FRAUD EXPOSED: Wendy Edeiken and shaklee = bankrupt aka Bad Consequences for Dishonest People! S_0119
Eddie Haskell
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=u4hhjvkf952ekuh5ugh3iof5oci3o43u90%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Re: Wendy Edeiken and shaklee = bankrupt
Message-ID: <u4hhjvkf952ekuh5u...@4ax.com>
On 11 Aug 2003 23:27:43 -0500, <szkisp3...@fnord.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> writes:
>
>>http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/ = all gone
>>
>>Looks like another dishonest business got exposed
Those complaints to the various fraud watch groups are most likely what did the
Edeiken Clan in.
Here is the Edeiken Fan Club trying to do damage control:
~~~<START>~~~
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=86vpatc85cta37b2m183gv4rdi6irpav1s%404ax.com&rnum=1
(Archived locally as ShakleeNet_2)
Subject: More of Sara Salzman's Lies Exposed for ALL to See and This Liar Was a
Witness Against Me in Court!!! aka Re: Sara Salzman PROVES She Perjured and Now
Changes Her Story aka Re: Day 28 - Blakely Lies and Runs Away. Nothing New.
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:06:37 -0600
Message-ID: <86vpatc85cta37b2m...@4ax.com>
References: <57eb28d439694934...@anon.xg.nu>
<catamont-E00097...@news.concentric.net>
<05ekatgb7gpe0ni69...@4ax.com>
<catamont-15611B...@news.concentric.net>
On Wed, 07 Feb 2001 09:04:29 GMT, Doc Tavish
<NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:09:24 -0000, "david_michael"
><david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
>>Mr McVay, he who advocates arguing against revisionism rather than
>>oppressing it (but who then employs a campaign of smears and intimidation
>>against revisionists), has now killfiled pretty much all the revisionists in
>>alt.revisionism and has joined the campaign to wreck alt.revisionism by
>>posting large numbers of inane messages thereby drowning out those who wish
>>to discuss revisionism.
>>
>>Such are the tactics of the anti-revisionists.
>>
>>David
:.
>Even stranger I posted the correct link to begin with and I have proven it
>yet they continue the same campaign. Now that is pathetic. I think one of
>them changed my original link from my original, as documented at DejaCom,
>in the thread with the sole purpose of creating this current diversion.
>
>Here is evidence my original CORRECT link was changed in the thread and
>making the appearance I posted the wrong link as witnessed: "Our thanks to
>Agent Salzman for her brilliant manipulation of Subject Tubbiness." I left
>all of McVay's assinine attempts to belittle me intact below. Strange he
>used the term "manipulation" because that is exactly what happened to the
>link from my original post! Shows the depths these serpents will go to in
>order to discredit me! The DejaCom Archive and URL below prove beyond any
>doubt that I posted the correct link! No IFS, ANDS, or BUTS!
>
> The facts are:
>1) I originally posted the correct link.
>2) My report to the FTC had in it the correct link.
>3) My report to the local BBB had the correct link.
>4) My report to the local consumer action group had the correct link. I
>don't know why these clowns are behaving in the manner they do!
>Here are my undeniable proofs:
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=5kkc7tsrs1g5lpe9mnepsj5t7tilhbejg7%404ax.com&rnum=1
(Archived locally as ShakleeNet_1)
>From: Doc Tavish <NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com>
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>Subject: Looks Like Yale "Tubby" Edeiken Isn't Making it as an Attorney!
>Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 05:44:23 GMT
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.174.7.66
>Message-ID: <5kkc7tsrs1g5lpe9m...@4ax.com>
>
>Just in to Tavish Dispatch:
>
>http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken
<<Tavish comment January 19, 2004: I had the foresight to save Wendy Edeiken's
SHAKLEE home page as: "Edeiken Associates Shaklee Fraud". Strange is the fact
the woman who is supposed to be Wendy looks like she is wearing a cross necklace
and she is married to an observant Jew! Somehow I think the picture is NOT her!
Further down I prove it was a generic photo supplied by SHAKLEE.NET!!!>>
>Tubby, you gave out your phone number! Isn't this why you sued me because
>I allegedly did so? My Tubby but you are a very FUNNY person!
>
>Is that you wife in the picture Tubby?
>Lurkers see: <http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme>
>Can't be because it looks like she's wearing a cross and we know what you
>Jews do when you see crosses. Just like Count Dracula (a fellow blood
>sucker your kind is likened to) you should recoil in horror BUT then again
>you probably love those blond haired shiksas! Most Jews do prefer Aryan
>beauties over the pigs (like Sara)....
>
><END>
>
>My report to FTC:
>
>FTC's homepage is www.ftc.gov
>Their file a complaint online link is:
>https://rn.ftc.gov/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01
>
>Here is what you will see as a response if you use the above
>online complaint:
>https://rn.ftc.gov/dod/wsolcq$solcq.actioninsert
>
>Success!
>Complaint Accepted. Thank you for your input.
>
>First Name: Scott
>Last Name: Bradbury
>Year Of Birth: (YYYY)
>E-Mail Address: xxx...@flash.net
>Subject of Your Complaint: Health
>Name of Company You Are Complaining About: Edeiken Associates
>Street Address: xxxxxxx
>City: xxxxxx
>State or Canadian Province: Pennsylvania
>Country: UNITED STATES
>Zip Code or Postal Code: ?
>Company Web Site: http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme
>Company E-Mail Address: ya...@enter.net
>Phone Number: xxxxxxxxxxx Ext.
>How Did the Company Initially Contact You?: Internet Web Site
>Explain Your Problem: http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme
>
>The link above makes some pretty tall claims concerning the products
>ability in dealing with MS and also I am certain the picture shown is NOT
>the person who made the web page and claims to have MS. I have read what
>MS has at their web site on alternative cures etc. and this appears to be
>offering desperate people in dire straits a "miracle cure." Everything
>I've read about MS shows it to be insidious and not reversible.
>
><Note I "X" out some of the info above to maintain privacy.>
>
>My report to an Allentown consumer watchdog group:
>
>X-Sender: xx...@pop.flash.net
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
>Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:12:52 -0600
>To: sbi...@quackwatch.com
>From: Scott Bradbury <xxx...@flash.net>
>Subject: Apparent Consumer Fraud in Allentown, Pennsylvania
>
>To whom it may concern,
> The following is a web page advertised a "miracle cure" as I will
>call it. I have strong suspicions Wendy Edeiken is not who she claims to
>be. This "company" is in Allentown, Pennsylvania and the address is:
>
>Yale F. Edeiken
><Address deleted for this post>
>
>If Wendy Edeiken is not afflicted with MS would not the following be
>definite consumer fraud and this is a web based business too!
>
>http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme
>Edeiken Associates
>Wendy & Yale Edeiken
>
>You can change your life because I did!
>
>Let me tell you how I got involved with Shaklee.
>
>In 1984 I was debilitated with multiple sclerosis. I had little hope for
>the future and when friends from college told me about Shaklee, I was
>desperate enough to listen even though my doctor said that it would be a
>waste of money.
>
>With the help of a pharmacist in Shaklee, I began a well-balanced program
>of Shaklee supplements, exercise, positive visualization and healthy
>eating.
>
>I was amazed at the change! I had energy and the desire to take control of
>my prognosis. Now, sixteen years later, I have a thriving Shaklee
>business, I am teaching four days a week, and I look forward to every new
>day! <BLAH BLAH -- Rest deleted for this post>
Notice the claim above and see what Shaklee says at the web page linked by
Edeiken: <http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutshaklee>
Click the link and scroll down and see at the bottom: "These statements
have not been evaluated by the Food & Drug Administration. This product is
not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease." Note: The
aforementioned statement is not made in reference to Edeiken's spectacular
claims. (Read the link and you all will see!)
