IRS Czars Fete at $5000 Rooms, While Children Starve

BroilJAB

unread,

Jun 5, 2013, 10:14:38 AM6/5/13

to

The Bethany Church was denied tax status while trying to feed hundreds
of starving orphans on 29 cents a day. Yet Obama's jews who run the
IRS stayed at super posh rooms charging taxpayers over $5000 a night
with whores and running up charges to taxpayers of 488 million
dollars. As Lindbergh
observed, "The Russian socalled 'jew' is a parasite on working
Christians...

Message has been deleted

benj

unread,

Jun 5, 2013, 5:11:24 PM6/5/13

to

On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray wrote:

> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
> <vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>Prepare for combat.

> Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
> 2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.

I'm afraid that privilege is reserve now for the president of the United
States. Along with other new powers at his discretion such as
imprisonment for any amount of time without trial or legal representation
or torture or other inhumane treatment. If you can't trust your president
to decide who should live and who should die (for the security of the
country, natch) then who can you trust?

> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.

How about "uninvent the gun"? That is about your level of ideas. I
presume when you say "stop the bullets" you are only referring to bullets
of victims and potential victims rather than those of criminals or
authorities in power.

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,

Jun 5, 2013, 5:42:28 PM6/5/13

to

On Jun 5, 9:00 am, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>

wrote:
> Enemies of the United States citizen.
>

> 1952- . Russia.
>
> 1988 - . Middle East.
>
> 2008 - . U.S. government.
>
> Prepare for combat.

"I am prepared!!"

-David Koresh

"Me too!!"

- Timothy McVeigh

Gunner Asch

unread,

Jun 5, 2013, 6:26:43 PM6/5/13

to

On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray
<SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"

><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>

>>1952 - . Russia.

>>
>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>
>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>
>>
>>
>>Prepare for combat.
>

>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>

>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.

Dont tell us. Your a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook.
Your someone that believes that the 2nd Amendment was a suggestion and
you want to kill everyone who thinks its important.

Stop the buffoonery. Kill yourself.

Your family will get over the shame of having you in the family
quickly after you are gone.

--
"You guess the truth hurts?

Really?

"Hurt" aint the word.

For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
Sunlight to a vampire.
Raid® to a cockroach.
Sheriff Brody to a shark
Bush to a Liberal

The truth doesn't just hurt. It's painful, like a red hot poker shoved
up their ass. Like sliding down a hundred foot razor blade using their
dick as a brake.

They HATE the truth."

Don Kresch

unread,

Jun 5, 2013, 6:55:31 PM6/5/13

to

On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray

<SavageGray...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:

>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>
>>1952 - . Russia.
>>
>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>
>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>
>>
>>
>>Prepare for combat.
>
>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>
>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.

Stop the drinking; kill the alcohol.

Same thing.

Don
aa#51, Knight of BAAWA, Jedi Slackmaster
Praise "Bob" or burn in Slacklessness trying not to.

Bleed

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 1:31:30 PM6/6/13

to

In article <aj9vq81l21ru9fdtg...@4ax.com>

Gray <SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
> <vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >Enemies of the United States citizen.
> >
> >1952 - . Russia.
> >
> >1988 - . Middle East.
> >
> >2008 - . U.S. government.
> >
> >
> >
> >Prepare for combat.
>
> Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
> 2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.

Makes you piss your pants, doesn't it Fauntleroy?

> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.

Stop Communism, kill scared ignorant liberals.

Gunner Asch

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 2:03:24 PM6/6/13

to

So who is "Harrison J. Bounel"?

RD Sandman

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 4:22:52 PM6/6/13

to

Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:rmj1r8toih8m33mnb...@4ax.com:

According to the claim....it is an alias for Obama.

http://tinyurl.com/42hn4lv

Too many to list here....... just used Harrison J. Bounel as a search
argument and you can read several of them.

--
Sleep well, tonight.....

RD (The Sandman

Old Air Force adage..The only time you have too
much fuel is when you are on fire!!

Message has been deleted

Dakota

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 6:18:32 PM6/6/13

to

On 6/6/2013 4:11 PM, Gray wrote:

> On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:55:31 -0500, Don Kresch
> <spam...@spamcatch.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray
>> <SavageGray...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:
>>
>>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>>> <vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>>
>>>> 1952 - . Russia.
>>>>
>>>> 1988 - . Middle East.
>>>>
>>>> 2008 - . U.S. government.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Prepare for combat.
>>>
>>> Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>>> 2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>>
>>> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>
>> Stop the drinking; kill the alcohol.
>>
>> Same thing.
>>
>>
>

> So what? I don't drink and I don't think other people should drink
> either.

>
> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>

Repealing the Second Amendment would have the same effect as did the
18th Amendment banning alcohol. It simply drove the business
underground to be run by mobsters.

By the way, vivapadrepio is a troll. He regularly predicts the end of
the world. Don't take anything he posts seriously.

Frank

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 6:30:38 PM6/6/13

to

On 6/5/2013 4:59 PM, Gray wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
> <vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>
>> 1952 - . Russia.
>>
>> 1988 - . Middle East.
>>
>> 2008 - . U.S. government.
>>
>>
>>
>> Prepare for combat.
>
> Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
> 2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>
> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>

Count me as a gun nut, but I believe we should starve this enemy.
Cut way back on his funds.

Don Kresch

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 6:37:11 PM6/6/13

to

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:10:44 -0400, Gray
<SavageGray...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:

>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:26:43 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:

>
>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray
>><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>>><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>>
>>>>1952 - . Russia.
>>>>
>>>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>>>
>>>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Prepare for combat.
>>>
>>>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>>>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>>
>>>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>
>>Dont tell us. Your a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook.
>>Your someone that believes that the 2nd Amendment was a suggestion and
>>you want to kill everyone who thinks its important.
>

>The second Amendment was hardly about individual's having the right to
>own guns.

