On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:59:01 -0500, JAB <h...@toadsfoot.net> wrote:Uhh, I forgot that you apparently need the obvious pointed out to
>On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:06:37 -0400, WaIIy <WaIIy@(nft).invalid> wrote:
>>What Mr. Newhouse actually said
>> Mr. Newhouse did not say, We will not let the truth get in the
>Still can't see thru the fog?
you... Wally's article has a quote from the community organizer...
"And they were asked about it and they said one of their campaign
Yeppers, that's your boy, the amateur community organizer, just flat
And lies have nothing to do with truth or honesty. Why do you think
>Thoughts and beliefs have nothing to do with facts (objective
the community organizer lies, knowing that anyone with half a brain
can do a simple check and see that he's lying? That's a rhetorical
There you go again. Read the article. obama was lying. The entire
>As such, "fact-checkers" are synonymous with truth (objective
>Therefore, Mr. Newhouse has indicated the degree of political slant he
article is about obama lying. But here you are talking about Mr.
Newhouse, apparently since you believed obama's lie.
"If you voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you re not a racist,
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.