=> Man Sues Church after God caused him to Fall <= Idiots feeding on Idiots
Reality_CheckŠ
1 day ago
KNOXVILLE, Tenn. (AP) - A man says he was so consumed by the spirit of God
that he fell and hit his head while worshipping.
Now he wants Lakewind Church to pay $2.5 million for medical bills, lost
income, and pain and suffering.
Matt Lincoln says he is suing after the church's insurance company denied
his claim for medical bills.
The 57-year-old has had two surgeries since the June 2007 injury but still
feels pain in his back and legs.
He says he was asking God to have "a real experience" while praying.
Lincoln says he has fallen from the force of the spirit before but has
always been caught by someone.
Lawyers for the church say other congregants saw him on the floor laughing
after his fall. They say he failed to look out for his own safety.
Peacenik
news:6dq7qcF...@mid.individual.net...
Evil eventually feeds on itself.
forevernitefan
> "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
More like people want an instant " spirituality" nowadays without
actuallly bothering to spend the time and energy to actually BE
spirtual. A number of Christians are looking for the ' signs and
wonders" without the drudgery of growing their faith by small
increments. It's much more exciting to " speak in tongues" rather than
volunteer at a homeless shelter or soup kitchen.
I even encountered someone who proclaimed she became a shaman over
the weekend in some dumbass course geared to separate the sucker from
their money. I had to enlighten the fool that to be an actual shaman
in ANY form takes years and that it was hardly an easy process.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
Deadrat
news:30d6749b-b9fd-475a...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
> On Jul 11, 10:55 pm, "Peacenik" <cnelsonpub...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> "Reality_CheckŠ" <Real...@Check.it> wrote in message
Yeah, so much better to figure out that neopaganism resonates with you in
high school.
> I had to enlighten the fool that to be an actual shaman
> in ANY form takes years and that it was hardly an easy process.
This from your many years of anthropological studies of shamanism, no
doubt. How could we tell whether someone actually became a shaman? If
he posted on misc.legal that it took him years, would that do it for you?
How about if he claimed that the local police came to his home to check
his shaman license?
God(dess), you people take yourselves seriously!
>
> Moe
<snip/>
forevernitefan
> forevernitefan <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:30d6749b-b9fd-475a...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 11, 10:55 pm, "Peacenik" <cnelsonpub...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Don't knock it Deadrat. My faith has helped me through some tough
times and gives me peace.
Somehow I get the feeling you can't say the same.....
BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
>
> > I had to enlighten the fool that to be an actual shaman
> > in ANY form takes years and that it was hardly an easy process.
>
> This from your many years of anthropological studies of shamanism, no
> doubt. How could we tell whether someone actually became a shaman? If
> he posted on misc.legal that it took him years, would that do it for you?
> How about if he claimed that the local police came to his home to check
> his shaman license?
Deadrat, as a Pagan for over two decades one of the many things I've
done is do some research on other Pagan beliefs and customs. And guess
what? That includes the various forms of Shamanism. I prefer being
informed.
As opposed to you on this matter, obviously.
The CONTEXT, which you convienently forgot to include, is my
criticism of the "instant Shaman" crap some New Agers do. Some New
Agers are so damn ignorant that in their naive intent of " honoring"
another faith they tend to show unintended disrespect.
And yes in college I took one anthropology course. I also took
courses in medical terminology and anatomy. However I am not claiming
to be a doctor.
Deadrat, I am a number of things and over they years I've studied a
number of subjects. And I think my knowledge about the Christian
theology which showed you to be at a disadvantage in the subject may
have irked you to a prejudiced conclusion about me.
For someone who has judged me so quickly, you have neglected to
actually find out what I am and what I've been posting for years.
Is your antagonism due to your mistake in thinking I was a Chriistian
and your pride in not wanting to admit your mistake?
Were you honest about this, you would know damn well that a Shaman
in Shinto Buddhism looks different than a Shaman in central Africa.
>
> God(dess), you people take yourselves seriously!
Actually I make jokes and can be quite funny, However what you have
been posting so far about me is meant in malice. And I do fight back
when someone tries to fight me. I am no pacifist Pagan and you're not
talkingt o a newbie here so I know damn well what you are doing.
You want a pissing contest with me, have the backbone to SAY so.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
>
> > Mo
>
> <snip/>- Hide quoted text -
Preventer of Work
God hates people worshipping him. He will strike you in the head.
He finally got his "real experience".
Deadrat
news:e28d41e8-cd79-44ac...@79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com:
> On Jul 12, 9:30 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>> forevernitefan <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> innews:30d6749b-b9fd-475a-b21f-a
> 22517...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>> > On Jul 11, 10:55 pm, "Peacenik" <cnelsonpub...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:6dq7qcF...@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> >> > Man sues Tenn. church over spiritual fall
>> >> > 1 day ago
>>
>> >> > KNOXVILLE, Tenn. (AP) - A man says he was so consumed by the
>> >> > spirit of God
>> >> > that he fell and hit his head while worshipping.
>>
>> >> > Now he wants Lakewind Church to pay $2.5 million for medical
>> >> > bills, lost income, and pain and suffering.
>>
>> >> > Matt Lincoln says he is suing after the church's insurance
>> >> > company denied his claim for medical bills.
>>
>> >> > The 57-year-old has had two surgeries since the June 2007 injury
>> >> > but still feels pain in his back and legs.
>>
>> >> > He says he was asking God to have "a real experience" while
>> >> > praying.
>>
>> >> > Lincoln says he has fallen from the force of the spirit before
>> >> > but has always been caught by someone.
>>
>> >> > Lawyers for the church say other congregants saw him on the
>> >> > floor laughing
>> >> > after his fall. They say he failed to look out for his own
>> >> > safety.
>>
>> >> Evil eventually feeds on itself.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> > More like people want an instant " spirituality" nowadays without
>> > actuallly bothering to spend the time and energy to actually BE
>> > spirtual. A number of Christians are looking for the ' signs and
>> > wonders" without the drudgery of growing their faith by small
>> > increments. It's much more exciting to " speak in tongues" rather
>> > than volunteer at a homeless shelter or soup kitchen.
>>
>> > I even encountered someone who proclaimed she became a shaman over
>> > the weekend in some dumbass course geared to separate the sucker
>> > from their money.
>>
>> Yeah, so much better to figure out that neopaganism resonates with
>> you in high school.
>
> Don't knock it Deadrat. My faith has helped me through some tough
> times and gives me peace.
Why should I believe that?
> Somehow I get the feeling you can't say the same.....
You get a lot of feelings and mistake them for knowledge, don't you?
> BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
> school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
I may be a doofus, but I know the difference between "infer" and "imply."
And I haven't even claimed to have gone to high school.
>> > I had to enlighten the fool that to be an actual shaman
>> > in ANY form takes years and that it was hardly an easy process.
>>
>> This from your many years of anthropological studies of shamanism, no
>> doubt. How could we tell whether someone actually became a shaman?
> If
>> he posted on misc.legal that it took him years, would that do it for
>> you?
>
>> How about if he claimed that the local police came to his home to
>> check his shaman license?
>
> Deadrat, as a Pagan for over two decades one of the many things I've
> done is do some research on other Pagan beliefs and customs. And guess
> what? That includes the various forms of Shamanism. I prefer being
> informed.
Precious little evidence of that.
> As opposed to you on this matter, obviously.
Lotsa stuff is obvious to you, isn't it?
> The CONTEXT, which you convienently forgot to include, is my
> criticism of the "instant Shaman" crap some New Agers do. Some New
> Agers are so damn ignorant that in their naive intent of " honoring"
> another faith they tend to show unintended disrespect.
Wow, you're good! You're so sensitive to the intent of some people that
you can figure out that they're showing the opposite of that intent.
But you can't figure out what we're talking about. Why is that?
> And yes in college I took one anthropology course.
Well, then, you're an expert.
> I also took
> courses in medical terminology and anatomy. However I am not claiming
> to be a doctor.
What's stopping you? Anyone can play a doctor in cyberspace, and you're
at least as learned in medicine as you are in anthropology.
> Deadrat, I am a number of things and over they years I've studied a
> number of subjects.
Anyone can matriculate in cyberspace.
> And I think my knowledge about the Christian
> theology which showed you to be at a disadvantage in the subject may
> have irked you to a prejudiced conclusion about me.
So you think you know more than I do, you think I'm angry at you, and you
think I'm biased against you. Have I parsed that properly?
> For someone who has judged me so quickly,
And that judgment would be?