Except that it is.

Don Kresch

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 6:37:45 PM6/6/13

to

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:11:16 -0400, Gray
<SavageGray...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:

>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:55:31 -0500, Don Kresch
><spam...@spamcatch.org> wrote:
>

>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray
>><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:
>>
>>>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>>><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>>
>>>>1952 - . Russia.
>>>>
>>>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>>>
>>>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Prepare for combat.
>>>
>>>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>>>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>>
>>>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>
>> Stop the drinking; kill the alcohol.
>>
>> Same thing.
>>
>>
>

>So what? I don't drink and I don't think other people should drink
>either.

I don't think you should be able to post to Usenet.

Gunner Asch

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 10:01:38 PM6/6/13

to

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:06:49 -0400, Gray
<SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>If we ban all guns, then the bullets will stop.

>
>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.

That hasnt worked in 10,000 yrs with any weapon. What makes you think
it will work now?

Hows that working out in the UK these days?

Hummmm?

Gunner Asch

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 10:04:15 PM6/6/13

to

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:09:09 -0400, Gray
<SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>>
>>> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>

>>More like killing out of self defense. 'Prepare for combat' is a suggestion. Some will, some won't.
>
>Tell that to the innocent children of Sandy Hook and their families.
>Preparing for combat has always resulted in combat. You reap what you
>sow.

So if we prepare for combat..it means that there are people we are
preparing against.

Now if there werent any such people..we wouldnt have combat.

So you are claiming that not preparing for combat removes those other
people from the equation?

Really?

So..out on parole or did the Home give you a couple days out of your
cell?

Gunner

--
"You guess the truth hurts?

Really?

"Hurt" aint the word.

For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
Sunlight to a vampire.

RaidŽ to a cockroach.

Gunner Asch

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 10:05:44 PM6/6/13

to

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:10:44 -0400, Gray

<SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>>
>>>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>>>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>>
>>>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>
>>Dont tell us. Your a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook.
>>Your someone that believes that the 2nd Amendment was a suggestion and
>>you want to kill everyone who thinks its important.
>

>The second Amendment was hardly about individual's having the right to

>own guns. That much is clear.

Really? Cites? And you may wish to take that up with the SCOTUS as
well.

<VBG>

Your opinions are rather fascinating. Ive not looked at your header
info to see if you are one of the regular trolls..or are simply
deranged.

Should I?

Gunner

Gunner Asch

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 10:06:36 PM6/6/13

to

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:11:16 -0400, Gray
<SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:55:31 -0500, Don Kresch
><spam...@spamcatch.org> wrote:
>

>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray
>><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:
>>
>>>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>>><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>>
>>>>1952 - . Russia.
>>>>
>>>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>>>
>>>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Prepare for combat.
>>>
>>>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>>>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>>
>>>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>
>> Stop the drinking; kill the alcohol.
>>
>> Same thing.
>>
>>
>

>So what? I don't drink and I don't think other people should drink
>either.

So you think your opinion has more power than someone elses?

Really?
Fascinating!

>
>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.

Gunner Asch

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 10:07:44 PM6/6/13

to

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:37:45 -0500, Don Kresch

<spam...@spamcatch.org> wrote:

>On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:11:16 -0400, Gray
><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:
>
>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:55:31 -0500, Don Kresch
>><spam...@spamcatch.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray
>>><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>>>><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>>>
>>>>>1952 - . Russia.
>>>>>
>>>>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>>>>
>>>>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Prepare for combat.
>>>>
>>>>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>>>>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>>>
>>>>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>>
>>> Stop the drinking; kill the alcohol.
>>>
>>> Same thing.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>So what? I don't drink and I don't think other people should drink
>>either.
>
> I don't think you should be able to post to Usenet.

I agree!

Seems the majority wins in this case.

Bailif! Cut his connection!!

<plink>

Gunner

>
>Don
>aa#51, Knight of BAAWA, Jedi Slackmaster
>Praise "Bob" or burn in Slacklessness trying not to.

Gray Guest

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 11:07:26 PM6/6/13

to

Gray <SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:aj9vq81l21ru9fdtg...@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>
>>1952 - . Russia.
>>
>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>
>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>
>>
>>
>>Prepare for combat.
>
> Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
> 2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>
> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.

Really? Who has actually said that?

--
Refusenik #1

Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.

Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama

Olrik

unread,

Jun 6, 2013, 11:36:40 PM6/6/13

to

Le 2013-06-06 18:37, Don Kresch a �crit :

I like it when you play the little statist. I really do: it destroys
pretty much every single post you wrote here.

> Don
> aa#51, Knight of BAAWA, Jedi Slackmaster
> Praise "Bob" or burn in Slacklessness trying not to.
>

--
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

Gray Guest

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 12:04:07 AM6/7/13

to

Gray <SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:blu1r8949h6qhq1j9...@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:26:43 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>

>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray
>><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>>><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>>
>>>>1952 - . Russia.
>>>>
>>>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>>>
>>>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Prepare for combat.
>>>
>>>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>>>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>>
>>>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>
>>Dont tell us. Your a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook.
>>Your someone that believes that the 2nd Amendment was a suggestion and
>>you want to kill everyone who thinks its important.
>

> The second Amendment was hardly about individual's having the right to

> own guns. That much is clear.

>
>
> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>

Really? "the right of the P-E-O-P-L-E to keep and bear arms shall not be
infringed" Are you an illiterate fucktard or just a dumbfuck zipperhead?

Please interpet that sentence for us, sparky.

