Interesting, no??
More shinanigans from the entity that they call the IRS.
Here's another interesting question:
Who owns the buildings in which the IRS operates?
> Interesting, no??
Only to moron who can't read.
> More shinanigans from the entity that they call the IRS.
>
> Here's another interesting question:
>
> Who owns the buildings in which the IRS operates?
Let's see, in the major city I live near, Uncle Sam owns the building. In
other places, Uncle Sam rents space in office buildings owned by private
individuals. In Washington DC thy operate in Uncle Sam owned buildings.
Of course, the obvious question to ask Nossy is, what the hell difference
does it make who owns the buildings the IRS operates out of anywhere in the
USof A?
But he can't answer that with any knowledge, but he will give us all kinds
of gibberish that proves he is an idiot!
>Now, now, Mr. Maffia. Chill out. You must feel very uncomfortable that
>your beloved IRS executes a "Notice of Lien" (rather than lien itself
>of course) based on an inheritance per USC 26 1040 on an individual.
>Pretty sneaky, no?
No. Why? Because it isn't referring to that section of the US Code.
>Then again, check around the country to see who owns buildings this
>so-called government agency operates out of.
Then again, as has been noted, it doesn't matter.
"Nossy" <he...@heavier.com> wrote in message
news:nu49i3h4e10mo9ec0...@4ax.com...
> Now, now, Mr. Maffia. Chill out. You must feel very uncomfortable that
> your beloved IRS executes a "Notice of Lien" (rather than lien itself
> of course) based on an inheritance per USC 26 1040 on an individual.
> Pretty sneaky, no?
Moron, the notice of lien merely informs you what they are going to do or
have done which the do with a proper action in accordance with the law.
> Then again, check around the country to see who owns buildings this
> so-called government agency operates out of.
>
Again, moron, so what the hell difference does it make who owns the
buildings the IRS operates out of?
I reitierate, in the large city nearest to my location, the IRS offices are
located in a Federal Government owned building. In other locations it
operates out of privately owned buildings in which the Federal Government
has leased space. And in Washinton DC they operate out of Federal Government
owned buildings.
Answer the simple question, moron! What difference does it make who owns the
building that a particular IRS office operates out of?
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:21:15 -0700, "Paul Maffia"
> <pma...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>
>>Nossy the tax moron is back with more idiotic questions.
>>"Nossy" <he...@heavier.com> wrote in message
>>news:jl28i318ge9ovvivp...@4ax.com...
>>> Why does the Notice of Lien on one's Individual Master File list the
>>> Type of Tax as "1040" which does not refer to the Return but to USC 26
>>> 1040, which provides for a lien for transfer of property inherited by
>>> from a deceased person on which tax was not paid.
>>
>>> Interesting, no??
>>
>>Only to moron who can't read.
>>
>>> More shinanigans from the entity that they call the IRS.
>>>
>>> Here's another interesting question:
>>>
>>> Who owns the buildings in which the IRS operates?
>>
>>Let's see, in the major city I live near, Uncle Sam owns the building. In
>>other places, Uncle Sam rents space in office buildings owned by private
>>individuals. In Washington DC they operate in Uncle Sam owned buildings.
In any case, maybe go check your own Individual Master File and look
for Tax. In case you need a refresher, the return 1040 is not a tax
but a form (using an improper OMB number of course).
§ 1040. Transfer of certain farm, etc., real property
How Current is This? (a) General rule
If the executor of the estate of any decedent transfers to a qualified
heir (within the meaning of section 2032A (e)(1)) any property with
respect to which an election was made under section 2032A, then gain
on such transfer shall be recognized to the estate only to the extent
that, on the date of such transfer, the fair market value of such
property exceeds the value of such property for purposes of chapter 11
(determined without regard to section 2032A).
(b) Similar rule for certain trusts
To the extent provided in regulations prescribed by the Secretary, a
rule similar to the rule provided in subsection (a) shall apply where
the trustee of a trust (any portion of which is included in the gross
estate of the decedent) transfers property with respect to which an
election was made under section 2032A.
(c) Basis of property acquired in transfer described in subsection (a)
or (b)
The basis of property acquired in a transfer with respect to which
gain realized is not recognized by reason of subsection (a) or (b)
shall be the basis of such property immediately before the transfer
increased by the amount of the gain recognized to the estate or trust
on the transfer. On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:05:06 -0400,
The NOTICE OF LIEN is a notification ONCE THE LIEN HAS BEEN
EXECUTED BY A COURT ORDER. In case you forgot, according to the
non-Soviet US Constitution, property cannot be taken without DUE
PROCESS, i.e. a COURT ORDER.
All the IRS hopes is that the bank will shiver in its boots, and
execute merely on the basis of a notice of lien and without a COURT
ORDER. In any case, the lien for good old 1040 has nothing to do with
an individual unless he has inherited property.........Ha, ha, ha,
ha.......Gotcha..........
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:31:03 -0700, "Paul Maffia"
and you're from planet Xenon and can't get off Ha, ha, ha,
ha.......Gotcha..........
(IRS "shivering in its boots (sic) ) !!!
>
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:31:03 -0700, "Paul Maffia"
>