Re: Experts predict 5000 DOW
Libby Loo
"Deucalion" <som...@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:lgdsq41j91kt3u2rl...@4ax.com...
> <http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gHs5OM3gFG_DytQQZFbWfgPT08MAD96M5CRO0>
>
> NEW YORK (AP) - Investors' despair about financial companies and the
> recession has brought the Dow Jones industrial average to another
> unwanted milestone: its first drop below 7,000 in more than 11 years.
> The market's slide Monday, which took the Dow down 300 points, was
> nowhere near the largest it has seen since last fall, but the tumble
> below 7,000 was nonetheless painful.
>
> The credit crisis and recession have slashed more than half the
> average's value since it hit a record high over 14,000 in October
> 2007. And now many investors fear the market could take a long time to
> regain the lost 7,000.
>
> "As bad as things are, they can still get worse, and get a lot worse,"
> said Bill Strazzullo, chief market strategist for Bell Curve Trading.
> Strazzullo said he believes there's a significant chance the S&P 500
> and the Dow will fall back to their 1995 levels of 500 and 5,000,
> respectively.
Obama hits a foul ball and sets the Dow back 14 years and now we are living
in the Clinton years again. Hide the silverware! DIVE! DIVE! DIVE!
Curly Surmudgeon
Which has absolutely nothing to do with the originator of this disaster,
President George Walker Bush and his merry band of pirates. You, too,
Libby Loo, are responsible for you've defended Bush and his crimes,
through many nym-changes, for a very long, too long, time.
Since you bear responsibility too, write your check to the Treasury
Department in a very large amount.
How did it go? What did they say?
Did you find a job today?
I could not find one here or there.
I could not find one anywhere.
I could not find a job in town,
Or in the other towns around.
Would you could you on a boat?
Any openings for milking goats?
How 'bout jobs in selling shoes,
Or reading out the evening news?
I would not, could not on a boat.
I don't know how to milk a goat.
My skills are wrong for selling shoes.
My voice is wrong for reading news.
I could not find a job today.
All the jobs have gone away.
Would you could you building houses?
How 'bout selling cute white mouses?
Picking produce? Catching fish?
Making calls for "Make a Wish"?
I would not, could not selling mouses.
There is no market for new houses.
Picking produce makes me sweat.
Catching fishes makes me wet.
I made some calls for charity,
But everyone hung up on me.
I could not find a job today.
All the jobs have gone away.
"No jobs here." They said and then,
"Maybe in two thousand ten."
-- Catherine Cowles
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$8,800,000,000,000.00, Angry Yet?
Arrest Bush
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan
And yet, through most of the last 8 years, we were far worse off than
those Clinton years, and nary a peep...
Your motivation for posting couldn't be, political, could it???
Dan
Libby Loo
"Dan" <dnad...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:WMxrl.60878$cI2....@newsfe09.iad...
I didn't post anything political or negative about the Clintons 8 years ago.
I was pretty much a lurker here, learning about survivalism issues. I only
joined in the fun when the Obama machine showed up to turn the newsgroup
into a playground. Whee!
Libby Loo
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:aojuq4panjbeti62v...@4ax.com...
> "Libby Loo" <gur...@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>>I didn't post anything political or negative about the Clintons 8 years
>>ago.
>>I was pretty much a lurker here, learning about survivalism issues. I only
>>joined in the fun when the Obama machine showed up to turn the newsgroup
>>into a playground. Whee!
>
> Bullshit. You were here defending Bush. You were doing that long
> before either party even picked their candidates.
We weren't talking about Bush, dimbulb. Try to focus, I won't fall for your
trolls.
I said I didn't post anything political or negative about the Clintons 8
years ago, whom I believe you defend to this day. If I did say anything
about the Clintons back then, then it was well deserved.
Curly Surmudgeon
Lie by deceit.
You attacked all things not Bush.
h...@nospam.com
Curly Surmudgeon
And a liar.