Jun 7, 2013, 1:33:41 AM6/7/13

to

Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com> on Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:26:43 -0700
typed in misc.survivalism the following:

>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray
><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>
>>>1952 - . Russia.
>>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>>
>>>Prepare for combat.
>>
>>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>
>>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>
>Dont tell us. Your a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook.

It is projecting again. Because it is obvious form it's
statements, that it has no idea what the Constitution of the United
States is about, or what the 2nd Amendment is about. There are some
things which are so outrageously wrong, only an intellectual would
believe them.

>You're someone that believes that the 2nd Amendment was a suggestion and

>you want to kill everyone who thinks its important.
>
>Stop the buffoonery. Kill yourself.
>
>Your family will get over the shame of having you in the family
>quickly after you are gone.

You presume two things not in evidence.

That it has a family, and that they might have any shame to speak
of.
--
pyotr filipivich.
Just about the time you finally see light at the end of the tunnel,
you find out it's a Government Project to build more tunnel.

pyotr filipivich

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 1:33:41 AM6/7/13

to

Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com> on Thu, 06 Jun 2013 19:04:15 -0700

typed in misc.survivalism the following:

>On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:09:09 -0400, Gray
><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>>
>>>More like killing out of self defense. 'Prepare for combat' is a suggestion. Some will, some won't.
>>
>>Tell that to the innocent children of Sandy Hook and their families.
>>Preparing for combat has always resulted in combat. You reap what you
>>sow.
>
>So if we prepare for combat..it means that there are people we are
>preparing against.
>
>Now if there werent any such people..we wouldnt have combat.
>
>So you are claiming that not preparing for combat removes those other
>people from the equation?
>
>Really?
>
> So..out on parole or did the Home give you a couple days out of your
>cell?

Finals are over, and the job market for those with degrees in
liberal studies is a bit ... "soft". SO these progressives have all
this time on their hand, and no more idea what to do with themselves
till starting grad school, than they did when they exited high school,
so many years ago.

SaPeIsMa

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 7:50:13 AM6/7/13

to

"Gray Guest" <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA1D817C322BBWe...@78.46.70.116...

<irony on>
But gray, "the people" is a collective term, and does not therefore mean
"individual persons".
Same as Militia is a collective term.
Haven't you had explained to you the notion that (to pinkies) EVERYBODY is
only a cog in some collective..
<irony off>

Devils Advocaat

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 8:36:24 AM6/7/13

to

On 7 June, 05:21, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Gunner Asch" <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:6mf2r8libqllennsr...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:06:49 -0400, Gray

> > <SavageGrayCork_ema...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> >>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 21:11:24 GMT, benj <b...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
>
> >>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray wrote:
>

> >>>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapadre...@aol.com"
> >>>> <vivapadre...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
> >>>>>Prepare for combat.
>
> >>>> Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
> >>>> 2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>
> >>>I'm afraid that privilege is reserve now for the president of the United
> >>>States. Along with other new powers at his discretion such as
> >>>imprisonment for any amount of time without trial or legal representation
> >>>or torture or other inhumane treatment. If you can't trust your president
> >>>to decide who should live and who should die (for the security of the
> >>>country, natch) then who can you trust?
>
> >>>> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>
> >>>How about "uninvent the gun"? That is about your level of ideas. I
> >>>presume when you say "stop the bullets" you are only referring to bullets
> >>>of victims and potential victims rather than those of criminals or
> >>>authorities in power.
>
> >>If we ban all guns, then the bullets will stop.
>
> >>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>
> > That hasnt worked in 10,000 yrs with any weapon. What makes you think
> > it will work now?
>
> > Hows that working out in the UK these days?
>
> > Hummmm?
>
> Appears that the Brits want their guns and right to self-defense back.

Any evidence for this assertion?

raven1

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 8:51:35 AM6/7/13

to

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:11:16 -0400, Gray
<SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:55:31 -0500, Don Kresch

><spam...@spamcatch.org> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray

>><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:

>>
>>>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>>><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>>

>>>>1952 - . Russia.
>>>>
>>>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>>>
>>>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

>>>>Prepare for combat.
>>>
>>>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>>>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>>

>>>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>

>> Stop the drinking; kill the alcohol.
>>
>> Same thing.
>>
>>
>
>So what? I don't drink and I don't think other people should drink
>either.

What other people do with their bodies is none of your business if it
does not infringe on yours.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 9:10:56 AM6/7/13

to

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:11:16 -0400, Gray
<SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:55:31 -0500, Don Kresch
><spam...@spamcatch.org> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray
>><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:
>>
>>>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>>><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>>
>>>>1952 - . Russia.
>>>>
>>>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>>>
>>>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Prepare for combat.
>>>
>>>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>>>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>>
>>>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>
>> Stop the drinking; kill the alcohol.
>>
>> Same thing.
>>
>>
>
>So what? I don't drink and I don't think other people should drink
>either.

So what?

"Gray dropped out of school in the sixth grade and doesn't think
anyone else should graduate high school either."

Makes perfect sense. [chuckle]

>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.

What is this supposed to mean? How can you kill something that's not
alive?

You, um, know guns are inanimate objects, right?

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 9:11:58 AM6/7/13

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 1:35:12 PM6/7/13

to

On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:02:00 -0700, pyotr filipivich
<ph...@mindspring.com> wrote:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> on Fri, 07 Jun 2013
>06:13:16 -0700 typed in misc.survivalism the following:
>>On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:09:09 -0400, Gray
>><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Tell that to the innocent children of Sandy Hook and their families.
>>>Preparing for combat has always resulted in combat
>>
>>Really? Sandy Hook was "combat?"
>>
> Of course it was - weren't assault weapon guns with the supersized

>clips involved.

Irrelevant. Combat need not involve a weapon. But it does require the
other party fighting back to fit the definition.

