Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

RON PAUL SAID HE WOULD KILL THE IRS IN HIS FIRST WEEK AS PRESIDENT

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Vicegerent

unread,
May 24, 2007, 8:15:34 PM5/24/07
to
RON PAUL SAID HE WOULD KILL THE IRS IN HIS
FIRST WEEK AS PRESIDENT.

Watch this short video:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=vyT3SBiTbpc

Then, IRS goons like Dave Johnson of the Denver area,
posting as Captain America II will have to resort to
picking bottles to survive, if they have enough intelligence
to do that.

Vicegerent

Paul Thomas, CPA

unread,
May 25, 2007, 9:13:10 AM5/25/07
to

"Vicegerent" <ge...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote

> RON PAUL SAID HE WOULD KILL THE IRS IN HIS
> FIRST WEEK AS PRESIDENT.

Terroristic threats noted.

It's highly likely that he'll not get elected. But, if he were to be, he'd
not have as cooperative of a Congress in killing off the entire revenue arm
of the government.


--
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?
----------------
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia


Vicegerent

unread,
May 25, 2007, 12:33:18 PM5/25/07
to
On May 25, 7:13 am, "Paul Thomas, CPA" <paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
> "Vicegerent" <g...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote

Ever heard of an "Executive Order" Paul?

And, besides, not all Americans may be as treasonous
and predators upon their fellow man as you obviously
are, Paul.

If polls are any indication of reality, there should be
enough of the traitorous congressmen and senators
removed from further damage to America to allow
a supportive Congress to Ron Paul.

As Ron Paul uses the term, it is hoped that
"BLOWBACK" will motivate the American people
to put a final end to all the traitors who have carried
an IRS badge, and all those CPAs and lawyers who
have aided and abeted their TREASON.

Vicegerent

Paul Thomas, CPA

unread,
May 25, 2007, 1:16:14 PM5/25/07
to

"Vicegerent" <ge...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote

> Ever heard of an "Executive Order" Paul?


Eldon!! You're back. You must have finished preparing and filing your
Canadian tax returns already. Good for you.

You should read up on the theory of a balance of power, such that the
President can't make that type of change without a change in the laws, and
that don't happen with a pen stroke by the efforts of one man.

And all your wishfull thinking won't bring it about.

--
Two Reasons Why It's So Hard To Solve A Redneck Murder:
1. All the DNA is the same.
2. There are no dental records.
--------------------------

Abbot

unread,
May 25, 2007, 2:29:37 PM5/25/07
to
On May 25, 1:16 pm, "Paul Thomas, CPA" <paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
> "Vicegerent" <g...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote

>
> > Ever heard of an "Executive Order" Paul?
>
> Eldon!! You're back. You must have finished preparing and filing your
> Canadian tax returns already. Good for you.
>
> You should read up on the theory of a balance of power, such that the
> President can't make that type of change without a change in the laws, and
> that don't happen with a pen stroke by the efforts of one man.
>
> And all your wishfull thinking won't bring it about.

Abbot) Being such a dumb ass as to think the tax codes could away by
executive order should preclude Eldon from giving advice on anything
tax related.

It seems the old boy never completed his education and never will.

Vicegerent

unread,
May 25, 2007, 2:37:05 PM5/25/07
to
Pretty Sad commentary from the two resident
PREDATORS and "Damage Control Goons".

Wonder just how puerile they can get?

Vicegerent

Abbot

unread,
May 25, 2007, 2:45:19 PM5/25/07
to

Abbot) Eldon, your post doesn't change the fact that you are so
misinformed as to think the president can wipe out the tax code with a
stroke of his pen.

You are clueless.

VRWC32

unread,
May 27, 2007, 10:19:53 AM5/27/07
to

Nice sentiment. Hope it happens. Unfortunately, the ONLY way it has
ANY chance of happening is if every member of Congress under a Ron
Paul administration is an exact clone of Ron Paul. The Income Tax is
one of the top two mechanisms that makes it possible for the venal,
never-ending regimes in Washington D.C. to continue its parasitic
lifestyle. Thus, it will not stop until it has killed its host.


On 24 May 2007 17:15:34 -0700, Vicegerent <ge...@mail.samhill.co.uk>
wrote:

Vicegerent

unread,
May 27, 2007, 4:42:58 PM5/27/07
to
On May 27, 8:19 am, VRWC32 <priv...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Nice sentiment. Hope it happens. Unfortunately, the ONLY way it has
> ANY chance of happening is if every member of Congress under a Ron
> Paul administration is an exact clone of Ron Paul. The Income Tax is
> one of the top two mechanisms that makes it possible for the venal,
> never-ending regimes in Washington D.C. to continue its parasitic
> lifestyle. Thus, it will not stop until it has killed its host.
>
> On 24 May 2007 17:15:34 -0700, Vicegerent <g...@mail.samhill.co.uk>

> wrote:
>
> >RON PAUL SAID HE WOULD KILL THE IRS IN HIS
> >FIRST WEEK AS PRESIDENT.
>
> >Watch this short video:
>
> >http://youtube.com/watch?v=vyT3SBiTbpc
>
> >Then, IRS goons like Dave Johnson of the Denver area,
> >posting as Captain America II will have to resort to
> >picking bottles to survive, if they have enough intelligence
> >to do that.
>
> >Vicegerent

Just because Jack Foster (Abbot) says the
Presidential "Executive Order" cannot abolish
the IRS and the income tax, does not make it so.

[Here is an ego website showing this puke
from Kentucky:
http://kanata.250free.com/rayder.htm ]

Lincoln was the first to use the "executive Order",
and with it, he abolished the system of triune
checks and balances of the original federal
government of the USA. I would suggest that,
in essence, his nullifying the Constitution for
the USA by executive order is a weightier
matter than abolishing the income tax.

