Atty Charles Novins Seeks Changes In Law to Protect Innocents From Internet Vandals
Albert Ekman
anonymous internet thugs attempting to libel him. The perpetrators
posted libelous musings about drug use and sex crimes, all outright
lies. Rather than face legal prosecution, most have backed down.
Novins is a prominent attorney from Toms River, a "Jersey-shore" town
in Ocean County, New Jersey,
Of course, the ability to post anonymously to the internet in such a
way that it is impossible to be traced is now trivially easy, so it is
likely further libel will appear. The only way this will ever be
addressed is to hold the "publishers" - online services ranging from
Google all the way down to bedroom-based chat-room providers -
responsible, just as was done in the days of print publishing.
The widely-despised "Communications Decency Act," a Clinton-era relic
meant to censor the internet, was mostly struck down by the Supreme
Court. It lives on in part, however, causing further harm. It
immunizes the publisher of damaging defamation from responsibility for
spreading the lies, the fraud, and for businesses harmed, in what
essentially amounts to stealing.
Novins hopes the damage that was caused to him can be remedied if the
law is changed. The defamation in his case was so egregious - and so
utterly false - that he hopes his case can serve as an example of what
happens when the law leaves an injured party without any legal means
of recourse.
Until the law is changed or repealed, the focus has been on Federal
Trade Commission prosecutions. But it's a stretch, legally. Some
balance will need to be eventually made so that the internet can
freely thrive, while at the same time, victims of defamation can have
a vehicle for justice.
The Novins firm is becoming a clearinghouse for others damaged in the
same way. Several other victims have called Novins, seeking
information as to the laws, the technology, and in some cases,
providing information about some perpetrators. It's a serious uphill
battle to alter federal laws, but Novins, a 23-year practitioner, has
several times in the past been instrumental in changing laws.
These newsgroups listed in the header were among the many where the
original libel of Novins (and others) was posted, thus the general
reporting of this matter here.
richard
Perhaps your learned attorney at law should understand the basics.
You cannot sue the news stand or the public library.
This is in effect what usenet is, a library and a news stand.
Most, if not all the providers, including google, probably have no idea
what is in their library.
AG Dennis Vaco (NY) tried to have two providers in NY charged with
disseminating child pornography. He lost the case.
I was harrassed for years by a small band of self proclaimed watch dogs for
years. The main instigator would take anything I said out of context and
use it against me. A simple edited email gave me the moniker of "Richard
the stupid", which is still being applied today.
When I began posting using x-no-archive:yes, they couldn't link my posts
through the google archives. I was soon found to be of no interest to them.
However, I was able to learn the true identity of my chief instigator and
once I posted his real name, he simply disappeared.
Most who have harrassed me have since moved on to other prey.
If the words being said were that damning, and caused harm, then he should
have just filed the lawsuit and get the assholes into court where they can
have their say.
Sticks and stones may break my bones......
but words will never harm me.
Aratzio
Albert Ekman <atlasbug...@gmail.com> got double secret probation
for writing:
>69.253.107.178
Hi, Chuck.
Sock stinks.
Now, who is it moved your case to Federal Court under the diversity
rule?
Aratzio
richard <mem...@newsguy.com> got double secret probation for writing:
Orson Wells as CitizenCain
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:q8rlj55l1uv5oav8o...@4ax.com...
For good reason, though "Emmett the Dumbshit" is quietly moving ahead.
"The Great One"
[ ].
--
Roz Ratzio
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Cat got your tongue.....Rat ??
--
HJ
"The Great One"
"Meat Plow" <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote in message news:3dcjda.i...@news.alt.net...
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:04:20 -0800, Aratzio
> <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>wrote:
Please entertain us by "FOADing" you Stupid Fat Slob !!
--
Your Pal,
HJ
Linda
> Charles Novins, Esq., has received apologies from several of the
> anonymous internet thugs attempting to libel him. The perpetrators
> posted libelous musings about drug use and sex crimes, all outright
> lies. Rather than face legal prosecution, most have backed down.
>
> Novins is a prominent attorney from Toms River, a "Jersey-shore" town
> in Ocean County, New Jersey,
>
> Of course, the ability to post anonymously to the internet in such a
> way that it is impossible to be traced is now trivially easy,
Incorrect.
The SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring is comprised of A) rogue
psychologists, B) rogue law enforcement agents, rogue attorneys ,
and other miscreants who possess a great deal of experience utilizing
abusive interrogation techniques, C) malicious hackers, D)
investigators, private and otherwise, E) linguists, and, F) lots
and lots and lots of muscle i.e. killers, rapists, child molesters,
arsons, burglars, batterers, muscle men ad nauseum ad infinitum.
In a text based medium like Usenet and the WWW, the SPP/AUK Criminal
Cyberring's linguists role is essential to the success of the SPP/AUK
Criminal Cyberring's serial Racketeering, and, Conspiracy to
Blackmail, Terrorize, and/or Murder by Proxy.
In a text based medium like Usenet , the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring
would be at a loss without it's bevy of linguists because the SPP/AUK
Criminal Cyberring relies so heavily on linguistic oriented
misdirection to keep the focus off the reprehensible nature of the
aggressive and criminal activities of the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring,
and, keep the focus on the innocent individuals whom the SPP/AUK
Criminal Cyberring serially and criminally Racketeers and Conspires to
Blackmail, Terrorize, and/or Murder by Proxy.
In a text based medium like Usenet, the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring
would also be lost without it's bevy of linguists because it's the SPP/
AUK Criminal Cyberring's bevy of linguists who perpetrate most, if
not all, the false flag operations which the SPP/AUK Criminal
Cyberring needs to manufacture a false pretext for the SPP/AUK
Criminal Cyberring's serial Racketeering and Conspiring to Blackmai,
Terrorize, and/or Murder by Proxy.
Most significant of all, the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring would be at a
loss without it's bevy of linguists, because, it's the SPP/AUK
Criminal Cyberring's linguists who out the personal identities of
those they target and each and every person who publishes articles
which disparage, denigrate, mocks and ridicules the members of the
SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring and/or their Racketeering and Conspiracy to
Blackmail, Terrorize and Murder by Proxy.
The SPP/AUK's Criminal Cyberring's success at outing the personal
identity of their targets and/or anyone who published articles in
which they disparage, denigrate, mock and ridicule the members of
the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring and/or their Racketeering and
Conspiring to Blackmail, Terrorize and Murder by Proxy is PROOF that
linguists can positively identity the author of most text.
If the SPP/AUK's Criminal Cyberring's linguists can, so can linguists
hired by their crime victims.
Furthermore, the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring has been operating for a
minimum of 16 or 17 years.
Myself and other crime victims of the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring have
been calling upon local, state, federal and international law
enforcement agencies, as well as, sitting members of US Congress to
arrest, prosecute and imprison past and present members of the SPP/
AUK Criminal Cybering for Racketeering, and, Conspiring to
Blackmail, Terrorize, and Murder by Proxy, for well over a decade,
if not, since the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring's inception approximately
17 years ago.
When local, state, federal and international Law Enforcement
Agencies decided to turn a blind eye to the SPP/AUK's Criminal
Cyberring's Racketeering and Conspiracy to Blackmail and Terrorize and
Murder others by Proxy, all these local, state, federal and
international law enforcment agencies did so despite the public
documented fact that myself and many others were the recipients of a
non-stop stream of terroristic threats on the lives of ourselves and
our children, both before and after our original terrorists publicly
passed their torch over to the members of the SPP/AUK Criminal
Cyberring.
Given the non-stop terrorist threats being published by the
psychopaths cybersquatting in Usenet's topical forums, as well as,
the non-stop terrorist threats published by members of the SPP/AUK
Criminal Cyberring upon the torch being publicly passed onto to the,
AND, the high priority which terroristic threats are given in the
times we live in, there has NEVER existed any doubt in my mind that,
at a minimum, the US DOJ and FBI knows the identity of each and every
one of the psychopaths cybersquatting in Usenet's topical forums, as
well as, the identities of the members of the SPP/AUK Criminal
Cyberring.
However, the fact that both US DOJ and FBI have been turning a blind
eye to the criminal activities of the psychopaths cybersquatting in
Usenet's topical forums for @ 17 years, as well as, the criminal
activities of members of the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring has made the
employees of the US DOJ and FBI Criminal Co-Conspirators ALA employees
of the DOJ/FBI permitting members of the KKK ample time to beat the
crap out of and/or kill bus passengers during the Civil Rights
Demonstrators in the 60's, which, a few FBI/DOJ were eventually
prosecuted for in the 90's.
