Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Blame Barry for reallitytrucker -> FUBAR

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Kyo Sakamoto

unread,
Nov 15, 2005, 1:34:52 PM11/15/05
to
A while back, realitytrucker said something about stopping his shit if I
posted my CDL to the internet.

Well, I did, I posted the back of it and someone pointed out it was an
Illinois CDL. His words were something like "It looks just like the back of
an Illinois Drivers License, but the Driver's license has a weight
restriction on it.

Duh, that missing weight restriction was because it was an Illinois CDL with
no weight restriction.

THE CRAP SHOULD HAVE ENDED RIGHT THERE.

Then Barry/Troublemaker post some crap and realitytrucker went DEEP SOUTH
making it sound like it wasn't a valid CDL.

RT, you have been given you scan of my CDL. You know from other post it was
an Illinois CDL now please please please stop your shit.

Just because you claim you do not like me, is not a valid reason for you not
to believe me.

Way to go Barry, now we have to call realitytrucker FUBAR.


TurboTrucker

unread,
Nov 15, 2005, 2:53:49 PM11/15/05
to
"Kyo Sakamoto" <woo...@att.net> wrote in
news:gTpef.105772$zb5....@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:

> A while back, realitytrucker said something about stopping his shit if
> I posted my CDL to the internet.
>
> Well, I did, I posted the back of it and someone pointed out it was an
> Illinois CDL. His words were something like "It looks just like the
> back of an Illinois Drivers License, but the Driver's license has a
> weight restriction on it.
>
> Duh, that missing weight restriction was because it was an Illinois
> CDL with no weight restriction.
>
> THE CRAP SHOULD HAVE ENDED RIGHT THERE.

Why? You're the only person that really cares whether or not anyone
believes you drive a truck. Personally, I couldn't give a damn.

What you want from members of this group, is not going to happen. You fail
to realize that not one person has any desire to interact with you on any
level, because you are a complete idiot, and NOT because you may not drive
a truck. Half the people that participate in here don't drive trucks for a
living, and you don't see THEM surrounded by so much controversy, do you?

The reason why you are constantly subjected to the phrase "wannabe" and
"RTQ", is simply because it gets a reaction from you. Thou protesteth far
too much. Where there is smoke, the fire must be there somewhere, and YOU
fan the flames with each post you make.

Please....grow up little boy.


realitytrucker

unread,
Nov 15, 2005, 2:57:22 PM11/15/05
to

Kyo Sakamoto wrote:
> A while back, realitytrucker said something about stopping his shit if I
> posted my CDL to the internet.

Nope, not me. My words were that I'd haunt you til the day I die and I
will. I may have said that I'd concede you have a CDL but not that you
are a professional truck driver. You're not a professional ANYTHING
unless it's professional TROLL.


>
> Well, I did, I posted the back of it and someone pointed out it was an
> Illinois CDL. His words were something like "It looks just like the back of
> an Illinois Drivers License, but the Driver's license has a weight
> restriction on it

Never said that either.


>
> Duh, that missing weight restriction was because it was an Illinois CDL with
> no weight restriction.

How many CDL has the state of Illinois issued in the past 3, 5, 10, or
even 20 years? You could have borrowed a friend's (if you have any)
CDL. Or, since it was from Illinois, you could have BOUGHT it....for
cash or sexual favors from the male licensing agent.
There was nothing on what you posted to indicate that it was your CDL.
The rest of us posted pics with SOMEthing on it to prove it was us.
You refused. One can only surmise that it was NOT your CDL


>
> THE CRAP SHOULD HAVE ENDED RIGHT THERE.
>
> Then Barry/Troublemaker post some crap and realitytrucker went DEEP SOUTH
> making it sound like it wasn't a valid CDL.

No name, no pic, no expiration date, no number...no nothing but a
simple little line. Could've been anything from anywhere.


>
> RT, you have been given you scan of my CDL.

Not that I am aware of

>You know from other post it was
> an Illinois CDL now please please please stop your shit.

And how do I know that? I should believe anything that anyone posts on
usenet? Sorry, Sweetie. I am not you.

Who's Illinois CDL was it, Sweetie. I don't believe it was yours. I
don't even believe you hold a valid one.


>
> Just because you claim you do not like me, is not a valid reason for you not
> to believe me.

You'e right there. It's because you are a liar and a fraud...thats
why I don't believe you.


>
> Way to go Barry, now we have to call realitytrucker FUBAR.

Barry doesn't have to do a damn thing. Neither do I. You can't force
us to do anything, Loser. Just like you couldn't force Cheryl to love
you. We don't like you. Never have. Never will. And we are tired of
your whining ass in this group.