> you have neglected to
> actually find out what I am and what I've been posting for years.
How could I find out what you are, and what could any of your posts tell
me?
> Is your antagonism due to your mistake in thinking I was a Chriistian
> and your pride in not wanting to admit your mistake?
So I'm antagonistic and prideful?
But I did say that I was mistaken. I just haven't apologized.
> Were you honest about this, you would know damn well that a Shaman
> in Shinto Buddhism looks different than a Shaman in central Africa.
If I were honest, then I'd be more informed?
And it's "different from." "Than" should be reserved for comparatives.
Did you really go to college?
>> God(dess), you people take yourselves seriously!
>
> Actually I make jokes and can be quite funny,
I'll have to say that out of everything you've posted, I find this to be
the least credible.
> However what you have been posting so far about me is meant in malice.
Well, it's meant deliberately. And it's a little mean, but malice? How
do you figure that?
> And I do fight back when someone tries to fight me.
And I'm sure you think you're absolutely terrifying.
> I am no pacifist Pagan and you're not
> talkingt o a newbie here so I know damn well what you are doing.
All the evidence suggests that you don't have a clue.
> You want a pissing contest with me, have the backbone to SAY so.
Volume or distance?
> Moe
<snip/>
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Jul 12, 9:30 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>> forevernitefan <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> innews:30d6749b-b9fd-475a...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> On Jul 11, 10:55 pm, "Peacenik" <cnelsonpub...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
No wonder for a delusional fuck-wit like you.
>
> Somehow I get the feeling you can't say the same.....
Describe the "feeling" you superstitious simpleton.
>
> BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
> school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
Is that were you were sexually abused?
>
>>
>>> I had to enlighten the fool that to be an actual shaman
>>> in ANY form takes years and that it was hardly an easy process.
>>
>> This from your many years of anthropological studies of shamanism, no
>> doubt. How could we tell whether someone actually became a shaman? If
>> he posted on misc.legal that it took him years, would that do it for
>> you?
>> How about if he claimed that the local police came to his home to
>> check
>> his shaman license?
>
> Deadrat, as a Pagan for over two decades one of the many things I've
> done is do some research on other Pagan beliefs and customs. And guess
> what? That includes the various forms of Shamanism. I prefer being
> informed.
And, by doctrine, they all *mandate* "years of study" to become an "actual
shaman",
right moron?
> As opposed to you on this matter, obviously.
>
> The CONTEXT, which you convienently forgot to include, is my
> criticism of the "instant Shaman" crap some New Agers do.
So "shamans" are made in your delusional world, and not born
with those traits, eh Moe?
> Some New
> Agers are so damn ignorant that in their naive intent of " honoring"
> another faith they tend to show unintended disrespect.
Clue: Mirror ... look into it ... what do you see?
>
> And yes in college I took one anthropology course.
ROTFLMAO !!
>I also took
> courses in medical terminology and anatomy. However I am not claiming
> to be a doctor.
But you imply to be an expert in "actual" shamanism, eh nutter?
>
> Deadrat, I am a number of things and over they years I've studied a
> number of subjects. And I think my knowledge about the Christian
> theology which showed you to be at a disadvantage in the subject may
> have irked you to a prejudiced conclusion about me.
Not so much your command of the English language.
>
> For someone who has judged me so quickly, you have neglected to
> actually find out what I am and what I've been posting for years.
You're the habitual lying cunt, who along with your butt-buddy Kunt
Wills has posted 100s of abject lies and prevarications.
Why do you lie so much?
>
> Is your antagonism due to your mistake in thinking I was a Chriistian
> and your pride in not wanting to admit your mistake?
>
> Were you honest about this, you would know damn well that a Shaman
> in Shinto Buddhism looks different than a Shaman in central Africa.
>
>>
>> God(dess), you people take yourselves seriously!
>
> Actually I make jokes and can be quite funny,
Yeah, you're a regular Harry Horwitz ... not!
> However what you have been posting so far about me is meant in malice.
You just can't stop lying, can you cunt?
>And I do fight back
Sure you do Moe, in you own deluded way.
> when someone tries to fight me. I am no pacifist Pagan and you're not
> talkingt o a newbie here so I know damn well what you are doing.
What are you going to do, eh Moe? Post some forged attacks against
yourself using DeadRats alias then whine and complain that he "threatened"
to kill you?
Now go fuck yourself you worthless lying cunt.
forevernitefan
of hid outhouse and sputtered:
> forevernitefan wrote:
> > On Jul 12, 9:30 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
> >> forevernitefan <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote
> >> innews:30d6749b-b9fd-475a...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>
> >>> On Jul 11, 10:55 pm, "Peacenik" <cnelsonpub...@hotmail.com> wrote:
And this by a guy who has an obsession about stories of what he
CLAIMS are Chrstians harming children. Even when the stories don't
mention the religion of the accused.
>
>
>
> > Somehow I get the feeling you can't say the same.....
>
> Describe the "feeling" you superstitious simpleton.
In this case, " impression", you racist misogynistic bigot.
>
>
>
> > BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
> > school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
>
> Is that were you were sexually abused?
Cite where I claimed I was sexually abused..
But then you know you are lying once again.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>> I had to enlighten the fool that to be an actual shaman
> >>> in ANY form takes years and that it was hardly an easy process.
>
> >> This from your many years of anthropological studies of shamanism, no
> >> doubt. How could we tell whether someone actually became a shaman? If
> >> he posted on misc.legal that it took him years, would that do it for
> >> you?
> >> How about if he claimed that the local police came to his home to
> >> check
> >> his shaman license?
>
> > Deadrat, as a Pagan for over two decades one of the many things I've
> > done is do some research on other Pagan beliefs and customs. And guess
> > what? That includes the various forms of Shamanism. I prefer being
> > informed.
>
> And, by doctrine, they all *mandate* "years of study" to become an "actual
> shaman",
> right moron?
You obviously don't know squat about the journey in many cultures to
become a shaman, Joneisie. Do try to limit yur attacks on things you
know something about. In this case youi are showing how morniic YOU
are and how pathetically weak your knowledge is.
Come to think of it, that would limit your responses significiantly.
>
> > As opposed to you on this matter, obviously.
>
> > The CONTEXT, which you convienently forgot to include, is my
> > criticism of the "instant Shaman" crap some New Agers do.
>
> So "shamans" are made in your delusional world, and not born
> with those traits, eh Moe?
I am not a New Ager, Never have been and I certainly have no
intention of becoming one. Shamans are real, Eric. You are so
desperate to want to stick it to me your ignorance of the subject is
hurting you far more than your feeble attacks upon me.
>
> > Some New
> > Agers are so damn ignorant that in their naive intent of " honoring"
> > another faith they tend to show unintended disrespect.
>
> Clue: Mirror ... look into it ... what do you see?
>
>
>
> > And yes in college I took one anthropology course.
>
> ROTFLMAO !!
Too bad you barely graduated high school, Eric.
>
> >I also took
> > courses in medical terminology and anatomy. However I am not claiming
> > to be a doctor.
>
> But you imply to be an expert in "actual" shamanism, eh nutter?
I know more about it than you do, and you show your ignorance in your
post.
>
>
>
> > Deadrat, I am a number of things and over they years I've studied a
> > number of subjects. And I think my knowledge about the Christian
> > theology which showed you to be at a disadvantage in the subject may
> > have irked you to a prejudiced conclusion about me.
>
> Not so much your command of the English language.
Are you my alternative?
>
>
>
> > For someone who has judged me so quickly, you have neglected to
> > actually find out what I am and what I've been posting for years.
>
> You're the habitual lying cunt, who along with your butt-buddy Kunt
> Wills has posted 100s of abject lies and prevarications.
As opposed to your numerous lies and attacks, Eric?
>
> Why do you lie so much?
I don't. You seem incapable of telling the truth.
>
>
>
> > Is your antagonism due to your mistake in thinking I was a Chriistian
> > and your pride in not wanting to admit your mistake?
>
> > Were you honest about this, you would know damn well that a Shaman
> > in Shinto Buddhism looks different than a Shaman in central Africa.
>
> >> God(dess), you people take yourselves seriously!
>
> > Actually I make jokes and can be quite funny,
>
> Yeah, you're a regular Harry Horwitz ... not!
Actually I'm more of a George Carlin and Robin Williams, humor-wise.
BTW how is your fecal-soaked brain today?
>
> > However what you have been posting so far about me is meant in malice.
>
> You just can't stop lying, can you cunt?
Your lack of intelligence noted.
