"Crazy" Dr. Jones Uses Science to Prove WTC Demolition.
knews4...@yahoo.com
greyl...@houston.rr.com
>http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf
I didn't have to read very far into the bullshit article you
referenced to realize that is IS - in fact - total bullshit.
He builds questionable assumptions on top of idiotic assertions
presented without proof and comes - surprise - surprise - to an
idiotic conclusion.
knews4...@yahoo.com
> On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:49:07 -0700, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JonesWTC911SciMethod...
>
> I didn't have to read very far into the bullshit article you
> referenced to realize that is IS - in fact - total bullshit.
>
You're a real scientist then.
> He builds questionable assumptions
Example?
>on top of idiotic assertions
Example?
> presented without proof and comes - surprise - surprise - to an
> idiotic conclusion.
And all your arm waving and lies proves?.........That you are a shill.
the_blogologist
Here is Dr. Jones revealing where he got his "molten metal evidence".
There is NO TELLING where this came from, collected TOTALLY AT RANDOM,
could be just about anything, but is probably slag from a cutting torch
that was used to clear the debris. Any court of law would have tossed
this out immediately:
knews4...@yahoo.com
Slag from removing debris doesn't stay red hot for days.
Your witness....or should I say...You're witless...
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiTy0sLY4as- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
The article linked say nothing about the pools of molten steel found
days and weeks after the "collpse.
The paper only discusses the molten metal drooling from the building
BEFORE the collapse.
the_blogologist
> On Jun 3, 8:24 pm, nob...@nowheres.com (the_blogologist) wrote:
> > <knews4u2c...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Jun 3, 12:53 pm, greylock...@houston.rr.com wrote: > On Sun, 03 Jun
> > > 2007 10:49:07 -0700, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote: >
> > > >http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JonesWTC911SciMethod
> > > ...
> >
> > > > I didn't have to read very far into the bullshit article you
> > > > referenced to realize that is IS - in fact - total bullshit.
> >
> > > You're a real scientist then.
> >
> > > > He builds questionable assumptions
> >
> > > Example?
> >
> > > >on top of idiotic assertions
> >
> > > Example?
> >
> > > > presented without proof and comes - surprise - surprise - to an
> > > > idiotic conclusion.
> >
> > > And all your arm waving and lies proves?.........That you are a shill.
> >
> > Here is Dr. Jones revealing where he got his "molten metal evidence".
>
> > There is NO TELLING where this came from, collected TOTALLY AT RANDOM,
> > could be just about anything, but is probably slag from a cutting torch
> > that was used to clear the debris. Any court of law would have tossed
> > this out immediately:
> >
>
> Slag from removing debris doesn't stay red hot for days.
The samples Jones collected and tested were not red hot, nor does he
claim they were. All his samples are all tiny collected from "private
people".
> Your witness....or should I say...You're witless...
Please use personal insults when you lack evidence or a logical
arguement.
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiTy0sLY4as- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> The article linked
That's not an article, that's a video.
> say nothing about the pools of molten steel found
> days and weeks after the "collpse.
Can you tell whether something is molten steel or not wtih your eyes?
What was found was likely a soup of alunimum, glass, and everything else
you can imagine.
> The paper only discusses the molten metal drooling from the building
> BEFORE the collapse.
Got any fire investigators who know what the hell they're talking about?
knews4...@yahoo.com
Why are you changing the subject?
You go from molten steel and hotspots that lasted for weeks to his
paper's discussion about micro size metal particles found in WTC dust.
Why are you obfuscating?
I know.....because you're a shill.
> > Your witness....or should I say...You're witless...
>
> Please use personal insults when you lack evidence or a logical
> arguement.
>
Then don't obfuscate.
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiTy0sLY4as-Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > The article linked
>
> That's not an article, that's a video.
>
> > say nothing about the pools of molten steel found
> > days and weeks after the "collpse.
>
> Can you tell whether something is molten steel or not wtih your eyes?
The molten steel was well documented. Red hot, hot spots even from
arial imaging.
> What was found was likely a soup of alunimum, glass, and everything else
> you can imagine.
>
And what caued this?
What make it stay molten for weeks?
Why was ALL the EVIDENCE hauled away to china?
> > The paper only discusses the molten metal drooling from the building
> > BEFORE the collapse.
>
> Got any fire investigators who know what the hell they're talking about?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Got any intention of staying on the same topic?