Troublemaker

unread,
Nov 15, 2005, 4:33:19 PM11/15/05
to

> Kyo Sakamoto wrote:
>>
>> Then Barry/Troublemaker post some crap and realitytrucker went DEEP SOUTH
>> making it sound like it wasn't a valid CDL.

Please expand on "some crap". Was it something way out there...like facts?
Please explain this spin of yours. Are you just projecting?

>> Way to go Barry, now we have to call realitytrucker FUBAR.

Actually, you would be the one that's Fucked Up Beyond All Recongnition.

Kyu Sakamoto

unread,
Nov 15, 2005, 9:58:04 PM11/15/05
to
"Troublemaker" <surfing...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:epKdndc3FpeCyefe...@comcast.com...

>
>> Kyo Sakamoto wrote:
>>>
>>> Then Barry/Troublemaker post some crap and realitytrucker went DEEP
>>> SOUTH
>>> making it sound like it wasn't a valid CDL.
>
> Please expand on "some crap".

Ok, your "crap" is below, on the line that starts with "> In other words."

From: "Troublemaker" <surfingtr...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: RealityTroller


> "mercurio" <mercur...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1105557182....@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> The format on the back of Illinois DL (your linked picture) is the same
>> for CDL and non-CDL. However, the bottom portion of back is used to
>> define the class listed on the front.
>
> In other words - another useless picture post by RTQ. Imagine that.

No, Barry, that is not what "mercurio" said AT ALL.

He said the "back is used to define the class listed on the front."

Mine listed a Class as:
"Class All Single and Comb Vehicles Any Size Mototcycle"
"Endorsements T-Double/Triple Trlr X-Tanker and HazMat"

In a post right behind yours, I made fun of having "Class." The "Class"
proved it was the back of an Illinois CDL, but because of your lame remark,
realitytrucker is now FUBOR (Fukced Up Beyond Our Rocky).

You think RT will ever be able to admit I posses a valid CDL and I have
since I told this NG I got it.

Way to go Barry, now we have to call realitytrucker FUBOR.

TNX


Popeye

unread,
Nov 15, 2005, 10:51:51 PM11/15/05
to

"Kyo Sakamoto" <woo...@att.net> wrote in message
news:gTpef.105772$zb5....@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

Do you do windows?


>
>


TurboTrucker

unread,
Nov 15, 2005, 10:53:17 PM11/15/05
to
"Kyu Sakamoto" <woo...@att.net> wrote in
news:jo2dnYmFsJ3...@giganews.com:

> He said the "back is used to define the class listed on the front."

A better wording would have been to say that the back of a license
describes EXPLAINS class codes on the front. This is universally offered on
the back portion of licenses in all 50 states. It is there because all
license codes are not the same, and it is put there for an out-of-state
officer to refer to. Some states use "H" rather than "X" for hazardous
material endorsements, as just one example.

> You think RT will ever be able to admit I posses a valid CDL and I
> have since I told this NG I got it.

Why not face the fact that posting a pic of the back of a license means
nothing, and further...why not accept the fact that whether or not you have
a CDL is not the problem people have with you.

Here's another fact for you to face. You could post the FRONT of your CDL
on a billboard on the side of I-80 and you would STILL be a "wannabe". Why?

1) Because you STILL would not be accepted by people in this group as
worthy conversation partner material. You've gone to great lengths to
alienate everyone but the only other person who's only contribution is to
come in here to fart. Neither of you have the courtesy to offer an "excuse
me" when you post.

2) Because you are a stalking troll that refuses to leave people alone when
they ask you to. Your social skills have not evolved to understand that
sometimes in life (in your case? more often than not), you are just not
liked by some people, and you do not know how to deal with it.

3) Because you are a fifteen year old boy in a 56 year old man's body, who
refuses to grow up. This was pointed out to you from the minute you started
writing posts into this group. Several people, including myself, questioned
you on your age. You were a "wannabe" then, and you are a wannabe now.