> Some people (and Corky here is a good example) seem to not grasp
>that the fastest way to end violence is to surrender first.

How does surrendering stop a deranged mass shooter?

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 3:22:09 PM6/7/13

to

On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:35:12 -0400, raven1
<quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:02:00 -0700, pyotr filipivich
><ph...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> on Fri, 07 Jun 2013
>>06:13:16 -0700 typed in misc.survivalism the following:
>>>On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:09:09 -0400, Gray
>>><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Tell that to the innocent children of Sandy Hook and their families.
>>>>Preparing for combat has always resulted in combat
>>>
>>>Really? Sandy Hook was "combat?"
>>>
>> Of course it was - weren't assault weapon guns with the supersized
>>clips involved.
>
>Irrelevant. Combat need not involve a weapon. But it does require the
>other party fighting back to fit the definition.

My dictionary says, " COM-bat (Noun) Fighting between armed forces.

Wonder what the Leftist Distionary says?

RD Sandman

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 3:29:52 PM6/7/13

to

Gray <SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:oeu1r8li4te6ccjdo...@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 21:11:24 GMT, benj <be...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray wrote:
>>

>>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>>> <vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>>Prepare for combat.
>>
>>> Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that
>>> the 2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't
>>> like.
>>
>>I'm afraid that privilege is reserve now for the president of the
>>United States. Along with other new powers at his discretion such as
>>imprisonment for any amount of time without trial or legal
>>representation or torture or other inhumane treatment. If you can't
>>trust your president to decide who should live and who should die (for
>>the security of the country, natch) then who can you trust?
>>
>>> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>
>>How about "uninvent the gun"? That is about your level of ideas. I
>>presume when you say "stop the bullets" you are only referring to
>>bullets of victims and potential victims rather than those of
>>criminals or authorities in power.
>
> If we ban all guns, then the bullets will stop.

How are you going to ban them when you don't know where 310 million of
them are.......and that is just the US.

--
Sleep well, tonight.....

RD (The Sandman

Old Air Force adage..The only time you have too
much fuel is when you are on fire!!

RD Sandman

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 3:30:31 PM6/7/13

to

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPe...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:kormum$vn4$1...@dont-email.me:

Some of them never lost either.

RD Sandman

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 3:32:18 PM6/7/13

to

Devils Advocaat <manky...@gmail.com> wrote in

news:be4ab54d-e7c3-45f6...@c7g2000vbv.googlegroups.com:

http://tinyurl.com/oabhjjs

Thank Gunner who posted this just before you posted.

RD Sandman

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 3:35:03 PM6/7/13

to

Gray <SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote in

news:blu1r8949h6qhq1j9...@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:26:43 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray

>><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>
>>>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>>><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>>

>>>>1952 - . Russia.
>>>>
>>>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>>>
>>>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

>>>>Prepare for combat.
>>>
>>>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>>>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>>

>>>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>

>>Dont tell us. Your a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook.
>>Your someone that believes that the 2nd Amendment was a suggestion and
>>you want to kill everyone who thinks its important.
>

> The second Amendment was hardly about individual's having the right to
> own guns. That much is clear.

What do you think it is about? Growing wheat in Kansas? Why do you
think the phrase, "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms..."
is there?

RD Sandman

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 3:40:50 PM6/7/13

to

Gray <SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:smu1r81os51q37u2o...@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:55:31 -0500, Don Kresch

> <spam...@spamcatch.org> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray

>><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> scrawled in blood:

>>
>>>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>>><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>>
>>>>1952 - . Russia.
>>>>
>>>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>>>
>>>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Prepare for combat.
>>>
>>>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the
>>>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>>
>>>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>

>> Stop the drinking; kill the alcohol.
>>
>> Same thing.
>>
>>
>
> So what? I don't drink and I don't think other people should drink
> either.

Who died and elected you monarch? Your word is not law.....and I'll
drink to that.

RD Sandman

unread,

Devils Advocaat

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 6:38:55 PM6/7/13

to

On 7 June, 22:51, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Devils Advocaat" <mankygo...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Then compare the numbers in that survey with the numbers that signed
the petition which led to the ban on handguns.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-20736167

700,000 against ownership of handguns.

Less than 20,000 wanting the ban lifted.

Which do you think really reflects the attitude of the general public?

Gunner Asch

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 7:30:04 PM6/7/13

to

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 9:17:16 PM6/7/13

to

"Devils Advocaat" <manky...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:109dfaae-c8d9-4091...@gw5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...

#
# Then compare the numbers in that survey with the numbers
# that signed the petition which led to the ban on handguns.
#
# http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-20736167
#
# 700,000 against ownership of handguns.
#
# Less than 20,000 wanting the ban lifted.
#
# Which do you think really reflects the attitude of the general public?

How about comparing apples to oranges dummy ?
The petition followed and fairly well orchestrated campaign
The poll was just that an informal poll

What do you imagine current numbers would be in the face of violent crime
increasing at an average rate of 9% in the first 10 years following the
ban/confiscation of handguns ?
What do you think the numbers would be if there was a concerted effort to
promote the repeal of the law ?

Again
Not only are you lacking in logic and semantic analysis, but intelectual
honesty also appears to be lacking.

pyotr filipivich

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 10:54:42 PM6/7/13

to

Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> on Fri, 07 Jun 2013

12:22:09 -0700 typed in misc.survivalism the following:

Does it matter?

As we used to say at Commie Martyr High

"Surrender now, avoid the War rush!"

Virgil

unread,

Jun 7, 2013, 11:00:02 PM6/7/13

to

In article <kou0ku$md0$1...@dont-email.me>,

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What do you imagine current numbers would be in the face of violent crime
> increasing at an average rate of 9% in the first 10 years following the
> ban/confiscation of handguns ?

