Hillary vs. Sarah...who would you bet on in a debate?
Too_Many_Tools
knowledgable, articulate and professional.
Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
I would love to see them in a debate....Hillary would mop the floor
with Sarah with one arm tied behind her back.
TMT
mentalw
I doubt we will see palin debating anyone - especially the next repub
field running for president. She would have to get by them before
debating any dem candidate. They will at first try to be gentlemen
about her lack of mental capacity - but they will get very nasty if or
when desperation time for them arrives.
We haven't yet seen what a REAL "attack" on her looks like until the
repubs get their turns. It will be best for her if she never becomes
the front runner and can stay in the background, out of spear rang
Dems can still hold out hope she will run till the end though.
The smart money is on palin just cashing in on her celebrity and
milking as much money from it as possible. Thats going to mean she
has to convince the right that she will be running, right up to the
time her campaign cash runs dry. Palin will know the last money train
(for herself) will depart once she officially drops out of the
running.
Think about it (this will exclude righties). How in the world could
she cope being the president when she couldn't even handle the most
miniscule criticism possible from critics in her own state? She'll
know the other repubs want that job a LOT more than she does.
The palin repubs are dreaming - we're only hearing from her
supporters.. I just wish there was a way to wager cash with them
about it.
....the_pc_jellllybean!!.!!!!.
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3bf1e2e4-401d-4a42...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
> knowledgable, articulate and professional.
I wouldnt take a bet on that, unless it's for how many pieces of failin
palin's ass was left on that skanky ugly ho after Hillary finished with her.
....the_pc_jellllybean!!.!!!!.
"mentalw" <men...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6a7f40c8-466e-4655...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
==
Well said.
Good post.
Klaus Schadenfreude
>I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
>knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>
>Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
So you admit that your attraction to her is just physical.
Straightarrow
That would be a hoot to watch. But,Nurze Ratchett would NEVER enter a
debate with Palin.
hal
<hoofhe...@yahoo.com> wrote:
It's the other way around. I'm sure Hillary would love to have Sarah
for lunch. I think Palin is just barely smart enough to know she
doesn't have a chance against Clinton. Or at least her handlers are.
Straightarrow
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:12:16 -0800 (PST), Straightarrow
>
You're "sure"?? Which stinking orifice did you pull that from?? The
tortured,cauliflower shaped bunghole that you pass your semi-digested
tofu through or that green tooth filled grogan sucking piehole that
you stuff with negro cock?
Lookout
wrote:
Her only hope is to run on the Conservative Party ballot. That way she
will be left out of the debates.
(watch this one folks..I got a feeling this is exactly what will
happen)
Beam Me Up Scotty
> On Nov 10, 12:29 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
>> knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>>
Like a screech owl...
>> Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
Thank god Sarah has some values.
>> I would love to see them in a debate....Hillary would mop the floor
>> with Sarah with one arm tied behind her back.
Sarah sure mopped the floor with Obama and Biden, and she did it while
scrapping with that old turd McCain who was "her boss". It was so funny
to see Sarah take on "all" the corrupt lying establishment politicians,
even in her own party.
Curly Surmudgeon
Back in the Bozo Bin, cockroach.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Straightarrow
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:08:40 -0800, Straightarrow
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 10, 7:28 am, hal wrote:
> >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:12:16 -0800 (PST), Straightarrow
>
> >> <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >On Nov 10, 12:29=A0am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was
> >> >> very knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>
> >> >> Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>
> >> >> I would love to see them in a debate....Hillary would mop the floor
> >> >> with Sarah with one arm tied behind her back.
>
> >> >> TMT
>
> >> >That would be a hoot to watch. But,Nurze Ratchett would NEVER enter a
> >> >debate with Palin.
>
> >> It's the other way around. I'm sure Hillary would love to have Sarah
> >> for lunch. I think Palin is just barely smart enough to know she
> >> doesn't have a chance against Clinton. Or at least her handlers are.
>
> > You're "sure"?? Which stinking orifice did you pull that from?? The
> > tortured,cauliflower shaped bunghole that you pass your semi-digested
> > tofu through or that green tooth filled grogan sucking piehole that you
> > stuff with negro cock?
>
> Back in the Bozo Bin, cockroach.
>
> --
> Regards, Curly
> 2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
>
> - Show quoted text -
Fuck you.
Lookout
Shoot the messenger? That's your defense?
Lookout
<Then-Destro...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 10, 12:29 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
>>> knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>>>
>
>Like a screech owl...
>
>>> Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>
>Thank god Sarah has some values.
Like the ones she taught her slut of a daughter? Those values?
>
>>> I would love to see them in a debate....Hillary would mop the floor
>>> with Sarah with one arm tied behind her back.
>
>Sarah sure mopped the floor with Obama and Biden, and she did it while
>scrapping with that old turd McCain who was "her boss". It was so funny
>to see Sarah take on "all" the corrupt lying establishment politicians,
>even in her own party.
She didn't answer half the questions. In a high school debate she
would have been taken off the dais.
Poetic Justice
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:28:19 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
> <Then-Destro...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Nov 10, 12:29 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
>>>> knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>>>>
>> Like a screech owl...
>>
>>>> Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>> Thank god Sarah has some values.
>
> Like the ones she taught her slut of a daughter? Those values?
