a couple Nebraska questions
Yakra
Take a look at US275 & NE36 in GMSV... The exit BGSes on 275 have NE36
markers, but the signs on the surface road at the jct and at old 275
are all for NE34.
Am I missing something? Has there been some monkeying with the
designations in that area, such as with 66 & 63 a few years back?
Or is it just a sign error that got repeated several times?
...I guess I'd have to assume it's an error, as NE34 would duplicate
US34 which is elsewhere in the state.
Item II:
NE2 Business in Grand Island... Westbound, it splits from NE2 @ Locust
St and travels north. It appears to take a left onto US30 (GMSV is a
little fuzzy here) then take a right onto Broadwell to eventually
connect back to NE2 at the US281 interchange. (Though I can't really
find any signage between State St & US30...)
Is this assessment correct?
DandyDan
Item I:
I tried looking at GMSV and I don't see how you see it as NE 34.
Assuming you are correct, that is a sign error.
Item II:
It's been awhile since I went through Grand Island (as opposed to
taking I-80), but I thought there was an overlap there. It's also
possible it follows Walnut NW to State to Broadwell.
Larry Sheldon
> On Jan 13, 7:17�pm, Yakra<ericdbry...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Item I:
>> markers, but the signs on the surface road at the jct and at old 275
>> are all for NE34.
>> Am I missing something? Has there been some monkeying with the
>> Or is it just a sign error that got repeated several times?
>>
>> ...I guess I'd have to assume it's an error, as NE34 would duplicate
>> US34 which is elsewhere in the state.
> Item I:
> I tried looking at GMSV and I don't see how you see it as NE 34.
> Assuming you are correct, that is a sign error.
We have talked about that intersection before here at some length.
Seems like I stopped by there and looked, but I'm not sure.
I don't remember what our findings were last time.
--
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to
take everything you have."
Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
Larry Sheldon
> On 1/14/2010 6:59 AM, DandyDan wrote:
>> On Jan 13, 7:17�pm, Yakra<ericdbry...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Item I:
>>> Take a look at US275& NE36 in GMSV... The exit BGSes on 275 have NE36
>>> markers, but the signs on the surface road at the jct and at old 275
>>> are all for NE34.
>>> Am I missing something? Has there been some monkeying with the
>>> designations in that area, such as with 66& 63 a few years back?
>>> Or is it just a sign error that got repeated several times?
>>>
>>> ...I guess I'd have to assume it's an error, as NE34 would duplicate
>>> US34 which is elsewhere in the state.
>
>> Item I:
>> I tried looking at GMSV and I don't see how you see it as NE 34.
>> Assuming you are correct, that is a sign error.
>
> We have talked about that intersection before here at some length. Seems
> like I stopped by there and looked, but I'm not sure.
>
> I don't remember what our findings were last time.
AKA http://tinyurl.com/yzhp49c
Shows a sign that made me say "by golly he is right--it does say 34.
But the more my elderly eyes and my mouse diddling worked on it the more
I decided, "no, it really does say "6", not "4".
Yakra
>
> Shows a sign that made me say "by golly he is right--it does say 34.
>
> But the more my elderly eyes and my mouse diddling worked on it the more
> I decided, "no, it really does say "6", not "4".
Having a look at GMSV again, I think you're right. I just see a blurry
'6' now.
Larry Sheldon
Makes you wish the font experts would speak up, doesn't it?
I don't remember ever confusing a "6" for a "4" before.