the rookie" and
> saying
> that I am him.
> Sorry to burst your egotistical bubble scott, but I ain't "rookie ricky"
> either.
> When I'm on the road driving for a living, I don't play around on the
> internet unless I have plenty of time to kill.
> And I sure as hell wouldn't pay some damn high price for the privilege.


Hey UsenetBomber

When did you learn how to count?

With the post above, it is Amy, Richard and Rocky that all said that Richard
is *not* Rocky.

Scott and Tim said Richard was Rocky. BFD.

I would *not* call 2 out of 5 the "Most."

I would say that you count exactly like a Troll would count if you think 2
is "Most" of 5.

And to think, this everlasting flame-war is just because Tim counts like a
Troll.

Rocky http://wookiee.home.att.net


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 4:52:44 PM5/1/07
to

"Rocky Roads on week 19" <NotARealEm...@sorry.org> wrote in message
news:c129vf$8...@library1.airnews.net...

> "tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in message
> news:cNKdnay8SdH...@comcast.com...
>> I'm referring to the soap opera star that claims to be working as a
>> rookie driver and posting every detail of his life to MTT.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Scott
>
>
> While you have great advise, your common sense is lacking.
>
> If you are so smart. Read my post on the "Fatal accident closes I-65 and
> then go to indystar.com and tell everybody how I managed to get that story
> correct.
>
> Here is the URL
> http://www.indystar.com/articles/4/122042-5774-092.html
>
>
> And here is a quote from the article. This is for truck. It is possible
> for a wreck to block traffic over 2 hours.
>
> "The crash happened in Boone County just south of the interchange with
> Ind.
> 267 and tied up traffic for almost six hours."
>
>
> Now for shooting at point blank range. Rocky is not Richard


Tim, you can not forget to count this post. I came right out and said that
"Rocky is not Richard" and you would still take Scott's word over Amy's.
How do you say dumb troll in a polite way?


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:13:47 PM5/1/07
to

"ld" <onth...@fartoolong.com> wrote in message
news:40344b3b$1...@news.vic.com...

>
>
> tscottme wrote:
>>Ricky is just a screen name for Bullis, Richard Bullis. He has no job
>>other than creating new screen names and making up stories. I guess
>>it's better than preying on children.
>>
>>--
>>
>>Scott
>>--------
>>
>
>
> Nah... Richard ain't Rookie.. but there is a guy on the Trucknet forums
> who sounds VERY familiar in all his "a local cop wouldn't DARE ask for
> my logbook or he'd be in court" statements.... goes by
> "lostforevermore".. sounds SO familiar... just can't place who talks
> like that....
>
>
> <grin>
>
>
>
> Dave
>
>
> --
> Posted at http://www.layover.com/
> Trucking jobs, news, features, chat rooms, and more!


Mr. UsenetBomber.

This post makes 4 posters that said "Richard ain't Rookie" so that makes 4
against 2 right now and I still have some more post to look through.

Rocky http://wookiee.home.att.net


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:17:15 PM5/1/07
to

"TurboTrucker" <Dr...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:Xns94979248BA6...@216.77.188.18...
> "tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in news:Naedne0CRr221a7dRVn-
> h...@comcast.com:

>
>> Ricky is just a screen name for Bullis, Richard Bullis. He has no job
>> other than creating new screen names and making up stories. I guess
>> it's better than preying on children.
>
> Is this really true?
>
> I can usually spot a Bullis nym in a New York second...
>
> If this is true, then I have been duped....
>
> I kinda like the Rookie myself, and I feel he is misunderstood by many in
> here....
>
> We really ought to be helping him rather than dumping on him....unless it
> IS Bullis....
>
> ~Tony~


Mr. Usenetbomber.

How did you count this one? I'd say it looks more like a vote for Amy than
Scott wouldn't you?

That makes 5 to 2 now and don't worry, believe it or not, I think there was
one more idiot that agreed with Scott. I'll keep looking, there aren't many
post left in this thread.

Rocky http://wookiee.home.att.net


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:19:20 PM5/1/07
to

"truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:RT7_b.3870$yZ1....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...

