"ladies and gentlemen, your resident, gorge double u tush."
"thank you, and i would like to thank all of you for showing up for
this press conference.
first, i would like to congratulate you all on the tremendous job you
have done in taking those tidbits that we have fed you and turning
them into realistic sounding news stories. i would especially like to
thank wolfie and the government controlled news network - GCNN.
now does everyone have the list of approved questions for when we go
live and on the air? good.
before we go live, i'd be happy to entertain any of your questions -
heleen?"
"yes mr. resident, thank you. is your daddy getting mad at you because
you're not taking the advise of all the advisors that he so carefully
placed around you?"
"i'm not sure what you mean heleen".
"well mr. resident, your daddy went to great lengths to ensure his #1,
C+ average son would be surrounded by people who actually had the
knowledge, experience and intelligence to make the decisions for you.
lately though it seems that you are countermanding everything that
people like general colon bowel are recommending to you. is your daddy
getting pissed at you?"
"well heleen, now i'm getting pissed. my wife laureen tells me day
after day, and she's right, that i'm my own man. i'm a big boy now and
i can make my own decisions. wolfie?"
"thank you mr. resident. has it occurred to you and your
administration that the public might realize that we are actively
controlling the news when they read the foreign accounts of what is
going on?"
"well wolfie, that's a good question. we have spent a lot of time and
energy building up the appearance of your resources and credibility at
the expense of foreign correspondents. we have put a whole patriotic
campaign in place to make anyone who circulates these stories from
international sources look like either a loony, a commie or both. i
think, wolfie, that we have our bases well covered."
"thank you mr. resident"
"jim?"
"yes mr. resident. two questions please. first, do you feel that the
public will feel that they've been hoodwinked when they find out that
you had troops in afghanistan quite some time before we told them that
we were activating our forces and second, will they realize that this
whole bin laden thing has no basis in fact and you are counting on
capturing him before anyone has time to react?"
"jim, if it hadn't been for those backstabbing pakistani's spotting
our special forces, no one would have been any wiser. they just HAD to
open their big mouths. really though, i don't think that there will be
any backlash. everyone is so intent on this patriotic wave that we've
been building, i really don't even think that they'll figure it out.
as for the second part of your question, this is tricky. as you all
know, the bin laden's and my family have a history together that most
aren't aware of. this is how we were able to get their son osama
involved in the afghani fight against the russian threat. business and
personal deals do go sour from time to time and osama has never let us
forget it. that and a few 'suggestions' in the right saudi ears and
all of a sudden we're the 'meddling evil american devils'. the bottom
line is that he is a major thorn in our side and what ever the cost,
the thorn has to be removed. finding the real culprits are secondary
to his removal."
"mr. resident"
"yes dave"
"mr. resident, stories are starting to surface that the government had
plenty of advance warning from many different sources that the attack
on the twin towers would occur on the 11th."
"dave, i would hardly call three credible sources 'many'. besides, the
original attack plan called for it to happen several days earlier,
with the 11th being a backup. when nothing happened on the first date,
we, you know, just kinda figured that our sources were, you know,
well, wrong. i mean our people were out of there, just in case, just
like in the oklahoma incident, but you know, we just never figured,
well, next time, we'll do things differently. pete?"
"thanks mr. resident, your popularity is at an all time high, higher
than any other president. you have the public in your corner as well
as several other countries. why do you think that your bid to
establish yourself as a deity by making comments like 'crusade',
failed?"
"well pete, timing is everything. my daddy said the time wasn't quite
right, but there was nothing to lose by trying. it doesn't matter.
over the course of the next couple of months there will be plenty of
time to re-establish my role as the new leader of the world. with our
control of the EU and the inroads we are making into the muslim
community there will be many chances to set this all up again. last
question - donna."
"yes mr. president. i'd like to congratulate you on the success of
your mission to reduce the personal freedoms of the public. i have to
admit that as often as you talked about it, i never thought that you
would really pull it off."
"heh, heh. well donna, thank you. yes, i'm actually surprised that it
went off so easily. this whole thing has snowballed so well that i've
actually got them lining up waiting to be told what to do next. they
even fell for the whole 'airline security' thing too. and they say
that texans are dumb rednecks. talk about the pot calling the kettle
muslim. did you have a question?"
"thank you. is the precedence being set by the mayor of new york to
keep himself in power after his term is finished going to be the basis
that you use to abolish the democratic process of presidential
elections?"
"democratic process be damned donna. there is no democratic process
and i think that the world finally got the message with our last
election. i am the president of the US, i will be the president of
north america and after that i will be the head of the global council
that will be formed by the joining of the EU, the north american
alliance and the united asian states.
that was the last question. now we have to get ready for the live
press conference.
you've all got the list of questions, my responses and your
follow-ups. heleen, i'd like you to start, as usual, with #7 and a
follow-up with 7D. wolfie, you handle #'s 3 & 6, lori #8 .............
.................................
WhiteWolf
(new email - whitewolf-...@rubyridge.com -
old email still active)
WW
donna in texas
>this fictional account has no basis in reality??
>
>"ladies and gentlemen, your resident, gorge double u tush."
Whatever.
PLONK
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
Check out our new Unlimited Server. No Download or Time Limits!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! ==-----
*****************************************************************************
You been smokin something strong fella ?
LCC
are you the one from the wizard of oz that went around singing 'if i
only had a brain'?
WW
************************************************************************
PIDDLE, TUSH, TWADDLE.
All of the above = the lovable oaf.