Most people want gun ownership sensibly controlled, and types of guns
sensibly controlled, but the gun manufacturers sock puppet, the NRA,
fights sanity at every step.
--

Wisely Non-Theist

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 12:05:47 AM6/8/13

to

In article <kotvvk$jb6$1...@dont-email.me>,

"SaPeIsMa" <SaPe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Clearly you have no capacity or skill in either logic or semantic analysis

That you do not like what is said does not make it wrong.

Olrik

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 12:08:41 AM6/8/13

to

Le 2013-06-07 01:19, Gunner Asch a �crit :

> On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:36:40 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dont tell us. Your a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook.
>>>>> Your someone that believes that the 2nd Amendment was a suggestion and
>>>>> you want to kill everyone who thinks its important.
>>>>

>>>> The second Amendment was hardly about individual's having the right to
>>>> own guns.
>>>

>>> Except that it is.
>>
>> You like it when I play the little retarded statist. You really do: it destroys
>> pretty much every single post I wrote here.
>
> Ayup.

Do you really think that people can't read Usenet threads?

aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 1:10:50 AM6/8/13

to

In article <virgil-7FD48A....@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM>,

The ruling strawman is lethal to any sane measures.

Not one of those morons can provide even one piece of evidence that the
US is trying to take law-abiding citizens' guns away. They scream about
it all the time, but the only people actually talking about it are their
media puppetmasters.

--

JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

Jason

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 1:53:42 AM6/8/13

to

In article <hlwdjsd2-174AD3...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne

<http://heritageaction.com/2013/03/morning-action-liberal-senator-want-obama-to-back-her-assault-weapons-ban/>

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 10:28:49 AM6/8/13

to

"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:mbj5r8tj2ho2lmcm3...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:00:02 -0600, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <kou0ku$md0$1...@dont-email.me>,
>> "SaPeIsMa" <SaPe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What do you imagine current numbers would be in the face of violent
>>> crime
>>> increasing at an average rate of 9% in the first 10 years following the
>>> ban/confiscation of handguns ?
>>
>>Most people want gun ownership sensibly controlled, and types of guns
>>sensibly controlled, but the gun manufacturers sock puppet, the NRA,
>>fights sanity at every step.
>
>
> Most people? Cites!!!
>

Well, he believes it. and probably knows 2 other people who agree with him.
So that becomes "most people (he knows)" believe it..

Come on.
You already know this...
:-))

SaPeIsMa

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 10:32:18 AM6/8/13

to

"Wisely Non-Theist" <a...@bbb.ccc> wrote in message
news:aaa-A60906.2...@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM...

So you're claiming that his "guess", since it was not the result of rational
thought processes, was right ??
<snicker>

SaPeIsMa

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 10:30:17 AM6/8/13

to

"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:4dj5r8t0o8f4f0qkr...@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 00:08:41 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

>>Le 2013-06-07 01:19, Gunner Asch a ï¿½crit :

>>> On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:36:40 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dont tell us. Your a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook.
>>>>>>> Your someone that believes that the 2nd Amendment was a suggestion
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> you want to kill everyone who thinks its important.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The second Amendment was hardly about individual's having the right
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> own guns.
>>>>>
>>>>> Except that it is.
>>>>
>>>> You like it when I play the little retarded statist. You really do: it
>>>> destroys
>>>> pretty much every single post I wrote here.
>>>
>>> Ayup.
>>
>>Do you really think that people can't read Usenet threads?
>>
>>aa #1981
>>EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
>
>
> Obviously you dont think so. Pity you are so fucking stupid.
>

null-rik is pretty dumb
And when it's not dumb, it's just stupid.
Probably the bacon he inspects is smarter than it is.

Uncle Steve

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 2:12:45 PM6/8/13

to

To a certain degree all of the hoopla surrounding the "gun debate" is
a great deal of sound and fury, signifying nothing. While there are
quite a few people who sincerely like the idea of completely disarming
the civilian population, they are not representative of where the real
threat lies.

The looming threat is governments, their police and military forces,
in posession of a wide spectrum of sophisticated weapons that are
unavailable to civilians at all. That is, not just firearms. In
addition the corrupt courts and all of the rest give too much power to
those who would be in control of armaments that may be deployed
against civilian populations. If corrupt secret police can turn off
or otherwise subvert your automobile, personal computers, and
telephones when they want to attack you -- for whaever motive -- a
firearm becomes a completely inadequate defensive weapon in that kind
of scenario.

On this basis, I consider the gun debate to be little more than a sick
joke. "Average is dumb" they say, and the shrill myopic loudmouths
barking on either side of the "gun control" debate are proving only
that they are easily led and blind to much of reality.

Regards,

Uncle Steve

--
There should be a special word in the English language to identify
people who create problems and then turn around and offer up their own
tailor-made bogus non-solutions designed to completely avoid the root
causes of the situation under consideration. 'Traitor' might be a
good choice, but lacks the requisite specificity. One of the problems
with contemporary English is it lacks many such words that would
otherwise categorically identify certain kinds of person, place, or
thing -- making it difficult or impossible to think analytically about
such objects. These shortcomings of the English lexicon are
representative of Orwellian linguistics at work in the real world.

Gray Guest

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 2:12:09 PM6/8/13

to

Gray <SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:blu1r8949h6qhq1j9...@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:26:43 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray

>><SavageGray...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>
>>>On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT), "vivapa...@aol.com"
>>><vivapa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.
>>>>

>>>>1952 - . Russia.
>>>>
>>>>1988 - . Middle East.
>>>>
>>>>2008 - . U.S. government.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Prepare for combat.
>>>
>>>Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes that the

>>>2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't like.
>>>

>>>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>

>>Dont tell us. Your a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook.
>>Your someone that believes that the 2nd Amendment was a suggestion and
>>you want to kill everyone who thinks its important.
>
> The second Amendment was hardly about individual's having the right to

> own guns. That much is clear.