>
> "TurboTrucker" <Dr...@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns94979248BA6...@216.77.188.18...
>> "tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in news:Naedne0CRr221a7dRVn-
>> h...@comcast.com:
>>
>> > Ricky is just a screen name for Bullis, Richard Bullis. He has no job
>> > other than creating new screen names and making up stories. I guess
>> > it's better than preying on children.
>>
>> Is this really true?
>>
>> I can usually spot a Bullis nym in a New York second...
>>
>> If this is true, then I have been duped....
>>
>> I kinda like the Rookie myself, and I feel he is misunderstood by many in
>> here....
>>
>> We really ought to be helping him rather than dumping on him....unless it
>> IS Bullis....
>>
>> ~Tony~
>
> Tony, we TRIED helping him, but the only advice he wanted was
> Bullis's.....which is another reason I am pretty sure he is Bullis...which
> is why he is in my Killfile.... Another thing, he only showed up after we
> all pretty much killfiled Bullis and wouldn't respond to his rants
> anymore....I think he was using that free AOL offer.....haven't seen much
> of
> him lately and before he was posting every couple of hours.....but then I
> do
> have him killfiled


Oh gawd. I wonder who started the above flamebait.


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:23:53 PM5/1/07
to

"informant" <x...@yyy.zzz> wrote in message
news:103ic8m...@news.supernews.com...

>
> "TurboTrucker" <Dr...@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns9497A66BCB7...@216.77.188.18...

>> "truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com> wrote in
>> news:RT7_b.3870$yZ1....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

>>
>> > Tony, we TRIED helping him, but the only advice he wanted was
>> > Bullis's.....which is another reason I am pretty sure he is
>> > Bullis...which is why he is in my Killfile.... Another thing, he only
>> > showed up after we all pretty much killfiled Bullis and wouldn't
>> > respond to his rants anymore....I think he was using that free AOL
>> > offer.....haven't seen much of him lately and before he was posting
>> > every couple of hours.....but then I do have him killfiled
>>
>> Hmmm....let me do some digging tonight....
>
> It's not Bullis, just a wannabe-Bullis.


Mr. UsenetBomber,

This means Tony fully agreed with Amy so the score is still 5 to 2 against
Rocky being Richard and yet you would still say "Most."

Guess we can pretty much tell that if you hadn't sided with Scott, he would
have been left all alone!

Rocky http://wookiee.home.att.net


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:27:09 PM5/1/07
to

"Rocky" <woo...@att.net> wrote in message
news:cISdnY80p7BzMqrb...@giganews.com...

Whoops, "informant" posted the above, not Tony, so that makes the score 6 to
2 against you and Scott..


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:28:52 PM5/1/07
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.0402...@posting.google.com...
> "truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:<RT7_b.3870$yZ1....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...

>> "TurboTrucker" <Dr...@nospam.net> wrote in message
>> news:Xns94979248BA6...@216.77.188.18...
>> > "tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in news:Naedne0CRr221a7dRVn-
>> > h...@comcast.com:
>> >
>> > > Ricky is just a screen name for Bullis, Richard Bullis. He has no
>> > > job
>> > > other than creating new screen names and making up stories. I guess
>> > > it's better than preying on children.
>> >
>> > Is this really true?
>> >
>> > I can usually spot a Bullis nym in a New York second...
>> >
>> > If this is true, then I have been duped....
>> >
>> > I kinda like the Rookie myself, and I feel he is misunderstood by many
>> > in
>> > here....
>> >
>> > We really ought to be helping him rather than dumping on him....unless
>> > it
>> > IS Bullis....
>> >
>> > ~Tony~
>>
>> Tony, we TRIED helping him, but the only advice he wanted was
>> Bullis's.....which is another reason I am pretty sure he is
>> Bullis...which
>> is why he is in my Killfile.... Another thing, he only showed up after
>> we
>> all pretty much killfiled Bullis and wouldn't respond to his rants
>> anymore....I think he was using that free AOL offer.....haven't seen much
>> of
>> him lately and before he was posting every couple of hours.....but then I
>> do
>> have him killfiled\
>
> I disagree with Tscott. As I said in a previous post it seems as if
> Rookie has at least a little common sense whereas Bullis is a
> blathering idiot in every sense of the word.
> Rookie's problem is arrogance. He gets a little experience under his
> belt and, like alot of newbies, thinks he's super trucker. It'll take
> some kind of incident, perhaps a minor accident, to bring him to his
> knees but it'll happen sooner or later.


