Re: The hatefilled idiot krackpot Ray Keller Nutcase spouts off about nothing, spewing fallacy, ignoring facts
Logic Alert
effective at trapping solar heat. So are water vapor (the source of 90% of earth's natural
greenhouse effect), methane, and other gases. The natural carbon dioxide content of the
atmosphere has doubled in the last 200 years, climate is getting warmer, so the logical
conclusion is that there is a connection between the two trends."
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/GlobWarm.HTM
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:47:56 -0700, <rayk...@rnsmte.com> wrote:
>... J.R. Dunn...
Rush Limbaugh quotes him, but he's a liar.
"the first sentence is not only untrue, but also nonsensical"
http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2007/05/jr_dunns_fabrications_against.php
"This is about the best example imaginable to illustrate why naive intuition is worthless
in science. ... That means we find out how the world works and base our intuition on
that, not untrained gut feelings."
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/GlobWarm.HTM
>...no stranger to fraud....
You support fraud, Ray. You also support avarice and malice in general.
What evidence do you have to prove global warming wrong?
Just admit that you have none. It's that obvious.
Gunner Asch
Co2 rises AFTER warming, not before.
Pitiful how you tards keep getting that backwards.
Gunner
"Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
Unknown Usnet Poster
Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
Keyton
The Very Model of Sweetness and Light
mainly responsible for this trend.
Graph showing that the observed temperature rise can easily result from the observed rise
of CO2 , based on simple numerical experiment. (Smoothed temperature data in Jones et al.,
1998; CO2 forcing data from CO2 history, and calculated expected rise in temperature
assuming 2 degree Celsius rise for CO2 doubling; sunspot abundance from J.Lean, NASA)
Of course, showing that the observed warming entirely agrees with reasonable expectations
for the rise in carbon dioxide does not exclude the possibility that some of this warming
would have occurred anyway, without human help. But the warming of the past 30 years, from
1970 to the present, is unexplainable by any known natural cause. In any case,
considerable further warming is very likely if emissions continue as in the past.
We know that CO2 causes warming."
http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/globalchange/global_warming/03.html
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:48:16 -0800, Gummer Ass <gun...@lightspeed.net> wrote:
>Co2 [sic] rises AFTER warming, not before.
You seem to be completely clueless about the fact
that CO2 also rises before warming.
>Pitiful how... tards keep getting that backwards.
>Gunner
>...always looking for a handout...
>... no balls ...
You could do better if you could learn how to do
research rather than kneel and swallow deceit.
The Very Model of Sweetness and Light
> ...fertilized with fraud, marinated in fraud, stewed in fraud, and
>at last served up to the world as prime grade-A fraud with nice side orders
>of fakery and disingenuousness...
Thanks for posting your life story, Ray.
"Inhofe is not only a crusading global-warming denier but a rampaging fundy loon who
believes the earth is man's playpen to befoul and exhaust while awaiting the Rapture.
(It's actually an insult to God to try to extend the life of the planet longer than He
means us to be here.) He has devoted his life to the promotion of ignorance and the
forcible destruction of knowledge and honest inquiry in all known forms. He is a savage
and a bully. And while he has championed pretty much the full range of dangerous and
psychotic Far Right causes, he is known above all for his unwavering devotion to the
pillaging and plundering of the environment."
http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2009/07/would-you-believe-that-scientists.html