Another "Experiment" for Rocky the Rookie
realitytrucker
Take a few days off from posting in MTT. Take that time to use your
computer expertise and run a search on Richard Bullis. Read every one
of his posts in all the groups he haunts. It shouldn't take that
long.....there're only 174 of them (be thankful its not Cain..350
groups and counting).Also read the responses to his posts. Then come
back and tell us with a straight face that he's not as bad as he's
made out to be.
Anxiously awaiting your response....unless I'm a member of the
infamous list of names you won't respond to.
Rocky Roads - week 24
news:8a7d8469.04032...@posting.google.com...
First tell me what is wrong with his post on Monteagle?
Brian Belliveau
"Rocky Roads - week 24" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c3rqqn$e...@library2.airnews.net...
Zeke
"Rocky Roads - week 24" <NotARealEm...@sorry.too> wrote in message
news:c3rqqn$e...@library2.airnews.net...
>
>
his? You were talking about Richard, who did not have a post about
Monteagle.
Are you saying that you are Richard?
A. Cain
"Richard" <Anon...@127.000> wrote in message
news:c3rhn...@enews4.newsguy.com...
> realitytrucker wrote:
No job yet?
> Searched English messages for "richard bullis". Results 1 - 50 of about
> 44,300. Search took 1.13 seconds.
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22richard+bullis%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=
> en
>
> Enjoy the reading.
>
> When you've been able to determine precisely what crimes I have committed,
> please feel free to inform the police.
>
> Unless you know what nics I have used in the past, you won't be able to
find
> them so easily.
http://www.lart.com/rtsfaq gives a pretty good indication.
> Oh and then there are those posts that certain people have claimed are
mine,
> even though the truth is they are not.
Sure, st00pid, sure. Everytime your socks get exposed you bleat and whine
and admit to them being yours.
>
> While the whiners like realitytrucker cry about how many nics I use, they
> never seem to mention how many they use.
realitytrucker doesn't brag in misc.legal about having been investigated by
the FBI and still being able to download pornography.
>
> Many of those groups you will find me in are due to crossposting.
> Some times I will snip groups when I feel it is inappropriate to crosspost
> the response.
Too bad you can't just delete them like you do on your "board," eh st00pid?
>
> And who's to say that I am the only "richard bullis" posting to usenet?
That's a pretty flimsy excuse, Bullis. Do you really think someone would
want to be associated with you in name?
>
> If you want the truth, ask me.
Why? You're a proven compulsive liar.
>Do not rely on ramblings of shit for brains
> who know nothing other than what they read on newsgroups.
Or see on TV, right "Quincy?"
A. Cain
"Zeke" <4242 at cableone dot net> wrote in message
news:106335s...@corp.supernews.com...
That sure as hell would explain things.
xlzt
>
> "Richard" <Anon...@127.000> wrote in message
> news:c3rhn...@enews4.newsguy.com...
>> realitytrucker wrote:
>
>
> No job yet?
>
>
>>
>> > Since you like your little "experiments" here's one for you:
>>
>> > Take a few days off from posting in MTT. Take that time to use your
>> > computer expertise and run a search on Richard Bullis. Read every one
>> > of his posts in all the groups he haunts. It shouldn't take that
>> > long.....there're only 174 of them (be thankful its not Cain..350
>> > groups and counting).Also read the responses to his posts. Then come
>> > back and tell us with a straight face that he's not as bad as he's
>> > made out to be.
>>
>> > Anxiously awaiting your response....unless I'm a member of the
>> > infamous list of names you won't respond to.
>>
>> Searched English messages for "richard bullis". Results 1 - 50 of about
>> 44,300. Search took 1.13 seconds.
>>
>>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22richard+bullis
Stoopid, you said you had a job, now you backpedal, you lied, bitch. You aid
unwholesome things that make you like what people claim. I think maybe its
time you went back under your rock now.
xlzt
> Searched English messages for "richard bullis". Results 1 - 50 of about
> 44,300. Search took 1.13 seconds.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22richard+bullis
22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=
> en
>
> Enjoy the reading.
>
> When you've been able to determine precisely what crimes I have committed,
> please feel free to inform the police.
>
> Unless you know what nics I have used in the past, you won't be able to
> find them so easily.
> Oh and then there are those posts that certain people have claimed are
> mine, even though the truth is they are not.
>
> While the whiners like realitytrucker cry about how many nics I use, they
> never seem to mention how many they use.
>
> Many of those groups you will find me in are due to crossposting.
> Some times I will snip groups when I feel it is inappropriate to crosspost
> the response.