So you're illiterate? Have you ever actually read the 2nd Amendment?

"the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"

Sorry, but we don't subscribe to the collectivist "people", never have
never will.

>
>
> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>

--
Refusenik #1

Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.

Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama

RD Sandman

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 4:18:01 PM6/8/13

to

Devils Advocaat <manky...@gmail.com> wrote in

news:f9595a3a-d42c-4021...@bh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com:

> On 7 June, 20:32, RD Sandman <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com> wrote

>> innews:be4ab54d-e7c3-45f6-96
> 7f-ae55...@c7g2000vbv.googlegroups.com:

>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 7 June, 05:21, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> "Gunner Asch" <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:6mf2r8libqllennsr...@4ax.com...
>>
>> >> > On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:06:49 -0400, Gray
>> >> > <SavageGrayCork_ema...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>

>> >> >>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 21:11:24 GMT, benj <b...@iwaynet.net> wrote:

>>
>> >> >>>On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:59:16 -0400, Gray wrote:
>>
>> >> >>>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT),
>> >> >>>> "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >>>>>Enemies of the United States citizen.

>> >> >>>>>Prepare for combat.
>>
>> >> >>>> Don't tell me. You're a gun nut. You're someone who believes
>> >> >>>> that th
>> > e
>> >> >>>> 2nd Amendment gives them the right to kill people they don't
>> >> >>>> like.
>>

>> >> >>>I'm afraid that privilege is reserve now for the president of
>> >> >>>the Unit
>> > ed
>> >> >>>States. Along with other new powers at his discretion such as
>> >> >>>imprisonment for any amount of time without trial or legal
>> >> >>>representat
>> > ion
>> >> >>>or torture or other inhumane treatment. If you can't trust your
>> >> >>>presid
>> > ent
>> >> >>>to decide who should live and who should die (for the security
>> >> >>>of the country, natch) then who can you trust?
>>

>> >> >>>> Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>

>> >> >>>How about "uninvent the gun"? That is about your level of
>> >> >>>ideas. I presume when you say "stop the bullets" you are only
>> >> >>>referring to bull
>> > ets
>> >> >>>of victims and potential victims rather than those of criminals
>> >> >>>or authorities in power.
>>
>> >> >>If we ban all guns, then the bullets will stop.
>>

>> >> >>Stop the bullets. Kill the gun.
>>

>> >> > That hasnt worked in 10,000 yrs with any weapon. What makes you
>> >> > thin
>> > k
>> >> > it will work now?
>>
>> >> > Hows that working out in the UK these days?
>>
>> >> > Hummmm?
>>
>> >> Appears that the Brits want their guns and right to self-defense
>> >> back.
>>
>> > Any evidence for this assertion?
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/oabhjjs
>>
>> Thank Gunner who posted this just before you posted.
>

> If you compare population data with the number of respondents I

> wouldn't call that an overwhelming demand for the ban on handguns to

> be lifted. I live in the UK and regularly watch the major news channel
> BBC News 24 and as far as I can recall this tidbit never even made it
> onto that channel.

Same thing happens in the US if the news doesn't jube with the agendas.

--
Sleep well, tonight.....

RD (The Sandman

Old Air Force adage..The only time you have too
much fuel is when you are on fire!!

RD Sandman

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 4:21:15 PM6/8/13

to

Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote in
news:virgil-7FD48A....@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM:

> In article <kou0ku$md0$1...@dont-email.me>,
> "SaPeIsMa" <SaPe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What do you imagine current numbers would be in the face of violent
>> crime increasing at an average rate of 9% in the first 10 years
>> following the ban/confiscation of handguns ?
>
> Most people want gun ownership sensibly controlled, and types of guns
> sensibly controlled,

The problem is that that differs depending on who you are talking with.
There are lots of ways to address the violence problem but I have no
truck with those who only look at guns as the controlling entity.

but the gun manufacturers sock puppet, the NRA,
> fights sanity at every step.

--

RD Sandman

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 4:24:38 PM6/8/13

to

Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in
news:hlwdjsd2-4C9089...@news.giganews.com:

It is one of the guns I desire to own. Hell, I can pass the background
check and pay the stamp for a full auto Tommy gun but won't be able to
buy an AR15 or AK clone which is semi automatic...a characterstic that
will be used to ban other guns that already own like my Glocks.

> Will you stop lying about this.

Who's lying? Are you denying that any member of Congress has banning of
certain firearms in mind?

Olrik

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 5:57:40 PM6/8/13

to

Le 2013-06-08 02:22, Gunner Asch a écrit :
> On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 00:08:41 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Le 2013-06-07 01:19, Gunner Asch a écrit :
>>> On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:36:40 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dont tell us. Your a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook.
>>>>>>> Your someone that believes that the 2nd Amendment was a suggestion and
>>>>>>> you want to kill everyone who thinks its important.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The second Amendment was hardly about individual's having the right to
>>>>>> own guns.
>>>>>
>>>>> Except that it is.
>>>>
>>>> You like it when I play the little retarded statist. You really do: it destroys
>>>> pretty much every single post I wrote here.
>>>
>>> Ayup.
>>
>> Do you really think that people can't read Usenet threads?
>

> Obviously you dont think so. Pity you are so fucking stupid.

Wooooooshhhhh...

--
Olrik

Scout

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 6:27:40 PM6/8/13

to

"Virgil" <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote in message
news:virgil-7FD48A....@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM...

Ok...

Please list of us the "sensible controls" you would put on gun ownership
that do not already exist.