Read what Shaklee says at their web site and you all will see they do not
come even close to making such claims!
http://www.shaklee.com/shakleebasics/
They even have a PDF file for download:
http://www.shaklee.com/pdfs/basics_brief.pdf
No where at their site have I found any claims made for easing MS
symptoms! See <http://www.shaklee.com/products/briefs/basics/studies.html>
I even looked at other member pages and not one I looked at made the same
bold claims. Mainly all is mentioned is how great of a vitamin supplement
it is! Here is how to find members in your area:
http://www.shaklee.net/public/advSearch
><END>
>
>The point being-- I had the correct link from day one and what the clowns
>are trying to pull off below looks like another diversion. Also regardless
>of how my ignoramus adversaries act the reports were filed with the
>correct information and are in hands of people who investigate FRAUD!
>
>Also BTW I've talked to numerous arm chair lawyers and in their humble
>opinion (100% agreement) if that picture on Tubby's web page is NOT Wendy
>then that alone is consumer fraud because the text reads as a first person
>account and the picture is presented without identifying who she is SO
>most people would assume that is Wendy Edeiken. The Edeiken family is
>allegedly Observant Jews so why would Wendy be wearing a CROSS necklace?
>Here is the link to the purported picture of Wendy Edeiken:
>http://www.shaklee.net/pws/pictures/SA24013.jpg
<<Tavish comment January 19, 2004: Funny that the picture link above is still
active and that the picture links to a photo gallery at SHAKLEE YET the Edeiken
web site has been down quite some time which suggests the picture above is NOT
Wendy Edeiken and that Wendy projected a healthy image to con people into
thinking she could provide relief for MS. It's a good thing Edeiken was shut
down. Nothing is worse than trying to profit from other people's misfortune!!>>
>Somehow that link tells me that is just a public domain image!
:.
>OBC <kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org> wrote in message
>>news:95o746$cqj$1...@news.tht.net...
>>> ZOGCANWEST to ZOGNA URGENT
>>> ZOG1 RE TAVISH
>>>
>>> MOST SECRET
>>>
>>> Contingency plans to change SHAKLEE.COM to SHAKLEE.NET dependent upon
>>> search engine access by Subject "TUBBY" entirely successful.
>>>
>>> With the support of NETWORKSOLUTIONS.COM, ZOGCANWEST successfully
>>> changed SHAKLEE.COM to SHAKLEE.NET fourteen times in the past 9 days,
>>> and changed SHAKLEE.NET to SHAKLEE.COM thirteen times during the same
>>> period.
>>>
>>> As predicted, The Moronic One was completely bamboozeled, and, as
>>> predicted, made a complete ass of himself.
>>>
>>> ZOGCANWEST wishes to thank ZOGCOLCENTRAL Salzman and
>>> ZOGSOUTHAFRIKA for contributing to the successful humiliation of
>>> someone almost too stupid to _be_ humiliated.
>>>
>>> ZOG1 extends congratulations on behalf of the Learned Elders on the
>>> successful completion of this specific Lard-Off, and invites ZOGNA
>>> agents to attend the entertaining ZOGPA Anti-Tubby Meeting, to be held
>>> in Pennsylvania on February Seventh in the appropriate Court.
>>>
>>> ZOG Target "Tubby", as usual, will not appear. Street talk has it that
>>> he has no gonads, but in the complete absence of female confirmation,
>>> this cannot be confirmed. Subject's deranged, high, squeaky voice
>>> should not be construed as evidence of the absence of presence.
>>>
>>> Nonetheless, the Spielberg special, "ZOG vrs. Utter Stupidity" will
>>> be aired as planned, narated by Desmond Morristein.
>>>
>>> Our thanks to Agent Salzman for her brilliant manipulation of Subject
>>> Tubbiness.
>>>
>>> ZOGCANWEST
>>> MOST SECRET
>
><END>
:.
>For the archives here is Sara "Sow" Salzman responding to McVay's childish
>antics. Don't these people realize they only bring dishonor to themselves?
:.
><START>
>
>In article <95o746$cqj$1...@news.tht.net>, kmc...@nizkor.org wrote:
>
>> ZOGCANWEST to ZOGNA URGENT
>> ZOG1 RE TAVISH
>>
>> MOST SECRET
>>
>> Contingency plans to change SHAKLEE.COM to SHAKLEE.NET dependent upon
>> search engine access by Subject "TUBBY" entirely successful.
>>
>> With the support of NETWORKSOLUTIONS.COM, ZOGCANWEST successfully
>> changed SHAKLEE.COM to SHAKLEE.NET fourteen times in the past 9 days,
>> and changed SHAKLEE.NET to SHAKLEE.COM thirteen times during the same
>> period.
>>
>> As predicted, The Moronic One was completely bamboozeled, and, as
>> predicted, made a complete ass of himself.
>>
>> ZOGCANWEST wishes to thank ZOGCOLCENTRAL Salzman and
>> ZOGSOUTHAFRIKA for contributing to the successful humiliation of
>> someone almost too stupid to _be_ humiliated.
>>
>> ZOG1 extends congratulations on behalf of the Learned Elders on the
>> successful completion of this specific Lard-Off, and invites ZOGNA
>> agents to attend the entertaining ZOGPA Anti-Tubby Meeting, to be held
>> in Pennsylvania on February Seventh in the appropriate Court.
>>
>> ZOG Target "Tubby", as usual, will not appear. Street talk has it that
>> he has no gonads, but in the complete absence of female confirmation,
>> this cannot be confirmed. Subject's deranged, high, squeaky voice
>> should not be construed as evidence of the absence of presence.
>>
>> Nonetheless, the Spielberg special, "ZOG vrs. Utter Stupidity" will
>> be aired as planned, narated by Desmond Morristein.
>>
>> Our thanks to Agent Salzman for her brilliant manipulation of Subject
>> Tubbiness.
>>
>> ZOGCANWEST
>> MOST SECRET
:.
>We are always happy to serve ZOG. Unfortunately, this assignment was so
>simple, any baboon with a keyboard could have made the target look silly.
>
>ZOG Agent Sara
>
><END>
:.
>So is Sara admitting that she deliberately "manipulated" my original
>CORRECT URL all in order to have made me; "the target look silly."? How is
>falsifying what I originally posted making me look silly Sara? And to
>think you still are clueless as to why I call you a lying filthy pig whore
>bitch. Remember I can call you worse and that I have exercised much
>restraint! More evidence that you lie, bear false witness, and are
>perjurious!
~~~<STOP>~~~
>Looks like Don "Dummy" Ellis hasn't learned anything from his last spanking.
>
>-PLH, but that's not news any more
Re: Wendy Edeiken and shaklee = bankrupt. I wonder if it because of those fraud
complaints and Yale's threats to sue me for exposing the sham for what it was?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=1uehntgltrimml80mvui1esupa63msqfbh%404ax.com&rnum=15
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Has No Shame or Honesty- Lying Through His Teeth is His
Way aka Re; How I am Threatened With a Lawsuit For Showing the Truth About a
SHAKLEE Distributor and Her Claims Concerning MS_ R 2
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 01:35:19 -0500
Message-ID: <1uehntgltrimml80m...@4ax.com>
Poor Tubby Edeiken:
1) His wife lost her Shaklee distributorship. (I wonder if it had to do with her
fraudulent claims?)
2) He lost his lawsuit against me.
3) He lost his appeal against me.
4) He lost his lawsuit against David E. Michael.
5) Two law firms disowned him.