>
> And who's to say that I am the only "richard bullis" posting to usenet?
>
> If you want the truth, ask me. Do not rely on ramblings of shit for brains
> who know nothing other than what they read on newsgroups.
unlike the blue collar bozo named reality trucker, reality seems to be
something you're a little bit shy on, st00pid. As in, aint realistic to
expect to avoid prosecution if you be collecting kiddie porn.
linehauler
>
>> realitytrucker wrote:
>>
>> > Since you like your little "experiments" here's one for you:
>>
>> > Take a few days off from posting in MTT. Take that time to use your
>> > computer expertise and run a search on Richard Bullis. Read every one
>> > of his posts in all the groups he haunts. It shouldn't take that
>> > long.....there're only 174 of them (be thankful its not Cain..350
>> > groups and counting).Also read the responses to his posts. Then come
>> > back and tell us with a straight face that he's not as bad as he's
>> > made out to be.
>>
>> > Anxiously awaiting your response....unless I'm a member of the
>> > infamous list of names you won't respond to.
>>
>> Searched English messages for "richard bullis". Results 1 - 50 of about
>> 44,300. Search took 1.13 seconds.
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22richard+bullis
>22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=
>> en
>>
>> Enjoy the reading.
>>
>
>something you're a little bit shy on, st00pid. As in, aint realistic to
>expect to avoid prosecution if you be collecting kiddie porn.
So reality trucker is a "BLUE COLLAR BOZO"? What the fuck
are you then you condescending worthless patronizing little shitbag?
You, like Cain (probably both one and the same) have doubtless
never held a job in your life, and believe me, it shows.
Before you start calling a working man a bozo, look to
your own situation you worthless little fuck.
A. Cain
"linehauler" <sh...@incanada.com> wrote in message
news:1nl46053jkb81dn64...@4ax.com...
Silly Canadian, I've had plenty of jobs.
(plonk)
realitytrucker
You must have me mistaken for someone else. I never said anything
about anyone's post on Monteagle. I don't remember even responding to
that thread at all. I simply presented you with a challenge....a
chance to prove us all wrong about Bullis, if you think you can.
realitytrucker
> news:c3rhn...@enews4.newsguy.com...
> > realitytrucker wrote:
>
>
> >
> > > Since you like your little "experiments" here's one for you:
>
> > > Take a few days off from posting in MTT. Take that time to use your
> > > computer expertise and run a search on Richard Bullis. Read every one
> > > of his posts in all the groups he haunts. It shouldn't take that
> > > long.....there're only 174 of them (be thankful its not Cain..350
> > > groups and counting).Also read the responses to his posts. Then come
> > > back and tell us with a straight face that he's not as bad as he's
> > > made out to be.
>
> > > Anxiously awaiting your response....unless I'm a member of the
> > > infamous list of names you won't respond to.
> >
> > Searched English messages for "richard bullis". Results 1 - 50 of about
> > 44,300. Search took 1.13 seconds.
> >
> >
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22richard+bullis%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=
> > en
> >
> > Enjoy the reading.
> >
> > When you've been able to determine precisely what crimes I have committed,
> > please feel free to inform the police.
I am not trying to prove any crimes, Bullis, I'll leave that to the
police. I just want Rookie to see first hand your admission to liking
what a sensible human being might call child pornography, your
outright lies(such as your esteemed military service in the Army
Security Agency), and your outrageously incorrect advice and
information given to rookies, and wannabe truckers that could get them
killed or thrown in jail.
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3dgty
>
>
>
> >
> > Unless you know what nics I have used in the past, you won't be able to
> find
> > them so easily.
I think just your name will suffice.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Oh and then there are those posts that certain people have claimed are
> mine,
> > even though the truth is they are not.
I think even Rocky Rookie can read headers, Richie.
>
>
>
>
> >
> > While the whiners like realitytrucker cry about how many nics I use, they
> > never seem to mention how many they use.
I tried a couple of different ones while trying a new service for a
grand total of about 2-3 posts...Mr. Jackson brought that to
everyone's attention and I returned to using just this one.
>
>
> >
> > Many of those groups you will find me in are due to crossposting.
> > Some times I will snip groups when I feel it is inappropriate to crosspost
> > the response.
<sigh> is this your last excuse? 'Cause I'm getting tired.
>
> >
> > And who's to say that I am the only "richard bullis" posting to usenet?
No, I didn't think it was.
I think, depending on the group, thread, and general tone he'll be
able to figure out that it's the REAL Richard Bullis posting.