---->

Then you can list for us the "sensibly controlled" types of guns that aren't
already controlled

----->

Scout

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 6:28:41 PM6/8/13

to

"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd2-174AD3...@news.giganews.com...

> In article <virgil-7FD48A....@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM>,
> Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <kou0ku$md0$1...@dont-email.me>,
>> "SaPeIsMa" <SaPe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > What do you imagine current numbers would be in the face of violent
>> > crime
>> > increasing at an average rate of 9% in the first 10 years following the
>> > ban/confiscation of handguns ?
>>
>> Most people want gun ownership sensibly controlled, and types of guns
>> sensibly controlled, but the gun manufacturers sock puppet, the NRA,
>> fights sanity at every step.
>
> The ruling strawman is lethal to any sane measures.
>
> Not one of those morons can provide even one piece of evidence that the
> US is trying to take law-abiding citizens' guns away.

Washington DC
Chicago
California

Gunner Asch

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 6:47:42 PM6/8/13

to

Denial again Oildick?

You really are one of the dumbest leftwingers Ive ever had the
displeasure of running across on Usenet. And thats really saying a
lot.

Poor Oildick....hates my sig in the worst way. Its about him.

Gunner

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 7:09:10 PM6/8/13

to

On Jun 5, 4:42 pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 9:00 am, "vivapadre...@aol.com" <vivapadre...@aol.com>

> wrote:
> > Enemies of the United States citizen.
> >

> > 1952- . Russia.

> >
> > 1988 - . Middle East.
> >
> > 2008 - . U.S. government.
> >
> > Prepare for combat.
>

> "I am prepared!!"
>
> -David Koresh
>
> "Me too!!"
>
> - Timothy McVeigh

So am I.

-Signed: Janet Reno

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 7:10:30 PM6/8/13

to

Ditto.

- Signed: Janet Napolitano

George Madonna

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 7:21:08 PM6/8/13

to

My enemies are people who can't conjugate verbs in French.

Do you know that if you moved to Quebec, they would force your
children to read and speak in French?

That's why illegals like you are better served in tolerant countries
like the USA.

If a Mexican Gangster is arrested in Montreal, he'll face a court that
only speaks French.

And if he argues, he will be beaten until he complies.

Language is important in a court of law. And Quebec observes Code
Napoleon.

The law code of the people, not that of the foreign interloper.

Come and visit, but don't dare break the law unless you are fluent in
the language of love and civilization, French.

You speak Spanish. Are you a Spaniard or a Catalonian?

MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 7:26:28 PM6/8/13

to

http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/10330.jpg
TRIFECTA

Gunner Asch

unread,

Jun 8, 2013, 7:47:23 PM6/8/13

to

On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 15:47:42 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 17:57:40 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Le 2013-06-08 02:22, Gunner Asch a écrit :
>>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 00:08:41 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Le 2013-06-07 01:19, Gunner Asch a écrit :
>>>>> On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:36:40 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dont tell us. Your a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook.
>>>>>>>>> Your someone that believes that the 2nd Amendment was a suggestion and
>>>>>>>>> you want to kill everyone who thinks its important.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The second Amendment was hardly about individual's having the right to
>>>>>>>> own guns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Except that it is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You like it when I play the little retarded statist. You really do: it destroys
>>>>>> pretty much every single post I wrote here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ayup.
>>>>
>>>> Do you really think that people can't read Usenet threads?
>>>
>>> Obviously you dont think so. Pity you are so fucking stupid.
>>
>>Wooooooshhhhh...
>
>Denial again Oildick?
>
>You really are one of the dumbest leftwingers Ive ever had the
>displeasure of running across on Usenet. And thats really saying a
>lot.
>
>Poor Oildick....hates my sig in the worst way. Its about him.
>
>Gunner

June 6th, 2013

BOMBSHELL: Document Examiner Tied To Obama Defense Attorney Says
Birth Certificate Is 100% Fraud

Reed Hayes is a court qualified handwriting and document examiner
whose business is located in Honolulu, Hawaii. He has nearly 40 years
of handwriting related experience, and has worked as an international
consultant and speaker. Never heard of him? Well, Hayes is the
Certified Document Examiner (CDE) who produced the 40 page opinion
referenced in the Mike Zullo affidavit that was submitted to the
Alabama Supreme Court in the Obama eligibility case and his report
concluded that the Obama birth certificate image, located at
WhiteHouse.gov is a complete fabrication.

PPSimmons reports:

The rabid followers of the “O” (Obots) have rushed to denounce
Reed Hayes as a “quack.” However, one might be surprised to learn that
one of Hayes’ clients listed in the Expert Witness Directory at this
link is an attorney with Perkins-Coie Law Firm.

Perkins – Coie is the law practice whose partners have provided
Obama’s personal defense against all birth certificate and natural
born citizen litigation over the past five years. Hmmmmm. Very
interesting indeed.

If it turns out that Sheriff Arpaio is successful in getting
Congress to investigate the authenticity of Obama’s BC, the
Perkins-Coie legal team, who will be defending Obama, will be hard
pressed to simply dismiss Reed Hayes as a “quack.” This fact will be
especially significant now that it is a revealed and proven truth that
members of the Perkins – Coie firm have used Hayes as an expert
witness! Their own prior cases, where Hayes was used as a witness,
would be severely compromised if they use Saul Alinski-styled mocking
attacks on Hayes.

It has been reported that Mr. Hayes has been hounded by Obama
operatives to discover the details of his 40-page forensic analysis of
the Obama pdf birth certificate. He has been referring them to Sheriff
Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse, who now legally own his report,
for further information.

I also found it interesting that someone sided with the Obama
administration and attempted to bring up dirt on Hayes by pointing out
that he was a homosexual with a “partner,” who is now deceased. Isn’t
that interesting? Why would that be considered “dirt” from the Obama
side? Isn’t he the one telling us that is “normal” and isn’t he the
one helping to push the homosexual agenda along? Ah, the hypocrisy!