Thus, neither the US DOJ nor the FBI are going to voluntarily fork
over any information that be helpful to the crime victims of a
Conspiracy to Blackmail, Terrorize, and/or Murder that they
themselves are criminal co=conspirators of.
However, it seems to me a Writ of Mandamus, or, some other Writ
could be utilized to COMPEL the US DOJ and FBI to furnish the
identities of the aforementioned cybercriminals to their crime
victims.
The only way this will ever be
> addressed is to hold the "publishers" - online services ranging from
> Google all the way down to bedroom-based chat-room providers -
> responsible, just as was done in the days of print publishing.
Although Defamation is the cornerstone of all the criminal activities
of the SPP/AUK Criminal Ring, Defamation is merely one element of
their crimes which are Racketeering and Conspiracy To Blackmail,
Conspiracy to Terrorize and Conspiracy to Murder by Proxy.
According to US Law, when an individual communicates the fact that
IF another individual doesn't say or do what the individual commands
them to do or say, THEN, their doing so constitutes the crime of
blackmail.
According to US Law, it doesn't matter if the defamation in question
has some basis in fact or reality, or, the defamation in question
was fabricated out of whole cloth i.e. "Kook" etc. ad nauseum ad
infinitum, communications which convey a threat to defame another if
the other doesn't say and do what the communicator commands them to
say or do constitute the Crime of Blackmail.
By definition, the "Loser Attitude Readjustment Training" which the
members of the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring designed, implemented, and
executed to discourage and/or deter denizens of usenet from exercising
their inalienable and constitutional right to equal protection of US
Laws constitutes the Crime of Blackmail, in and of itself.
If the members of the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyber-ring could find a way to
get around the fact that the "Loser Attitude Readjustment Training"
they designed, implemented, and executed constituted Racketeering
and Conspiracy to Blackmail, Terrorize, and Murder By Proxy, by
definition, then the remaining members of the SPP/AUK Criminal
Cyberring wouldn't have ceased utilizing the term LART when myself and/
or other crime victims exposed the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring as the
Blackmailers and Terrorists they all are.
The members of the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyber-ring's dropping the term
LART or "Loser Attitude Readjustment Training" in response to myself
and others exposing them as Blackmailers and Terrorists constitutes
consciousness of Guilt of the crime of Blackmail and Terrorism.
However, their discontinuation of their use of the term LART or
"Loser Attitude Readjustment Training" to describe their activities
doesn't alter the fact that their activities constitute the crimes of
Racketeering, and, Conspiracy to Blackmail, Terrorize, and Murder
by Proxy.
The fact that local, state, federal, and international law
enforcement agencies continue to turn a blind eye to the criminal
activities of the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring approximately 17 years
after it's inception, and, a decade or more after it's crime victims
called upon local, state, federal, and international law
enforcement agencies, as well as, sitting members of Congress to
take appropriate action to halt the criminal activities of the members
of the SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring gives Charles Novins and it's most
recent crime victims legal standing to file a Writ of Mandamus
COMPELLING the State of NJ, and/or the US Government to arrest and
prosecute the past and present members of the SPP/AUK Criminal
Cyberring for Racketeering, and, Criminal Conspiracy to Blackmail,
Terrorize, and Murder by Proxy.
http://dictionary.die.net/writ%20of%20mandamus
writ of mandamus
n : an extraordinary writ commanding an official to perform a
ministerial act that the law recognizes as an absolute duty and not a
matter for the official's discretion; used only when all other
judicial remedies fail [syn: mandamus]
Aratzio
Linda <indomi...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
>The SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring
You are incorrect Linda the proper name is:
The SPP/AUK Criminal Cyberring Inc
A wholly owned subsidiary of
Planet Busters Inc. - A worldwide Criminal Enterprise
PBI brings you the best in mass crimes, individual crime, corporate
crime and cyber crime. Our SPP/AUK subsidiary specializes in online
harassment, stalking and can provide terminal services to a select
clientele.
Please update your records Linda.
Linda
Mea Culpa!
