Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
SECURITY VS. PRIVACY??
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Ted McMillan
Sep 22, 2001, 11:57:35 PM9/22/01
to
Since the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, our American
government is now asking of the citizens of the United States what
they have asked before persistently: for them to surrender at least
some of their rights and liberties. It is being pressed upon them
that it is necessary for them to give up their rights to privacy in
order to attain safety and security. If the American citizens
therefore agree to give up some of their liberties because of the
crisis of the hour, would they get it back? We can find out the
answer to this question through the fact that the government has been
asking her citizens to give up their rights even before this incident
and under suspicious conditions since there was no crisis nor danger
noticeable.
British Intelligence has noticed that American security has been very
successful in deterring terrorist activity in this country. But
suddenly they are mystified that this massive terrorist attack which
must have taken years to plan and implement has not been detected by
them even with their sophisticated listening devices that already
violate the privacy of all Americans. When the request was made for
the citizens to give up some of their privacy, the request claimed
specifically that the citizens must allow the government to be able to
read encrypted email. They were not asked for the government to be
able to read regular email, for it must be common knowledge that she
already does that.
Now that the attack has taken place, we find that the government is
arresting suspects left and right and are catching potential
terrorists in their tracks. At the same time she is still asking for
the American citizens to give up some of their liberties so that she
would be able to catch terrorists. How is it that the government can
now catch so many people after the terrorist attack without yet
attaining the ability to read encrypted email?
The American government knows that terrorists exercise encrypted email
from the black market and that no legislation allowing the government
to read encrypted email will affect terrorists. The only encrypted
email that will be affected will be those of the citizens of America.
Why therefore are they still asking Americans to give up their rights
to use secure encrypted email?
We find that almost every terrorist is islamic and comes from the
middle east. We conclude however that we cannot in any way
discriminate against Muslim or Arab American citizens. We now find
that almost every email sent by terrorists are encrypted. Are we then
going to violate the rights of many others who use encrypted email?
Most encrypted email IS NOT SENT BY TERRORISTS!
government is now asking of the citizens of the United States what
they have asked before persistently: for them to surrender at least
some of their rights and liberties. It is being pressed upon them
that it is necessary for them to give up their rights to privacy in
order to attain safety and security. If the American citizens
therefore agree to give up some of their liberties because of the
crisis of the hour, would they get it back? We can find out the
answer to this question through the fact that the government has been
asking her citizens to give up their rights even before this incident
and under suspicious conditions since there was no crisis nor danger
noticeable.
British Intelligence has noticed that American security has been very
successful in deterring terrorist activity in this country. But
suddenly they are mystified that this massive terrorist attack which
must have taken years to plan and implement has not been detected by
them even with their sophisticated listening devices that already
violate the privacy of all Americans. When the request was made for
the citizens to give up some of their privacy, the request claimed
specifically that the citizens must allow the government to be able to
read encrypted email. They were not asked for the government to be
able to read regular email, for it must be common knowledge that she
already does that.
Now that the attack has taken place, we find that the government is
arresting suspects left and right and are catching potential
terrorists in their tracks. At the same time she is still asking for
the American citizens to give up some of their liberties so that she
would be able to catch terrorists. How is it that the government can
now catch so many people after the terrorist attack without yet
attaining the ability to read encrypted email?
The American government knows that terrorists exercise encrypted email
from the black market and that no legislation allowing the government
to read encrypted email will affect terrorists. The only encrypted
email that will be affected will be those of the citizens of America.
Why therefore are they still asking Americans to give up their rights
to use secure encrypted email?
We find that almost every terrorist is islamic and comes from the
middle east. We conclude however that we cannot in any way
discriminate against Muslim or Arab American citizens. We now find
that almost every email sent by terrorists are encrypted. Are we then
going to violate the rights of many others who use encrypted email?
Most encrypted email IS NOT SENT BY TERRORISTS!
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.org
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.org
Lonnie Courtney Clay
Sep 28, 2001, 12:07:45 PM9/28/01
to
Ted McMillan <tmac...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:<6dnqqtci95ac194bs...@4ax.com>...
>
> For the Work Finished!
>
>
>
> Ted McMillan
> THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
> http://www.seventh-dayadventism.org
> For the Work Finished!
>
>
> Ted McMillan
> THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!!
> http://www.seventh-dayadventism.org
>
> For the Work Finished!
>
>
>
> Ted McMillan
> THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
> http://www.seventh-dayadventism.org
> For the Work Finished!
>
>
> Ted McMillan
> THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!!
> http://www.seventh-dayadventism.org
*******************************************************************************
For the Work Finished! = Shrink off the wierdo!
I shrunk my own head and no longer heed headshrinkers....
Is your head caught in a vise ? "Ted McMillan = Met Mild Clan.
Notice that he brags of having the last word. On the other hand, in
the circus the show is not over till the fat lady sings. Going to gain
weight and get a sex change bubba ?
*******************************************************************************
LCC
Lonnie Courtney Clay
Sep 28, 2001, 12:16:02 PM9/28/01
to
> Are we then
> going to violate the rights of many others who use encrypted email?
> Most encrypted email IS NOT SENT BY TERRORISTS!
>
>
> For the Work Finished!
>
>
>
> Ted McMillan
> THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
> http://www.seventh-dayadventism.org
> For the Work Finished!
>
>
> Ted McMillan
> THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!!
> http://www.seventh-dayadventism.org
> going to violate the rights of many others who use encrypted email?
> Most encrypted email IS NOT SENT BY TERRORISTS!
>
>
> For the Work Finished!
>
>
>
> Ted McMillan
> THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
> http://www.seventh-dayadventism.org
> For the Work Finished!
>
>
> Ted McMillan
> THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!!
> http://www.seventh-dayadventism.org
********************************************************************************
You have something to hide bubba ? I never did, and consider a wider
audience to be sincere flattery!
LCC
0 new messages