<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes</id>
  <title type="text">misc.taxes Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Tax laws and advice.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/misc.taxes/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="misc.taxes feed"/>
  <updated>2008-07-24T21:25:36Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Thomas, CPA</name>
  <email>paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T21:22:19Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/9249bb7cc7e86a5c?show_docid=9249bb7cc7e86a5c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/9249bb7cc7e86a5c?show_docid=9249bb7cc7e86a5c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;lt;JackneySn...@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; Whatever dude. &lt;br&gt; Government does exist. It&#39;s what was created by &amp;quot;the cooperative and &lt;br&gt; voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principal mode of &lt;br&gt; organized society&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; So all you are proposing to do is change the term &amp;quot;government&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;anarchy&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; Is your entire argument, and therefore your life&#39;s work, based on semantics?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>nat</name>
  <email>esen...@tx.rr.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T21:25:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/a6eb48f767e3aef5?show_docid=a6eb48f767e3aef5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/a6eb48f767e3aef5?show_docid=a6eb48f767e3aef5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Employer Identification Number</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Don&#39;t have a payroll and you won&#39;t owe those taxes. &lt;br&gt; Don&#39;t turn a profit and you won&#39;t owe those taxes. &lt;br&gt; If you want to run a business just for the fun of it, be my guest. &lt;br&gt; If you believe that, you are hopelessly deluded. &lt;br&gt; I double dog dare you. Try to pay an income tax without earning any &lt;br&gt; income.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>JackneySneeb@gmail.com</name>
  <email>jackneysn...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T20:14:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/0635d6d1fdc5e5dd?show_docid=0635d6d1fdc5e5dd</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/0635d6d1fdc5e5dd?show_docid=0635d6d1fdc5e5dd"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Jul 24, 9:54 am, &amp;quot;Paul Thomas, CPA&amp;quot; &amp;lt;paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net &amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Ergo: anarchy - not &amp;quot;government&amp;quot; - exists. &lt;br&gt; Q.E.D. &lt;br&gt; --Jackney Sneeb
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Thomas, CPA</name>
  <email>paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T18:31:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/8f67eb1efa76784d?show_docid=8f67eb1efa76784d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/8f67eb1efa76784d?show_docid=8f67eb1efa76784d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Employer Identification Number</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;lt;jonn...@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; Again, in plain words. Don&#39;t have a profit, earn wages or income, generate &lt;br&gt; gains, etc and so on. &lt;br&gt; An LLC, taxed as a partnership, passes it&#39;s profits, gains, income, &lt;br&gt; earnings, etc along to it&#39;s partners who will pay the appropriate taxes on &lt;br&gt; the amount and types of income, earnings, profits, gains, etc.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>jonn...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T17:07:20Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/b712220b02786333?show_docid=b712220b02786333</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/b712220b02786333?show_docid=b712220b02786333"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Employer Identification Number</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Jul 24, 7:49 am, &amp;quot;Paul Thomas, CPA&amp;quot; &amp;lt;paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net &amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Perhaps I was too general when &amp;quot;I stated I do not want to do ANYTHING &lt;br&gt; that places this state-sanctioned entity within the taxing authority &lt;br&gt; of the federal goverment.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; What I intened to express is that I do not want do anything that
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Thomas, CPA</name>
  <email>paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T16:54:19Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/bca8e25fdbe21562?show_docid=bca8e25fdbe21562</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/bca8e25fdbe21562?show_docid=bca8e25fdbe21562"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;lt;JackneySn...@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;political and social disorder&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; also &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;a theory that regards the absence of all direct or coercive government as a &lt;br&gt; political ideal and that proposes the cooperative and voluntary association &lt;br&gt; of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; **with the punctuation mark inside the quote - as if that changes things**
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>JackneySneeb@gmail.com</name>
  <email>jackneysn...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T15:47:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/fe927eb168a7aab9?show_docid=fe927eb168a7aab9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/fe927eb168a7aab9?show_docid=fe927eb168a7aab9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Once again &amp;quot;cpt&amp;quot; banjo breaks his pledge not to react to my posts. &lt;br&gt; And once again he demonstrates his lack of knowledge of the subject &lt;br&gt; matter. ed senter&#39;s argument is based on the idea that right, wrong, &lt;br&gt; good, bad, better, worse are all subjective judgments, not objective &lt;br&gt; truths - not mine. &lt;br&gt; Well, this is partly true . . .in theory, &amp;quot;government&amp;quot; is better than
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>cpt banjo</name>