You mean *NOT* to kill a baby? Getting pregnant isn't a value, women do
that everywhere, the only question is when do you suggest they get
pregnant. The problem "is" when women kill their babies, not "when"
they have their babies....
There were no laws broken by Sarah or her Daughter, just as Octomom had
all her kids legally. Where is the problem?
SaPeIsMa
"mentalw" <men...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6a7f40c8-466e-4655...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
> knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>
> Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>
> I would love to see them in a debate....Hillary would mop the floor
> with Sarah with one arm tied behind her back.
>
> TMT
# I doubt we will see palin debating anyone - especially the next repub
# field running for president. She would have to get by them before
# debating any dem candidate. They will at first try to be gentlemen
# about her lack of mental capacity - but they will get very nasty if or
# when desperation time for them arrives.
The stupidity of the left is clearly exemplified by the above statement.
The left presumes, that they aremarter than anyone else,
Therefore they NEED to conclude that ANY and all who don't agree with them
are stupid
Similarly, anyone who didn't believe in the Soviet, was by definition
mentally ill.
SaPeIsMa
"hal" wrote in message news:4af96a3c...@news.newsguy.com...
That's the same crap you morons believed about Bush, and yet he consistently
rolled over the allegedly smarter candidates you offered up..
Lookout
<PoeticJustice@talk-n-dog...com> wrote:
>Lookout wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:28:19 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
>> <Then-Destro...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Nov 10, 12:29 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
>>>>> knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>>>>>
>>> Like a screech owl...
>>>
>>>>> Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>>> Thank god Sarah has some values.
>>
>> Like the ones she taught her slut of a daughter? Those values?
>
>You mean *NOT* to kill a baby?
You mean fetus, don't you? A fetus is not a baby legally or medically.
>Getting pregnant isn't a value, women do
>that everywhere, the only question is when do you suggest they get
>pregnant. The problem "is" when women kill their babies, not "when"
>they have their babies....
Women don't kill babies. They abort fetuses. Get it right.
>
>There were no laws broken by Sarah or her Daughter, just as Octomom had
>all her kids legally. Where is the problem?
No one said any law were broken. The problem is that Sarah and Todd
Palin never taught her daughter to keep her legs closed. Sarah Palin
was more concerned with the pot holes on Main Street than what her
daughter was doing with her boyfriend. Sarah Palin ranted about Family
Values and she couldn't walk the walk.
Poetic Justice
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:48:44 -0500, Poetic Justice
> <PoeticJustice@talk-n-dog...com> wrote:
>
>> Lookout wrote:
>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:28:19 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
>>> <Then-Destro...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Nov 10, 12:29 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
>>>>>> knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>>>>>>
>>>> Like a screech owl...
>>>>
>>>>>> Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>>>> Thank god Sarah has some values.
>>> Like the ones she taught her slut of a daughter? Those values?
>> You mean *NOT* to kill a baby?
>
> You mean fetus, don't you? A fetus is not a baby legally or medically.
Women are not with fetus, they are with child, women have babies not
fetuses. You can call it what ever you want but that dance doesn't make
it any less of a baby.
>> Getting pregnant isn't a value, women do
>> that everywhere, the only question is when do you suggest they get
>> pregnant. The problem "is" when women kill their babies, not "when"
>> they have their babies....
>
> Women don't kill babies. They abort fetuses. Get it right.
That is your Nomenclature used to detach yourself from the immoral act
of murder.... if that's all it takes to ease your conscience, you
aren't much of a human are you. That's akin to Hitler calling the Jews a
scourge, it made it morally OK to him.
>> There were no laws broken by Sarah or her Daughter, just as Octomom had
>> all her kids legally. Where is the problem?
>
> No one said any law were broken. The problem is that Sarah and Todd
> Palin never taught her daughter to keep her legs closed. Sarah Palin
> was more concerned with the pot holes on Main Street than what her
> daughter was doing with her boyfriend. Sarah Palin ranted about Family
> Values and she couldn't walk the walk.
Excuse me but she did, her daughter may have had other plans that TV and
sex education in school gave her.....
The fact that the daughter had a baby is well within the societal norm.
the fact that Sarah supported the daughters decision to keep the baby
says that Sarah did walk the walk....
Had Sarah wanted to force the daughter to get an abortion, then you
might have had an issue.
Lookout
<PoeticJustice@talk-n-dog...com> wrote:
>Lookout wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:48:44 -0500, Poetic Justice
>> <PoeticJustice@talk-n-dog...com> wrote:
>>
>>> Lookout wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:28:19 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
>>>> <Then-Destro...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 10, 12:29 am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
>>>>>>> knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>>>>>>>
>>>>> Like a screech owl...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>>>>> Thank god Sarah has some values.
>>>> Like the ones she taught her slut of a daughter? Those values?
>>> You mean *NOT* to kill a baby?
>>
>> You mean fetus, don't you? A fetus is not a baby legally or medically.
>
>
>Women are not with fetus, they are with child, women have babies not
>fetuses. You can call it what ever you want but that dance doesn't make
>it any less of a baby.
NO medical record uses the word baby or child for a pregnant woman.
You're wrong. It starts out as a fertilized egg, then it's a zygote,
then a blastocyst. Once the blastocyst is attached to the uterus it's
an embryo. Those are medical and legal terms. It's not a baby until
it's born. I thought most of us learned this in high school.