>
> >
> > If you want the truth, ask me.
Well, that hasn't worked before...why should it work now?
>
>
>
> >Do not rely on ramblings of shit for brains>
Oh, I don't, Richie, if I did we wouldn't be having this discussion.
I'd just believe you and "keep on truckin'"!
realitytrucker
Yes, "blue collar" tonight. Yesterday it was a white one. And the
day before? Hey, I was feeling bold that day...NO COLLAR AT ALL!!
And it felt GREAT!
realitytrucker
Thanks,Linehauler.
A brief history of my collars for Richard:
Let's see, I was a trucker back in the late 70's/early 80's...I guess
that could be considered a "blue collar" profession...then I went into
radio in '83 but that was my t-shirt and jeans phase...thats all I
wore..no collars there!
I trucked again from '99 to 2002...bought a coat with a furry like
collar up north somewhere..does that count? Back to radio in
2002..now I wear either t shirts or golf shirts...with collars in a
multitude of collars. So, why DO you consider me "blue collar",
Richie ? BTW got a job yet?
realitytrucker
Seems I should have directed my last remarks in this thread to
someone who calls themselves "xlzt" which may or may not just another
one of Bullis' sock puppets. BTW I blew off the "bozo" part as just a
feeble attempt to insult me but still wanna know why you call me
"blue collar".
Rocky Roads - week 24
Cool it Less,
You want me to "Read every one of his post" I figured we could just use one
of the latest post so you could try and make your point.
The truth is you could not use that particular post, since there is nothing
about KP in it. I think your full name must be RealityLessTrucker.
realitytrucker
No, no, Rookie, you know better than that. It'll take more than just
"his latest posts". Truth is you got your ass backed into a corner
and you're trying to weasle your way out of it. I never said you'd
find reference to "kp" in each and every post. And you won't
neccessarily find it in a few of his latest posts. Ever since his ass
was called on the carpet he's been keeping his mouth shut about that
particular subject. Seems even Bullis knows when he's shot his mouth
off once too often.
You, on the other hand, are a different story. You ran your mouth,
Rookie, told us we were all wrong about Bullis and when we told you
where the proof was....where his admissions were, you turn tail and
run....just like your mentor Bullis. So why don't you read them?
Can't stand to be proved wrong, can you Rookie?
Call me "RealityLessTrucker" if you want, Sweetie. Most of us here at
MTT think your real name is RICHARD BULLIS! Take the challenge,
COWARD, prove us wrong. I, for one, don't think you can!
linehauler
Momma's computer polluting NG's and chatrooms I'm surprised you
have time to sleep or eat.
linehauler
OOps, I just thought of a few jobs you may be qualified for, or
held:
Squeegee boy
Male whore
Spare-change street beggar
Able-bodied welfare cheater
Professional liar
Rocky Roads
> "his latest posts". Truth is you got your ass backed into a corner
> and you're trying to weasle your way out of it. I never said you'd
> find reference to "kp" in each and every post. And you won't
> neccessarily find it in a few of his latest posts. Ever since his ass
> was called on the carpet he's been keeping his mouth shut about that
> particular subject. Seems even Bullis knows when he's shot his mouth
> off once too often.
> You, on the other hand, are a different story. You ran your mouth,
> Rookie, told us we were all wrong about Bullis and when we told you
> where the proof was....where his admissions were, you turn tail and
> run....just like your mentor Bullis. So why don't you read them?
> Can't stand to be proved wrong, can you Rookie?
> Call me "RealityLessTrucker" if you want, Sweetie. Most of us here at
> MTT think your real name is RICHARD BULLIS! Take the challenge,
> COWARD, prove us wrong. I, for one, don't think you can!
Oh Less, you are beating a dead horse. After a post by Walker and I forget
the other person's name, I have changed my opinion on that subject.
If you want to think I am Richard go right ahead and think that. It is so
far from the truth it isn't even funny it is just plain st00pid. (word
taken from Alex)
But then again, maybe this really is Romper Room and people have to keep
complaining, even after they get their candy.
FYI I will say one good thing about Richard. He has never tried to say that
I am Richard. ;-)
thanx
realitytrucker
Well, look at that! He talks shit just like Bullis and he backpedals
like him too! The only two things that are "just plain st00pid" are
Richard and YOU, Rookie Sweetie!
Rocky Roads
Ok Richardalitytrucker. You can now join Alex in my new killfile. It will
be just the two of you and since you both like to talk about Richard so much
you will have a lot of fun there. If Zeke shows up later, it was because he
felt sorry for the two of you.