7 to 1 because you yourself were an anti-Scott! Yet you would still claim
you voted with Scott just yesterday or was it this morning. Either way.


realitytrucker

unread,
May 1, 2007, 5:32:31 PM5/1/07
to
On May 1, 5:28 pm, "Rocky" <wook...@att.net> wrote:
> "realitytrucker" <timp1...@aol.com> wrote in message

>
> news:8a7d8469.0402...@posting.google.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > <news:RT7_b.3870$yZ1....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> >> "TurboTrucker" <D...@nospam.net> wrote in message
> >>news:Xns94979248BA6...@216.77.188.18...
> >> > "tscottme" <blahb...@blah.net> wrote in news:Naedne0CRr221a7dRVn-
> you voted with Scott just yesterday or was it this morning. Either way.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

And nine posts in a row just proves what a pathetic idiot you are.
Anyone desperate enough to search the such old posts to further prove
what a moron he is is one sick freak.

Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:32:34 PM5/1/07
to

"tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in message
news:Y_mdnYio_-6...@comcast.com...
>
>
> TurboTrucker <Dr...@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns94979248BA6...@216.77.188.18...
>> "tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in news:Naedne0CRr221a7dRVn-

>> h...@comcast.com:
>>
>> > Ricky is just a screen name for Bullis, Richard Bullis. He has no
> job
>> > other than creating new screen names and making up stories. I guess
>> > it's better than preying on children.
>>
>> Is this really true?
>>
>> I can usually spot a Bullis nym in a New York second...
>>
>> If this is true, then I have been duped....
>>
>> I kinda like the Rookie myself, and I feel he is misunderstood by many
> in
>> here....
>>
>> We really ought to be helping him rather than dumping on him....unless
> it
>> IS Bullis....
>>
>> ~Tony~
>
> He may not be Bullis but one of his groupies, or more pathetically a
> groupie's groupie.
>
> --
>
> Scott


UsenetBomber

WOW, this means Scott changed his mind meaning absolutely nobody thought
that I was Richard.

In other words the score was 8 to 0 and yet you would still claim "Most"
with a 0!


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:33:47 PM5/1/07
to

"Trai' La Trash" <YouAintS...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:c1gb06$1hugrc$1...@ID-208857.news.uni-berlin.de...

>
> "tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in message
> news:Y_mdnYio_-6...@comcast.com...
>>
>>
>> TurboTrucker <Dr...@nospam.net> wrote in message
>> news:Xns94979248BA6...@216.77.188.18...
>> > "tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in news:Naedne0CRr221a7dRVn-
>> > h...@comcast.com:
>> >
>> > > Ricky is just a screen name for Bullis, Richard Bullis. He has no
>> job
>> > > other than creating new screen names and making up stories. I guess
>> > > it's better than preying on children.
>> >
>> > Is this really true?
>> >
>> > I can usually spot a Bullis nym in a New York second...
>> >
>> > If this is true, then I have been duped....
>> >
>> > I kinda like the Rookie myself, and I feel he is misunderstood by many
>> in
>> > here....
>> >
>> > We really ought to be helping him rather than dumping on him....unless
>> it
>> > IS Bullis....
>> >
>> > ~Tony~
>>
>> He may not be Bullis but one of his groupies, or more pathetically a
>> groupie's groupie.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Scott
>> --------
>> "One person can make a difference. But most of the time they probably
>> shouldn't."
>> Marge Simpson
>>
>>
>
> This guy is so plonked.
> Everytime I come here all I ever see him post is replies to bullshit.
> Am I wrong? Does this guy even drive? or just respond to trolls every
> post?


Hey UsenetBomber, this guy had you pegged as a Troll!


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:37:51 PM5/1/07
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.0402...@posting.google.com...
> "Rocky Bullis Roads on week 19" <NotARealEm...@sorry.org> wrote in
> message news:<c1507r$c...@library2.airnews.net>...
>> "Richard" <anon...@127.000> wrote ...
>> > I will say this, he has the guts to tough it out as a rookie in this
>> shitty
>> > weather.
>>
>>
>> Sorry to disappoint you, but the last time the weather got bad, I took a
>> load to Ft. Pierce, Florida and spent the weekend in Marianna, Florida.
>>
>> Backing is no big deal anymore. I realize a lot of my time was spent
>> backing, so I work harder at getting it right the first time.
>>
>> This one is for you. I hope you do not mind my new name. Since Scott
>> and
>> David want to believe we are the same person, I decided, I would really
>> throw them for a curve. ;-)
>>
>> Rocky . . . on the end of my 19th week.
>
> Probably not real smart including "Bullis" in your screen name. Alot
> of people are already accusing you of being Bullis so if you're really
> not I'd lose that new addition.


Tim, or should I say Mr. UsenetBomber, where did you loose count. At this
point in the thread NOBODY thought I was "Bullis" not even Scott!