Are you going to read the original article of a premier scientist or
are you going to obfuscate?
Jones does not stand alone in his conclusions.
Are you going to read the NIST Report which had no explaination for
most of the anomalies?
Can you explain why they had to stretch their computer models by a
factor of more than TEN TIMES to maken their "theory" fit their
conclusions?
No you can't.
You are a shill.
Kirby M. Wilson
is there any conspiracy theory you don't believe or find
ridiculous? ... oh, I forgot -- income taxes!
http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/introduction
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blxterror.htm
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html
.
knews4...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Are there any NWO lies and propaganda you won't spread like the
plague?
Are you really that sick and cowardly as to sell your soul for a pack
of lies made to destroy America and enslave the world?
Oh, that's right. Your a "Chatbot" without a soul.
911 Truth.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22911+truth%22
Kirby M. Wilson
>
> > .- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Are there any NWO lies and propaganda you won't spread like the
> plague?
> Are you really that sick and cowardly as to sell your soul for a pack
> of lies made to destroy America and enslave the world?
> Oh, that's right. Your a "Chatbot" without a soul.
> 911 Truth.http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22911+truth%22
all those "lies" !!
the mysterious water powered car, perpetual energy machines, jews
taking over the world, federal reserve banks, flouride, etc. there's
gotta be some conspiracy theory you don't believe in!
But it's all fun and entertainment!
the_blogologist
> On Jun 4, 12:43 am, nob...@nowheres.com (the_blogologist) wrote:
> > <knews4u2c...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Jun 3, 8:24 pm, nob...@nowheres.com (the_blogologist) wrote:
> > > > There is NO TELLING where this came from, collected TOTALLY AT RANDOM,
> > > > could be just about anything, but is probably slag from a cutting torch
> > > > that was used to clear the debris. Any court of law would have tossed
> > > > this out immediately:
> >
> > > Slag from removing debris doesn't stay red hot for days.
> >
> > The samples Jones collected and tested were not red hot, nor does he
> > claim they were. All his samples are all tiny collected from "private
> > people".
> >
>
> Why are you changing the subject?
The topic of this thread was "Crazy" Dr. Jones.
===YOU=== changed the subject, idiot.
Archmedes
> all those "lies" !!
>
> the mysterious water powered car, perpetual energy machines, jews
> taking over the world, federal reserve banks, flouride, etc. there's
> gotta be some conspiracy theory you don't believe in!
> But it's all fun and entertainment!
Speaking of entertainment, I saw the movie "Bug" over the weekend. As I watched it, one couldn't help but be reminded of "Chewy" and all the other delusionals who post here. Here's a short synopsis:
"The story involves this man's obsession with bugs that he believes infect his cells and may have been implanted by the government during his treatment for obscure causes after military service in the Gulf. We think he's crazy. Agnes listens and nods, and doesn't want him to leave; she feels safer around him. He begins to seem more weird. This doesn't bother her. With mounting urgency, she begins to share his obsession with bugs, and together they hurtle headlong into a paranoid fantasy that ties together in one perfect conspiracy all of the suspicions they've ever had about anything."
Kirby M. Wilson
> Kirby M. Wilson wrote:
> > all those "lies" !!
>
> > the mysterious water powered car, perpetual energy machines, jews
> > taking over the world, federal reserve banks, flouride, etc. there's
> > gotta be some conspiracy theory you don't believe in!
> > But it's all fun and entertainment!
>
> Speaking of entertainment, I saw the movie "Bug" over the weekend. As I watched it, one couldn't help but be reminded of "Chewy" and all the other delusionals who post here. Here's a short synopsis:
>
> "The story involves this man's obsession with bugs that he believes infect his cells and may have been implanted by the government during his treatment for obscure causes after military service in the Gulf. We think he's crazy. Agnes listens and nods, and doesn't want him to leave; she feels safer around him. He begins to seem more weird. This doesn't bother her. With mounting urgency, she begins to share his obsession with bugs, and together they hurtle headlong into a paranoid fantasy that ties together in one perfect conspiracy all of the suspicions they've ever had about anything."
the trailers for that movie say "he sees conspiracies everywhere"
"knews4...@yahoo.com" --- you should've been playing the
conspiracy wacko!
knews4...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
No, the subject was spherical metal particles as a result of thermite
combustion and you changed it to molten metal that Dr. Jones
admittedly had not witnessed the collection or documentation there of.