6) My former attorney got elected State Representative despite Tubby's Fan Club
running a smear campaign against him.
7) He's so fat he waddles when he walks.
8) He's been Publicly Censured by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of
the State of Pennsylvania
9) He's currently being investigated for criminal acts against me.
10) He's been sued for malpractice (and lost) more than once!!
11) There is more but I can't tell!!
You would think the Fat Bastard would learn by now that he's a loser in all
arenas of life.
Tavish
--Criminal Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F. Edeiken a "private reprimand"
but he continued to act like the psychotic nut case he is and defied them and
refused to appear at his hearing more than once! He was then "forced" to appear
and the "private reprimand" had escalated to "PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest
court of that bastard's state! Furthermore the Disciplinary Board closed with:
"It is further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F. Edeiken] shall pay costs to the
Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), PaR.D.E." IOW Yale had to pay the
Disciplinary Board to "kick his shyster ass" AFTER the Disciplinary Board of the
Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to serve numerous notices upon
him and compel him to attend his disciplinary hearing!! Yale also had to pay for
all costs of the investigation too! It's all detailed in that PDF file!! GO
LOOK!!
BTW Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and
Yale had received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC
CENSURE" in 1998!!! Looks like Yale F. Edeiken is real shining example of the
legal profession doesn't it? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me! His assaulting a Deputy Sheriff should have done him in- in 1990!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3921e1e6.182032557%40news.newsguy.com&rnum=1
From: doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
Subject: CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <3921e1e6....@news.newsguy.com>
Yale is also a perjurer who also makes criminal death threats using subpoenaed
information:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!)
Message-ID: <gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Compare what Yale said on August 20, 2001 concerning two law firms attitudes
toward his presence with his own words: "they were dealing with someone who was
"mentally unstable" (their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their
description) who they wanted to go away as quckly as possible" to this which was
posted July 4, 2000: "Tubby has no respect from the legal community and as a
whole they wish he'd just waddle away."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=20000704143439.5399.qmail%40nym.alias.net&rnum=4
From: SoloP...@nym.alias.net
Subject: Yale _Tubby_ Edeiken
Date: 2000/07/04
Message-ID: <200007041434...@nym.alias.net>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Eddie Haskell wrote
in message <ecnn00tq851f6g6er...@4ax.com>:
>Classic expose' repost. Notice how honest the holocaust researchers are NOT!!
Notice how the Shame of Belleville is now attacking people who have
*never* posted here, for no other reason than personally vendetta?
What possible bearing could Wendy's business dealing have on the
historical facts of the Holocaust?
Eddie Haskell
<90d40e959040be3e...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . > wrote:
>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Eddie Haskell wrote
> in message <ecnn00tq851f6g6er...@4ax.com>:
>
>>Classic expose' repost. Notice how honest the holocaust researchers are NOT!!
>
>Notice how the Shame of Belleville is now attacking people who have
>*never* posted here, for no other reason than personally vendetta?
She attacked me in court and she was wanting my blood in her husband's trumped
up failed lawsuit against me! She's one down and her shyster husband is next!
>What possible bearing could Wendy's business dealing have on the
>historical facts of the Holocaust?
It shows that the wife of the great holocaust researcher Yale F. Edeiken is as
crooked as he is! BTW that con artist was wanting my blood at her bastard
husband's lawsuit against me. Serves the bitch right to lose her franchise! Bad
consequences for dishonest people. She should have served time for her false
advertising and seeking to profit from the misery of MS victims!
Tavish
I.E.
Joebruno
> Classic expose' repost. Notice how honest the holocaust researchers are NOT!!
>
>
You are the fraud. None of your links show any indication that Shaklee
is bankrupt. Most of them yield error messages, which mean YOU gave us
the wrong link, you idiot.
Sara Salzman
Eddie Haskell <eddie_haskell@mayfield01net> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:51:03 GMT,
> <90d40e959040be3e...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . > wrote:
>
> >In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> > (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> > someone claiming to be Eddie Haskell wrote
> > in message <ecnn00tq851f6g6er...@4ax.com>:
> >
> >>Classic expose' repost. Notice how honest the holocaust researchers are
> >>NOT!!
> >
> >Notice how the Shame of Belleville is now attacking people who have
> >*never* posted here, for no other reason than personally vendetta?
>
> She attacked me in court and she was wanting my blood in her husband's
> trumped
> up failed lawsuit against me! She's one down and her shyster husband is next!
>
She did? And how did she "attack" you? You never bothered to drag your
fat ass into court, claiming some kind of "disability" that kept you
from travelling.
So please explain this "attack" against you, and how she could possibly
be interested in your blood.
Sara
"Personal attack is all your kind has."
"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
"My name is not Bradshit you hooked nosed kike"
"Now go fist yourself hook nose"
"Why don't you ever accept my challenge you dick licker?"
Why won't you accept my challenge you dick nibbler?
Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook nose
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Eddie Haskell wrote
>>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>> someone claiming to be Eddie Haskell wrote
>> in message <ecnn00tq851f6g6er...@4ax.com>:
>>>Classic expose' repost. Notice how honest the holocaust researchers are NOT!!
>>Notice how the Shame of Belleville is now attacking people who have
>>*never* posted here, for no other reason than personally vendetta?
>She attacked me in court and she was wanting my blood in her husband's trumped
>up failed lawsuit against me! She's one down and her shyster husband is next!
She did? How would you know -- you weren't there.
And even if she did -- court would be the appropriate forum for a
response, not whining on Usenet.
>>What possible bearing could Wendy's business dealing have on the
>>historical facts of the Holocaust?
>It shows that the wife of the great holocaust researcher Yale F. Edeiken is as
>crooked as he is!
Which has *what* bearing on the historical facts of the Holocaust,
even if true, which it is not?
>BTW that con artist was wanting my blood at her bastard
>husband's lawsuit against me.
Prove it.
>Serves the bitch right to lose her franchise! Bad
>consequences for dishonest people. She should have served time for her false
>advertising and seeking to profit from the misery of MS victims!
But all you can do is whine about it on Usenet. How does it feel to
be a Usenet Kook of the Month and the most impotent entity on Usenet?
Beaver Cleaver
<catamont-99093F...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <k5io005kac73arq1n...@4ax.com>,
> Eddie Haskell <eddie_haskell@mayfield01net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:51:03 GMT,
>> <90d40e959040be3e...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . > wrote:
>>
>> >In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>> > (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>> > someone claiming to be Eddie Haskell wrote
>> > in message <ecnn00tq851f6g6er...@4ax.com>:
>> >
>> >>Classic expose' repost. Notice how honest the holocaust researchers are
>> >>NOT!!
>> >
>> >Notice how the Shame of Belleville is now attacking people who have
>> >*never* posted here, for no other reason than personally vendetta?
>>
>> She attacked me in court and she was wanting my blood in her husband's
>> trumped up failed lawsuit against me! She's one down and her shyster husband is next!
>
>She did? And how did she "attack" you?
My own attorney told me so as well as you running your mouth!
>You never bothered to drag your fat ass into court,
Didn't have to- that is why I had an attorney which liars like you claimed I
didn't have!
>claiming some kind of "disability" that kept you
>from travelling.
It's not a claim- it is fact.
>So please explain this "attack" against you,
Hostile witness such as you proved when you ran your mouth with:
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/s/salzman-sara/please-post.html
(Archived locally as: SowSqueal)
"Until these issues are taken seriously..."