>>> Getting pregnant isn't a value, women do
>>> that everywhere, the only question is when do you suggest they get
>>> pregnant. The problem "is" when women kill their babies, not "when"
>>> they have their babies....
>>
>> Women don't kill babies. They abort fetuses. Get it right.
>
>That is your Nomenclature used to detach yourself from the immoral act
>of murder....
If it was murder then someone would be charged. You're obviously
wrong.
> if that's all it takes to ease your conscience, you
>aren't much of a human are you. That's akin to Hitler calling the Jews a
>scourge, it made it morally OK to him.
Nope. Hitler killed people. Big difference.
>
>>> There were no laws broken by Sarah or her Daughter, just as Octomom had
>>> all her kids legally. Where is the problem?
>>
>
>> No one said any law were broken. The problem is that Sarah and Todd
>> Palin never taught her daughter to keep her legs closed. Sarah Palin
>> was more concerned with the pot holes on Main Street than what her
>> daughter was doing with her boyfriend. Sarah Palin ranted about Family
>> Values and she couldn't walk the walk.
>
>Excuse me but she did, her daughter may have had other plans that TV and
>sex education in school gave her.....
So you're saying that Sarah and Todd Palin were lousy parents? Ok! Now
we're getting somewhere because good parents are able to teach their
children in spite of TV. By the way...there was no sex ed in Alaska
schools.
>
>The fact that the daughter had a baby is well within the societal norm.
The teen pregnancy rate in Alaska
http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/national-data/pdf/STBYST07.pdf
7.3 out of every 100. That's your idea of the norm? 7.3%
(Don't you just hate facts?)
>the fact that Sarah supported the daughters decision to keep the baby
>says that Sarah did walk the walk....
Wrong. Sarah Palin is a Family Values shit head which means a strict
adherence to the bible. The bible says you should be a virgin when you
marry.
>Had Sarah wanted to force the daughter to get an abortion, then you
>might have had an issue.
Not at all. It's none of my business what a woman does with her body.
Poetic Justice
Scott Peterson killed his wife and unborn baby "fetus" and was charged
with murdering his son.
Someone is charged with murder for killing a "fetus" or as it really
is... a baby.
If someone chooses to slip a "day after" pill to his girlfriend to
avoid child care payments..... did he kill something? Maybe he's
just guilty of tampering with food, good for a minimal probation right...
$250k in child support or $5.00 pill and a years probation?
No womens baby is safe....?
Lookout
<PoeticJustice@talk-n-dog...com> wrote:
He was charged with killing the FETUS. Look up the charge that was
presented in court. It specifically says fetus because that's what the
law says.
>
>If someone chooses to slip a "day after" pill to his girlfriend to
>avoid child care payments..... did he kill something? Maybe he's
>just guilty of tampering with food, good for a minimal probation right...
No idea. It would depend on the law.
>$250k in child support or $5.00 pill and a years probation?
>
>No womens baby is safe....?
Baby or fetus? Make up your mind. I have, the medical community has
and the legal community has.
Dan
And the rightwingnuts would be all over the airwaves raving about how
Sarah was much cuter than Hillary, and obviously won the debate, and
wouldn't she make a great President.
Dan
Tater Gumfries
> "mentalw" <ment...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6a7f40c8-466e-4655...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 9, 10:29 pm, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
> > knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>
> > Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>
> > I would love to see them in a debate....Hillary would mop the floor
> > with Sarah with one arm tied behind her back.
>
> > TMT
>
> #
> # I doubt we will see palin debating anyone - especially the next repub
> # field running for president. She would have to get by them before
> # debating any dem candidate. They will at first try to be gentlemen
> # about her lack of mental capacity - but they will get very nasty if or
> # when desperation time for them arrives.
>
> The stupidity of the left is clearly exemplified by the above statement.
> The left presumes, that they aremarter than anyone else,
Hillary Clinton is smarter, more educated and better prepared than
Sarah Palin, period. It has nothing whatsoever to do with left or
right. Bill Buckley was smarter than Al Gore or Joe Biden. Nothing to
do with right or left.
Your opinion of Palin versus Clinton, however has everything to do
with politics.
Tater
Gunner Asch
<TaterG...@usa.com> wrote:
>>
>> The stupidity of the left is clearly exemplified by the above statement.
>> The left presumes, that they aremarter than anyone else,
>
>Hillary Clinton is smarter, more educated and better prepared than
>Sarah Palin, period. It has nothing whatsoever to do with left or
>right. Bill Buckley was smarter than Al Gore or Joe Biden. Nothing to
>do with right or left.
>
>Your opinion of Palin versus Clinton, however has everything to do
>with politics.
>
>Tater
Your opinon of Palin versus anyone, has everything to do with your far
leftwing extremist fringe kook politics.
Ill be glad when they hang you from a lamp post and splash diesel fuel
on your twitching corpse and set it aflame.
Shrug
Gunner
"Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
Unknown Usnet Poster
Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
Keyton
Curly Surmudgeon
Sarah Palin would make a great Republican Candidate for President in 2012.
Vote for her in the primaries. Vote often.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tater Gumfries
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:26:42 -0800 (PST), Tater Gumfries
>
>
> >> The stupidity of the left is clearly exemplified by the above statement.