Dan
Then please explain: "I only joined in the fun when the Obama machine
showed up..."
Oops. If you are going to lie, at LEAST trim the thread so that your
lie is not caught by reading up a couple of lines.
You wingers are SO dumb.
Dan
Dan
Ya think?!?
That is why I think it might be a parody poster.
Dan
terryc
> Strazzullo said he believes there's a significant chance the S&P 500 and
> the Dow will fall back to their 1995 levels of 500 and 5,000,
> respectively.
Um, who cares?
Apart from stock market gamblers?
Libby Loo
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:r421r4leuir2cf61n...@4ax.com...
> "Libby Loo" <gur...@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>>news:aojuq4panjbeti62v...@4ax.com...
>>> "Libby Loo" <gur...@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>
>>>> I only
>>>>joined in the fun when the Obama machine showed up to turn the newsgroup
>>>>into a playground.
>>>
>>> Bullshit. You were here defending Bush. You were doing that long
>>> before either party even picked their candidates.
>
>>I said I didn't post anything political or negative about the Clintons 8
>>years ago, whom I believe you defend to this day. If I did say anything
>>about the Clintons back then, then it was well deserved.
>
> You said you didn't post until Obama came on the scene. That's
> bullshit.
Still trying to put words in my mouth I see. Blatant attempt, as my words
are posted above. Having fun yet?
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com
> <http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gHs5OM3gFG_DytQQZFb...>
>
> NEW YORK (AP) — Investors' despair about financial companies and the
> recession has brought the Dow Jones industrial average to another
> unwanted milestone: its first drop below 7,000 in more than 11 years.
> The market's slide Monday, which took the Dow down 300 points, was
> nowhere near the largest it has seen since last fall, but the tumble
> below 7,000 was nonetheless painful.
>
> The credit crisis and recession have slashed more than half the
> average's value since it hit a record high over 14,000 in October
> 2007. And now many investors fear the market could take a long time to
> regain the lost 7,000.
>
> "As bad as things are, they can still get worse, and get a lot worse,"
> said Bill Strazzullo, chief market strategist for Bell Curve Trading.
> and the Dow will fall back to their 1995 levels of 500 and 5,000,
> respectively.
>
>
> Go to the provided link to read the rest of the article.
Darktower
Libby Loo
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:1ir3r4pq6ij2mlg6o...@4ax.com...
> Yes the are posted.
>
> "I only joined in the fun when the Obama machine showed up to turn the
> newsgroup into a playground."
>
> And what you posted is a lie.
Typical lib loser lying response from the Clinton lover.
Curly Surmudgeon
Weasel. You've been here under multiple nyms including the now
discredited "Jerry" well before the Obama supporters arrived.
In other words, it is you, not Winston, who is lying.
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 17:53:57 -0800 (PST),
>
> - Show quoted text -
No. Darkguard.
pyotr filipivich
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com reported Elvis on Fri, 6 Mar 2009
17:53:57 -0800 (PST) in misc.survivalism:
If the markets stop at 1995 levels, I'll be surprised.
I mean, we've got Jimmy Carter redux, without Jimmy's experience.
So I wouldn't be surprised if the markets return to those levels
either. That's 962 high on Jan 21, 1977, and 763 low on April 18,
1980. I'm not sure what that might be "adjusted for inflation."
But we also had double digit prime rates, inflation rates and
unemployment rates. But that was okay, growth was in the single
digits.
Yeah, I wouldn't be that surprised if the Dow goes below 5,000. Or
even 1,000. I'd be pleasantly surprised if it doesn't, but the
Democrat party's effectiveness at destroying wealth has been well
documented over the last century.
toodles
pyotr
--
pyotr filipivich
Next month's Panel: Graft - Boon or blessing?