[Email header trimmed]
Message-Id: <v02130500b69de4c84e18@[207.155.173.15]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:53:30 -0700
To: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC)
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: PLEASE POST THIS ON NIZKOR
Daylin Leach is an attorney in Pennsylvania. He is currently representing Scott
Bradbury, a virulent anti-Semite who has been sued for criminal harassment over
the Internet. Mr. Bradbury's threats were directed at Yale Edeiken, a member of
The Holocaust History Project, and at that member's family and business
associates. Most recently, Mr. Bradbury has threatened the THHP member's wife
and her business associates. A default judgement was issued against Mr. Bradbury
in August of 2000. <END>
Funny how you Jews throw anti-semite out when you are seeking to defame a person
who exposes you or even disagrees with you YET my own attorney is a Jew and he
saw you and Yale for the "KIKES" you are! I did NOT threaten Wendy Edeiken's
business associates in any way. I did file complaints with the FTC and other
entities regarding her false advertising that taking SHAKLEE vitamin supplements
would relieve Multiple Sclerosis! I had the wisdom to save her now defunct web
page as a web document which I will be all to glad to ZIP and post so everyoine
may see for themselves which I quote now word for word below.
<start/quote>
Edeiken Associates
Wendy & Yale Edeiken
You can change your life because I did!
Let me tell you how I got involved with Shaklee.
In 1984 I was debilitated with multiple sclerosis. I had little hope for the
future and when friends from college told me about Shaklee, I was desperate
enough to listen even though my doctor said that it would be a waste of money.
With the help of a pharmacist in Shaklee, I began a well-balanced program of
Shaklee supplements, exercise, positive visualization and healthy eating.
I was amazed at the change! I had energy and the desire to take control of my
prognosis. Now, sixteen years later, I have a thriving Shaklee business, I am
teaching four days a week, and I look forward to every new day!
I still have MS, but it doesn't have me. Shaklee gave me the extra nutrition my
body needed to begin a life-long quest for health.
Shaklee only sells products that are in harmony with nature and good health. You
can be confident that our products will deliver the best results possible due to
extensive research and testing through our own state-of-the-art facilities and
reputable universities.
With our concept of Partnership Marketing, you will have the support you need to
change your physical and financial life.
We have toll-free ordering, free shipping on your first order, Email, fax and
Shaklee.com to make your ordering simple and pleasant.
If you need advice or nutritional counseling call me at 610-435-xxxx!
<stop/quote>
That picture she included is a picture from SHAKLEE'S own web site which are
apparently promo images. So your hero's wife preyed upon desperate people with
an image of health and vitality and made the claims above! I filed complain6ts
against her and her alone. I knew SHAKLEE made no such claim seeing how they are
quite forward with their disclaimer which is: "...have not been evaluated by the
Food & Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat,
cure, or prevent any disease..." which counters what Wendy was claiming above.
No wonder she lost her franchise!!! Wendy is a bottom feeder just like her
stupid husband!
Yale, his wife, and YOU are liars!
>and how she could possibly be interested in your blood.
Because I cost the "snake oil peddler" her franchise and next I costing Yale his
law license! Wait and see! Wait and see!
Yale already has all of these strikes against him and his house of cards is on a
shaky foundation:
I.E.
Now go fist yourself- you're bothering me again!
From: (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Edeiken v. Bradbury: Affidavit
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A2.01
Last-Modified: 2001/02/07
AFFIDAVIT
I, Sara Salzman, being duly sworn, state as follows:
[...]
15. That Daylin Leach refused to act to halt the campaign of harassment
and stated that if Deponent wished to avoid such harassment, that she
should "stop bothering" Defendant Bradbury...
16. That in response to her complaint and concerns for the safety of
her immediate and extended family, Daylin Leach informed Deponent that she
was a "crackpot"... <END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She Wrote
The FIST Postings! Date: 17 Dec 2003 19:40:10 GMT
Message-ID: <hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Re: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She
Wrote The FIST Postings! Date: 18 Dec 2003 06:13:32 GMT
Message-ID: <ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com>
Despite overwhelming evidence Sara "The Fist" will keep repeating
her lies and remain in denial.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sara Salzman aka Sara "The Fist" Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> did post:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
Message-ID: <sschwartz-110...@p14.infinet.com>
Date: 11 Feb 95 13:19:07 GMT
References: <3hf46h$p...@nyx10.cs.du.edu> <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 19
NNTP-Posting-Host: p14.infinet.com
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
>
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Is Sara "The Whipped" Salzman Still Being Whipped by Her Husband's
Electric Whipping Machine?
Message-ID: <0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2003 22:00:00 GMT
>Sara
>
>"Personal attack is all your kind has."
TRUE AS EVER
>"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
>"My name is not Bradshit you hooked nosed kike"
>"Now go fist yourself hook nose"
Said AFTER being called a "Fat" name.
>"Why don't you ever accept my challenge you dick licker?"
Said AFTER being called a "Fat" name.
>Why won't you accept my challenge you dick nibbler?
Said AFTER being called a "Fat" name.
>Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook nose
Said AFTER being called a "Fat" name.
Notice you never acknowledge who swung the first punch! If some bully swings at
me I will swing back!
Tavish
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <53fp005662lvj5u0d...@4ax.com>:
>On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:44:13 -0700,
><catamont-99093F...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>In article <k5io005kac73arq1n...@4ax.com>,
>> Eddie Haskell <eddie_haskell@mayfield01net> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:51:03 GMT,
>>> <90d40e959040be3e...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . > wrote:
>>> >In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>>> > (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>>> > someone claiming to be Eddie Haskell wrote
>>> > in message <ecnn00tq851f6g6er...@4ax.com>:
>>> >>Classic expose' repost. Notice how honest the holocaust researchers are
>>> >>NOT!!
>>> >Notice how the Shame of Belleville is now attacking people who have
>>> >*never* posted here, for no other reason than personally vendetta?
>>> She attacked me in court and she was wanting my blood in her husband's
>>> trumped up failed lawsuit against me! She's one down and her shyster husband is next!
>>She did? And how did she "attack" you?
>My own attorney told me so as well as you running your mouth!
Which doesn't answer the question, how, exactly, did she attack you?
>>You never bothered to drag your fat ass into court,
>Didn't have to- that is why I had an attorney which liars like you claimed I
>didn't have!
And so you didn't, until after the verdict had already been handed
down. At least, he didn't file an appearance so as far as the court
was concerned, he wasn't your attorney.
>>claiming some kind of "disability" that kept you from travelling.
>It's not a claim- it is fact.
Suuuuuuuuuure it is.
>>So please explain this "attack" against you,
>Hostile witness such as you proved when you ran your mouth with:
Nothing there indicating how she attacked you -- just your unprovoked
attack against her.
>http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/s/salzman-sara/please-post.html
>>and how she could possibly be interested in your blood.
>Because I cost the "snake oil peddler" her franchise and next I costing Yale his
>law license! Wait and see! Wait and see!
No, you didn't.
>Yale already has all of these strikes against him and his house of cards is on a
>shaky foundation:
If you're a delusional Usenet Kook of the Month, it might appear so.
<snip remainder of unsupported rant>
Sara Salzman
Beaver Cleaver <beaver_cleaver@mayfield01net> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:44:13 -0700,
> <catamont-99093F...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <k5io005kac73arq1n...@4ax.com>,
> > Eddie Haskell <eddie_haskell@mayfield01net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:51:03 GMT,
> >> <90d40e959040be3e...@news.teranews.com> Roger <roger@ . >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> >> > (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> >> > someone claiming to be Eddie Haskell wrote
> >> > in message <ecnn00tq851f6g6er...@4ax.com>:
> >> >
> >> >>Classic expose' repost. Notice how honest the holocaust researchers are
> >> >>NOT!!