> >> The left presumes, that they aremarter than anyone else,
>
> >Hillary Clinton is smarter, more educated and better prepared than
> >Sarah Palin, period. It has nothing whatsoever to do with left or
> >right. Bill Buckley was smarter than Al Gore or Joe Biden. Nothing to
> >do with right or left.
>
> >Your opinion of Palin versus Clinton, however has everything to do
> >with politics.
>
> >Tater
>
> Your opinon of Palin versus anyone, has everything to do with your far
> leftwing extremist fringe kook politics.
Tater's a conservative. Always has been. Your lyin about his opinions
is based on nothing but politics.
Tater
Lookout
I agreed with Buckley more than I agreed with Gore or Biden. He could
tear your argument to pieces and sit there with a smug smile knowing
he destroyed you. He was a master.
Lookout
<gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:26:42 -0800 (PST), Tater Gumfries
><TaterG...@usa.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> The stupidity of the left is clearly exemplified by the above statement.
>>> The left presumes, that they aremarter than anyone else,
>>
>>Hillary Clinton is smarter, more educated and better prepared than
>>Sarah Palin, period. It has nothing whatsoever to do with left or
>>right. Bill Buckley was smarter than Al Gore or Joe Biden. Nothing to
>>do with right or left.
>>
>>Your opinion of Palin versus Clinton, however has everything to do
>>with politics.
>>
>>Tater
>
>Your opinon of Palin versus anyone, has everything to do with your far
>leftwing extremist fringe kook politics.
>
>Ill be glad when they hang you from a lamp post and splash diesel fuel
>on your twitching corpse and set it aflame.
You seem to want to kill a lot of people. Don't let the local health
center find out..you will be asked to come in for a discussion.
Tater Gumfries
Wouldn't a Buckley/Hitchens debate be a hoot?
Tater
hal
wrote:
"Rolled over"? What planet are you from? Bush couldn't even do a
debate without cheating. He never rolled over anyone, ever. He was
the organ grinder's monkey. He was the stupid fall guy for the ultra
wealthy who wanted him to destroy the US economy, and along with it
the middle class.
SaPeIsMa
"Tater Gumfries" <TaterG...@usa.com> wrote in message
news:57978a44-b2f6-4e2a...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 10, 10:44 pm, Gunner Asch <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:26:42 -0800 (PST), Tater Gumfries
>
> <TaterGumfr...@usa.com> wrote:
>
> >> The stupidity of the left is clearly exemplified by the above
> >> statement.
> >> The left presumes, that they aremarter than anyone else,
>
> >Hillary Clinton is smarter, more educated and better prepared than
> >Sarah Palin, period. It has nothing whatsoever to do with left or
> >right. Bill Buckley was smarter than Al Gore or Joe Biden. Nothing to
> >do with right or left.
>
> >Your opinion of Palin versus Clinton, however has everything to do
> >with politics.
>
> >Tater
>
> Your opinon of Palin versus anyone, has everything to do with your far
> leftwing extremist fringe kook politics.
# Tater's a conservative. Always has been. Your lyin about his opinions
# is based on nothing but politics.
#
tatter also has a Napoleon complex which is why it speaks of itself in the
3rd person
SaPeIsMa
"Poetic Justice" <PoeticJustice@talk-n-dog...com> wrote in message
news:B2lKm.5155$ky1....@newsfe14.iad...
You need to look up nomenclature and figuire out at what point a person is
actually a "person" in the legal, biblical or social definition.
Currently a fetus is not a "person" legally, biblically or socially.
SaPeIsMa
"hal" wrote in message news:4afaeb9c...@news.newsguy.com...
And yet, in both elextions he beat your candidates.
Didn't even need to cheat as you losers have and do keep claiming.
But then, that's why you're such a loser.
You're not even smart enough when you've been beat.
Too_Many_Tools
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:26:42 -0800 (PST), Tater Gumfries
>
As a disinterested third party, I would say Gunner made a death
threat.
I think the FBI who monitors Usenet would agree.
TMT
hal
wrote:
>And yet, in both elextions he beat your candidates.
> Didn't even need to cheat as you losers have and do keep claiming.
>But then, that's why you're such a loser.
> You're not even smart enough when you've been beat.
>
LOL ! Hey moron, last I checked, Obama won the presidency by a
landslide, and Democrats have a distinct majority in Congress. You're
the loser, buddy. You're just too stupid to know it.
Tater Gumfries
> "Tater Gumfries" <TaterGumfr...@usa.com> wrote in message
You know nothin about Tater's psychology. Now, how about actually
trying to have a discussion of politics instead of engagin in amateur
(and wrong) psychology?
Tater
Dan
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:02:46 -0800, Dan <dnad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
>>> knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>>>
>>> Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>>>
>>> I would love to see them in a debate....Hillary would mop the floor
>>> with Sarah with one arm tied behind her back.
>>>
>>> TMT
>> And the rightwingnuts would be all over the airwaves raving about how
>> Sarah was much cuter than Hillary, and obviously won the debate, and
>> wouldn't she make a great President.
>>
>> Dan
>
> Sarah Palin would make a great Republican Candidate for President in 2012.
>
> Vote for her in the primaries. Vote often.
I certainly can, but I'm not sure I'd do so - the small chance she could
actually become President would be too destructive to our nation. In
the same vein, I also would not place my entire net worth on the flip of
a coin.
Dan
Berry Oakley
> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>As a disinterested third party, I would say Gunner made a death
>>threat.