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com
> I missed the Staff Meeting but the Minutes record that
> 17:53:57 -0800 (PST) in misc.survivalism:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Mar 4, 3:06 am, Deucalion <some...@nowhere.net> wrote:
> >> <http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gHs5OM3gFG_DytQQZFb...>
>
> >> NEW YORK (AP) — Investors' despair about financial companies and the
> >> recession has brought the Dow Jones industrial average to another
> >> unwanted milestone: its first drop below 7,000 in more than 11 years.
> >> The market's slide Monday, which took the Dow down 300 points, was
> >> nowhere near the largest it has seen since last fall, but the tumble
> >> below 7,000 was nonetheless painful.
>
> >> The credit crisis and recession have slashed more than half the
> >> average's value since it hit a record high over 14,000 in October
> >> 2007. And now many investors fear the market could take a long time to
> >> regain the lost 7,000.
>
> >> "As bad as things are, they can still get worse, and get a lot worse,"
> >> said Bill Strazzullo, chief market strategist for Bell Curve Trading.
> >> Strazzullo said he believes there's a significant chance the S&P 500
> >> and the Dow will fall back to their 1995 levels of 500 and 5,000,
> >> respectively.
>
> >> -----------------------------------
>
> >> Go to the provided link to read the rest of the article.
>
> >Darktower
>
> If the markets stop at 1995 levels, I'll be surprised.
>
> I mean, we've got Jimmy Carter redux, without Jimmy's experience.
So you don't think "Community Organizer" provides the requisite
experience to deliver us from the great depression?
> So I wouldn't be surprised if the markets return to those levels
> either. That's 962 high on Jan 21, 1977, and 763 low on April 18,
> 1980. I'm not sure what that might be "adjusted for inflation."
I lived through those years. There wasn't any work when my enlistment
was up. There wasn't any work when my 6 month extension was up, and
there wasn't any work when my second 6 motnh extension was up.
> But we also had double digit prime rates, inflation rates and
> unemployment rates. But that was okay, growth was in the single
> digits.
I got a $1200 reenlistment bonus. My wife got a living room set.
> Yeah, I wouldn't be that surprised if the Dow goes below 5,000. Or
> even 1,000. I'd be pleasantly surprised if it doesn't, but the
> Democrat party's effectiveness at destroying wealth has been well
> documented over the last century.
Be nice. They have good intentions and that's all that matters.
> toodles
> pyotr
>
> --
> pyotr filipivich
> Next month's Panel: Graft - Boon or blessing?- Hide quoted text -
Curly Surmudgeon
Yet it is the Republicans which precipitated this economic disaster while
yelling "Clinton" under whom the economy did quite well. Speaking of
century-old "Republican" and "Democrat" parties is disingenuous since
they've traded platforms.
Republicans were once the party of liberalism.
But I agree about the possibility of a much deeper market collapse. It's
the product of both parties.
pyotr filipivich
13:55:11 -0800 (PST) in misc.survivalism:
>
>> Yeah, I wouldn't be that surprised if the Dow goes below 5,000. Or
>> even 1,000. I'd be pleasantly surprised if it doesn't, but the
>> Democrat party's effectiveness at destroying wealth has been well
>> documented over the last century.
>
>Be nice. They have good intentions and that's all that matters.
fnord.
Gunner Asch
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I wouldn't be that surprised if the Dow goes below 5,000. Or
>> even 1,000. I'd be pleasantly surprised if it doesn't, but the
>> Democrat party's effectiveness at destroying wealth has been well
>> documented over the last century.
>
>Be nice. They have good intentions and that's all that matters.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.......
Gunner
at yoyodyne they were all veterans of the psychic wars
exiled from the eighth dimension where the winds of limbo roar"
mariposa rand mair theal
Libby Loo
"Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote in message
news:49b239b3$0$10147$7836...@newsrazor.net...
Now you are both lying loser liberals.
Libby Loo
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:vrp5r4ldilv874hm9...@4ax.com...