> >> >
> >> >Notice how the Shame of Belleville is now attacking people who have
> >> >*never* posted here, for no other reason than personally vendetta?
> >>
> >> She attacked me in court and she was wanting my blood in her husband's
> >> trumped up failed lawsuit against me! She's one down and her shyster
> >> husband is next!
> >
> >She did? And how did she "attack" you?
>
> My own attorney told me so as well as you running your mouth!
Let's see who can find the flaw in this "logic." She attacked him and
wanted his blood, but he wasn't there and his attorney TOLD him about it?
>
> >You never bothered to drag your fat ass into court,
>
> Didn't have to- that is why I had an attorney which liars like you claimed I
> didn't have!
>
> >claiming some kind of "disability" that kept you
> >from travelling.
>
> It's not a claim- it is fact.
>
> >So please explain this "attack" against you,
>
> Hostile witness such as you proved when you ran your mouth with:
[...nothing about Wendy Edeiken 'attacking' Mr. Bradbury or 'wanting his
blood.']
It's bad enough that you're a vile, slimy piece of crap, but you
continue to show the world how low you can sink. To attack a woman with
MS and try to deprive her of her ability to earn a living -- a woman who
has never said a word in this newsgroup, who has never said a word to
you -- is just about the lowest behavior possible.
And of course, your responses, "They did it first!" is a lie, since
Wendy Edeiken never did ANYTHING to Mr. Bradbury.
> >"Personal attack is all your kind has."
>
> TRUE AS EVER
>
> >"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
> >"My name is not Bradshit you hooked nosed kike"
> >"Now go fist yourself hook nose"
>
> Said AFTER being called a "Fat" name.
What a baby you are.
>
> >"Why don't you ever accept my challenge you dick licker?"
>
> Said AFTER being called a "Fat" name.
What a baby you are.
>
> >Why won't you accept my challenge you dick nibbler?
>
> Said AFTER being called a "Fat" name.
What a baby you are.
>
> >Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook nose
>
> Said AFTER being called a "Fat" name.
What a baby you are.
>
> Notice you never acknowledge who swung the first punch! If some bully swings
> at
> me I will swing back!
> Tavish
>
Notice I don't care "who started it." Your behavior is judged by what
YOU do, not by what others do or say.
Sara
Beaver Cleaver
<catamont-73A33F...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
Why should I have been there you lying pig!? I paid my attorney to make
appearance. Seeing how Yale F. Edeiken never served his trumped up complaints on
my attorney as he was obligated to do why should I have shown up totally
unprepared and making a 3000 mile round trip at my expense?
Yale on the other hand didn't file a brief for his appeal nor did he re-file in
my jurisdiction- he chose instead to stop posting and headed to his hide out!
Speaking of cowards- that's Yale through and through!
DO NOT EVER FORGET:
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant. The court has
heard telephone messages left on the defendant's answering machine, in which
the plaintiff admits dedicating himself to making the defendant's life a "living
hell." He refers to the defendant as a "miserable piece of shit" among other
charming epithets. The defendant's private medical information, subpoenaed by
Mr. Edeiken finds its way onto the Internet. Even after the defendant is
represented by counsel, mail is still sent directly to the defendant addressed
to "Defendant Bradbury." ...When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of
the complaint when he first becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You"
via e-mail. In plain English, this is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged
by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never met. The court should not be a party to
this."
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
The key statements above were: "Since a complaint has never been filed or
served, the defendant is unable to attach a copy of preliminary objections he
would file if the judgment was opened pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a)." AND
"When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first
becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail."
IOW I was not given my right to due process by Edeiken to defend myself from his
numerous documented perjurious accusations and some are detailed here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=ja362v4amltqohp97uo053rju5erbf80qr%404ax.com
Subject: Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:23:54 -0600
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
Looks like the court ruled in my favor to me! Yale even lost his appeal as well!
Looks like I was victorious twice!
<START>
September 26, 2001
Yale F. Edeiken
918 N Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104-3759
RE: Yale F. Edeiken, Appellant v. Scott Bradbury et al
1714 EDA 2001
Dear Mr. Edeiken:
This is to advise that the attached Order has been entered in the
above- captioned matters.
A Certified Copy of this Order together with the record will be
sent to the Prothonotary of Lehigh County in due course.
Very truly yours,
(Signed)
David A. Szewczak
Prothonotary
DAS/dag
Attachment
CC: Daylin B. Leach, Esquire
Scott Bradbury
Honorable Edward D. Reibman
The Attachment:
<Start>
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Eastern District Office
Yale F. Edeiken APPELLANT No. 1714 EDA 2001
V.
Scott Bradbury Et Al C.P. Civil Lehigh County
99-C-2786
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2001, the within
appeal is DISMISSED for failure to file a brief."
PER CURIAM
<STOP>
The prudent question to why Yale failed to file his brief is answered in this
archive which shows his motive for legal system abuse and how serious he was NOT
in litigating me!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=sq4v2us0odig5nhq79f6crk7a2e7lsqh1s%404ax.com&rnum=6&filter=0
Subject: Why Yale F. Edeiken LOST His Appeal..
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:30:59 -0600
Message-ID: <sq4v2us0odig5nhq7...@4ax.com>
Message-ID: <ja362v4amltqohp97...@4ax.com>
I was ready and very willing for the lawsuit to go all the way back to square
one and be re-tried from step one BUT your hero didn't want to follow through!
WHY IS THAT SARA?
Why did your hero tuck tail and run like the god damned worthless coward he is!
>> >You never bothered to drag your fat ass into court,
>>
>> Didn't have to- that is why I had an attorney which liars like you claimed I
>> didn't have!
>>
>> >claiming some kind of "disability" that kept you
>> >from travelling.
>>
>> It's not a claim- it is fact.
>>
>> >So please explain this "attack" against you,
>>
>> Hostile witness such as you proved when you ran your mouth with:
Why did you delete this Sara:
<START>
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/s/salzman-sara/please-post.html
(Archived locally as: SowSqueal)
"Until these issues are taken seriously..."
[Email header trimmed]
Message-Id: <v02130500b69de4c84e18@[207.155.173.15]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:53:30 -0700
To: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC)
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: PLEASE POST THIS ON NIZKOR
Daylin Leach is an attorney in Pennsylvania. He is currently representing Scott
Bradbury, a virulent anti-Semite who has been sued for criminal harassment over
the Internet. Mr. Bradbury's threats were directed at Yale Edeiken, a member of
The Holocaust History Project, and at that member's family and business
associates. Most recently, Mr. Bradbury has threatened the THHP member's wife
and her business associates. A default judgement was issued against Mr. Bradbury
in August of 2000. <END>
Funny how you Jews throw anti-semite out when you are seeking to defame a person
who exposes you or even disagrees with you YET my own attorney is a Jew and he
saw you and Yale for the "KIKES" you are! I did NOT threaten Wendy Edeiken's
business associates in any way. I did file complaints with the FTC and other
entities regarding her false advertising that taking SHAKLEE vitamin supplements
would relieve Multiple Sclerosis! I had the wisdom to save her now defunct web
page as a web document which I will be all to glad to ZIP and post so everyone
Here is a GOOGLE search I just performed which verifies what I posted with the
words above: "have not been evaluated by the Food & Drug Administration. This
product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease...