> "Threat" implies there's some force or agency available to implement such a
> suggestion, whereas in Gumer's case there's neither, just empty prattle.
>>I think the FBI who monitors Usenet would agree.
> I'll bet if any of them are reading his chronic nonsense,
> they're probably a low level newbie that's been assigned to do so.
After all, TMT threatened me, and never showed up when I double dog
dared him, and gave him my address!
And I DID PROMISE that "I WOULD STOP HIM" (kill,if needed ) when TMT and
his band of fairy friends broke into my house to harm/take stuff.
Where is that poofter?
Dan
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:26:42 -0800 (PST), Tater Gumfries
> <TaterG...@usa.com> wrote:
>
>>> The stupidity of the left is clearly exemplified by the above statement.
>>> The left presumes, that they aremarter than anyone else,
>> Hillary Clinton is smarter, more educated and better prepared than
>> Sarah Palin, period. It has nothing whatsoever to do with left or
>> right. Bill Buckley was smarter than Al Gore or Joe Biden. Nothing to
>> do with right or left.
>>
>> Your opinion of Palin versus Clinton, however has everything to do
>> with politics.
>>
>> Tater
>
> Your opinon of Palin versus anyone, has everything to do with your far
> leftwing extremist fringe kook politics.
>
> Ill be glad when they hang you from a lamp post and splash diesel fuel
> on your twitching corpse and set it aflame.
Just Runner being stupid (but I repeat myself).
> Shrug
>
> Gunner
>
> "Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
> I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
> Unknown Usnet Poster
Cats are liberals: they do what they want, ignore leaders unless it is
their choice, keep themselves clean, and basically annoy phony
conservatives.
Dogs are conservatives: they blindly follow a leader, ask for handouts,
leave messes for other people to clean up, and want nothing more than to
be a part of a group.
> Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
> Keyton
Again, a Neocon trait, not a liberal one.
Dan
Harold Burton
<3bf1e2e4-401d-4a42...@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I would love to see them in a debate....Hillary would mop the floor
> with Sarah with one arm tied behind her back.
Of course, when you can lie with ease you've got the edge.
"Everybody in politics lies, but they (the Clintons) do it with such
ease it's troubling,"
David Geffen
Berry Oakley
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!
THE "FBI who monitors Usenet?"
OH My!
Yer in deep dog doo doo, TMT!
After all your threats to take my stuff, with your "friends?"
My local cops are waiting to call the local crime scene cleaners,
"TSWMP" (Trauma Scene Waste Management Practitioners) to scrape your
guts and remaining brain cell matter off the front stoop.
When ARE you going to show up and make your attempt?
They are getting antsy!
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
> ASCII wrote:
>
>> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
>>>As a disinterested third party, I would say Gunner made a death threat.
>
>> "Threat" implies there's some force or agency available to implement
>> such a suggestion, whereas in Gumer's case there's neither, just empty
>> prattle.
>
>>>I think the FBI who monitors Usenet would agree.
>
>> I'll bet if any of them are reading his chronic nonsense, they're
>> probably a low level newbie that's been assigned to do so.
>
>
> After all, TMT threatened me, and never showed up when I double dog
> dared him, and gave him my address!
Nonsense, your nym is new and you're trolling.
Curly Surmudgeon
I didn't suggest voting for her in the general election but in the
Republican primary...
Vote for Sarah in 2012. Vote early. Vote often.
Observer
Yeah, and no one took YOUR offer to "visit" Klaus seriously, either.
__
The last official act of any government is the looting of the nation.
Lookout
wrote:
Yes he won with people who spelled elections 'elections'. Bush was the
dumbest SOB we have had a president because he was voted in by the
dumbest SOBs.
Too_Many_Tools
> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
> >As a disinterested third party, I would say Gunner made a death
> >threat.
>
> suggestion, whereas in Gumer's case there's neither, just empty prattle.
>
>
> they're probably a low level newbie that's been assigned to do so.
All Usenet groups are monitored by Homeland Security and the FBI.
Some get extra special attention.
Like survival, gun and political ones.
And people like Gunner and the rest of the wannbe domestic terrorists
who post get extra special attention.
Recurring events like the Fort Hood shooter insures that.
And like the Fort Hood shooter, just because Gunner hasn't had his
sorry butt thrown in jail yet doesn't mean Big Brother isn't watching.
Meanwhile the local authorities are enlisted to keep an eye on the
budding wannabe terrorist.
Agents also post regularly on discussion sites.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
Tell us...how are your friends, the local cops, these days?
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:01:06 GMT, hal wrote:
> >On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:42:45 -0600, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@HotMail.com>
> >wrote:
>
> >>And yet, in both elextions he beat your candidates.
> >> Didn't even need to cheat as you losers have and do keep claiming.
> >>But then, that's why you're such a loser.
> >> You're not even smart enough when you've been beat.
>
> >LOL ! Hey moron, last I checked, Obama won the presidency by a
> >landslide, and Democrats have a distinct majority in Congress. You're
> >the loser, buddy. You're just too stupid to know it.
>
> happened in the latest Govoner's race you'll be a Moron as well?
>
> Even with a majority in Congress they don't seem to be able to get
> much done. Look how narrow Nancy's big win on Health Care was.
>
> --
>
> "Gustatus Similis Pullus"
LOL...perhaps you should educate yourself about winning and losing.