> "Libby Loo" <gur...@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote
>>> "Libby Loo" <gur...@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote
>
>>>>> You said you didn't post until Obama came on the scene. That's
>>>>> bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>Still trying to put words in my mouth I see. Blatant attempt, as my
>>>>words
>>>>are posted above. Having fun yet?
>>>
>>> Yes the are posted.
>>>
>>> "I only joined in the fun when the Obama machine showed up to turn the
>>> newsgroup into a playground."
>>>
>>> And what you posted is a lie.
>>
>>Typical lib loser lying response from the Clinton lover.
>
> I guess pointing out every time the Cheese Bobs tell another whooper
> is getting to be pretty "typical".
Don't lump me in with any Bob's when you tell your lies. I'm not your puppet
so quit trying to put your words in my mouth.
Observer
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com wrote:
Didn't the great depresion happen eraly LAST century?
>> So I wouldn't be surprised if the markets return to those levels
>> either. That's 962 high on Jan 21, 1977, and 763 low on April 18,
>> 1980. I'm not sure what that might be "adjusted for inflation."
>
>I lived through those years. There wasn't any work when my enlistment
>was up. There wasn't any work when my 6 month extension was up, and
>there wasn't any work when my second 6 motnh extension was up.
No work for what?
>> But we also had double digit prime rates, inflation rates and
>> unemployment rates. But that was okay, growth was in the single
>> digits.
>
>I got a $1200 reenlistment bonus. My wife got a living room set.
They gave spouses living room stes?
>> Yeah, I wouldn't be that surprised if the Dow goes below 5,000. Or
>> even 1,000. I'd be pleasantly surprised if it doesn't, but the
>> Democrat party's effectiveness at destroying wealth has been well
>> documented over the last century.
>
>Be nice. They have good intentions and that's all that matters.
Really? Wow.
>> toodles
>> pyotr
>>
>> --
>> pyotr filipivich
>> Next month's Panel: Graft - Boon or blessing?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
__
The last official act of any government is the looting of the nation.
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com
That's Quitefine.
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com
> On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 13:21:49 -0800, pyotr filipivich wrote:
> > I missed the Staff Meeting but the Minutes record that
So you voted for Obama by proxy...
Can you still claim that you support the second amendment? I don't
think so.
Do you still claim you are an anarchist? Yeh, sure. Obama is all
about less intrusive government.
> --
> Regards, Squirrelly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> $8,800,000,000,000.00, Angry Yet?
> Arrest Obama
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 13:55:11 -0800 (PST),
> hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>> Yeah, I wouldn't be that surprised if the Dow goes below 5,000. Or
>>> even 1,000. I'd be pleasantly surprised if it doesn't, but the
>>> Democrat party's effectiveness at destroying wealth has been well
>>> documented over the last century.
>> Be nice. They have good intentions and that's all that matters.
>
>
> The road to hell is paved with good intentions.......
Such as lying about Democrats?
Seemed like a good idea at the time, eh?
Dan
Strabo
> "Libby Loo" <gur...@127.0.0.1> wrote:>
>> "Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote
>
>>>> Typical lib loser lying response from the Clinton lover.
>>> I guess pointing out every time the Cheese Bobs tell another whooper
>>> is getting to be pretty "typical".
>> Don't lump me in with any Bob's when you tell your lies. I'm not your puppet
>> so quit trying to put your words in my mouth.
>
>
OK. Who is he, really?
Libby Loo
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:isrbr4le6qlk9f99m...@4ax.com...
> Both his language style and the mechanics of his posting are very
> similar to HHC/ACMY/BB. Certainly LL is the creature we knew as
> Jerry. I have this feeling they are all one in the same.
Your powers of deduction are terrible, don't quit your position in the soup
line.
>
> In any case they are trolls. They never state an opinion, they just
> attack others for what they post. Good way to keep things stirred up
> without ever getting pinned down to defend a position.