>
> >And I do fight back
>
> Sure you do Moe, in you own deluded way.
As opposed to your delusions, Eric?
>
> > when someone tries to fight me. I am no pacifist Pagan and you're not
> > talkingt o a newbie here so I know damn well what you are doing.
>
> What are you going to do, eh Moe? Post some forged attacks against
> yourself using DeadRats alias then whine and complain that he "threatened"
> to kill you?
Cite where I EVER tried that. I don't fake posts ever. And anyone
who actually threatens me online GETS some REAL WORLD problems coming
his way. One who tried got six months in federal prison.
>
> Now go fuck yourself you worthless lying cunt.
Try better insults, Eric. It's obvious you fear me.
- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Jul 12, 8:39 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> peered out
> of hid outhouse and sputtered:
>> forevernitefan wrote:
>>> On Jul 12, 9:30 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>>>> forevernitefan <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote
>>>> innews:30d6749b-b9fd-475a...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>>>> On Jul 11, 10:55 pm, "Peacenik" <cnelsonpub...@hotmail.com> wrote:
So if the stories don't mention it, then it can't be true, eh moron?
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Somehow I get the feeling you can't say the same.....
>>
>> Describe the "feeling" you superstitious simpleton.
>
> In this case, " impression", you racist misogynistic bigot.
You're the clueless cunt who has the English comprehension
of a retarded 5th grader.
So describe this "impression" you pathetic prevaricator.
>>
>>
>>
>>> BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
>>> school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
>>
>> Is that were you were sexually abused?
>
> Cite where I claimed I was sexually abused..
You continuously exhibit the pathology of one
who suffered childhood sexual abuse or rape trauma.
You're a bitter, angry, man-hating hysterical female
who's prone to habitual lying and delusional infantile fantasies.
>>
>>>>> I had to enlighten the fool that to be an actual shaman
>>>>> in ANY form takes years and that it was hardly an easy process.
>>
>>>> This from your many years of anthropological studies of shamanism,
>>>> no doubt. How could we tell whether someone actually became a
>>>> shaman? If he posted on misc.legal that it took him years, would
>>>> that do it for you?
>>>> How about if he claimed that the local police came to his home to
>>>> check
>>>> his shaman license?
>>
>>> Deadrat, as a Pagan for over two decades one of the many things I've
>>> done is do some research on other Pagan beliefs and customs. And
>>> guess what? That includes the various forms of Shamanism. I prefer
>>> being informed.
>>
>> And, by doctrine, they all *mandate* "years of study" to become an
>> "actual shaman",
>> right moron?
>
> You obviously don't know squat about the journey in many cultures to
> become a shaman, Joneisie.
Which you learned in that singular Anthropology course you claim
to have take in "college", eh moe?
> Do try to limit yur attacks on things you
> know something about.
> In this case youi are showing how morniic
^^^^ ^^^^^^^
Stammer much, you illiterate imbecile ?
> YOU are and how pathetically weak your knowledge is.
This from a stump-stupid stammering simpleton.
>
> Come to think of it, that would limit your responses significiantly.
>>
>>> As opposed to you on this matter, obviously.
>>
>>> The CONTEXT, which you convienently forgot to include, is my
>>> criticism of the "instant Shaman" crap some New Agers do.
>>
>> So "shamans" are made in your delusional world, and not born
>> with those traits, eh Moe?
>
> I am not a New Ager, Never have been and I certainly have no
> intention of becoming one.
Careful ... it's contagious.
> Shamans are real, Eric.
If you say so.
Who's "Eric" ?
> You are so desperate to want to stick it to me
eeewwwwwww! yuck!
> your ignorance of the subject is
> hurting you far more than your feeble attacks upon me.
You really are an illiterate ignoramus. What "college" do
you claim you attended? The same "college" that Larry the
legal imbecile claims to have attended for his law degree?
>>
>>> Some New
>>> Agers are so damn ignorant that in their naive intent of " honoring"
>>> another faith they tend to show unintended disrespect.
>>
>> Clue: Mirror ... look into it ... what do you see?
>>
>>
>>
>>> And yes in college I took one anthropology course.
>>
>> ROTFLMAO !!
>
> Too bad you barely graduated high school, Eric.
Who's "Eric" ?
>
>>
>>> I also took
>>> courses in medical terminology and anatomy. However I am not
>>> claiming to be a doctor.
>>
>> But you imply to be an expert in "actual" shamanism, eh nutter?
>
> I know more about it than you do,
Sure you do moe.
> and you show your ignorance in your post.
Do tell.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Deadrat, I am a number of things and over they years I've studied a
>>> number of subjects. And I think my knowledge about the Christian
>>> theology which showed you to be at a disadvantage in the subject may
>>> have irked you to a prejudiced conclusion about me.
>>
>> Not so much your command of the English language.
>
> Are you my alternative?
Non sequitur.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> For someone who has judged me so quickly, you have neglected to
>>> actually find out what I am and what I've been posting for years.
>>
>> You're the habitual lying cunt, who along with your butt-buddy Kunt
>> Wills has posted 100s of abject lies and prevarications.
>
> As opposed to your numerous lies and attacks, Eric?
At least you now admit and confess that you're a habitual lying
cunt who along with your butt-buddy Kunt Wills has posted 100s
of abject lies and prevarications.
>>
>> Why do you lie so much?
>
> I don't.
You're lying again, you lying cunt.
>You seem incapable of telling the truth.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Is your antagonism due to your mistake in thinking I was a
>>> Chriistian and your pride in not wanting to admit your mistake?
>>
>>> Were you honest about this, you would know damn well that a Shaman
>>> in Shinto Buddhism looks different than a Shaman in central Africa.
>>
>>>> God(dess), you people take yourselves seriously!
>>
>>> Actually I make jokes and can be quite funny,
>>
>> Yeah, you're a regular Harry Horwitz ... not!
>
> Actually I'm more of a George Carlin and Robin Williams, humor-wise.
You're lying again, you lying cunt.
>>
>>> However what you have been posting so far about me is meant in
>>> malice.
>>
>> You just can't stop lying, can you cunt?
>
> Your lack of intelligence noted.
>
>>
>>> And I do fight back
>>
>> Sure you do Moe, in you own deluded way.
>
> As opposed to your delusions, Eric?
What is it with your perpetual delusions about "Eric" ?
>
>>
>>> when someone tries to fight me. I am no pacifist Pagan and you're
>>> not talkingt o a newbie here so I know damn well what you are doing.
>>
>> What are you going to do, eh Moe? Post some forged attacks against
>> yourself using DeadRats alias then whine and complain that he
>> "threatened" to kill you?
>
> Cite where I EVER tried that. I don't fake posts ever.
You're lying again you lying cunt.
> And anyone who actually threatens me online GETS some REAL WORLD problems
> coming his way.
Wow. Such a tough cunt in you own deluded fantasy world, eh moe?
>One who tried got six months in federal prison.
Prove it, you lying cunt.
>
>
>>
>> Now go fuck yourself you worthless lying cunt.
>
> Try better insults, Eric.
Who's "Eric" ?
>It's obvious you fear me.
Prove it you pathetic lying cunt.
Deadrat
news:4ac66d4d-5750-4b5b...@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
> On Jul 12, 8:39 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> peered out
> of hid outhouse and sputtered:
>> forevernitefan wrote:
>> > On Jul 12, 9:30 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>> >> forevernitefan <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> >> innews:30d6749b-b9fd-475a...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroup
>> >> s.com:
<snipped: fool's game/>
>
> Cite where I EVER tried that. I don't fake posts ever. And anyone
> who actually threatens me online GETS some REAL WORLD problems coming
> his way. One who tried got six months in federal prison.
Might we have his name, the charge, and dates of incarceration?
Anyone can play Eliot Ness in cyberspace.
<snip/>
> Moe
<snip/>
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> > Don't knock it Deadrat. My faith has helped me through some tough
>> > times and gives me peace.
>>
>> No wonder for a delusional fuck-wit like you.
>
> And this by a guy who has an obsession about stories of what he
>CLAIMS are Chrstians harming children. Even when the stories don't
>mention the religion of the accused.
>
And when asked for evidence of the religious belief offers
nothing, or offers proof that a different person with the same name
claims the religion.
[...]
>>
>> > BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
>> > school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
>>
>> Is that were you were sexually abused?
>
>Cite where I claimed I was sexually abused..
>
> But then you know you are lying once again.
Have you ever known Jonezie to post anything true? Ever?
[...]