  <email>cptba...@aol.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T14:55:53Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/7f39a7c4fc1c51c1?show_docid=7f39a7c4fc1c51c1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/7f39a7c4fc1c51c1?show_docid=7f39a7c4fc1c51c1"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Jul 23, 11:35 pm, &amp;quot;JackneySn...@gmail.com&amp;quot; &amp;lt;JackneySn...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Once again Malloy shows the vacuity of his ideas. If his statement is &lt;br&gt; true, then anarchy is no better than any other system, and all of his &lt;br&gt; screeds to the contrary are just so much hot air because there is no &lt;br&gt; objective standard by which he could ever demonstrate that anything he
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Thomas, CPA</name>
  <email>paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T12:47:02Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/e4c58a182ab7efbf?show_docid=e4c58a182ab7efbf</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/e4c58a182ab7efbf?show_docid=e4c58a182ab7efbf"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Employer Identification Number</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;lt;jonn...@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; No. You don&#39;t. &lt;br&gt; Look harder. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs4.asp?DocName=080501800HArt%2E+1&amp;ActID=2290&amp;ChapAct=805%26nbsp%3BILCS%26nbsp%3B180%2F&amp;ChapterID=65&amp;ChapterName=BUSINESS+ORGANIZATIONS&amp;SectionID=64924&amp;SeqStart=1000&amp;SeqEnd=3000&amp;ActName=Limited+Liability+Company+Act%2E&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Thomas, CPA</name>
  <email>paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T12:50:45Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/05fe7dd7a20ee183?show_docid=05fe7dd7a20ee183</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/05fe7dd7a20ee183?show_docid=05fe7dd7a20ee183"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;lt;JackneySn...@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;APA&amp;quot;??? &lt;br&gt; American Punctuation mark Association? &lt;br&gt; Good Lord Malloy. Is that the best you got?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Thomas, CPA</name>
  <email>paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T12:49:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/a0397937699afcc5?show_docid=a0397937699afcc5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/a0397937699afcc5?show_docid=a0397937699afcc5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Employer Identification Number</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;lt;jonn...@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; That&#39;s easy Dale. Do not have any profit, income, gains, etc. &lt;br&gt; Easy. Don&#39;t have any income, profits, gains, etc.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Tax Tip</name>
  <email>realtaxt...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T09:53:27Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/50d984baeb290f13/462cf9b9ba0d36be?show_docid=462cf9b9ba0d36be</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/50d984baeb290f13/462cf9b9ba0d36be?show_docid=462cf9b9ba0d36be"/>
  <title type="text">No Loss Limit for Real Estate Professionals and Spouses</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Real estate professionals can claim unlimited investment property &lt;br&gt; losses against their income regardless of how much they or their &lt;br&gt; spouse earns. People at high income brackets cannot claim losses on &lt;br&gt; rental activities due to loss limitations, so many of them resort to &lt;br&gt; becoming real estate professionals, allowing them to deduct unlimited
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>jonn...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T05:14:52Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/b53884071f5d080f?show_docid=b53884071f5d080f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/b53884071f5d080f?show_docid=b53884071f5d080f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Employer Identification Number</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Yes. The federal government has the Constitutional power to collect &lt;br&gt; two classes of taxes: direct and indirect. &lt;br&gt; There does not currently exist in our nation a direct tax. &lt;br&gt; There are a plethora of indirect taxes - the federal income taxes are &lt;br&gt; of the &amp;quot;indirect&amp;quot; class. &lt;br&gt; Indirect taxes are levied against goods and activities. These types of
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>jonn...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T05:04:59Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/ae0bdccec58a7690?show_docid=ae0bdccec58a7690</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/fce0c271f5c0d44e/ae0bdccec58a7690?show_docid=ae0bdccec58a7690"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Employer Identification Number</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Jul 23, 2:04 pm, &amp;quot;Paul Thomas, CPA&amp;quot; &amp;lt;paulthomascp...@bellsouth.net &amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; I don&#39;t try very hard? &lt;br&gt; I mention that &amp;quot;Illinois has no such requirement in its law &lt;br&gt; books&amp;quot; (I&#39;m data mining the Illinois Compiled Statutes), and your &lt;br&gt; response is to refer me to goverment PUBLICATIONS (which contain &lt;br&gt; information that cannot be used in reasonable defense in court), and
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>JackneySneeb@gmail.com</name>
  <email>jackneysn...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-24T04:35:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/2be437fd6c532d19?show_docid=2be437fd6c532d19</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.taxes/browse_thread/thread/7e0c3780e52dd718/2be437fd6c532d19?show_docid=2be437fd6c532d19"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  What does that have to do with &amp;quot;hate&amp;quot;? &lt;br&gt; I have paid protection. That&#39;s all. I don&#39;t consent to be ordered &lt;br&gt; around in some general way (and neither do you) just because I paid &lt;br&gt; for a driver&#39;s license. &lt;br&gt; Absence of substantive response noted. &lt;br&gt; No, it means &amp;quot;law&amp;quot; - commandments backed by force - are not more
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