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:39:19 PM5/1/07
to

"SloRide9430" <slori...@aol.common> wrote in message
news:20040220191100...@mb-m18.aol.com...
> >From: Rookie
>
>>Since David does not want to see me get past 22 weeks, I am thinking of
>>going straight to "Rocky Roads on week 23" a few weeks early.
>>
>>What do you think of that?
>
>
> Who gives a rat's ass?
>
> y'know, Scott, I don't think he's Bullis.... to be that juvenile, it must
> be
> Alex Cain.
>
>
> Safe truckin' !
>
> Slo

Mr. UsenetBomber, I think this is 9 to 0 now. I'll have to add them all up
later but nobody thought I was Richard then and I doubt if anybody does now
either.


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:40:43 PM5/1/07
to

"tscottme" <blah...@blah.net> wrote in message
news:rcOdna9rQo5...@comcast.com...

>
> SloRide9430 <slori...@aol.common> wrote in message
> news:20040220191100...@mb-m18.aol.com...
>>
>>
>> Who gives a rat's ass?
>>
>> y'know, Scott, I don't think he's Bullis.... to be that juvenile, it
> must be
>> Alex Cain.
>>
>>
>> Safe truckin' !
>>
>> Slo
>
> You're probably right.
>
> --
>
> Scott

Mr. UsenetBomber,

Once more we have an indication that Scott changed his mind. So at 9 to 0
with you at 0 you would still say "Most?"


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:46:06 PM5/1/07
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1178055151.8...@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

Tim,

I'm just proving that you are a bullshitter, since apparently you don't know
that. Or is it just that you do a good job at using bullshit to cover your
bullshit.


realitytrucker

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:11:19 PM5/1/07
to
On May 1, 5:46 pm, "Rocky" <wook...@att.net> wrote:
> "realitytrucker" <timp1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> bullshit.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

No, with an additional six mindless babbling posts you are just
proving what a desperate, delusional little boy you are. Like I told
you, I don't need to present any "evidence". You keep doing the job
for me. You prove, with every post, what an idiot you really are.

realitytrucker

unread,
May 1, 2007, 6:23:21 PM5/1/07
to
On May 1, 5:33 pm, "Rocky" <wook...@att.net> wrote:
> "Trai' La Trash" <YouAintSpammi...@aol.com> wrote in messagenews:c1gb06$1hugrc$1...@ID-208857.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "tscottme" <blahb...@blah.net> wrote in message
> >news:Y_mdnYio_-6...@comcast.com...
>
> >> TurboTrucker <D...@nospam.net> wrote in message
> >>news:Xns94979248BA6...@216.77.188.18...
> >> > "tscottme" <blahb...@blah.net> wrote in news:Naedne0CRr221a7dRVn-
> Hey UsenetBomber, this guy had you pegged as a Troll!- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Strange how you reach that conclusion since my s/n is nowhere to be
found in the post. I remember, tho, and he was talking about you or
possibly Bullis.

Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 9:03:26 PM5/1/07
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1178057479.6...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...


That you used the word "Most" when in reality there were ZERO posters that
throught I was Richard because even Scott changed his mind after getting
input from the others, and one of those was YOU!
>


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 9:05:08 PM5/1/07
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1178058201.9...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

I told you he had you pegged!

Now be gone delusion boy.


realitytrucker

unread,
May 1, 2007, 10:03:08 PM5/1/07
to
> - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Who cares. You have proven to the group "who" you are and that
person is not wanted here.

Doug McCrary

unread,
May 1, 2007, 10:23:50 PM5/1/07
to

"Rocky" <woo...@att.net> wrote in message
news:ce-dnSMUS6vEfqrb...@giganews.com...
Bullis is just a pedo - you are (or should be) a certified, card-carrying CRAZY
person.
Not that anyone cares any more.


Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 10:40:04 PM5/1/07
to

If that were true, why do you have to stoop to so many outright lies
and bullshit to try and get your way?

You have to become a Troll just to make Dave Ruff happy! What a sick
poster you are. God, I'd hate to think of what else you would do for
Davfraud Rufbish besides paint your face green.

Rocky

realitytrucker

unread,
May 1, 2007, 10:58:25 PM5/1/07
to
> Rocky- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

I HAVEN"T "gotten my way". You are still here nymshifting and
trolling.

Rocky

unread,
May 1, 2007, 11:03:33 PM5/1/07
to


Maybe you are using the wrong color green on your face. Try emeral
green next time not pea green.

Rocky * http://wookiee.home.att.net

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages