>"Stuart A. Bronstein" wrote in message
>news:Xns9FF390BF5FE4Bs...@130.133.4.11...
>
>She was in the trade or business for several months for the purpose
>of that one estate. Why couldn't she use a Schedule C?
I respectfully disagree - she was NOT in the trade or business of being an
executor or personal rep because she doesn't do it on a "regular and
continuous basis." The ONLY reason she did it in this case was because of
her close relationship. THAT makes it an entirely different situation.
NOW, if she acted as a personal rep for strangers, much the way accountants
and attorneys take on work for non-friends or non-family members, THEN she'd
be in a trade or business.
>On the other hand, out of pocket costs should have been paid by the
>estate. And reimbursements should not be taxable to OP.
Agreed - and this may be nothing more than fixing the book entries by
rebooking payment to her that were for expenses as expenses and NOT as
payments to her. That way the books reflect that only the payments to her
were for fiduciary fees and the other payments to her for reimbursements.
As a side note, and one of my pet peeves - this is exactly what happens in
most DIY cases. Someone, with the best of intentions, does a job in
half-hearted manner, resulting in confusion and ugly records that can easily
wind up costing several times more than the professional fees had
professional help been retained at the start.
Gene E. Utterback, EA, RFC, ABA