Vicegerent

Abbot

unread,
May 27, 2007, 9:00:52 PM5/27/07
to
> Vicegerent- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Abbot) Warman, you are an ignorant sh*t. Lincoln excesses where
declared unconstitutional and the rulings stuck, thus disproving your
claim of an 1860's American imperial presidency. I have straightened
you out on this point before, yet you keep telling the same old
story.

You are either a liar or a retard.

Abbot

unread,
May 27, 2007, 9:03:03 PM5/27/07
to
On May 27, 1:42 pm, Vicegerent <g...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote:
> Vicegerent- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Abbot) Warman, you ignorant sh*t. Lincoln excesses were declared

Vicegerent

unread,
May 28, 2007, 7:11:21 PM5/28/07
to
> If you believe my shit, you are either a liar or a retard.
> I have no proof of what I just said, mainly because
> there is no proof of what I just said about Lincoln.

Guess you are right, Abbot.

Vicegerent

rudy-...@excite.com

unread,
May 28, 2007, 10:05:54 PM5/28/07
to
On May 25, 11:16 am, "Paul Thomas, CPA"
<paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> "Vicegerent" <g...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote

>
> > Ever heard of an "Executive Order" Paul?
>
> Eldon!! You're back. You must have finished preparing and filing your
> Canadian tax returns already. Good for you.
>
> You should read up on the theory of a balance of power, such that the
> President can't make that type of change without a change in the laws, and
> that don't happen with a pen stroke by the efforts of one man.

What laws Paul?

Show me the INCOME TAX LAW.

Paul Thomas, CPA

unread,
May 29, 2007, 8:20:45 AM5/29/07
to
Another moron posting as
<rudy-...@excite.com> wrote

> Show me the INCOME TAX LAW.


Gladly. Let's start at the top.

The Constitution of the United States of America
Section 8.
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and
Excises

Amendment XVI.
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from
whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and
without regard to any census or enumeration.

United States Code
TITLE 26 - INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
SUBTITLE A - INCOME TAXES
CHAPTER 1 - NORMAL TAXES AND SURTAXES
SUBCHAPTER A - DETERMINATION OF TAX LIABILITY
PART I - TAX ON INDIVIDUALS

Section 1. Tax imposed
(a) Married individuals filing joint returns and surviving spouses
There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of -
(1) every married individual
(b) Heads of households
There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every head of a
household

(c) Unmarried individuals (other than surviving spouses and heads
of households)
There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every individual
(other than a surviving spouse as defined in section 2(a) or the
head of a household as defined in section 2(b)) who is not a
married individual

(d) Married individuals filing separate returns
There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every married
individual (as defined in section 7703) who does not make a single
return jointly with his spouse

You may like this one..............

Section 6012. Persons required to make returns of income
(a) General rule
Returns with respect to income taxes under subtitle A shall be
made by the following:
(1)(A) Every individual having for the taxable year gross
income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount


Section 61. Gross income defined
(a) General definition
Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means
all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited
to) the following items:
(1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions,
fringe benefits, and similar items;
(2) Gross income derived from business;
(3) Gains derived from dealings in property;
(4) Interest;
(5) Rents;
(6) Royalties;
(7) Dividends;
(8) Alimony and separate maintenance payments;
(9) Annuities;
(10) Income from life insurance and endowment contracts;
(11) Pensions;
(12) Income from discharge of indebtedness;
(13) Distributive share of partnership gross income;
(14) Income in respect of a decedent; and
(15) Income from an interest in an estate or trust.

Section 62. Adjusted gross income defined (a) General rule
For purposes of this subtitle, the term "adjusted gross income"
means, in the case of an individual, gross income minus the
following deductions:
(1) Trade and business deductions
(2) Certain trade and business deductions of employees
(C) Certain expenses of officials
(D) Certain expenses of elementary and secondary school
teachers
(E) Certain expenses of members of reserve components of the
Armed Forces of the United States
(3) Losses from sale or exchange of property
(4) Deductions attributable to rents and royalties
(5) Certain deductions of life tenants and income beneficiaries
of property
(6) Pension, profit-sharing, and annuity plans of self-employed
individuals
(7) Retirement savings
(9) Penalties forfeited because of premature withdrawal of funds
from time savings accounts or deposits
(10) Alimony
(11) Reforestation expenses
(12) Certain required repayments of supplemental unemployment
compensation benefits
(13) Jury duty pay remitted to employer
(14) Deduction for clean-fuel vehicles and certain refueling
property
(15) Moving expenses
(16) Archer MSAs
(17) Interest on education loans
(18) Higher education expenses
(19) Health savings accounts

Section 63. Taxable income defined (a) In general
Except as provided in subsection (b), for purposes of this
subtitle, the term "taxable income" means gross income minus the
deductions allowed by this chapter (other than the standard
deduction).
(b) Individuals who do not itemize their deductions
In the case of an individual who does not elect to itemize his
deductions for the taxable year, for purposes of this subtitle, the
term "taxable income" means adjusted gross income, minus -
(1) the standard deduction, and
(2) the deduction for personal exemptions provided in section 151.


--
"For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For
those who do not, none will suffice." - Joseph Dunniger

Archmedes

unread,
May 29, 2007, 2:19:56 PM5/29/07
to
<rudy-...@excite.com> wrote:
> What laws Paul?
> Show me the INCOME TAX LAW.

This might help. The IRS recently showed Sidley Austin LLP the law:
http://www.irs.gov/irs/article/0,,id=170731,00.html


0 new messages