I meant to say ...
According to US Law, when an individual communicates the fact that IF
another individual doesn't say or do what the individual commands them
to, THEN, the former is going to globally defame the latter, their
doing so constitutes the Crime of Blackmail.
Lady Veteran
wrote:
I don't think the provider is the issue. It is the idiots that defamed
him.
>AG Dennis Vaco (NY) tried to have two providers in NY charged with
>disseminating child pornography. He lost the case.
As well he should have. Again, the provider is not the issue. I do
think that providers should take a better stance on the use of
anonymous remailers and servers. I think they have responsibility in
that regard.
>
>I was harrassed for years by a small band of self proclaimed watch dogs for
>years. The main instigator would take anything I said out of context and
>use it against me. A simple edited email gave me the moniker of "Richard
>the stupid", which is still being applied today.
>
>When I began posting using x-no-archive:yes, they couldn't link my posts
>through the google archives. I was soon found to be of no interest to them.
>However, I was able to learn the true identity of my chief instigator and
>once I posted his real name, he simply disappeared.
So the idiot found other targets. What about stopping them from
forcing their psychosis on others.
>
>Most who have harrassed me have since moved on to other prey.
Is this the "better them than me" issue rearing it's ugly head?
>
>If the words being said were that damning, and caused harm, then he should
>have just filed the lawsuit and get the assholes into court where they can
>have their say.
That is what he is doing. He seems to be holding the provider
responsible for the issue mentioned above.
>
>Sticks and stones may break my bones......
>but words will never harm me.
But they can harm a well-fought for reputation and psychos who prey on
others should not use anonymous servers.
LV
"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."
---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
--------------------------------------------
"Some people are only alive because it is
illegal to kill them."
---Anonymous
----------------------------------------------
How does your idiocy measure up?
My Blog http://ladyveteranslog.blogspot.com
---------------------------------------------
Are you being harassed on Usenet and want to fight
back instead of leaving the net? Are you willing to
stand up to Internet bullies and stalkers?
Join my group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antiCHU
----------------------------------------------
"I am mad as hell and I will not take it anymore!"
---Network
Aratzio
Anyone <""Zrqt�\"@Qi�QUm[�H:\"&z25u/g`MpEr)\"{ETq[opZ\"Vz.az?"> got
double secret probation for writing:
>Aratzio wrote on 31-Dec-09 17:13 ...
>what -- no 'sekret decoder ring'?
>just whatinthehell kind o' club izit, anyway?
We use *embedded neural* technology, decoder rings are so 1960s.
"The Great One"
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:kfb0k59fd8580bsht...@4ax.com...
LIAR !!
None of the "Gay caballers" of 'AUK' have any neurons....Roz !!
--
HJ
Aratzio
Anyone <""Zrqt�\"@Qi�QUm[�H:\"&z25u/g`MpEr)\"{ETq[opZ\"Vz.az?"> got
double secret probation for writing:
>Aratzio wrote on 02-Jan-10 21:41 ...
>MEMs and graphene?
Nah. big ass chips shoved in their noses.
Kadaitcha Man
> Mea Culpa!
Ok, but do you suck cock and swallow, honey?
--
Test signature
Dick Scumville (FreeSpeechStore)
wrote:
> CharlesNovins, Esq., has received apologies from several of the
> anonymous internet thugs attempting to libel him. The perpetrators
> posted libelous musings about drug use and sex crimes, all outright
> lies. Rather than face legal prosecution, most have backed down.
>
> in Ocean County, New Jersey,
>
> Of course, the ability to post anonymously to the internet in such a
> way that it is impossible to be traced is now trivially easy, so it is
> likely further libel will appear. The only way this will ever be
> addressed is to hold the "publishers" - online services ranging from
> Google all the way down to bedroom-based chat-room providers -
> responsible, just as was done in the days of print publishing.
>
> The widely-despised "Communications Decency Act," a Clinton-era relic
> meant to censor the internet, was mostly struck down by the Supreme
> Court. It lives on in part, however, causing further harm. It
> immunizes the publisher of damaging defamation from responsibility for
> spreading the lies, the fraud, and for businesses harmed, in what
> essentially amounts to stealing.
>
> utterly false - that he hopes his case can serve as an example of what
> of recourse.