>>
>> > Deadrat, as a Pagan for over two decades one of the many things I've
>> > done is do some research on other Pagan beliefs and customs. And guess
>> > what? That includes the various forms of Shamanism. I prefer being
>> > informed.
>>
>> And, by doctrine, they all *mandate* "years of study" to become an "actual
>> shaman",
>> right moron?
>
> You obviously don't know squat about the journey in many cultures to
>become a shaman, Joneisie. Do try to limit yur attacks on things you
>know something about.
He wouldn't be able to attack at all.
>In this case youi are showing how morniic YOU
>are and how pathetically weak your knowledge is.
>
> Come to think of it, that would limit your responses significiantly.
To near zero.
>>
>> > As opposed to you on this matter, obviously.
>>
>> > The CONTEXT, which you convienently forgot to include, is my
>> > criticism of the "instant Shaman" crap some New Agers do.
>>
>> So "shamans" are made in your delusional world, and not born
>> with those traits, eh Moe?
>
> I am not a New Ager, Never have been and I certainly have no
>intention of becoming one. Shamans are real, Eric. You are so
>desperate to want to stick it to me your ignorance of the subject is
>hurting you far more than your feeble attacks upon me.
Sadly, his intellect is so low, he really won't understand.
>>
>> > Some New
>> > Agers are so damn ignorant that in their naive intent of " honoring"
>> > another faith they tend to show unintended disrespect.
>>
>> Clue: Mirror ... look into it ... what do you see?
>>
>>
>>
>> > And yes in college I took one anthropology course.
>>
>> ROTFLMAO !!
>
> Too bad you barely graduated high school, Eric.
>
There are times when I question if he managed that.
[...]
>> > For someone who has judged me so quickly, you have neglected to
>> > actually find out what I am and what I've been posting for years.
>>
>> You're the habitual lying cunt, who along with your butt-buddy Kunt
>> Wills has posted 100s of abject lies and prevarications.
>
> As opposed to your numerous lies and attacks, Eric?
We know he's a racist. We know he stated I was wrong when I
claimed it was unlikely he's a pedophile. We know he is unable to
offer anything to support his claims.
>
>>
>> Why do you lie so much?
>
> I don't. You seem incapable of telling the truth.
He may be capable, but he certainly doesn't want to.
[...]
>>
>> >And I do fight back
>>
>> Sure you do Moe, in you own deluded way.
>
> As opposed to your delusions, Eric?
>
Jonezie ran away when you offered a means by which to meet you.
He doesn't even fight. He just whines a great deal.
>>
>> > when someone tries to fight me. I am no pacifist Pagan and you're not
>> > talkingt o a newbie here so I know damn well what you are doing.
>>
>> What are you going to do, eh Moe? Post some forged attacks against
>> yourself using DeadRats alias then whine and complain that he "threatened"
>> to kill you?
>
> Cite where I EVER tried that.
You'll be waiting a LONG time.
Jonezie has yet to learn that no matter how much he wants to, he
can't prove his lies to be true.
>I don't fake posts ever. And anyone
>who actually threatens me online GETS some REAL WORLD problems coming
>his way. One who tried got six months in federal prison.
>
I honestly doubt Jonezie would learn anything if he were to be
incarcerated.
>
>>
>> Now go fuck yourself you worthless lying cunt.
>
> Try better insults, Eric. It's obvious you fear me.
Bullies fear anyone standing up to them. Add that you are a
female standing up to him, and you can see why he is as he is.
--
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
Deadrat
news:6dursnF...@mid.individual.net:
> forevernitefan wrote:
>> On Jul 12, 8:39 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> peered out
>> of hid outhouse and sputtered:
>>> forevernitefan wrote:
>>>> On Jul 12, 9:30 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>>>>> forevernitefan <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote
>>>>> innews:30d6749b-b9fd-475a...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroup
>>>>> s.com:
<snip/>
>>>> BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
>>>> school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
>>>
>>> Is that were you were sexually abused?
>>
>> Cite where I claimed I was sexually abused..
>
> You continuously exhibit the pathology of one
> who suffered childhood sexual abuse or rape trauma.
In the mindreading business with Kent and Moe?
And don't you mean "continually"?
> You're a bitter, angry, man-hating hysterical female
> who's prone to habitual lying and delusional infantile fantasies.
She's prone to nasty language. Whom does that remind you of?
<snip/>
>> your ignorance of the subject is
>> hurting you far more than your feeble attacks upon me.
>
> You really are an illiterate ignoramus. What "college" do
> you claim you attended? The same "college" that Larry the
> legal imbecile claims to have attended for his law degree?
Hey! Leave Larry out of this. At least he understands the phrase about
shouting fire in the theater.
<snip/>
>>>> Is your antagonism due to your mistake in thinking I was a
>>>> Chriistian and your pride in not wanting to admit your mistake?
>>>
>>>> Were you honest about this, you would know damn well that a Shaman
>>>> in Shinto Buddhism looks different than a Shaman in central Africa.
>>>
>>>>> God(dess), you people take yourselves seriously!
>>>
>>>> Actually I make jokes and can be quite funny,
>>>
>>> Yeah, you're a regular Harry Horwitz ... not!
>>
>> Actually I'm more of a George Carlin and Robin Williams, humor-wise.
>
> You're lying again, you lying cunt.
No, no. I think it's one of those koan things. Here's someone who's
completely humorless but thinks she's a George Carlin. How funny is
*that*?
<snip/>
_ Prof. Jonez _
>>> On Jul 12, 8:39 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> peered out
>>> of hid outhouse and sputtered:
>>>> forevernitefan wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 12, 9:30 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>>>>>> forevernitefan <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote
>>>>>> innews:30d6749b-b9fd-475a...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroup
>>>>>> s.com:
> <snip/>
>
>>>>> BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
>>>>> school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
>>>>
>>>> Is that were you were sexually abused?
>>>
>>> Cite where I claimed I was sexually abused..
>>
>> You continuously exhibit the pathology of one
>> who suffered childhood sexual abuse or rape trauma.
>
> In the mindreading business with Kent and Moe?
The fact is she exhibits the symptoms,
only she knows how much she was abused
or how brutally she was raped.
>
> And don't you mean "continually"?
You read my mind ...
>
>> You're a bitter, angry, man-hating hysterical female
>> who's prone to habitual lying and delusional infantile fantasies.
>
> She's prone to nasty language. Whom does that remind you of?
Do tell.
>
> <snip/>
>
>>> your ignorance of the subject is
>>> hurting you far more than your feeble attacks upon me.
>>
>> You really are an illiterate ignoramus. What "college" do
>> you claim you attended? The same "college" that Larry the
>> legal imbecile claims to have attended for his law degree?
>
> Hey! Leave Larry out of this. At least he understands the phrase
> about shouting fire in the theater.
Now you're reading the "mind" of Larry the Legal Imbecile?
Here then, tell us exactly what Larry understands in re:
"Having private savings accounts comprise a part of social security
is not the same as privatizing social security."
-- Larry Glasser, stammering imbecile
"What do you think a "DNA Warrant" is? There is no such thing."
-- Larry the legal stooge
" [The Jury] might have unanimously found that he probably committed the crime,
or likely committed them, or possibly committed them - *or* that he was in fact
innocent."
-- Larry the idiot
"The jury was hung. Whether it was hung 11 for the top count and 1
for a lesser count or 1 for the top count and 11 to acquit is of no legal
relevance in terms of bail."
-- Larry the legal imbecile
" Actually, prisons are one of the few public places where
you can still smoke."
-- Larry the moron
"There are over 1300 ADAs in New York City alone, and
I personally know at least a half-dozen named Larry or Lawrence."
-- Larry the eponymous fool
" I don't know a single attorney, public or private,
who knows his/her attorney registration number."
-- Larry Glasser
"Plus, receiving stolen money (or property of any kind) is only a
crime if the recipient knows it is stolen"
-- Lyin' Larry, the legal jackass
>>>> Kent Wills: "I'm just the guy who can travel without restriction to
>>>> several Latin American countries."
>>>> UM: "Why not all the Latin American countries then, eh Kent?"
>>>> Larry the imbecile Glasser: "Federal law, dumbass. No citizen can go
>>>> to some of the nations from the US."
Larry the Imbecile claims that 0.625 grams is "far more than a gram"
and that a handcuffed man will "fall faster" when pushed off a cliff.
>>>> Q: And just what does a moron like you think a Townhouse is, eh jackass ?
>>>> Larry the Ignoramus: "A dwelling, which is a type of structure or building.
>>>> It is not, however, real property."