See the results of Election Day 2008.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:52:27 -0800 (PST), Too_Many_Tools
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> "Gustatus Similis Pullus"- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
A case against an criminal is built one charge at a time.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
>
> - Show quoted text -
Again...tell us all the things you want to do to me.
Don't forget any of the gory details.
Tell us please.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:29:31 -0500, Berry Oakley <AllmanBroth...@bass.gov>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > ASCII wrote:
>
> >> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
> >>>As a disinterested third party, I would say Gunner made a death threat.
>
> >> "Threat" implies there's some force or agency available to implement
> >> such a suggestion, whereas in Gumer's case there's neither, just empty
> >> prattle.
>
> >>>I think the FBI who monitors Usenet would agree.
>
> >> I'll bet if any of them are reading his chronic nonsense, they're
> >> probably a low level newbie that's been assigned to do so.
>
> > After all, TMT threatened me, and never showed up when I double dog
> > dared him, and gave him my address!
>
> Nonsense, your nym is new and you're trolling.
>
> --
> Regards, Curly
> 2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
>
> - Show quoted text -
Correct.
TMT
Harold Burton
<5ed19ca8-41ff-443e...@s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com>,
Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> See the results of Election Day ...
...1992, 1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002, and 2004, 2010, 2012
Snicker
Harold Burton
Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> dumbest SOB we have had a president...
...except for DumbocRAT Lyndon Johnson.
Snicker
Stormin Mormon
arguments, and win the women. Except for the conservative
women who would see Hillary as a bit too cold and
calculating. Sarah Palin would get a bunch of great laugh
lines, and win easily on substance.
--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
Dan
> I'd imagine that Hillary would use all the emotional
> arguments, and win the women. Except for the conservative
> women who would see Hillary as a bit too cold and
> calculating. Sarah Palin would get a bunch of great laugh
> lines, and win easily on substance.
Don't quit your day job: your attempt at writing comedy failed the
connection with reality test.
Dan
cop welfare
> On Nov 10, 10:44 pm, Gunner Asch <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:26:42 -0800 (PST), Tater Gumfries
>
> > <TaterGumfr...@usa.com> wrote:
>
> > >> The stupidity of the left is clearly exemplified by the above statement.
> > >> The left presumes, that they aremarter than anyone else,
>
> > >Hillary Clinton is smarter, more educated and better prepared than
> > >Sarah Palin, period. It has nothing whatsoever to do with left or
> > >right. Bill Buckley was smarter than Al Gore or Joe Biden. Nothing to
> > >do with right or left.
>
> > >Your opinion of Palin versus Clinton, however has everything to do
> > >with politics.
>
> > >Tater
>
> > Your opinon of Palin versus anyone, has everything to do with your far
> > leftwing extremist fringe kook politics.
>
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
better be careful, dude.
you just made his "cull" list.
deny it all you want, yer now a "librul".
cop welfare
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:26:42 -0800 (PST), Tater Gumfries
>
>
>
>
>
> <TaterGumfr...@usa.com> wrote:
> >> "mentalw" <ment...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:6a7f40c8-466e-4655...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> >> On Nov 9, 10:29 pm, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
> >> > knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>
> >> > Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>
> >> > I would love to see them in a debate....Hillary would mop the floor
> >> > with Sarah with one arm tied behind her back.
>
> >> > TMT
>
> >> # I doubt we will see palin debating anyone - especially the next repub
> >> # field running for president. She would have to get by them before
> >> # debating any dem candidate. They will at first try to be gentlemen
> >> # about her lack of mental capacity - but they will get very nasty if or
> >> # when desperation time for them arrives.
>
> >> The stupidity of the left is clearly exemplified by the above statement.
> >> The left presumes, that they aremarter than anyone else,
>
> >Hillary Clinton is smarter, more educated and better prepared than
> >Sarah Palin, period. It has nothing whatsoever to do with left or
> >right. Bill Buckley was smarter than Al Gore or Joe Biden. Nothing to
> >do with right or left.
>
> >Your opinion of Palin versus Clinton, however has everything to do
> >with politics.
>
> >Tater
>
> tear your argument to pieces and sit there with a smug smile knowing
> he destroyed you. He was a master.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
buckley was an idiot.
specious arguments and faulty logic.
a fraud.
anybody couldn't see that...
i don't know.
i used to watch his tv show.
a fraud.
a pretentious yalie asshole with that phony accent.
cop welfare
> "hal" wrote in messagenews:4afaeb9c...@news.newsguy.com...
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:11:58 -0600, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@HotMail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >>"hal" wrote in messagenews:4af96a3c...@news.newsguy.com...
> >>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:12:16 -0800 (PST), Straightarrow
>
> >>>>On Nov 10, 12:29=A0am, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
> >>>>> knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>
> >>>>> Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>
> >>>>> I would love to see them in a debate....Hillary would mop the floor
> >>>>> with Sarah with one arm tied behind her back.
>
> >>>>> TMT
>
> >>>>debate with Palin.
>
> >>> It's the other way around. I'm sure Hillary would love to have Sarah
> >>> for lunch. I think Palin is just barely smart enough to know she
> >>> doesn't have a chance against Clinton. Or at least her handlers are.
>
> >>That's the same crap you morons believed about Bush, and yet he
> >>consistently
> >>rolled over the allegedly smarter candidates you offered up..
