Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
misc.news.internet.discuss
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Lie lie lie
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Buzz  
View profile  
 More options Sep 2 2012, 10:32 am
Newsgroups: misc.news.internet.discuss
From: Buzz <b...@buzz.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:33:44 -0400
Local: Sun, Sep 2 2012 10:33 am
Subject: Re: Lie lie lie
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:59:01 -0500, JAB <h...@toadsfoot.net> wrote:
>On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:06:37 -0400, WaIIy <WaIIy@(nft).invalid> wrote:

>>What Mr. Newhouse actually said
>>was, These fact-checkers come to those ads with their own sets of
>>thoughts and beliefs. We re not going to let our campaign be dictated by
>>fact-checkers.

>>    Mr. Newhouse did not say, We will not let the truth get in the
>>way.

>Still can't see thru the fog?

Uhh, I forgot that you apparently need the obvious pointed out to
you...  Wally's article has a quote from the community organizer...

"And they were asked about it and they said one of their campaign
people said, We won t have the fact-checkers dictate our campaign. We
will not let the truth get in the way.

Yeppers, that's your boy, the amateur community organizer, just flat
out telling another lie.

>Thoughts and beliefs have nothing to do with facts (objective
>observations/etc).

And lies have nothing to do with truth or honesty.  Why do you think
the community organizer lies, knowing that anyone with half a brain
can do a simple check and see that he's lying?  That's a rhetorical
question, BTW.

>As such, "fact-checkers" are synonymous with truth (objective
>observations/etc).

>Therefore, Mr. Newhouse has indicated the degree of political slant he
>will follow.

There you go again.  Read the article.  obama was lying.  The entire
article is about obama lying.  But here you are talking about Mr.
Newhouse, apparently since you believed obama's lie.  

Hello?

--

"If you voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you re not a racist,
you ll have to vote for someone else in 2012 to prove you re
not an idiot." - spotted bumper sticker


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google