"I never mentioned New York? That's so demonstrably false I'm still
laughing. Anytime I speak in anything resembling a specific, I make it
clear that I'm referring to NY statutes. I've never claimed to know the
details of criminal statutes in other jurisdictions."
-- Larry Glasser the Pathological Liar
Q: "So people who suffer from a medical/mental disability don't have
the "right" to defend their homes, eh comrade ?"
Larry the Legal Imbecile: "No, they don't."
>
> <snip/>
>
>>>>> Is your antagonism due to your mistake in thinking I was a
>>>>> Chriistian and your pride in not wanting to admit your mistake?
>>>>
>>>>> Were you honest about this, you would know damn well that a Shaman
>>>>> in Shinto Buddhism looks different than a Shaman in central
>>>>> Africa.
>>>>
>>>>>> God(dess), you people take yourselves seriously!
>>>>
>>>>> Actually I make jokes and can be quite funny,
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, you're a regular Harry Horwitz ... not!
>>>
>>> Actually I'm more of a George Carlin and Robin Williams,
>>> humor-wise.
>>
>> You're lying again, you lying cunt.
>
> No, no. I think it's one of those koan things. Here's someone who's
> completely humorless but thinks she's a George Carlin. How funny is
> *that*?
You'll note she picked two notorious cocaine abusers as idols.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:50:50 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
> <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> Don't knock it Deadrat. My faith has helped me through some tough
>>>> times and gives me peace.
>>>
>>> No wonder for a delusional fuck-wit like you.
>>
>> And this by a guy who has an obsession about stories of what he
>> CLAIMS are Chrstians harming children. Even when the stories don't
>> mention the religion of the accused.
>>
>
> And when asked for evidence of the religious belief offers
> nothing,
You're lying again, Kunt.
> or offers proof that a different person with the same name
> claims the religion.
You just can't stop lying, can you Kunt?
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>>> BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
>>>> school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
>>>
>>> Is that were you were sexually abused?
>>
>> Cite where I claimed I was sexually abused..
>>
>> But then you know you are lying once again.
>
> Have you ever known Jonezie to post anything true? Ever?
"Let's pretend breathing is outlawed and everyone the world
over ceases inhaling and exhaling.
There will be NO change in CO2 levels since we exhale carbon
monoxide, not carbon dioxide, stupid."
- Kent Wills si-untist from Iowa
"You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
reply to you."
-- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
"At this point Madeleine is equally alive and dead. "
-- Kent ignoramus Wills giving the Iowa version of Kwantum Mahkaniks
" Currently, we, citizens of the U.S., aren't allowed to go to
Venezuela or Cuba. My hope is that Venezuela's restriction will
be lifted after the next election."
- Kent Wills 2007, lying jackass
Kent Wills
<the...@jonez.net> wrote:
[...]
>>> No wonder for a delusional fuck-wit like you.
>>
>> And this by a guy who has an obsession about stories of what he
>> CLAIMS are Chrstians harming children. Even when the stories don't
>> mention the religion of the accused.
>
>So if the stories don't mention it, then it can't be true, eh moron?
>
It can be true, but you've never been able to offer anything to
support your claims. Ever.
[...]
>>>
>>> Is that were you were sexually abused?
>>
>> Cite where I claimed I was sexually abused..
>
>You continuously exhibit the pathology of one
>who suffered childhood sexual abuse or rape trauma.
>You're a bitter, angry, man-hating hysterical female
>who's prone to habitual lying and delusional infantile fantasies.
Interesting diagnosis. It's based on the lies you've presented,
which really makes it interesting.
You use your lie that she hates men, that she lies and has
delusions to support your lie that she was sexually abused and/or
raped.
10 out of 10 for the attempt, but negative several million for
honesty and accuracy.
[...]
>>>
>>> And, by doctrine, they all *mandate* "years of study" to become an
>>> "actual shaman",
>>> right moron?
>>
>> You obviously don't know squat about the journey in many cultures to
>> become a shaman, Joneisie.
>
>Which you learned in that singular Anthropology course you claim
>to have take in "college", eh moe?
Did she claim such?
Why are you so unable to be honest about anything at any time?
>
>> Do try to limit yur attacks on things you
>> know something about.
>> In this case youi are showing how morniic
> ^^^^ ^^^^^^^
>
>Stammer much, you illiterate imbecile ?
>
And with that, Jonezie admits he's lost.
For readers unaware, Jonezie admits Moe has beaten him by pointing
out spelling errors.
No point in going on with a reply. You've admitted defeat.
--
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
>
Kent Wills
<the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:50:50 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
>> <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> Don't knock it Deadrat. My faith has helped me through some tough
>>>>> times and gives me peace.
>>>>
>>>> No wonder for a delusional fuck-wit like you.
>>>
>>> And this by a guy who has an obsession about stories of what he
>>> CLAIMS are Chrstians harming children. Even when the stories don't
>>> mention the religion of the accused.
>>>
>>
>> And when asked for evidence of the religious belief offers
>> nothing,
>
>You're lying again, Kunt.
Prove it.
>
>> or offers proof that a different person with the same name
>> claims the religion.
>
>You just can't stop lying, can you Kunt?
>
Prove it.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>
>>>>> BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
>>>>> school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
>>>>
>>>> Is that were you were sexually abused?
>>>
>>> Cite where I claimed I was sexually abused..
>>>
>>> But then you know you are lying once again.
>>
>> Have you ever known Jonezie to post anything true? Ever?
>
>
>
>"Let's pretend breathing is outlawed and everyone the world
>over ceases inhaling and exhaling.
>There will be NO change in CO2 levels since we exhale carbon
>monoxide, not carbon dioxide, stupid."
> - Kent Wills si-untist from Iowa
>
I accept your admitting that I've beaten you once again.
forevernitefan
BTW I noted you crossposted this to the alt wicca newsgroup. Did you
also post your kerosine and bonfire for the " witch" story story?
> forevernitefan wrote:
> > On Jul 12, 8:39 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> peered out
> > of hid outhouse and sputtered:
> >> forevernitefan wrote:
> >>> On Jul 12, 9:30 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
> >>>> forevernitefan <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote
> >>>> innews:30d6749b-b9fd-475a...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
>
> >>>>> On Jul 11, 10:55 pm, "Peacenik" <cnelsonpub...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote in message
You claim it you never PROVED it, Jonesie. Your hatred of
Christianity is so much you see Christianity where it is not a factor.
>
>
>
> >>> Somehow I get the feeling you can't say the same.....
>
> >> Describe the "feeling" you superstitious simpleton.
>
> > In this case, " impression", you racist misogynistic bigot.
>
> You're the clueless cunt who has the English comprehension
> of a retarded 5th grader.
At least my comprehension is higher than yours.
>
> So describe this "impression" you pathetic prevaricator.
I don't need to. Your pathetic desperation in focusing on me gives
me plenty of examples to form impressions about you.
>
>
>
> >>> BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
> >>> school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
>
> >> Is that were you were sexually abused?
>
> > Cite where I claimed I was sexually abused..
>
> You continuously exhibit the pathology of one
> who suffered childhood sexual abuse or rape trauma.
How so? By what basis do you think that? Are you by any chance a rape
crisis counselor? Or is this just your crappy little mind at work
hoping I was raped or abused? At any rate you are way off the mark.
> You're a bitter, angry, man-hating hysterical female
> who's prone to habitual lying and delusional infantile fantasies.
Hmn, me man-hating. ( Looks at Chippendales Calendar and photos of
Welling). Wrong again. I don't like YOU or Greg but then neither of
you are men. Males, yes, men no.
Are you my alternative?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>> I had to enlighten the fool that to be an actual shaman
> >>>>> in ANY form takes years and that it was hardly an easy process.
>
> >>>> This from your many years of anthropological studies of shamanism,
> >>>> no doubt. How could we tell whether someone actually became a
> >>>> shaman? If he posted on misc.legal that it took him years, would
> >>>> that do it for you?
> >>>> How about if he claimed that the local police came to his home to
> >>>> check
> >>>> his shaman license?
>
> >>> Deadrat, as a Pagan for over two decades one of the many things I've
> >>> done is do some research on other Pagan beliefs and customs. And
> >>> guess what? That includes the various forms of Shamanism. I prefer
> >>> being informed.
>
> >> And, by doctrine, they all *mandate* "years of study" to become an
> >> "actual shaman",
> >> right moron?
>
> > You obviously don't know squat about the journey in many cultures to
> > become a shaman, Joneisie.
