Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bush Jr. and his Orwellian Address

0 views
Skip to first unread message

xganon

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 1:56:22 AM9/25/01
to
Click this link to read a great post about how scary Bush Babys speach really was!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&rnum=6&selm=rDwr7.7521%24ob.171925%40news1.rdc1.bc.home.com

---
This post was anonymized at http://www.xganon.com
Come visit the newest xganon server http://www.xganon.org providing
rights and freedom related news.
---


Aidan

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 5:50:54 AM9/25/01
to
> I agreed with Bush's speech for the large part, even after some
> extensive thought on the matter..so why should I read some propaganda
> from Bush haters?
If you had any brains you'd realize that just about EVERYTHING G.W Shrub
says is designed to pull the wool over americans eyes.
Propaganda Panda says "Make up your own minds, don't become a mindless media
drone, cuz that makes me a sad panda"......


sunseeker

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 9:08:20 AM9/25/01
to
"Aidan" <ai...@linknet.com.au> wrote in message news:<FvYr7.8$b93...@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>...


How about a sub-title for the article?

"Circle of Poison"
"Pandora's Box"
"Pogo"
"Catch-22"
"Alice in Wonderland"
?

Children. There are no pure white knights.
But when some people see a black stain
they *only* see black.

Sunseeker

no

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 12:16:30 PM9/25/01
to

Gunner wrote:


>
> xganon <nob...@xganon.com> wrote:
>
> >Click this link to read a great post about how scary Bush Babys speach really was!!
> >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&rnum=6&selm=rDwr7.7521%24ob.171925%40news1.rdc1.bc.home.com
>

> I agreed with Bush's speech for the large part, even after some
> extensive thought on the matter..so why should I read some propaganda
> from Bush haters?

Go ahead, ley Shrub and He-Who-Speaks-In-Tongues take your civil rights away.
Go ahead, let the Gov't throw you in jail indefinitely with no charges.
Go ahead, stick your head blissfully in the sand or up your ignorant ass.

SW4747

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 1:00:52 PM9/25/01
to
I read your article and it is garbage.

"xganon" <nob...@xganon.com> wrote in message
news:2b1244884252aa7c...@xganon.com...

no

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 6:25:55 PM9/25/01
to

SW4747 wrote:
>
> I read your article and it is garbage.

Thik you are safe in your momma's house in Suffolk KKKounty, eh?

Woodswun

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 7:47:19 PM9/25/01
to
In article <FvYr7.8$b93...@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>, "Aidan" <ai...@linknet.com.au> wrote:
>> I agreed with Bush's speech for the large part, even after some
>> extensive thought on the matter..so why should I read some propaganda
>> from Bush haters?
>If you had any brains you'd realize that just about EVERYTHING G.W Shrub
>says is designed to pull the wool over americans eyes.

No more than any other president ever has. I suppose you missed Clinton's
little statement to the press about having organized a "hit squad" to get Bin
Laden (even though assassination is not permitted) - only thing that stopped
it was lack of support by third party countries.

They all lie like snakes - after all, we wouldn't elect them if they told us
what they really planned to do!

Woods

H. McDaniel

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 8:58:36 PM9/25/01
to
Aidan wrote:

Are you sure you aren't a mindless anti-Bush drone? The prez doesn't have 90%
approval ratings because everybody who didn't like him before Sep. 11 was
brainwashed by CNN or somesuch. You can believe that if you want of course.

-McDaniel

Lonnie Courtney Clay

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 10:35:53 PM9/25/01
to
no <pu...@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message news:<3BB11287...@nyc.rr.com>...

> SW4747 wrote:
> >
> > I read your article and it is garbage.
>
> Thik you are safe in your momma's house in Suffolk KKKounty, eh?

I think that President Bush did remarkably well under the
circumstances. He was caught off balance as were all but the perps. He
has settled into an even handed approach for an odd situation. He is
using a multifaceted strategy to tackle people with one track minds.
Let us examine that accusation "Or Well Ian". That brings to mind Ian
Fleming, which pulls up James Bond, and from there we jump to stocks
and bonds, which were a major business in the world trade center. In
other words, you can make much ado about nothing to quote Shakespear.
Since spears have a sharp point then I suppose I am marking a barbed
rejoinder to the accusation. Which reminds me that I am STILL looking
for Barbie.
LCC

Gunner

unread,
Sep 25, 2001, 6:59:44 PM9/25/01
to
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 19:50:54 +1000, "Aidan" <ai...@linknet.com.au>
wrote:

Sore/Loserman 2000

sigh.. and I thought you rocket scientists had given it up by now.
Evidently not.. Consult your theropist..the meds are not working.