You are the troll here, your Bush bashing posts have nothing to do with
survivalism and just attracts the riff-raff.
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com
> Strabo <str...@flashlight.net> wrote:
> >Winston_Smith wrote:
> >> "Libby Loo" <gur...@127.0.0.1> wrote:>
> >>>> "Libby Loo" <gur...@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Typical lib loser lying response from the Clinton lover.
> >>>> I guess pointing out every time the Cheese Bobs tell another whooper
> >>>> is getting to be pretty "typical".
> >>> Don't lump me in with any Bob's when you tell your lies. I'm not your puppet
> >>> so quit trying to put your words in my mouth.
>
> >> Agreed. You are not MY puppet.
>
> >OK. Who is he, really?
>
> similar to HHC/ACMY/BB. Certainly LL is the creature we knew as
> Jerry.
That's "ACMH" to my friends.
>I have this feeling they are all one in the same.
I have this feeling that you are wrong. Again.
> In any case they are trolls.
Hi!
> They never state an opinion,
Been there, done that. All I got was ad hom attacks for it.
> they just attack others for what they post.
I would never do that!
I have merely commented on what you never posted (criticism of
Clinton) and what you never did (serve your country).
> Good way to keep things stirred up
> without ever getting pinned down to defend a position.
How can you say that?
Every day your team tries to damn me for my position.
Curly Surmudgeon
> Both his language style and the mechanics of his posting are very
> similar to HHC/ACMY/BB. Certainly LL is the creature we knew as Jerry.
> I have this feeling they are all one in the same.
There are others we've forgotten like "John \C\" who fit the same style,
position, and pattern.
> In any case they are trolls. They never state an opinion, they just
> attack others for what they post. Good way to keep things stirred up
> without ever getting pinned down to defend a position.
They both lie a lot too.
Observer
How so? Give ALL the 3rd party votes to McSame & O'same still would
have won.
>Can you still claim that you support the second amendment? I don't
>think so.
I'm guessing he voted for a candidate that supported the 2nd
amendment, Brian.
>Do you still claim you are an anarchist? Yeh, sure. Obama is all
>about less intrusive government.
>
>> --
>> Regards, Squirrelly
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> $8,800,000,000,000.00, Angry Yet?
>> Arrest Obama
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice post editing, Brian.
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com
wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:45:51 -0700, Winston_Smith wrote:
> > Strabo <str...@flashlight.net> wrote:
>
> >>Winston_Smith wrote:
> >>> "Libby Loo" <gur...@127.0.0.1> wrote:>
> >>>>> "Libby Loo" <gur...@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Typical lib loser lying response from the Clinton lover.
> >>>>> I guess pointing out every time the Cheese Bobs tell another whooper
> >>>>> is getting to be pretty "typical".
> >>>> Don't lump me in with any Bob's when you tell your lies. I'm not your
> >>>> puppet so quit trying to put your words in my mouth.
>
> >>> Agreed. You are not MY puppet.
>
> >>OK. Who is he, really?
>
> > Both his language style and the mechanics of his posting are very
> > similar to HHC/ACMY/BB. Certainly LL is the creature we knew as Jerry.
> > I have this feeling they are all one in the same.
>
> There are others we've forgotten like "John \C\" who fit the same style,
> position, and pattern.
Carroll? I don't claim him.
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com
No. The electoral votes would have changed with the popular vote.
> >Can you still claim that you support the second amendment? I don't
> >think so.
>
> I'm guessing he voted for a candidate that supported the 2nd
> amendment, Brian.
I'm guessing that candidate didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell
to win. IOW, a wasted vote.
> >Do you still claim you are an anarchist? Yeh, sure. Obama is all
> >about less intrusive government.
Obama says he's losing the war in Afghanistan. How's his war in Iraq
going?
> >> --
> >> Regards, Squirrelly
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> $8,800,000,000,000.00, Angry Yet?
> >> Arrest Obama
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Nice post editing, Brian.