>
> Which you learned in that singular Anthropology course you claim
> to have take in "college", eh moe?
And in over twenty years of being a Pagan, Eric. Shamans are Pagan.
>
> > Do try to limit yur attacks on things you
> > know something about.
> > In this case youi are showing how morniic
>
> ^^^^ ^^^^^^^
>
> Stammer much, you illiterate imbecile ?
Alliteration is a cheap pretense for literacy, Eric. You never fail
to show me as much better than you in language and in intelligent
response.
>
> > YOU are and how pathetically weak your knowledge is.
>
> This from a stump-stupid stammering simpleton.
Ah more alliteration. Not exactly clever, but then I don't expect you
to exceed your half-wit status.
>
>
>
> > Come to think of it, that would limit your responses significiantly.
>
> >>> As opposed to you on this matter, obviously.
>
> >>> The CONTEXT, which you convienently forgot to include, is my
> >>> criticism of the "instant Shaman" crap some New Agers do.
>
> >> So "shamans" are made in your delusional world, and not born
> >> with those traits, eh Moe?
>
> > I am not a New Ager, Never have been and I certainly have no
> > intention of becoming one.
>
> Careful ... it's contagious.
I'm sure you are quite infected with many diseases.
>
> > Shamans are real, Eric.
>
> If you say so.
(( smiles)) Oh don't rley upon my word. Try actually being educated
beyond your child porn.
>
> Who's "Eric" ?
You Jonesie. Repeat yourself much?
>
> > You are so desperate to want to stick it to me
>
> eeewwwwwww! yuck!
Thanks for confirming your aversion to adult females.
>
> > your ignorance of the subject is
> > hurting you far more than your feeble attacks upon me.
>
> You really are an illiterate ignoramus. What "college" do
> you claim you attended? The same "college" that Larry the
> legal imbecile claims to have attended for his law degree?
>
I am not Larry. And you know, people attend and graduate college
every year. Not everyoneis as deficient as you are.
>
>
> >>> Some New
> >>> Agers are so damn ignorant that in their naive intent of " honoring"
> >>> another faith they tend to show unintended disrespect.
>
> >> Clue: Mirror ... look into it ... what do you see?
Thankfully not your face. In the CONTEXT of what I was referring to,
something you failed to comprehend, is that some new ager types think
they are honoring a belief in their action but in the process their
ignorance results in the opposite result. that happened to a Native
American sacred land area.
Your attempt at a personal attack noted.
>
> >>> And yes in college I took one anthropology course.
>
> >> ROTFLMAO !!
>
> > Too bad you barely graduated high school, Eric.
>
> Who's "Eric" ?
You, of course.
>
>
>
> >>> I also took
> >>> courses in medical terminology and anatomy. However I am not
> >>> claiming to be a doctor.
>
> >> But you imply to be an expert in "actual" shamanism, eh nutter?
>
> > I know more about it than you do,
>
> Sure you do moe.
See above. Shamans are Pagans. I've been Pagan for more than two
decades. I even posted a Wiki URL.
>
> > and you show your ignorance in your post.
>
> Do tell.
I don't need to. You show your ignorance without my help.
>
>
>
> >>> Deadrat, I am a number of things and over they years I've studied a
> >>> number of subjects. And I think my knowledge about the Christian
> >>> theology which showed you to be at a disadvantage in the subject may
> >>> have irked you to a prejudiced conclusion about me.
>
> >> Not so much your command of the English language.
>
> > Are you my alternative?
>
> Non sequitur.
Said by the prince of non seqtuiors and ad hominens.
>
>
>
> >>> For someone who has judged me so quickly, you have neglected to
> >>> actually find out what I am and what I've been posting for years.
>
> >> You're the habitual lying cunt, who along with your butt-buddy Kunt
> >> Wills has posted 100s of abject lies and prevarications.
>
> > As opposed to your numerous lies and attacks, Eric?
>
> At least you now admit and confess that you're a habitual lying
> cunt who along with your butt-buddy Kunt Wills has posted 100s
> of abject lies and prevarications.
I never ' admitted" any of that. Your delusion is quite severe.
>
>
>
> >> Why do you lie so much?
>
> > I don't.
>
> You're lying again, you lying cunt.
So you're using " cunt" here as a word of affection?
>
>
>
>
>
> >You seem incapable of telling the truth.
>
> >>> Is your antagonism due to your mistake in thinking I was a
> >>> Chriistian and your pride in not wanting to admit your mistake?
>
> >>> Were you honest about this, you would know damn well that a Shaman
> >>> in Shinto Buddhism looks different than a Shaman in central Africa.
>
> >>>> God(dess), you people take yourselves seriously!
>
> >>> Actually I make jokes and can be quite funny,
>
> >> Yeah, you're a regular Harry Horwitz ... not!
>
> > Actually I'm more of a George Carlin and Robin Williams, humor-wise.
>
> You're lying again, you lying cunt.
I'm a fan of both comedians. What proof do you have otherise? Oh, you
are just doing your reaction spewing again.
>
>
>
> >>> However what you have been posting so far about me is meant in
> >>> malice.
>
> >> You just can't stop lying, can you cunt?
>
> > Your lack of intelligence noted.
>
> >>> And I do fight back
>
> >> Sure you do Moe, in you own deluded way.
>
> > As opposed to your delusions, Eric?
>
> What is it with your perpetual delusions about "Eric" ?
I have no delusions about you. You barely rank an audio
hallucination. Though I think you need to ne deloused.
>
>
>
> >>> when someone tries to fight me. I am no pacifist Pagan and you're
> >>> not talkingt o a newbie here so I know damn well what you are doing.
>
> >> What are you going to do, eh Moe? Post some forged attacks against
> >> yourself using DeadRats alias then whine and complain that he
> >> "threatened" to kill you?
>
> > Cite where I EVER tried that. I don't fake posts ever.
>
> You're lying again you lying cunt.
Avoidance noted. I asked for proff of your claims and you can't do
it.
Your intellectual impotence noted.
>
> > And anyone who actually threatens me online GETS some REAL WORLD problems
> > coming his way.
>
> Wow. Such a tough cunt in you own deluded fantasy world, eh moe?
Better a " tough cunt" than a spinelss coward like you.
>
> >One who tried got six months in federal prison.
>
> Prove it, you lying cunt.
Email me and I'll show it to you.
>
>
>
> >> Now go fuck yourself you worthless lying cunt.
>
> > Try better insults, Eric.
>
> Who's "Eric" ?
You.
>
> >It's obvious you fear me.
>
> Prove it you pathetic lying cunt
You are proving it for me.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:20:01 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:50:50 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
>>> <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> Don't knock it Deadrat. My faith has helped me through some tough
>>>>>> times and gives me peace.
>>>>>
>>>>> No wonder for a delusional fuck-wit like you.
>>>>
>>>> And this by a guy who has an obsession about stories of what he
>>>> CLAIMS are Chrstians harming children. Even when the stories don't
>>>> mention the religion of the accused.
>>>>
>>>
>>> And when asked for evidence of the religious belief offers
>>> nothing,
>>
>> You're lying again, Kunt.
>
> Prove it.
"Let's pretend breathing is outlawed and everyone the world
over ceases inhaling and exhaling.
There will be NO change in CO2 levels since we exhale carbon
monoxide, not carbon dioxide, stupid."
- Kent Wills si-untist from Iowa
>
>>
>>> or offers proof that a different person with the same name
>>> claims the religion.
>>
>> You just can't stop lying, can you Kunt?
>>
>
> Prove it.
"You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
reply to you."
-- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
>>>>>> school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that were you were sexually abused?
>>>>
>>>> Cite where I claimed I was sexually abused..
>>>>
>>>> But then you know you are lying once again.
>>>
>>> Have you ever known Jonezie to post anything true? Ever?
>>
>>
>>
>> "Let's pretend breathing is outlawed and everyone the world
>> over ceases inhaling and exhaling.
>> There will be NO change in CO2 levels since we exhale carbon
>> monoxide, not carbon dioxide, stupid."
>> - Kent Wills si-untist from Iowa
>>
>
> I accept
"At this point Madeleine is equally alive and dead. "
forevernitefan
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:50:50 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
>
>
> [...]
>
> >> > Don't knock it Deadrat. My faith has helped me through some tough
> >> > times and gives me peace.
>
> >> No wonder for a delusional fuck-wit like you.
>
> > And this by a guy who has an obsession about stories of what he
> >CLAIMS are Chrstians harming children. Even when the stories don't
> >mention the religion of the accused.