I knew there would be lots of jokes to come as soon as I started
hearing about dangling chads.
I respect President Bush. I suggest that you try that on for size,
because the alternative offered was Al Gore. I voted for someone else
entirely, but respect due process. America, love it or leave it until
the next election.
Lonnie Courtney Clay
You are a pretty good tin-man yourself...
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 11:47:34 GMT, WhiteWolf <whit...@rubyridge.com>
wrote:
<Snip>
> you've all got the list of questions, my responses and your
> follow-ups. heleen, i'd like you to start, as usual, with #7 and a
> follow-up with 7D. wolfie, you handle #'s 3 & 6, lori #8 .............
Amazing how the Democrats end up accusing everyone else of doing what
the Democrats are doing. Ever hear how Clinton would go berserk if
someone got "uppity" with "His Egoness"?
Take another look at what the moslems are up to, Jackass. Take a look
at their beliefs. You are a total idiot if you think you can use them
to tear down your enemies and survive after. Then again, you are a
slimy treasonous piece of filth, so maybe you are foolish enough to
believe such.
Too bad Google does not have a kill file function. I will have to wade
through your treason to search out the posts I wish to respond to, but
at least my news reader program does.
<<PLONK>>
WW
you sit there scared to even envision a world where the government and
the media would lie to you.
they do it every day. they always have. face the facts.
war is not always the answer, in fact, it's rarely the answer. there
are times that agressive defense is called for, but as a last resort.
every seer, every prophet and the Lamb of GOD has tried to tell
mankind this since the dawn of rational thought, but too many refuse
to listen.
WW
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 12:50:15 -0400, Bob Brock <bbr...@i-america.net>
wrote:
WW
On 29 Sep 2001 09:32:53 -0700, LCC...@aol.com (Lonnie Courtney Clay)
wrote:
Not a mark of a survivalist.
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 22:52:16 GMT, WhiteWolf <whit...@rubyridge.com>
wrote:
either way you say it -
dying is not the mark of a survivalist
WW
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 19:40:26 -0400, Bob Brock <bbr...@i-america.net>
wrote:
>Those who live by the sword shall die by the sword, but the pacifist,
No, dying is not the mark of a survivalist. I imagine that Mabu had a
lot of fun with you. Is surviving all that there is to it for you?
Taking the next breath is the measure of a man? I won't discuss the
ethics of survival at any cost with you. You make your stance
perfectly clear. While you may not be exactly the "sheeple" that you
like to condemn, you're worse.
Argue with yourself for awhile. You should be able to convince
yourself that you are right.
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001 01:54:35 GMT, WhiteWolf <whit...@rubyridge.com>
wrote:
WW, You have a right to say what every you want to say.
However, I've read a half-dozen of your posts, and what you say isn't
particularly useful.
I agree one should be thinking when listening to the politicians, and
deciding for oneself if what they are saying is sensible. That is the basis
for the concept of an informed electorate, and a key part of the idea of
representative democracy.
What you've been posting, though, goes beyond that; or around it. Rather
than posting a reasoned argument, showing cites for various steps in a chain
of logic leading to your position, you're posting drivel.
Yes, you do have a right to say what you want.
Just as I have a right to say -
*Plonk*
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 22:39:19 -0400, Bob Brock <bbr...@i-america.net>
wrote:
>Really? I wasn't aware that you were the one who got to decide what
>it was that I wanted to say.
no, just said you talk too much & say little.
>No, dying is not the mark of a survivalist.
i know. i already said it.
> I imagine that Mabu had a
>lot of fun with you.
you lost me on this one. is that one of the demons you worship?
>Is surviving all that there is to it for you?
nothing is accomplished by dying. actually, you are starting to sound
just like those terrorists - ready to die for your cause?
>Taking the next breath is the measure of a man?
no, dying and leaving my children and wife to fend for themselves is
the mark of a man.
did you just grow your first hair or something?
meet ya in the alaskan wilderness & when i hide from the attacking
grizzly, i'll remind you to stand there and be a man.
when you mature a bit, you'll learn how to pick and choose the battles
that will have the most effect & walk away to fight the others another
day.
when you mature a bit, you'll learn that there are many ways to win a
battle.
when you mature a bit - if you live that long....
> I won't discuss the ethics of survival at any cost with you.
why? are you running out of coined phrases? or are you waiting for the
media & government to tell you what to say?
>You make your stance perfectly clear.
i will live. you will commit suicide for your cause.
just like a terrorist.
...snip.....
WW
>ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>oh, i'm sorry, did you say something.
>
>
>On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 22:39:19 -0400, Bob Brock <bbr...@i-america.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Really? I wasn't aware that you were the one who got to decide what
>>it was that I wanted to say.
>no, just said you talk too much & say little.
>
>>No, dying is not the mark of a survivalist.
>i know. i already said it.
No, that's not what you said and you know it. The mis-representations
and name calling speaks for itself. Your moaning mean nothing to me,
so I (like many others) will put your posts where they belong...in the
waste basket.
I have better things to do...
PLONK
Snip name calling and other drivel for brevity.
******************************************************************************
I respect the President in the Italian sense - what are the
alternatives ? No man is an island, but is surrounded by the boundless
sea if he is.
"Jeff Schwartz" has his head screqed on straight, and not just for his
acknowledement of *my* right to an opinion. Encore, Encore, Encore!
LCClay1 = Else 'e lay one. - laying another one for nitwits to
examine.
Lonnie Courtney Clay