Is Obama now a war criminal? You might want to step back and let the
squirrel answer that one.
Curly Surmudgeon
There's a female personality in your head too? The Cockroach, hot-ham-
and-cheese, almost-cut-his-hair, libby loo, Jerry, and now Carol? Let
her out once in a while, can't possibly be as warped at the five guys she
has to share a cranium with.
Or are there unidentified others?
Observer
Sope electoral voters would have changed.
McSame. Still. Would. Have. Lost.
>> >Can you still claim that you support the second amendment? I don't
>> >think so.
>>
>> I'm guessing he voted for a candidate that supported the 2nd
>> amendment, Brian.
>
>I'm guessing that candidate didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell
>to win. IOW, a wasted vote.
McSame didn't have a chance. ergo, by your logic, YOU pissed away
your vote.
>> >Do you still claim you are an anarchist? Yeh, sure. Obama is all
>> >about less intrusive government.
>
>Obama says he's losing the war in Afghanistan. How's his war in Iraq
>going?
You are replying to your own wortds, there.
>> >> --
>> >> Regards, Squirrelly
>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> $8,800,000,000,000.00, Angry Yet?
>> >> Arrest Obama
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Nice post editing, Brian.
>
>Is Obama now a war criminal? You might want to step back and let the
>squirrel answer that one.
You keep making that assertion.
Observer
wrote:
Er,
Some electoral votes would have changed.
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com
Why do you always zero in on the women?
> Or are there unidentified others?
>
> --
> Regards, Curly
John \C\ = John Carroll, you idiot. I don't claim him.
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com
Do you think Squirrelly will ever answer or are you his messenger boy?
> >> >> --
> >> >> Regards, Squirrelly
> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> $8,800,000,000,000.00, Angry Yet?
> >> >> Arrest Obama
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >> Nice post editing, Brian.
>
> >Is Obama now a war criminal? You might want to step back and let the
> >squirrel answer that one.
>
> You keep making that assertion.
You keep answering for Squirrelly.
Observer
Squirrelly? You're the most squirell like critter on this NG,
Cheese-Bob, aka Brian Burke, aka brian...@juno.com. Will Curly
answer the squirrily Cheese-Bob troll? We'll have to wait.
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Regards, Squirrelly
>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> $8,800,000,000,000.00, Angry Yet?
>> >> >> Arrest Obama
>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> >> Nice post editing, Brian.
>>
>> >Is Obama now a war criminal? You might want to step back and let the
>> >squirrel answer that one.
>>
>> You keep making that assertion.
>
>You keep answering for Squirrelly.
No. I keep pointing out your assertion, Brian.
hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com
> answer the squirrily Cheese-Bob troll? We'll have to wait.
>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> Regards, Squirrelly
> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> $8,800,000,000,000.00, Angry Yet?
> >> >> >> Arrest Obama
> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >> >> Nice post editing, Brian.
>
> >> >Is Obama now a war criminal? You might want to step back and let the
> >> >squirrel answer that one.
>
> >> You keep making that assertion.
>
> >You keep answering for Squirrelly.
>
> No. I keep pointing out your assertion, Brian.
AKA Robeson
Dan
No, no, no, no, no. He is not squirrelly, he is Hamster (hear him mew).
Dan
Observer
Cite? Obviously not.
>> Or are there unidentified others?
>>
>> --
>> Regards, Curly
>
>John \C\ = John Carroll, you idiot. I don't claim him.
Are you sure?
Observer
>AKA Robitussion
Sure.
Curly Surmudgeon
Because I like women. I like their company, their friendship, their
personalities, their aroma, their flavor.
If you were hetrosexual you wouldn't need to ask.
>> Or are there unidentified others?
>>
>> --
>> Regards, Curly
>
> John \C\ = John Carroll, you idiot. I don't claim him.
Sometimes alternate personalities are combative. Your problem.