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=SHAKLEE+Food+%26+Drug+Administration&num=30&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=This+product+is+not+intended+to+diagnose%2C+treat%2C+cure%2C+or+prevent+any+disease&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&safe=images
Searched the web for SHAKLEE Food & Drug Administration "This product is not
intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease". Results 1 - 16 of
about 120 (Search done my little ol' me on January 21, 2004 3:28am CST)
Sample returns:
http://www.shaklee.com/pws/library/products/20660_presentation.pdf
[PDF] New Shaklee New Shaklee Product Introducing ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
... been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not
intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Shaklee Difference
Shaklee ... www.shaklee.com/pws/library/products/ 20660_presentation.pdf -
Similar pages
http://www.shaklee.com/pws/library/products/20649_presentation.pdf
[PDF] No Slide Title
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
... science ? 100% Shaklee guaranteed *These statements have not been evaluated
by the Food & Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose,
treat ... www.shaklee.com/pws/library/products/ 20649_presentation.pdf - Similar
pages [ More results from www.shaklee.com ]
http://www.npicenter.com/index.asp?action=NBViewDoc&DocumentID=3161
NPIcenter - Natural Products Industry Center News Nutraceutical ...
... visit http://www.shaklee.com/. These claims have not been evaluated by the
Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat,
cure ... www.npicenter.com/ index.asp?action=NBViewDoc&DocumentID=3161 - 36k -
Cached - Similar pages
IOW Yale, his wife, and YOU are liars!
NO WONDER WHY WENDY WAS SHUT DOWN AND TO THINK- ALL ON ACCOUNT OF LITTLE OL'
ME!! WHY DON'T YOU GET LARDASS YALE TO TRY SUEING ME AGAIN AND THIS TIME AT MY
COUNTY COURTHOUSE!? I WOULD LOVE TO SEE HIM NAILED FOR HIS PERJURY!!!
>and how she could possibly be interested in your blood.
Because I cost the "snake oil peddler" her franchise and next I will be costing
Shyster Yale his law license! Wait and see! Wait and see!
<STOP>
>[...nothing about Wendy Edeiken 'attacking' Mr. Bradbury
Not according to my attorney!
Also your own words:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-4ABF2E.11255412022001%40news.concentric.net&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: SarasBigMouth-1)
From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: What happened Tavish??
Date: 12 Feb 2001 18:25:58 GMT
Message-ID: <catamont-4ABF2E...@news.concentric.net>
In article <rc5g8t00fv1o4niir...@4ax.com>,
dckomat...@mindspring.com wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Feb 2001 21:32:49 GMT, Doc Tavish
> <NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 8 Feb 2001 20:20:33 +0000 (UTC), kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org
> >(Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
> >
> >>In article <wkk871g...@winternet.com>,
> >>Joel Rosenberg <jo...@winternet.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>[some twit's hot air removed]
> >>
> >>>I'm sure that they'll all laugh at you, too, Scotty. Just like the
> >>>rest of us.
> >
> >I don't believe your pal Tubby is laughing and especially seeing how the
> >FTC is going to get around to investigating him. That had better be a
> >real picture of his wife on that web page or else-- false and misleading
> >advertisement. My money says such picture is a public domain picture!
>
> "Going to get around to it"? Is that what they told you, Scottikins?
> Sounds like a bureaucratic brush-off to me. I can see the clerk now,
> laughing and showing your letter around for giggles before trashing
> it.
>
> On the issue of Yales wifes picture, I think Ellis has talked you into
> doing something dumb, again. You should reconsider who your friends
> are. We might laugh our asses off when you do stupid stuff, but we
> don't tell you to do it, unlike, say, Don.
The ironic thing is that "RevWhite" claims he was in Court, and Daylin
Leach was DEFINITELY in Court, as was Yale's wife. If Bradshit had
simply asked Leach if the photograph was Yale's wife, he wouldn't have
to now embarass himself in front of the FTC.
Sara
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Apparently the FTC did get around to Wendy's web site and it has been shut down
and as for the picture which was allegedly Wendy Edeiken- it appears to be a
generic PUBLIC DOMAIN picture available from SHAKLEE even at this current date!
I.E.
From my previous post:
<start/quote>
>Also BTW I've talked to numerous arm chair lawyers and in their humble
>opinion (100% agreement) if that picture on Tubby's web page is NOT Wendy
>then that alone is consumer fraud because the text reads as a first person
>account and the picture is presented without identifying who she is SO
>most people would assume that is Wendy Edeiken. The Edeiken family is
>allegedly Observant Jews so why would Wendy be wearing a CROSS necklace?
>Here is the link to the purported picture of Wendy Edeiken:
>http://www.shaklee.net/pws/pictures/SA24013.jpg
<<Tavish comment January 19, 2004: Funny that the picture link above is still
active and that the picture links to a photo gallery at SHAKLEE YET the Edeiken
web site has been down quite some time which suggests the picture above is NOT
Wendy Edeiken and that Wendy projected a healthy image to con people into
thinking she could provide relief for MS. It's a good thing Edeiken was shut
down. Nothing is worse than trying to profit from other people's misfortune!!>>
<end/quote>
>or 'wanting his blood.']
Wanting my blood is a figure of speech you stupid pig!
>It's bad enough that you're a vile, slimy piece of crap, but you
>continue to show the world how low you can sink. To attack a woman with
>MS and try to deprive her of her ability to earn a living -- a woman who
>has never said a word in this newsgroup, who has never said a word to
>you -- is just about the lowest behavior possible.
She was only in court with her shyster husband and the both of therm were very
hostile at that damages hearing which got thrown out with the kook lawsuit
against me! As for me being "a vile, slimy piece of crap"- what about a woman
having a web site showing a picture which apparently is NOT her showing a woman
in good health along with this claim:
<START>
Edeiken Associates
Wendy & Yale Edeiken
You can change your life because I did!
Let me tell you how I got involved with Shaklee.
In 1984 I was debilitated with multiple sclerosis. I had little hope for the
future and when friends from college told me about Shaklee, I was desperate
enough to listen even though my doctor said that it would be a waste of money.
With the help of a pharmacist in Shaklee, I began a well-balanced program of
Shaklee supplements, exercise, positive visualization and healthy eating.
I was amazed at the change! I had energy and the desire to take control of my
prognosis. Now, sixteen years later, I have a thriving Shaklee business, I am
teaching four days a week, and I look forward to every new day!
I still have MS, but it doesn't have me. Shaklee gave me the extra nutrition my
body needed to begin a life-long quest for health.
Shaklee only sells products that are in harmony with nature and good health. You
can be confident that our products will deliver the best results possible due to
extensive research and testing through our own state-of-the-art facilities and
reputable universities.
With our concept of Partnership Marketing, you will have the support you need to
change your physical and financial life.
We have toll-free ordering, free shipping on your first order, Email, fax and
Shaklee.com to make your ordering simple and pleasant.
If you need advice or nutritional counseling call me at 610-435-xxxx!
<STOP>
That picture she included is a picture from SHAKLEE'S own web site which are
apparently promo images. So your hero's wife preyed upon desperate people with
an image of health and vitality and made the claims above! I filed complain6ts
against her and her alone. I knew SHAKLEE made no such claim seeing how they are
quite forward with their disclaimer which is: "...have not been evaluated by the
Food & Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat,
cure, or prevent any disease..." which counters what Wendy was claiming above.
No wonder she lost her franchise!!! Wendy is a bottom feeder just like her
stupid husband!
My complaints were legitimate and the fact Wendy was shut down proves I had my
facts all together!
I.E.
My report to FTC:
From: Scott Bradbury <xxx...@flash.net>
Subject: Apparent Consumer Fraud in Allentown, Pennsylvania
To whom it may concern,
The following is a web page advertised a "miracle cure" as I will
call it. I have strong suspicions Wendy Edeiken is not who she claims to
be. This "company" is in Allentown, Pennsylvania and the address is:
Yale F. Edeiken
<Address deleted for this post>
If Wendy Edeiken is not afflicted with MS would not the following be
definite consumer fraud and this is a web based business too!
http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme
Edeiken Associates
Wendy & Yale Edeiken
You can change your life because I did!