>
> And when asked for evidence of the religious belief offers
> nothing, or offers proof that a different person with the same name
> claims the religion.
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> >> > BTW you said in another post you don't think I ever went to high
> >> > school and now you infer I did. Pick a lane, doofus.
>
> >> Is that were you were sexually abused?
>
> >Cite where I claimed I was sexually abused..
>
> > But then you know you are lying once again.
>
> Have you ever known Jonezie to post anything true? Ever?
Never.I'd be in shock if he actually stuck to the truth for very
long.
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> >> > Deadrat, as a Pagan for over two decades one of the many things I've
> >> > done is do some research on other Pagan beliefs and customs. And guess
> >> > what? That includes the various forms of Shamanism. I prefer being
> >> > informed.
>
> >> And, by doctrine, they all *mandate* "years of study" to become an "actual
> >> shaman",
> >> right moron?
>
> > You obviously don't know squat about the journey in many cultures to
> >become a shaman, Joneisie. Do try to limit yur attacks on things you
> >know something about.
>
> He wouldn't be able to attack at all.
>
> >In this case youi are showing how morniic YOU
> >are and how pathetically weak your knowledge is.
>
> > Come to think of it, that would limit your responses significiantly.
>
> To near zero.
Less than zero. We would be blessed with his absence.
>
>
>
> >> > As opposed to you on this matter, obviously.
>
> >> > The CONTEXT, which you convienently forgot to include, is my
> >> > criticism of the "instant Shaman" crap some New Agers do.
>
> >> So "shamans" are made in your delusional world, and not born
> >> with those traits, eh Moe?
>
> > I am not a New Ager, Never have been and I certainly have no
> >intention of becoming one. Shamans are real, Eric. You are so
> >desperate to want to stick it to me your ignorance of the subject is
> >hurting you far more than your feeble attacks upon me.
>
> Sadly, his intellect is so low, he really won't understand.
He tries to look clever but parroting the same old stuff shows how
numb brained he actually is. I almost pity him.
>
>
>
> >> > Some New
> >> > Agers are so damn ignorant that in their naive intent of " honoring"
> >> > another faith they tend to show unintended disrespect.
>
> >> Clue: Mirror ... look into it ... what do you see?
>
> >> > And yes in college I took one anthropology course.
>
> >> ROTFLMAO !!
>
> > Too bad you barely graduated high school, Eric.
>
> There are times when I question if he managed that.
He might have recieved his diploma by default rather than by merit.
>
> [...]
>
> >> > For someone who has judged me so quickly, you have neglected to
> >> > actually find out what I am and what I've been posting for years.
>
> >> You're the habitual lying cunt, who along with your butt-buddy Kunt
> >> Wills has posted 100s of abject lies and prevarications.
>
> > As opposed to your numerous lies and attacks, Eric?
>
> We know he's a racist. We know he stated I was wrong when I
> claimed it was unlikely he's a pedophile. We know he is unable to
> offer anything to support his claims.
He's never supported his claims about anything, including his claims
about me.
>
>
>
> >> Why do you lie so much?
>
> > I don't. You seem incapable of telling the truth.
>
> He may be capable, but he certainly doesn't want to.
I think he can't even stand the truth about himself, to be honest.
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> >> >And I do fight back
>
> >> Sure you do Moe, in you own deluded way.
>
> > As opposed to your delusions, Eric?
>
> Jonezie ran away when you offered a means by which to meet you.
> He doesn't even fight. He just whines a great deal.
No surprise there. Jonesie is big on the bully act online but he's a
coward where it counts.
>
>
>
> >> > when someone tries to fight me. I am no pacifist Pagan and you're not
> >> > talkingt o a newbie here so I know damn well what you are doing.
>
> >> What are you going to do, eh Moe? Post some forged attacks against
> >> yourself using DeadRats alias then whine and complain that he "threatened"
> >> to kill you?
>
> > Cite where I EVER tried that.
>
> You'll be waiting a LONG time.
> Jonezie has yet to learn that no matter how much he wants to, he
> can't prove his lies to be true.
He hurls to see what sticks or whether someone else will use it for
him. gGeg and Kenney tried some of that with me. They failed. Jonesie
is just more of the same pathetic weak stuff.
>
> >I don't fake posts ever. And anyone
> >who actually threatens me online GETS some REAL WORLD problems coming
> >his way. One who tried got six months in federal prison.
>
> I honestly doubt Jonezie would learn anything if he were to be
> incarcerated.
He'd learn not to bend over in the shower......
>
>
>
> >> Now go fuck yourself you worthless lying cunt.
>
> > Try better insults, Eric. It's obvious you fear me.
>
> Bullies fear anyone standing up to them. Add that you are a
> female standing up to him, and you can see why he is as he is.
Yeah he seems scared of anything with adult female genitalia. Typical
loudmouth coward.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
>
> --
> Jonezie:
>
> >> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
> >> the invading White Man ...
>
> Deadrat:
>
> > Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
>
> Jonezie:
> S for Savage.
>
> Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
> Message-ID: <6b3i56F2svfk...@mid.individual.net>
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Jul 13, 12:19 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>
> BTW I noted you crossposted this to the alt wicca newsgroup. Did you
> also post your kerosine and bonfire for the " witch" story story?
Stammer much you pig-ignorant retard?
forevernitefan
Dumb enough to think if you do this crossposting that you might not
piss off a hacker, Jonesie?
forevernitefan
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:19:24 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>
>
> [...]
>
> >>> No wonder for a delusional fuck-wit like you.
>
> >> And this by a guy who has an obsession about stories of what he
> >> CLAIMS are Chrstians harming children. Even when the stories don't
> >> mention the religion of the accused.
>
> >So if the stories don't mention it, then it can't be true, eh moron?
>
> It can be true, but you've never been able to offer anything to
> support your claims. Ever.
Proof is in facts not in the OMISSION of facts. It would be like
saying since the artciles don't say they are reptlian invaders they
MUST BE reptilian invaders.
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> >>> Is that were you were sexually abused?
>
> >> Cite where I claimed I was sexually abused..
>
> >You continuously exhibit the pathology of one
> >who suffered childhood sexual abuse or rape trauma.
And your expertise on that comes from? Gee such " compassion" when
you call me a " cunt".
Jonesie I hardly act like anyone who suffered a rape or childhood
sexual abuse, no matter what you DREAM about me. Greg and Kennie tried
that claim before. They failed.
> >You're a bitter, angry, man-hating hysterical female
> >who's prone to habitual lying and delusional infantile fantasies.
>
> Interesting diagnosis. It's based on the lies you've presented,
> which really makes it interesting.
It his fantasy not reality. Apparently if I am a man-hater I don't
have a Chippendales calendar and I have no attraction to a certain
damn good looking male actor......
> You use your lie that she hates men, that she lies and has
> delusions to support your lie that she was sexually abused and/or
> raped.
> 10 out of 10 for the attempt, but negative several million for
> honesty and accuracy.
He's just hurt I don't find him desirable.
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> >>> And, by doctrine, they all *mandate* "years of study" to become an
> >>> "actual shaman",
> >>> right moron?
>
> >> You obviously don't know squat about the journey in many cultures to
> >> become a shaman, Joneisie.
>
> >Which you learned in that singular Anthropology course you claim
> >to have take in "college", eh moe?
>
> Did she claim such?
> Why are you so unable to be honest about anything at any time?
>
>
>
> >> Do try to limit yur attacks on things you
> >> know something about.
> >> In this case youi are showing how morniic
> > ^^^^ ^^^^^^^
>
> >Stammer much, you illiterate imbecile ?
>
> And with that, Jonezie admits he's lost.
> For readers unaware, Jonezie admits Moe has beaten him by pointing
> out spelling errors.
> No point in going on with a reply. You've admitted defeat.
I never deny I make typos. However typos and " stammering" are
different things. Poor Jonesie is incapable of seeing a distinction.
>
> --
> Jonezie:
>
> >> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
> >> the invading White Man ...
>
> Deadrat:
>
> > Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
>
> Jonezie:
> S for Savage.
>
> Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
> Message-ID: <6b3i56F2svfk...@mid.individual.net>
> >Prove it you pathetic lying cunt.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Moe
Deadrat
news:31f72919-7e21-40b7...@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com:
> On Jul 13, 12:19 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>
> BTW I noted you crossposted this to the alt wicca newsgroup. Did you
> also post your kerosine and bonfire for the " witch" story story?
>
>
>> forevernitefan wrote:
<snip/>
>
>> You're a bitter, angry, man-hating hysterical female
>> who's prone to habitual lying and delusional infantile fantasies.
