Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Rocky the Road whatever

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Dave R

unread,
May 9, 2004, 2:13:54 PM5/9/04
to
Doesn't it bother you when the professionals tell you that you're a danger
on the road. Lets see if you can respond intelligently.


Cainman

unread,
May 9, 2004, 9:26:18 PM5/9/04
to

"Dave R" <sword...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:G9WdnT_6ged...@comcast.com...

> Doesn't it bother you when the professionals tell you that you're a danger
> on the road. Lets see if you can respond intelligently.
>


People have told Bullis that and it hasn't bothered him; I think Rocky and
Bullis are closer than they think.
>

Coquine

unread,
May 9, 2004, 9:38:23 PM5/9/04
to

"Dave R" <sword...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:G9WdnT_6ged...@comcast.com...
> Doesn't it bother you when the professionals tell you that you're a danger
> on the road. Lets see if you can respond intelligently.
>
>

Rookie, Rocky, or whatever is the flavor du jour cannot respond
intelligently if his life depended on it.


0

unread,
May 9, 2004, 10:06:28 PM5/9/04
to

"Coquine" <pu...@ass.bitch> wrote in message
news:109tn89...@corp.supernews.com...


And you are the guy that does not like girls. I do not care how smart you
are, keep your distance from me.


Cainman

unread,
May 9, 2004, 11:47:04 PM5/9/04
to

" 0" <0@0.0> wrote in message news:c7mo0f$7...@library2.airnews.net...

So you're a homophobe too, on top of everything else. Big surprise there,
Dorky.

realitytrucker

unread,
May 10, 2004, 3:29:27 AM5/10/04
to
" 0" <0@0.0> wrote in message news:<c7mo0f$7...@library2.airnews.net>...

Well, let's see....after your admitted unsafe driving habits and your
obvious attraction to middle aged pedophiles I really don't think
you'll have to worry about any of the regulars here getting too close
to you.

0

unread,
May 10, 2004, 6:59:10 AM5/10/04
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.04050...@posting.google.com...

> Well, let's see....after your admitted unsafe driving habits and your
> obvious attraction to middle aged pedophiles I really don't think
> you'll have to worry about any of the regulars here getting too close
> to you.


Needed: Date and time of post you are referring to. It looks like you are
as bad as Dave Rockhead and takes the falsified post by the
corp.supernews.com poster to be me.

Are you trying to take this weeks idiot award away from Dave?


Dave R

unread,
May 10, 2004, 12:20:37 PM5/10/04
to
I'll bet he's crying right now. Just remember Rockhead to pull off the road
so those tears don't cause an accident.

"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.04050...@posting.google.com...

realitytrucker

unread,
May 11, 2004, 1:46:56 AM5/11/04
to
" 0" <0@0.0> wrote in message news:<c7nn79$o...@library2.airnews.net>...

We all know about your affection for Bullis...that was long before you
started crying "IMPOSTER!" so I am assuming that there was none and
that it was really you who tried so valiantly to defend the
pedophile...or are you denying it?

Are you also denying that it was you just recently that proudly
announced that you look up directions on your computer while driving
then tried to defend yourself when my other posters and I told you
what a dumbfuck you are for doing something so unsafe?

Tell us, Rookie, Rocky, 0, or whatever your name is this week. Or
will you backpedal like your idol Bullis? Sounds like you've already
started.

0

unread,
May 11, 2004, 7:08:00 AM5/11/04
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.04051...@posting.google.com...


I am glad you brought that up.

My imposter is very easy to prove. the corp.supernews.com on the Message ID
line is in close to 100+ post, and here is the funny part.

I wasn't really defending "Bullis" but, I was saying how someone could
impersonate someone and make him look worse than he is, and then someone
does it to me.

In other words, the Imposter that is now going by the name "Coquine" proved
the point I was trying to make, to the 't' in the word point.

Did people care? No, they would rather believe total garbage, as evidenced
by Dave R's post, where he kept referring to items in the falsified post.

Once again. Get your post straight, you are starting to stretch things as
far as Dave R and just might get the "Idiot of the Week" award this time
around.


Troublemaker

unread,
May 11, 2004, 5:31:23 PM5/11/04
to

" 0" <0@0.0> wrote in message news:c7qc43$a...@library2.airnews.net...

Here's a surprise - all questions went unswered. Amazing.
>
>


realitytrucker

unread,
May 11, 2004, 7:32:54 PM5/11/04
to
" 0" <0@0.0> wrote in message news:<c7qc43$a...@library2.airnews.net>...


Bullis backpedals and you sidestep. I asked you if you are denying
stating that you drive and operate a computer at the same time. You,
of course, sidestepped the question by bringing up "imposters" again.
Was it or was it not you, Rookie. And before you get all upset and
start crying you are not a rookie...you ARE. And with your attitude
you always will be.

realitytrucker

unread,
May 11, 2004, 7:35:28 PM5/11/04
to
"Dave R" <sword...@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<dcadnSrNZ7x...@comcast.com>...

He's almost Bullis' identical twin. Runs his mouth, gets caught in a
lie or other shit then cries "It wasn't me! It wasn't me!".

0

unread,
May 11, 2004, 11:05:01 PM5/11/04
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.04051...@posting.google.com...
> Bullis backpedals and you sidestep. I asked you if you are denying
> stating that you drive and operate a computer at the same time. You,
> of course, sidestepped the question by bringing up "imposters" again.
> Was it or was it not you, Rookie. And before you get all upset and
> start crying you are not a rookie...you ARE. And with your attitude
> you always will be.


I answered you already tonight. You should not have any trouble finding the
post.

