misc.legal Google Group

Re: Texas Judge Cummings Denies Motion to Stay Susan Polgar Lawsuit pending Settlement

onech...@comcast.net (ChessFire) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:14:41 UT

Actually, the man of many names, and the man without any names, have
bored the shit out of all of us here for 2 years. They are sort of
legal, sort of anti-gay, and sort of boring about their predictions of
chess, from a perspective outside of chess.
Do any of these characters care for the game? I would say that their

Re: Texas Judge Cummings Denies Motion to Stay Susan Polgar Lawsuit pending Settlement

chrisfal...@gmail.com (Chris Falter) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:14:25 UT

Can't the parties go ahead and settle anyway? Perhaps the judge's
ruling is designed to light a fire under the settlement negotiations,
so to speak, by emphasizing that the parties have much at risk and
should get down to brass tacks?

Re: Texas Judge Cummings Denies Motion to Stay Susan Polgar Lawsuit pending Settlement

chrisfal...@gmail.com (Chris Falter) — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:10:53 UT

What is the practical effect of this ruling and the consolidation
ruling? The way I see it, Polgar has more to lose the longer this
goes on (probably untenable legal position + further damage to
reputation + legal fees) than the USCF (legal fees). To what extent
are USCF's legal fees reimbursable (probably not the legal term) by

Re: Documents of Project DoD Federici DMCA Takedown lawsuit now available

gregh...@home.fake (Gregory Hall) — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:26:05 UT

I'm sure she'll have a change of heart any time now.
<groups restored>

Re: Documents of Project DoD Federici DMCA Takedown lawsuit now available

a...@b.com (Deadrat) — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:00:43 UT

Monica Pignotti <pigno...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
<snip/>
In fact, this is *exactly* a right that free speech endows. That is, the
government does not in general criminalize defamatory speech. (I say,
"in general" because of the disgraceful criminal libel statutes still on
the books in some states.) That doesn't mean that libelous statements

Re: Documents of Project DoD Federici DMCA Takedown lawsuit now available

gregh...@home.fake (Gregory Hall) — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:59:00 UT

None of those were DMCA complaints. Free speech does not give people
the right to make libelous statements about others. It was not a
"parody" and anyone who sees the huge volume of personal attacks on me
can readily see that it was not a "parody" -- it was part of a
malicious smear campaign against people who are taking a stand against

Re: Documents of Project DoD Federici DMCA Takedown lawsuit now available

pigno...@worldnet.att.net (Monica Pignotti) — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:48:36 UT

Re: Kunt Wills EASY ANSWERS via REMAILER

kr...@tampabay.rr.com (krp) — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:24:27 UT

DAVID D. MOORE INTERNET PSYCHO STALKER
news:091500a06f02986b648cfca7cf73bbce@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
What hotmail and gmail share with remailers is that they are THROW AWAY
free accounts. If you get locked out on one you just come back with a nedw
one. Like YOU did with Freedom and then Freedom with a number and you got

Re: Kunt Wills EASY ANSWERS

aboutkrp...@aboutiskenapangbornfraud.com (freedom) — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:11:41 UT

=20
ES=20
ack
t=20
He makes the same claim about me. Supposedly I've denied who I am....
however, pointing out that he doesn't have accurate information on me
doesn't constitute denial of who I am. =20
He seems to think that he's so important, that any statement he makes
becomes fact, and anyone who contests it is lying, even if it's fact.

Re: Documents of Project DoD Federici DMCA Takedown lawsuit now available

gregh...@home.fake (Gregory Hall) — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:17:08 UT

Yes, about as pathetic as somebody who says he doesn't give a crap but then
take the time to type it and post it.
<original groups restored>

THE ACTUAL DEVIL HIMSELF - ! SPEAKING ! - Press TV - Israeli Rabbi backs Killing Innocent Children - YOUR CHILD! YOUR LIFE! YOUR CHILD! - (paid for by Amerikan Inc.)

Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:18:50 UT

Who Would Appose?
Again, none of the "suspects" for 911 were from
Afghanistan, and NONE, I say as King Johnny,
NONE were alleged to be al-qeada. Not a single one.
Today, there is nothing more i wish, than to hear
bushite nazi savage thieves for the neocon die
rightly, before the innocent they target for murder.

Texas and California Susan Polgar Cases Consolidated

samhsl...@gmail.com (samsloan) — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:32:16 UT

U.S. District Court
Northern District of Texas
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 1/4/2010 at 2:47 PM CST and
filed on 1/4/2010
Case Name: Polgar v. United States of America Chess Federation Inc et
al
Case Number: 5:08-cv-169
Filer:
Document Number: 224
Docket Text:

Re: Documents of Project DoD Federici DMCA Takedown lawsuit now available

gregh...@home.fake (Gregory Hall) — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:26:14 UT

Wrong. My protesting your abusive misappropriation of my image by
requesting a private website to remove it is not "censorship". I did
not misuse or even evoke DMCA. It is not the same thing at all. The
private website made the decision to remove your abuse of my image,
something they had every right to do. It is not the same thing at all.

Re: Justifiable legal murder?

e...@theobvious.espphotography.com (Evan Platt) — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:07:06 UT

I think we've been over this before.
I have a home to go to.
I think most of us would prefer a nice house than a different motel
every night. Or even the same motel for that matter.
<SNIP>
The point is - and maybe I need to type this slower and use smaller
words for you - you numerous times stated "these idiots call

Re: Texas Judge Cummings Denies Motion to Stay Susan Polgar Lawsuit pending Settlement

joeschm...@gmail.com (None) — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:54:08 UT

I disagree. The idiots are the ones that don't understand an idiot
like Sam. Keep kissing his ass and maybe he'll cut you in on his
publishing empire.