4) You HAVE to be Bullis's twin, separated at birth. I wonder, has anyone
checked the birth dates?

realitytrucker

unread,
Nov 15, 2005, 11:52:32 PM11/15/05
to

Kyu Sakamoto wrote:
> "Troublemaker" <surfing...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:epKdndc3FpeCyefe...@comcast.com...
> >
> >> Kyo Sakamoto wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Then Barry/Troublemaker post some crap and realitytrucker went DEEP
> >>> SOUTH
> >>> making it sound like it wasn't a valid CDL.
> >
> > Please expand on "some crap".
>
> Ok, your "crap" is below, on the line that starts with "> In other words."
>
> From: "Troublemaker" <surfingtr...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:02 PM
> Subject: Re: RealityTroller
>
>
> > "mercurio" <mercur...@aol.com> wrote in message
> > news:1105557182....@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >> The format on the back of Illinois DL (your linked picture) is the same
> >> for CDL and non-CDL. However, the bottom portion of back is used to
> >> define the class listed on the front.
> >
> > In other words - another useless picture post by RTQ. Imagine that.
>
> No, Barry, that is not what "mercurio" said AT ALL.

"mercurio", eh? never heard of him, before or since. Seems strange
that this screen name just appears out of the blue to "explain" (in
YOUR eyes, anyway) the wording on your alleged CDL

>
> He said the "back is used to define the class listed on the front."

And this mysterious "mercurio" is the usenet expert on CDL's?

>
> Mine listed a Class as:
> "Class All Single and Comb Vehicles Any Size Mototcycle"
> "Endorsements T-Double/Triple Trlr X-Tanker and HazMat"

I'd say chances are very good that "mercurio" is yet another sockpuppet
of Roger Wittekind. You've proved you love to change names at the drop
of a hat. Hell, I found one thread where you changed names no less
than a dozen times


>
> In a post right behind yours, I made fun of having "Class." The "Class"
> proved it was the back of an Illinois CDL, but because of your lame remark,
> realitytrucker is now FUBOR (Fukced Up Beyond Our Rocky).
>
> You think RT will ever be able to admit I posses a valid CDL and I have
> since I told this NG I got it.

YOU told this ng. Yeah, right. Who's gonna believe a lying little
shit like you? Post something POSITIVE. Like the rest of us did.
You've already been outted. We all know your name, address, city and
state, the works so what do you have to lose now, Wannabe-boy? You
want people to belive you then post the whole damn thing. But you
won't. For the same reason you wouldn't post the url for the supposed
picture of you and your truck in a local paper: Because IT DOESN'T
EXISIT!!!

>
> Way to go Barry, now we have to call realitytrucker FUBOR.

What a freakin' lying LOSER. You lie soooo much you start to believe
your OWN LIES!
>
> TNX

My pleasure, wannabe-boy...TOTALLY my pleasure.

Troublemaker

unread,
Nov 16, 2005, 2:31:15 PM11/16/05
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1132116752.6...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

RTQ also forgot to mention that he admitted he was wrong in the same thread:

Subject: RealityTroller
Username: Rocky Roads
Time/Date: 06:09:04 PM 1/13/05
Message:

"Fire&Ice" <firea...@pclnospamet.net> wrote in message
news:xYCFd.826$813...@fe40.usenetserver.com...
>
>
>
> "Rocky Roads" <avoi...@mr.Zeek> wrote in message
> news:cs6i02$t...@library2.airnews.net...
>>
>>
>> Do you honestly think the back of a non-CDL would have the word
"class?"
>>
>> RR
>>
>
>
> The back of my NON-CDL license says "class" on it. In fact the last 3
> states I have had a license in have had "class" on the back.
>
>
> F&I
>
> --
> ~Never knock on Death's door: Ring the doorbell and run (he hates that)~


Yes, you are right.

I called someone up and found out what a non-CDL, in my state says. It
says
something like "Class single under 16,000."

RR

Also, a quick Google search only pulls up "mercurio" <mercur...@aol.com>
only twice, and both around the same date. Another RTQ sock puppet.


Kyu Sakamoto

unread,
Nov 16, 2005, 5:07:55 PM11/16/05
to

"Troublemaker" <surfing...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:DuKdnYw15s-fFObe...@comcast.com...


I can't believe how many posters here want to live in RT's make believe
world.

The back of my CDL is still on my website at:
http://wookiee.home.att.net
Why would it use the word "Endorsements" if it wasn't a CDL? You have
never answered that.

Once again, it shows:
"Class All Single and Comb Vehicles Any Size Motorcycle"


"Endorsements T-Double/Triple Trlr X-Tanker and HazMat"

I know now you and RT are just FUKCING with me.


BEVERLY RUSK

unread,
Nov 16, 2005, 5:14:27 PM11/16/05
to

Kyu Sakamoto wrote:

> I know now you and RT are just FUKCING with me.

Your Hott!!

Mail Hauler

unread,
Nov 17, 2005, 9:51:45 PM11/17/05
to

"TurboTrucker" <alpr...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns970FE8C89AFF1a...@216.196.97.136...

ROTFLMAO I love it!


0 new messages