Sworn Testimony on 1040 Form
Wolf
The clause above the signature line beginning with "Under
the penalties of perjury" is part of the statutory law
found at 26USC 6065 Entitled : Verification of Returns
See Cornell:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00006065----000-.html
What is really interesting if you go to the link on the
right called Notes
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00006065----000-notes.html You will be drawn to the fact that in 1976 Public Law 94-455 took effect in 1977 and struck out the provision for signing these kinds of returns under the Penalties of Perjury. " TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 61 > Subchapter A > PART IV >6065 NOTES: Source (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 749; Pub. L. 94 455, title XIX, 1906(a)(6), (b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1824, 1834.) Amendments 1976 Pub. L. 94 455, 1906(a)(6), struck out provisions relating to the authority of the Secretary or his delegate to require that any return, statement, or other document to be made under provision of the internal revenue laws or regulations shall be verified by an oath. Pub. L. 94 455, 1906(b)(13)(A), struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary". Effective Date of 1976 Amendment Amendment by Pub. L. 94 455 effective on first day of first month which begins more than ninety days after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1906(d)(1) of Pub. L. 94 455, set out as a note under section 6013 of this title. Don't you think it is deceptive to even put this phrase on returns.....
P. Maffia
Why insist on displaying your idiocy on Christmas Eve?
"Wolf" <wolfga...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OhD4l.22979$wV2....@newsfe07.iad...
AllYou!
P. Maffia <pma...@centurytel.net> mused:
> So what?
>
> Why insist on displaying your idiocy on Christmas Eve?
Do you really think he has anything else to do?