>
> > "Rolled over"? What planet are you from? Bush couldn't even do a
> > debate without cheating. He never rolled over anyone, ever. He was
> > the organ grinder's monkey. He was the stupid fall guy for the ultra
> > wealthy who wanted him to destroy the US economy, and along with it
> > the middle class.
>
> And yet, in both elextions he beat your candidates.
> But then, that's why you're such a loser.
>
> - Show quoted text -
"And yet, in both elextions he beat your candidates." rip van
tinkerbell
are you crazy or just partial to "cowboys".
cop welfare
>
> - Show quoted text -
destruction and corruption come in cycles, i think.
have we hit bottom yet?
will we ever?
if we're getting close, i'd vote for her just to help get it over
with.
consoivatives are intuitive of the fact that we're all f*cked and it
brings out the lemming in them.
they all want to go out in a blaze of glory and take everybody else
with them.
and they're bitter that they might never get to spend all their money.
cop welfare
>
> - Show quoted text -
well, maybe not ALL of us.
maybe just a FEW of us.
i just said that.
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
> anybody couldn't see that...
Precisely!
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curly Surmudgeon
"Connection with reality"?
Duh... Dan, you're speaking to a crazymotherfucker! A Mormon!!! Are
you partaking of illicit substances this evening?
> Dan
Too_Many_Tools
>
> - Show quoted text -
LOL...do you doubt that Klaus isn't on a watch list? Review his posts
for yourself.
Then show us how an offer to visit someone with the authorities in tow
is the same as a death threat.
One is an offer to help a mentally unbalanced person while the other
is a threat to do deadly harm.
TMT
Observer
So, you maintain that's NOT the guy you were threatening? .
Alim Nassor
>
> NO medical record uses the word baby or child for a pregnant woman.
> You're wrong. It starts out as a fertilized egg, then it's a zygote,
> then a blastocyst. Once the blastocyst is attached to the uterus it's
> an embryo. Those are medical and legal terms. It's not a baby until
> it's born. I thought most of us learned this in high school.
>
And yet it is human the entire time.
Observer
I have, as well as yours.
>Then show us how an offer to visit someone with the authorities in tow
>is the same as a death threat.
Your innitial offer(s) did not mention you'd be bringing a crew with
you. So why DID you puss out, instead of showing with a full crew?
>One is an offer to help a mentally unbalanced person while the other
>is a threat to do deadly harm.
Keep telling yourself that. Google shows otherwise.
Anonymous Infidel - the anti-political talking head
> knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>
> Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>
> I would love to see them in a debate....Hillary would mop the floor
> with Sarah with one arm tied behind her back.
Bill.
Lookout
He's never listed anywhere near the bottom.
Lookout
So his father and brother had the same fake accent?
Nah..you're just to fucking stupid to keep up with him.
Lookout
But it has no federal rights.
r wiley
Who cares. Mazola match.
rw
Curly Surmudgeon
And is not "human" any more than my cut fingernails are "human."
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SaPeIsMa
"hal" wrote in message news:4afb09b1...@news.newsguy.com...
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:42:45 -0600, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPe...@HotMail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>And yet, in both elextions he beat your candidates.
>>But then, that's why you're such a loser.
>>
> LOL ! Hey moron, last I checked, Obama won the presidency by a
> landslide, and Democrats have a distinct majority in Congress. You're
> the loser, buddy. You're just too stupid to know it.
Better look up the meaning of "landslide" hal.
You're just showing your ignorant and bigoted prejudice again
SaPeIsMa
"Tater Gumfries" <TaterG...@usa.com> wrote in message
news:5399d90e-78f0-4e59...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 11, 11:41 am, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@HotMail.com> wrote:
> "Tater Gumfries" <TaterGumfr...@usa.com> wrote in message
>
> news:57978a44-b2f6-4e2a...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 10, 10:44 pm, Gunner Asch <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:26:42 -0800 (PST), Tater Gumfries
>
> > <TaterGumfr...@usa.com> wrote:
>
> > >> The stupidity of the left is clearly exemplified by the above
> > >> statement.
> > >> The left presumes, that they aremarter than anyone else,
>
> > >Hillary Clinton is smarter, more educated and better prepared than
> > >Sarah Palin, period. It has nothing whatsoever to do with left or
> > >right. Bill Buckley was smarter than Al Gore or Joe Biden. Nothing to
> > >do with right or left.
>
> > >Your opinion of Palin versus Clinton, however has everything to do
> > >with politics.
>
> > >Tater
>
> > leftwing extremist fringe kook politics.
>
> # Tater's a conservative. Always has been. Your lyin about his opinions
> # is based on nothing but politics.
> #
>
> tatter also has a Napoleon complex which is why it speaks of itself in the
> 3rd person
#
# You know nothin about Tater's psychology. Now, how about actually
# trying to have a discussion of politics instead of engagin in amateur
# (and wrong) psychology?
#
LOL
Then why do you keep proving me right ?
Morton Davis
<hal> wrote in message news:4afb09b1...@news.newsguy.com...
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:42:45 -0600, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPe...@HotMail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>And yet, in both elextions he beat your candidates.
>> Didn't even need to cheat as you losers have and do keep claiming.
>>But then, that's why you're such a loser.
>> You're not even smart enough when you've been beat.