Since I have answered your question, your paragraph above, was jumping the
gun and is now pointless.

I have to agree with A. Pain where you are the S00P3R TRUCK3R.

0

unread,
May 12, 2004, 12:17:17 AM5/12/04
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.04051...@posting.google.com...

> He's almost Bullis' identical twin. Runs his mouth, gets caught in a
> lie or other shit then cries "It wasn't me! It wasn't me!".


Man are you ever screwed up. Who is talking without thinking now? If you
find the post you are talking about, you will see it was the Coquine
changing his name over an over and over on the same thread.

I did not complain about it, like he makes it look. I started up my own
website for my post if I needed it for that. In other words, I had a
solution for the problem, and if I need it again, I will use it again.

It is very funny, that you proven you are a Bullsh_tter and then you think
you can call anybody else one?

PKB That is Pot Kettle Black, or Pot calling the Kettle Black.

Right now, you just moved into first place for the "Idiot of the week award"
where it is between Dave R, Troublemaker and Realitytruck3r.


Dream Weaver

unread,
May 12, 2004, 12:50:16 AM5/12/04
to

"realitytrucker" <timp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8a7d8469.04051...@posting.google.com...


If Richard pulled you out of the way of a speeding automobile and saved your
life, would you immediately turn to him and call him a pedophile. You
probably would because everything you ever say about him is tied to that
word. It is like you have a one track mind.

You have got no in between, so it is worthless to try and say anything to
you, except you can keep your dreams if they make you happy, I have found it
useless to show you that you have been fooled.

My new name is to remind me, I have to let people dream because it takes too
much out of me to try and wake them up.

Signed
DW


realitytrucker

unread,
May 12, 2004, 1:17:51 AM5/12/04
to
"Troublemaker" <surfingtr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<LCboc.74488$kh4.4207822@attbi_s52>...


Yep. Bullis backpedals...Rookie sidesteps. They certainly aren't
truck drivers but they'd be great together as dance partners.

Zero

unread,
May 12, 2004, 8:27:01 AM5/12/04
to

" Dream Weaver" <0@0.0> wrote in message
news:c7sa41$o...@library2.airnews.net...

>
> My new name is to remind me, I have to let people dream because it takes
too
> much out of me to try and wake them up.
>

You have "morphed" yet again?

realitytrucker

unread,
May 12, 2004, 9:47:42 AM5/12/04
to
" 0" <0@0.0> wrote in message news:<c7s866$g...@library2.airnews.net>...

I am so honored. Now go away.

Dave R

unread,
May 12, 2004, 12:45:42 PM5/12/04
to
I didn't realize that I had that much control over Rockhead. Man I must
really get under his skin. I've done my job and I must say it's fun to make
this punk cry. He thinks he knows me but the only thing he knows for sure
about me is that I could drive circles around him and I've forgotten more
about trucking than he'll ever know and I can learn something new everyday.
How many safe driving awards have you got Rockhead the Rookie Queer???

He'll never answer straight questions but he doesn't need to. We know the
truth. He's pick me and a couple others as his enemies but he's too stupid
to realize that he hasn't had a positive response in months. Then he comes
out with the most idiotic thought process I've ever heard. His tires are too
worn because the truck doesn't run like the last one. That just go to show
how much of a rookie he is. And the one thing we all told him was to watch
and keep his mouth shut and then he makes a statement like this. Hey Stoopid
do you think maybe there might be other factors involved like how the engine
was broke in??? When you're around for some time you're learn that no two
trucks run the same.

Then to top it off he's using a computer while driving. He doesn't get safer
like he should, he gets more careless. He'll always be a rookie unless he
wises up. But for now he doesn't deserve any advise from any of us. He needs
to come off the road.

And how come he's the only one to get an imposter? He comes up with this
lame explanation about bullis but then it sounds like a stupid attempt to
clear his name. And here's the funny part there's no imposters. Now go cry
you've won the lifetime idiot award.


"Troublemaker" <surfingtr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:LCboc.74488$kh4.4207822@attbi_s52...
>

Troublemaker

unread,
May 12, 2004, 4:59:25 PM5/12/04
to

" Dream Weaver" <0@0.0> wrote in message
news:c7sa41$o...@library2.airnews.net...

>
>
> My new name is to remind me, I have to let people dream because it takes
too
> much out of me to try and wake them up.
>
> Signed
> DW

Yet you claim to not care. Unreal.


Troublemaker

unread,
May 12, 2004, 5:01:27 PM5/12/04
to

" 0" <0@0.0> wrote in message news:c7s866$g...@library2.airnews.net...

So, calling upon you to clarify your paranoia qualifies one for IoW? You
really need to get a life outside of Usenet. You do realize your silly-ass
little award means nothing to anyone, right?


Message has been deleted

Rocky - 136 weeks ą 1ž

unread,
May 14, 2006, 6:26:19 PM5/14/06
to

" 0" <0@0.0> wrote in message news:c7qc43$a...@library2.airnews.net...


WOW realitytrucker, you sure do rant about Bullis a LOT! I found a whole
thread where that is about all you can do. Too bad I don't plan to use all
of them on the site below:
http://delusionalrealitytrucker.on.justicegonewild.com/rt.htm#thefetishofrt

Once again, after seeing how k00ks on the internet, like you, can deny the
fact I hold a CDL, I can not and I never will believe the "Pedo" bullshit
about Richard!

The funny thing is. You claimed I defended him on December 30, 2003 and now
after seeing all your CDL bullshit, you gave me the reason I will never
believe the "pedo" crap said about him! Way to go!

Rocky - http://wookiee.home.att.net


0 new messages