Let me tell you how I got involved with Shaklee.
In 1984 I was debilitated with multiple sclerosis. I had little hope for
the future and when friends from college..
<Full text shown higher up>
>And of course, your responses, "They did it first!" is a lie, since
>Wendy Edeiken never did ANYTHING to Mr. Bradbury.
She was a hostile witness against me and the spouse of a convicted criminal and
a perjurer! So much for her honesty when she engages in CONSUMER FRAUD and gets
shut down!!
>> >"Personal attack is all your kind has."
>>
>> TRUE AS EVER
>>
>> >"My name is not Bradshit you god damned cock sucker!"
>> >"My name is not Bradshit you hooked nosed kike"
>> >"Now go fist yourself hook nose"
>>
>> Said AFTER being called a "Fat" name.
:.
>What a baby you are.
IOW it is Okay for your pals to hurl insult after insult YET I am a baby when I
get fed up and call them what they are. How Jewish of you!
>> >"Why don't you ever accept my challenge you dick licker?"
>>
>> Said AFTER being called a "Fat" name.
:.
>What a baby you are.
IOW it is Okay for your pals to hurl insult after insult YET I am a baby when I
get fed up and call them what they are. How Jewish of you!
>> >Why won't you accept my challenge you dick nibbler?
>>
>> Said AFTER being called a "Fat" name.
:.
>What a baby you are.
IOW it is Okay for your pals to hurl insult after insult YET I am a baby when I
get fed up and call them what they are. How Jewish of you!
>> >Drop dead you Jew Kike bastard! Take the chalenge you big mouth hook nose
>>
>> Said AFTER being called a "Fat" name.
:.
>What a baby you are.
IOW it is Okay for your pals to hurl insult after insult YET I am a baby when I
get fed up and call them what they are. How Jewish of you!
>> Notice you never acknowledge who swung the first punch! If some bully swings
>> at me I will swing back!
>> Tavish
>>
>
>Notice I don't care "who started it."
You and your fellow Jews never do when it is you and your fellow Jews who start
it. OTOH when someone else starts it then it is a serious matter!
>Your behavior is judged by what YOU do, not by what others do or say.
IOW if I am attacked then I should just take it regardless and never reply in
defense or kind after I have repeatedly taken abuse!?
GOING BY YOUR LOGIC:
1) Israel MUST not retaliate against Palestinian suicide bombers.
2) Jews should stop harassing Germans and seeking revenge/restitution for all of
the "alleged" Nazi atrocities against Jews!
Notice I used "alleged" because I don't deny Nazi atrocities- I just doubt what
Jews, themselves, claim seeing how I catch you and your fellows in lies all the
time! Look at your sig line and how dishonest it is. If you would deliberately
try to deceive people with your version of a two way exchange which transpired
in the past year or so then why on Earth should you and your fellow Jews at the
Holocaust History Project ET AL be trusted with what transpired over fifty years
ago!?
>
>Sara
Your artfully contrived sig line:
>--
>-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
>is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
>you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
>-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
>the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
>BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
> --Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
My response to it:
>-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
>is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
>you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
Notice I called Art Tandy a lying Jew Bastard (which he is) AFTER I had my fill
of his continual verbal abuse! I guess you expect me to not respond to such
abuse in the manner I did which is another reason why Jews are despised. Most
people hate double standards!
The above exchange was a result of this:
<start/quote>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ple4cv8432qih0sft30s5tqi7junbkc0c3%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: Re: Anti-Gun Organizations are Jewish ...
Message-ID: <ple4cv8432qih0sft...@4ax.com>
References: <abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com>
On 13 May 2003 21:18:58 -0700, <abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com>
tar...@indystart.com (knight57) wrote:
><deleted unreliable bullshit by the psychotic and chronic liar named
>Fatbury Scumbag>
My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call is all
a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong you dirty filthy
lying Jew bastard! <END>
------------------------
Rather than dealing in facts your Jew decided he would rather engage in
name calling and chose to ignore my proofs and it is all fully documented here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rtasbv05mohed914ktef95j9dh3kc11dmr%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Arthur J. Tandy in Denial About Who The Main Gun Grabbers Are!
Message-ID: <rtasbv05mohed914k...@4ax.com>
Date: 11 May 2003 11:35:17 GMT (Archived as: AJT1)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kf6dcv8pgph2v568bnlhda66md7d4q8bg0%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Arthur J. Tandy's Fellow Jews Are Trying to Extend Their Gun Control!
Message-ID: <kf6dcv8pgph2v568b...@4ax.com>
Date: 11 May 2003 11:35:17 GMT (Archived as: AJT2)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ple4cv8432qih0sft30s5tqi7junbkc0c3%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: Re: Anti-Gun Organizations are Jewish (Classic Repost from January 17,
1997) Message-ID: <ple4cv8432qih0sft...@4ax.com>
Date: 14 May 2003 13:23:47 GMT (Archived as: AJT3)
<end/quote>
>-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
>the bulk of my posts prove so!
Still TRUE and my original postings as a whole are not personal attacks!
The greater majority of Art Tandy's posts are name calling and personal
attacks which seems to be a very common method of reply by Jews and their
gentile USEFUL IDIOTS! Anyone reading the above three archives will see me
presenting many documented facts and in every case Art Tandy would reply
with: "I deny it, you ignorant fat piece of lying shit.. You are a fat lying
ignorant fuck.. Fatboy Turns Blind and runs Away from the Issue.. I am
telling the TRUTH, something you cannot do very well, fatscum.. That
doesn't prove all Jews support gun control, you fucking moron. Your
logic is ridiculous and you are a stupid degenerate lowlife... <deleted
unreliable bullshit by the psychotic and chronic liar named Fatbury Scumbag>"
>You can't discern the difference.
>BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
Who called names first? It is Okay for Jews to hurl abuse in post after post but
when the recipient gets tired of it and calls the bastard a KIKE then you think
it is ironic or hypocritical. If you Jews don't like being called kikes, swine,
vermin etc, then STOP calling everyone you can't refute names!
> --Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
No, there is no irony. I will call you obnoxious Jews what you are every time
I've had my abundant fill of your Chutzpa or name calling! If you don't want me
to call you and your fellow Christ Denying Pharisees KIKES or Lying Jew
Bastards/Bitches in reply to your kind's continual insults hurled at me then you
should stop with the name calling! Plain and simple!!
If Sara and her fellows aren't truthful in small matters such as above then why
should be trusted with weightier matters especially when Jesus made this
observation about the Saras and Yales of his day:
CHILDREN OF THE DEVIL IDENTIFIED:
John 8 New International Version (NIV)
37 [Jesus spoke]: I know you are Abraham's descendants. Yet you are ready to
kill me, because you have no room for my word.
38 I am telling you what I have seen in the Father's presence, and you do what
you have heard from your father."
39 "Abraham is our father," they answered.
40 "If you were Abraham's children," said Jesus, "then you would do the things
Abraham did. As it is, you are determined to kill me, a man who has told you the
truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do such things.
41 You are doing the things your own father does."
"We are not illegitimate children," they protested. "The only Father we have is
God himself."
The Children of the Devil
42 Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came
from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me.
43 Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I
say.
44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's
desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for
there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is
a liar and the father of lies.
45 Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!
46 Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why don't
you believe me?
47 He who belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that
you do not belong to God."
48 The Jews answered him, "Aren't we right in saying that you are a Samaritan
and demon-possessed?"
49 "I am not possessed by a demon," said Jesus, "but I honor my Father and you
dishonor me..