Gunner


----------------------------------------------------------.
"When one hears that the majority, not the constitution,
should define civil rights, one should feel a shiver of fear.

Constitutionally guaranteed rights protect gun owners,
property owners, people of different races and
many separate religions, to name a small number.

I will work to protect the rights of all,
not just some.
-- Rama O.A. Schneider, Williamstown, Vermont
----------------------------------------------------------

sunseeker

unread,
Sep 26, 2001, 9:22:29 AM9/26/01
to
LCC...@aol.com (Lonnie Courtney Clay) wrote in message news:<7edd270a.01092...@posting.google.com>...

Cute. :)


Sunseeker

SW4747

unread,
Sep 26, 2001, 4:15:56 PM9/26/01
to
if that's where you think I live, fine.

"no" <pu...@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3BB11287...@nyc.rr.com...
>
>

no

unread,
Sep 26, 2001, 4:19:03 PM9/26/01
to

Need we remind you that your address has ALREADY been posted.
A few simple Google searches was all that was needed.

Chris King

unread,
Sep 27, 2001, 9:16:55 PM9/27/01
to

"Aidan" <ai...@linknet.com.au> wrote in message
news:FvYr7.8$b93...@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net...


hehehe!


SW4747

unread,
Sep 28, 2001, 4:41:57 PM9/28/01
to
good for you.
you are so smart.

"no" <pu...@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message

news:3BB24636...@nyc.rr.com...

Das Monkey

unread,
Sep 28, 2001, 10:57:22 PM9/28/01
to
"H. McDaniel" wrote:

> Are you sure you aren't a mindless anti-Bush drone? The prez doesn't have 90%
> approval ratings because everybody who didn't like him before Sep. 11 was
> brainwashed by CNN or somesuch. You can believe that if you want of course.

it could have been yogi bear in office right now, there'd still be a 90% approval
rating. all he had to do is say "it's a trajedy, we are going to war on terrorism
boo-boo". i mean, fuck. it's not like it's a fantastic superplan.

*************************************************
Http://www.dasmonkey.com
Where a Polygon isn't just a dead Parrot
*************************************************
You've been stuck in a lift
In the belly of a whale
At the bottom of the ocean
*************************************************
*************************************************


José J. Bronze

unread,
Oct 10, 2001, 8:46:47 AM10/10/01
to
YOU MUST BE CONTRAVERSY ITSELF!

You probably wrote your comment on this post yourself, but it looks like you
didn't read Orwell's work nor this link. R U Illitered? No! Then get the
book and read! (If you are the fool you want us to believe you are, then
hire the movie. It's a week representation of the book, but you silly
simpelnesses need the diversion)

Your kind of people are treatening democracy; When morons like you vote,
people like Bush get to govern the most powerfull country in the world.


"Lonnie Courtney Clay" <LCC...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:7edd270a.01092...@posting.google.com...

Altersys

unread,
Oct 11, 2001, 7:28:14 PM10/11/01
to
cyp...@punk.net belched in octaves:

>Wow, a totally incoherent post.
>
>I have no idea what you are trying to say.
>
>The misspellings don't help:
>
> CONTRAVERSY
> Illitered
> simpelnesses
> treatening
> powerfull
>

Donn't forget R and U.

-Alt

no

unread,
Oct 12, 2001, 1:21:40 AM10/12/01
to

cyp...@punk.net wrote:
>
> In nyc.general "José J. Bronze" <jay...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> # YOU MUST BE CONTRAVERSY ITSELF!
> #
> # You probably wrote your comment on this post yourself, but it looks like you
> # didn't read Orwell's work nor this link. R U Illitered? No! Then get the
> # book and read! (If you are the fool you want us to believe you are, then
> # hire the movie. It's a week representation of the book, but you silly
> # simpelnesses need the diversion)
> #
> # Your kind of people are treatening democracy; When morons like you vote,
> # people like Bush get to govern the most powerfull country in the world.


>
> Wow, a totally incoherent post.
>
> I have no idea what you are trying to say.
>
> The misspellings don't help:
>
> CONTRAVERSY
> Illitered
> simpelnesses
> treatening
> powerfull

It must be a "home schooling" thang.......

0 new messages