>
> Until thelawis changed or repealed, the focus has been on Federal
> Trade Commission prosecutions. But it's a stretch, legally. Some
> balance will need to be eventually made so that the internet can
> freely thrive, while at the same time, victims of defamation can have
> a vehicle for justice.
>
> same way. Several other victims have calledNovins, seeking
> information as to the laws, the technology, and in some cases,
> providing information about some perpetrators. It's a serious uphill
> several times in the past been instrumental in changing laws.
>
> These newsgroups listed in the header were among the many where the
> reporting of this matter here.
Let's hope that one the biggest k00ks on the internet, Richard Morton
Scoville of FreeSpeechStore infamy, is shut down and Scoville thrown
in jail for the rest of disgusting life.
Kadaitcha Man
incoherently wrote:
> Let's hope that one the biggest k00ks on the internet, Richard Morton
> Scoville of FreeSpeechStore infamy, is shut down and Scoville thrown in
> jail for the rest of disgusting life.
WOAH! Scovile has a life?
--
Test signature
TVinternet
Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote:
>
> Some thievish kebab named Lady Veteran rapped:
>
> > I don't think
>
> True.
>
Zzzz.
Flash�
>"Flash�" <ScarletS...@fastest.man.alive.org> wrote in message
>news:rl86n5tcrimhn3ukb...@4ax.com...
>
>>
>> Care to set a wager any input from "Charles" is published
>> under a REM or Guggle headers?
>>
>
>You're so very uninformed as usual.
>
Feeling empowered there 'Harry' [snarf]
>How about posting under a Freebie?
A wise choice you think, gweggie?
I get strong emanations of North--->South pain over the
magnetosphere, as you struggle with the dilemma you
built for yourself in this post:
From: "Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: RESOLVE! There is no AUK.
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:56:15 -0500
Message-ID: <3fs7ih....@news.alt.net>
Longer than you lasted the last time you wrote "unsubscribe"
a fortnight is hardly a "sabbatical", yes?
Notwithstanding your 'memos' of course [snarf]
<3grvd2....@news.alt.net>
<3ge8be....@news.alt.net>
Whatever, it is *your* problem.
And one I fear you may well have more trouble recovering
from than you as a newbie adventurer can foresee.
Carnt see it?
Why am I not surprised ]:-/
Charles Novins - k00k Esq. claims he is hellbent on purging
participants he claims impede his "free speech". Yet he ignores
the instigator of the woes he finds himself now battling with.
You.
As I see it Chucky Buggered Novins has now been handed
(by your own hand)
the spanner to undo the wrong you did in creating
<alt.asshole.charles-novins.aka.atlas-bugged>.
Impersonating a real person electronically with the intent to
bring disrepute is an offence in this Country[.au], a breach of
the Telecommunications Act.
In America?
DickHead.. you even signed off under these headers..!
From: "Charles Novins, Esq." <Ch_N...@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: Atty Charles Novins Seeks Changes In Law to Protect Innocents From Internet Vandals
Message-ID: <qEFcn.19194$5n....@newsfe23.iad>
[..]
--
Mr. Novins, Sir, to you!
As another "Chucky" said of you not so long back.
<q>
Not even close to
properly faked kiddie.
</q>
Not so long ago you yourself felt so enthused with your own
Usenet identity you were compelled to make this post:
From: "Gregory Hall�" <greg...@home.fake>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: I trademarked my name so nobody can use it
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:59:49 -0500
Message-ID: <2ik34j....@news.alt.net>
Don't you DARE use my trademarked name . . .
[..]
I have retained Atlas Bugged to do my legal work.
"Oh just in fun" you say?
Have a laugh at this thought then.. I am.
I be reasonably certain that should Charles Novins - k00k Esq.
be genuine in his quest, then.... then a subpoena aimed at nibble.net
would quickly have you on his "defendants list" and well "served"
. a place you dread to be, eh gweggie [SNARF]
. as Ratz said... "not yet" :-D
Get busy packing that shitbox boat, Capn.
If Charles Novins - k00k Esq. does not act on this gem you have
handed him then truly he deserves all he has got, and will get, as the
clueless arrogant fskn loser he has so far projected.
--
Flash�
handing out backbones around YeLLa America
fup 2 <auk>