Brian Belliveau
> Ok Richardalitytrucker. You can now join Alex in my new killfile. It
will
> be just the two of you and since you both like to talk about Richard so
much
> you will have a lot of fun there. If Zeke shows up later, it was because
he
> felt sorry for the two of you.
>
You see, rookie, the thing about the killfile is, nobody gives a rat's ass
that you find their input unpalatable. That you would appear to be
sympathetic to the pedo makes you suspect, but if you, like him, were to
take a long walk on a short pier ( or just STFU ), the topic would drop off
the edge of the board in due course. In all likelihood, there would never be
another off topic post in this group (yeah, right)
Would it kill you to find that I would put you in my killfile ? Get it ?
To put it in yet another form you may be able to grasp ... the kill file
doesn't remove them ... it removes you !
Rocky Roads - 25th week
news:Tm79c.16891$R27.2411@pd7tw2no...
Can you spell Rocky for me.
Here, I will help you. It is R - O - C - K - Y. There is that better.
I still think a lot of posters on this NG are Romper Room dropouts.
My concern was not with the word pedo, but any word that has not been
properly defined. In this case it was "porn."
If you knew exactly what word I was talking about, in my own life, and the
fact I have proven it wrong in court, you and others would not give me any
of crap I get.
As I've said before, I have never asked it to stop, just keep away from the
things that are an obvious errors, like that bad joke about him being on
Cops.
You want to make me sound "suspect?" I suspect the people that put Richard
down the most. Look at A. Pain, I hear he is "strange" himself.
Maybe you should do some looking into psychology and see why some people get
so bent out of shape when they really do not have to go that far. It is
like a mob mentality. Why are their certain posters that will put so much t
ime on Richard they miss other things right in front of their noses?
As for my kill file. Sure, it takes me out of a loop, but that might be
what I want it to do. I thought I made my point very well with
Richardalitytrucker and he still wants to call me names. I don't even want
to see his post anymore. Do you blame me?
FYI I do not like to change subjects, but if it has my name in it, I feel
like I can do anything I want to with it. ;-)
thanx
realitytrucker
> >
Since you put it that way, Brian, I only have one thing to say:
Rookie, Sweetie, please, oh God, PLEASE, killfile me!~!
Zeke
>
> Rookie, Sweetie, please, oh God, PLEASE, killfile me!~!
and killfile me also. Please Rookie Roads with 25 weeks in as Richard's
butt boy.
realitytrucker
Point? What point did you make? What point have you EVER made? You
have not made point 1 since you first came to MTT.
Besides the only thing I ever called you besides "Sweetie", Sweetie,
was "coward" because you talked your shit then turned tail and ran
when your back was to the wall. You acted, as was expected, very
"Bullisy".
Or is THAT what you consider name calling? The fact that everyone
calls you Richard? I'm not the only one there, Sweetie, maybe its
time to look in that old mirror you mentioned.
TurboTrucker
news:c3rhn...@enews4.newsguy.com:
> Searched English messages for "richard bullis". Results 1 - 50 of
> about 44,300. Search took 1.13 seconds.
Amazing...
> Enjoy the reading.
It's not enjoyable.
> When you've been able to determine precisely what crimes I have
> committed, please feel free to inform the police.
Who's accused you of committing a crime? The stating that you are a
pedophile is in no way an accusation of your being a criminal. It is a
statement of YOUR state of mind and tendencies as documented across the
world of usenet. The proof is in the archives and can be directly shown to
come from one and the same....you.
> Unless you know what nics I have used in the past, you won't be able
> to find them so easily.
Thanks to a few good people, and a listing of them kept up on a few good
web sites, your "nics" are for the most part...easy to find.
> Oh and then there are those posts that certain people have claimed are
> mine, even though the truth is they are not.
You really would like to believe that people are THAT stupid?
> While the whiners like realitytrucker cry about how many nics I use,
> they never seem to mention how many they use.
Not everyone who uses or changes "nics" does it to hide their pecker tracks
across the web. You routinely do.
> Many of those groups you will find me in are due to crossposting.
> Some times I will snip groups when I feel it is inappropriate to
> crosspost the response.
Didn't you know that it is rather innapropriate all the time?
> And who's to say that I am the only "richard bullis" posting to
> usenet?
Do you really think that there is a soul in America who would even consider
for a second to copy THAT "nic" and use it legitimately?
> If you want the truth, ask me. Do not rely on ramblings of shit for
> brains who know nothing other than what they read on newsgroups.
And of course, you will tell the "truth"...right?
You're pathetic.
~Tony~