Mike Zullo responded to the revelation from Hayes, “This ought to
serve as a warning shot across the bow to the naysayers of our
criminal investigation in the Obama fraud case. The impressive
credentials of Mr. Hayes, and the fact that he has testified in court
cases for Perkins-Coie coupled with the fact that Mr. Hayes is a
registered Democrat, demonstrates the integrity of our investigation
and our conviction that we possess incontrovertible evidence to back
our case. It must be emphasized that we possess much more evidence
similar to this revelation that we have not yet released for public
information.”

Attorney Orly Taitz, who has also been pursuing the Obama fraud, even
to the Supreme Court, believes something else is going on. She writes:

I contacted Mr. Hayes, he stated that he made a deal with Mike
Zullo that he will not cooperate with anyone else….

What is going on here?

To me this is like a Kabuki theater: great male song, dance and
acting theater. Feds brought the law suit against Arpaio before he
decided to become really hot on the issue of Obama’s birth
certificate. When Brian Riley and 250 residents of AZ brought this
complaint against Obama, Arpaio was already facing a federal law suit
from Hispanics in his district, where they claimed that he violated
their civil rights under the color of authority, that he does not
investigate complaints of rape and sexual abuse in Hispanic enclaves.
If convicted, Arpaio could get a prison term.

So Arpaio became very loud, very outspoken about Obama’s use of a
forged birth certificate. Suddenly on August 31, 2012, right before
the election, Obama dropped federal law suit against Arpaio and Arpaio
never filed a criminal complaint against Obama. People donated
millions of dollars, nothing came out of it. Arpaio never submitted
his criminal complaint against Obama and Obama was reelected without a
cinch.

…

What is the end result of this Kabuki dance? The whole country is
still going down the drain, but Arpaio has an ace in his deck playing
poker with Obama, while Obama has an ace in his deck against Arpaio.
The country is still going down the drain, but as long as Arpaio does
not file his criminal complaint against Obama and does not disclose
the aforementioned affidavit, Obama will not file criminal charges
against Arpaio on Hispanic drivers civil rights violation criminal
case.

She then asked why the far left were attacking her, yet quoting Mike
Zullo.

“The answer is, because I am very close to proving Obama to be a
criminal, who absolutely has to be removed from the White House and
send (sic) to prison,” she wrote.

Taitz recently had her docket denied by Judge Lamberth because she
used a pen, instead of a black marker to perform redacting on a
document. “Big deal!” she wrote on Friday. “Monday morning he will
have the same motion staring at him with black marker and not pen
redacting. Lamberth did not indicate any other reasons, which means
that within a short period of time we will get the original
application to this Connecticut Social Security number of Harrison J.
Bounel 042-68-4425. Now Lamberth has zero justification to deny it, as
I have proven that the owner of the Social Security number that Obama
is using would be 123 years old today and by SSA’s own 120 year rule
they are obligated to give me his application even without his consent
and without any proof that he is deceased. We have Obama cornered, I
have his tax returns with his signature under the stolen Social
Security number, I do not tell witnesses not to testify for others, I
do not hide important evidence and I cannot be bought or intimidated
by anything or anyone.”

Last year Obama attorney Alexandra Hill, of the Newark-based law firm
Genova, Burn and Giantomasi, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth
certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that it could not
be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship
status.

Seems to me Taitz is laying all her cards out on the table and Arpaio
and Zullo, while seeming to have massive amount of evidence may be
suspect by not filing a criminal complaint, while the Obama
administration dropped their federal lawsuit against him. I don’t know
what to make of them at this point. I do know that the evidence of
forgery and that we have a Manchurian President seem overwhelmingly
clear to me.

Read more:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/06/bombshell-document-examiner-tied-to-obama-defense-attorney-says-birth-certificate-is-100-fraud/#ixzz2Vfg66F00

Olrik

unread,

Jun 9, 2013, 12:14:05 AM6/9/13

to

Le 2013-06-08 18:47, Gunner Asch a �crit :

> On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 17:57:40 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

>> Le 2013-06-08 02:22, Gunner Asch a �crit :

>>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 00:08:41 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>

>>>> Le 2013-06-07 01:19, Gunner Asch a �crit :

>>>>> On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:36:40 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dont tell us. Your a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook.
>>>>>>>>> Your someone that believes that the 2nd Amendment was a suggestion and
>>>>>>>>> you want to kill everyone who thinks its important.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The second Amendment was hardly about individual's having the right to
>>>>>>>> own guns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Except that it is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You like it when I play the little retarded statist. You really do: it destroys
>>>>>> pretty much every single post I wrote here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ayup.
>>>>
>>>> Do you really think that people can't read Usenet threads?
>>>
>>> Obviously you dont think so. Pity you are so fucking stupid.
>>
>> Wooooooshhhhh...
>
> Denial again Oildick?
>
> You really are one of the dumbest leftwingers Ive ever had the
> displeasure of running across on Usenet. And thats really saying a
> lot.
>
> Poor Oildick....hates my sig in the worst way. Its about him.
>
> Gunner

Sinking until hitting rock bottom, I see. Nice project. Moving along
just fine.

Please continue.

Gunner Asch

unread,

Jun 9, 2013, 7:14:19 AM6/9/13

to

On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 00:14:05 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Le 2013-06-08 18:47, Gunner Asch a écrit :
>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 17:57:40 -0400, Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>

<VBG>

Oh..the courts indeed will continue. My job is done. Yours has only
started.

You are going to have to try really really hard to muffle the sound
this makes. And even then..I doubt you are capable of it.

<VBG>