>>
> LOL ! Hey moron, last I checked, Obama won the presidency by a
> landslide
Not on this planet.
Lookout
<CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:52:23 -0600, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:04:42 -0800 (PST), Alim Nassor
>> <alimn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Nov 11, 6:11�am, Lookout <mrLook...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> NO medical record uses the word baby or child for a pregnant woman.
>>>> You're wrong. It starts out as a fertilized egg, then it's a zygote,
>>>> then a blastocyst. Once the blastocyst is attached to the uterus it's
>>>> an embryo. Those are medical and legal terms. It's not a baby until
>>>> it's born. I thought most of us learned this in high school.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>And yet it is human the entire time.
>>
>> But it has no federal rights.
>
>And is not "human" any more than my cut fingernails are "human."
It is part of the woman and no damn business of yours.
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
What planet do you post from?
Curly Surmudgeon
Stipulated.
Lookout
<CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:38:49 -0600, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:19:24 +0000 (UTC), Curly Surmudgeon
>> <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:52:23 -0600, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:04:42 -0800 (PST), Alim Nassor
>>>> <alimn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Nov 11, 6:11�am, Lookout <mrLook...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NO medical record uses the word baby or child for a pregnant woman.
>>>>>> You're wrong. It starts out as a fertilized egg, then it's a zygote,
>>>>>> then a blastocyst. Once the blastocyst is attached to the uterus
>>>>>> it's an embryo. Those are medical and legal terms. It's not a baby
>>>>>> until it's born. I thought most of us learned this in high school.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>And yet it is human the entire time.
>>>>
>>>> But it has no federal rights.
>>>
>>>And is not "human" any more than my cut fingernails are "human."
>>
>> It is part of the woman and no damn business of yours.
>
>Stipulated.
Nonsense answer
Curly Surmudgeon
Succinct. Look the word up, it means that I agree without argument.
Lookout
<CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Stipulated
Not really. You used it out of context. Maybe if you had said "AS
stipulated".
cop welfare
wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:38:36 -0800, cop welfare <cop.welf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > anybody couldn't see that...
>
> Precisely!
>
> --
> Regards, Curly
> 2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
"anybody couldn't see that" - trusting soul
"Precisely!" - whoever...
just to clear it up. i'll restate more...clearly.
anybody that couldn't see that buckley was full of it probably had
some kind of lack of the "vision thing".
cop welfare
>
> - Show quoted text -
"So his father and brother had the same fake accent?" - lookout
i take it all back about his accent.
frankly, i never thought it was worth looking into his background.
but the internet makes it easy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Buckley,_Jr.
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
> On Nov 11, 10:12 pm, Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> wrote:
And that was the "cleared up" version...
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curly Surmudgeon
Yes, really. "As stipulated" refers to a previous agreement. Common word
in all Romance languages. And "stipulated" is a very common response
meaning "agreed." Look at definition #5 in your own link...
Expand your vocabulary. Or at least don't show the lack of so readily by
impugning people with a superior command of language.
lorad
> I recently watched Hillary in an extended interview, the lady was very
> knowledgable, articulate and professional.
>
> Everything that Cut N Run Sarah is not.
>
> I would love to see them in a debate....Hillary would mop the floor
> with Sarah with one arm tied behind her back.
>
> TMT
Hillary vs. Sarah?
It doesn't matter.
cop welfare
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:48:21 -0800, cop welfare <cop.welf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 11, 10:12 pm, Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:38:36 -0800, cop welfare <cop.welf...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > anybody couldn't see that...
>
> >> Precisely!
>
> >> --
> >> Regards, Curly
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------>> 2012 Run, Sarah, Run!
> >> 2012
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> > "anybody couldn't see that" - trusting soul
>
> > "Precisely!" - whoever...
>
> > just to clear it up. i'll restate more...clearly.
>
> > anybody that couldn't see that buckley was full of it probably had some
> > kind of lack of the "vision thing".
>
> And that was the "cleared up" version...
>
> --
> Regards, Curly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'And that was the "cleared up" version.' -defender of the faith
his tv shows are all probably still available.
suspend your suspension of disbelief and watch a few of them.
or try and find the video of him lecturing on the sex-life of ayn
rand.
ho ho ho..
how jolly!
Too_Many_Tools
Yawn..grasping at straws...again.
And trying to change the subject...again.
Your attempt to limit my free speech is noted too....again.
Typical paranoid winger still stinging from his personal loss in
November 2008.
The last official act of any government is the looting of the
nation...Mission Accomplished - George Bush
TMT
Observer
Indeed you are.
>And trying to change the subject...again.
Typical for you.
>Your attempt to limit my free speech is noted too....again.
How am I restricting your speech. Think really really hard on this
one.
>Typical paranoid winger still stinging from his personal loss in
>November 2008.
Why are you stinging? Realize your "choice" wasn't what it was
s'posed to be?
>The last official act of any government is the looting of the
>nation...Mission Accomplished - George Bush
Mission continuing, right on schedule.
Lookout
One of the very few funny conservatives...or libertarian..depending on
which decade you asked him.
Lookout
<CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
If you have to go to #5 it means it's very rarely used that way.
Curly Surmudgeon
Buckley's wit went over the heads of most. Evidently "cop welfare" too.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curly Surmudgeon
If you don't understand common American English then don't attack those
who do.