<<The above is irrefutable about who Jesus referred to as the Children of the
Devil.>>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=g1ughv88ra215m6ji...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: How Can Jews Be Honest to Non-Jews When They Break Their Word to Their
G-d? (Kol Nidre Prayer) Date: 18 Jul 2003 22:42:39 GMT
Message-ID: <g1ughv88ra215m6ji...@4ax.com>
Speaking of Holocaust Denial!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=5rhktv483m9oofgqt8goir93o4pm08ht49%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: 3 Major ... Organizations Engage in Holocaust Denial
Message-ID: <5rhktv483m9oofgqt...@4ax.com>
Date: 12 Dec 2003 22:57:48 GMT
Tavish
_______________________________________________________________________________
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
<attributions>
>>> >> >>Classic expose' repost. Notice how honest the holocaust researchers are
>>> >> >>NOT!!
>>> >> >Notice how the Shame of Belleville is now attacking people who have
>>> >> >*never* posted here, for no other reason than personally vendetta?
>>> >> She attacked me in court and she was wanting my blood in her husband's
>>> >> trumped up failed lawsuit against me! She's one down and her shyster
>>> >> husband is next!
>>> >She did? And how did she "attack" you?
>>> My own attorney told me so as well as you running your mouth!
>>Let's see who can find the flaw in this "logic." She attacked him and
>>wanted his blood, but he wasn't there and his attorney TOLD him about it?
>Why should I have been there you lying pig!? I paid my attorney to make
>appearance.
Which he didn't do until *after* the verdict had been reached...
>Seeing how Yale F. Edeiken never served his trumped up complaints on
>my attorney as he was obligated to do why should I have shown up totally
>unprepared and making a 3000 mile round trip at my expense?
*After* your attorney actually bothered to file his appearance, which
is the point at which he officially became your attorney in the eyes
of the court, *then* he began receiving the documents. Until then,
they were entirely properly sent to you. Now it, as you claim, you
had an attorney at that time, the rational thing to do would have been
to have given those documents to them.
*You*, OTOH, not being rational, decided it would be cute to send them
all back marked "Return to Stalker."
None of which answers the question of *how* exactly Wendy is supposed
to have attacked you...
>Yale on the other hand didn't file a brief for his appeal nor did he re-file in
>my jurisdiction- he chose instead to stop posting and headed to his hide out!
>
>Speaking of cowards- that's Yale through and through!
>
>DO NOT EVER FORGET:
<snip the how manyth reposting of a petition by the Shame of
Belleville's lawyer which had *no* bearing whatever on the final
judgement>
>The key statements above were:
"PETTION"
>IOW I was not given my right to due process by Edeiken to defend myself from his
>numerous documented perjurious accusations and some are detailed here:
IOW, you screwed yourself, and those accusations were found by the
court to be completely truthful, and so cannot be perjurious by
definition.
>Looks like the court ruled in my favor to me! Yale even lost his appeal as well!
>Looks like I was victorious twice!
Looks like you're still lying about this -- learn what "without
prejudice" means.
>I was ready and very willing for the lawsuit to go all the way back to square
>one and be re-tried from step one BUT your hero didn't want to follow through!
>
> WHY IS THAT SARA?
Why do you claim that you won, and then demand that the suit be
re-filed? If you had won, what would be the point?
>Why did your hero tuck tail and run like the god damned worthless coward he is!
Because you cannot get blood from a turnip, and you aren't worth the
time?
>>> >You never bothered to drag your fat ass into court,
>>> Didn't have to- that is why I had an attorney which liars like you claimed I
>>> didn't have!
>>> >claiming some kind of "disability" that kept you
>>> >from travelling.
>>> It's not a claim- it is fact.
>>>
>>> >So please explain this "attack" against you,
>>> Hostile witness such as you proved when you ran your mouth with:
>Why did you delete this Sara:
Because it's irrelevant to pointing out your lies about Wendy
"attacking" you.
The Shame of Belleville is, of course, an expert on bottom feeding.
The only claim Wendy made above is that it helped *her*.
>Here is a GOOGLE search I just performed which verifies what I posted with the
>words above: "have not been evaluated by the Food & Drug Administration. This
>product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease...
<snip irrelevancy>
>IOW Yale, his wife, and YOU are liars!
So. your claim is that the products in question *didn't* help Wendy?
What proof do you offer?
>NO WONDER WHY WENDY WAS SHUT DOWN AND TO THINK- ALL ON ACCOUNT OF LITTLE OL'
>ME!! WHY DON'T YOU GET LARDASS YALE TO TRY SUEING ME AGAIN AND THIS TIME AT MY
>COUNTY COURTHOUSE!? I WOULD LOVE TO SEE HIM NAILED FOR HIS PERJURY!!!
Except for the small problem that there *was* no perjury...
>>and how she could possibly be interested in your blood.
>Because I cost the "snake oil peddler" her franchise and next I will be costing
>Shyster Yale his law license! Wait and see! Wait and see!
You did? Exactly how did you accomplish this?
I'm wondering because I've just gotten info from both the Pennsylvania
Attorney General Office of Consumer Fraud (610-821-6690,) and the
Bethlehem, PA BBB (the office closest to Wendy -- 610-866-8780,) and
they report *never* having had *any* complaints filed against her, a
fact which is confirmed by Shaklee.
IOW, you're lying (again) when you claim that you had anything to do
with whether Wendy is still a rep for Shaklee, which makes your
current personal attack even more pathetic than your usual.
So tell us all, how exactly did you accomplish this, or is it all a
vindictive fantasy like Bruno?
><STOP>
>>[...nothing about Wendy Edeiken 'attacking' Mr. Bradbury
>Not according to my attorney!
You *still* haven't told us how exactly she "attacked" you, nor why
this is an appropriate forum for this personal attack...
>>or 'wanting his blood.']
>
>Wanting my blood is a figure of speech you stupid pig!
IOW, another lie.
>>It's bad enough that you're a vile, slimy piece of crap, but you
>>continue to show the world how low you can sink. To attack a woman with
>>MS and try to deprive her of her ability to earn a living -- a woman who
>>has never said a word in this newsgroup, who has never said a word to
>>you -- is just about the lowest behavior possible.
>She was only in court with her shyster husband and the both of therm were very
>hostile at that damages hearing which got thrown out with the kook lawsuit
>against me! As for me being "a vile, slimy piece of crap"- what about a woman
>having a web site showing a picture which apparently is NOT her showing a woman
>in good health along with this claim:
"Apparently" in this case == "the Shame of Belleville has no idea
whether it was or not, nor can SoB support a case that the picture was
ever meant to represent Wendy"
Woohoo! You got a form letter! Way to go!
>The link above makes some pretty tall claims concerning the products
>ability in dealing with MS
Nup, it only said that it helped *Wendy*, something you are unable to
show was not the case.
>and also I am certain the picture shown is NOT
>the person who made the web page and claims to have MS.
But then, you are also certain that you are not delusional -- which is
demonstrably not the case.
>I have read what
>MS has at their web site on alternative cures etc. and this appears to be
>offering desperate people in dire straits a "miracle cure." Everything
>I've read about MS shows it to be insidious and not reversible.
Nor has Wendy made any claims re: reversibility.
>>And of course, your responses, "They did it first!" is a lie, since
>>Wendy Edeiken never did ANYTHING to Mr. Bradbury.
>She was a hostile witness against me and the spouse of a convicted criminal and
>a perjurer! So much for her honesty when she engages in CONSUMER FRAUD and gets
>shut down!!
Lies. But then, you knew this. Personal attack is all you've got,
isn't it?