>
> Hmn, me man-hating. ( Looks at Chippendales Calendar and photos of
> Welling).
Anyone can play a straight chick in cyberspace.
<snip/>
>>
>> > Do try to limit yur attacks on things you
>> > know something about.
>> > In this case youi are showing how morniic
>>
>> ^^^^
> ^^^^^^^
>>
>> Stammer much, you illiterate imbecile ?
>
> Alliteration is a cheap pretense for literacy, Eric.
Alliteration is the repetition of consonantal sounds at the beginnings of
words. That would be something like
Alliteration is a *ch*eap *ch*ance for *ch*umps to pretend to literacy
The repetition of the short 'i' in *i*lliterate *i*mbecile is called
assonance.
I thought you said you went to college.
> You never fail
> to show me as much better than you in language and in intelligent
> response.
Oops! Is your face red!
<snip/>
> I am not Larry.
Anyone can play at not being Larry in cyberspace.
<snip/>
> Said by the prince of non seqtuiors
'I' before 'e' except after 'c'; 'u' after 'q' except before 't'?
> and ad hominens.
It's ad homine*m*. "Ad" is a prepostion meaning against and takes the
accusative, in this case of homo,hominis meaning "man," in the sense of
person.
An ad hominem argument is one that is against the person making the
argument and not the argument itself. In other words, an ad hominem
argument says "You're wrong because of who or what you are." For example,
if I say, "The FISA law is bad because George Bush is for it." that's an ad
hominem argument. FISA is bad law regardless of Bush's stance on it.
Saying otherwise is a good bet but a fallacious argument.
Notice that abuse isn't an argument at all, let alone an ad hominem. Jonez
is just insulting you.
Didn't you say you went to college?
<snip/>
> Moe
<snip/>
Deadrat
> Deadrat wrote:
>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in
>>> forevernitefan wrote:
>>>> On Jul 12, 8:39 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> peered
>>>> out of hid outhouse and sputtered:
>>>>> forevernitefan wrote:
>>>>>> On Jul 12, 9:30 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> forevernitefan <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote
>>>>>>> innews:30d6749b-b9fd-475a...@a70g2000hsh.googlegro
>>>>>>> up s.com:
<snip/>
Don't make me start cutting and pasting again.
>> <snip/>
>>
>>>>>> Is your antagonism due to your mistake in thinking I was a
>>>>>> Chriistian and your pride in not wanting to admit your mistake?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Were you honest about this, you would know damn well that a
>>>>>> Shaman in Shinto Buddhism looks different than a Shaman in
>>>>>> central Africa.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> God(dess), you people take yourselves seriously!
>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually I make jokes and can be quite funny,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, you're a regular Harry Horwitz ... not!
>>>>
>>>> Actually I'm more of a George Carlin and Robin Williams,
>>>> humor-wise.
>>>
>>> You're lying again, you lying cunt.
>>
>> No, no. I think it's one of those koan things. Here's someone who's
>> completely humorless but thinks she's a George Carlin. How funny is
>> *that*?
>
> You'll note she picked two notorious cocaine abusers as idols.
Could coke explain all this? It's the real thing, you know.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Jul 13, 2:50 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>> forevernitefan wrote:
>>> On Jul 13, 12:19 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>
>>> BTW I noted you crossposted this to the alt wicca newsgroup. Did you
>>> also post your kerosine and bonfire for the " witch" story story?
>>
>> Stammer much you pig-ignorant retard?
>
> Dumb enough to think if you do this crossposting that you might not
> piss off a hacker, Jonesie?
Oh no! Not a "hacker"! Anything but that you lying cunt.
Would that be the same "hacker" that Kent *the felon* Wills
claims he hired to insert his "false" criminal conviction record
into the Iowa State Dept. of Corrections database?
Or the "hacker" that Kent *the lying asswipe* Wills claims
he hired to "trace" those self-fabricated "threatening" posts
he made via motz? Or would that "hacker" be one of your
professors at that estemed "college" you claim you not
only attended, but somehow mananged to graduate from?
Please, you lying cunt, anything but the dreaded "hacker".
Now go fuck yourself you lying cunt.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> forevernitefan <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:31f72919-7e21-40b7...@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Jul 13, 12:19 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>
>> BTW I noted you crossposted this to the alt wicca newsgroup. Did you
>> also post your kerosine and bonfire for the " witch" story story?
>>
>>
>>> forevernitefan wrote:
>
> <snip/>
>
>>
>>> You're a bitter, angry, man-hating hysterical female
>>> who's prone to habitual lying and delusional infantile fantasies.
>>
>> Hmn, me man-hating. ( Looks at Chippendales Calendar and photos of
>> Welling).
>
> Anyone can play a straight chick in cyberspace.
>
Not very convincingly ...
> <snip/>
>
>>>
>>>> Do try to limit yur attacks on things you
>>>> know something about.
>>>> In this case youi are showing how morniic
>>>
>>> ^^^^
>> ^^^^^^^
>>>
>>> Stammer much, you illiterate imbecile ?
>>
>> Alliteration is a cheap pretense for literacy, Eric.
>
> Alliteration is the repetition of consonantal sounds at the
> beginnings of words. That would be something like
>
> Alliteration is a *ch*eap *ch*ance for *ch*umps to pretend to
> literacy
>
> The repetition of the short 'i' in *i*lliterate *i*mbecile is called
> assonance.
>
> I thought you said you went to college.
Clearly the College of Clueless Cretinoid Cunts in Colchester Connecticut.
>
>> You never fail
>> to show me as much better than you in language and in intelligent
>> response.
>
> Oops! Is your face red!
>
> <snip/>
>
>> I am not Larry.
>
> Anyone can play at not being Larry in cyberspace.
>
> <snip/>
>
>> Said by the prince of non seqtuiors
>
> 'I' before 'e' except after 'c'; 'u' after 'q' except before 't'?
>
>> and ad hominens.
>
> It's ad homine*m*. "Ad" is a prepostion meaning against and takes the
> accusative, in this case of homo,hominis meaning "man," in the sense
> of person.
>
> An ad hominem argument is one that is against the person making the
> argument and not the argument itself. In other words, an ad hominem
> argument says "You're wrong because of who or what you are." For
> example, if I say, "The FISA law is bad because George Bush is for
> it." that's an ad hominem argument. FISA is bad law regardless of
> Bush's stance on it. Saying otherwise is a good bet but a fallacious
> argument.
>
> Notice that abuse isn't an argument at all, let alone an ad hominem.
> Jonez is just insulting you.
>
> Didn't you say you went to college?
Any lying cunt named moe can tell lies on Usenet.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> "john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> thought of his favorite role models and
> shrieked:
>
>>
>> Oral Roberts!
Don't forget his brother ... Anal
> Rich Roberts! Pat Robertson, Benny! Rod!
>> Fred! Creflo!
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Jul 13, 1:15 pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:50:50 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
>>
>> <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> Don't knock it Deadrat. My faith has helped me through some tough
>>>>> times and gives me peace.
>>
>>>> No wonder for a delusional fuck-wit like you.
>>
>>> And this by a guy who has an obsession about stories of what he
>>> CLAIMS are Chrstians harming children. Even when the stories don't
>>> mention the religion of the accused.
>>
>> And when asked for evidence of the religious belief offers
>> nothing, or offers proof that a different person with the same name
>> claims the religion.
You really are one stump-stupid lying cunt, aren't you moe?
=> CHRISTIAN Man Sues Church after God caused him to Fall <= Idiots feeding on
Idiots
Wayne
"_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
news:6dvcppF...@mid.individual.net...
And don't forget Paula White. She's quite a looker too.
Kent Wills
<the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:20:01 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
>> <the...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:50:50 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
>>>> <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't knock it Deadrat. My faith has helped me through some tough
>>>>>>> times and gives me peace.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No wonder for a delusional fuck-wit like you.
>>>>>
>>>>> And this by a guy who has an obsession about stories of what he
>>>>> CLAIMS are Chrstians harming children. Even when the stories don't
>>>>> mention the religion of the accused.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And when asked for evidence of the religious belief offers
>>>> nothing,
>>>
>>> You're lying again, Kunt.
>>
>> Prove it.
>
>
>
>"Let's pretend breathing is outlawed and everyone the world
>over ceases inhaling and exhaling.
>There will be NO change in CO2 levels since we exhale carbon
>monoxide, not carbon dioxide, stupid."
> - Kent Wills si-untist from Iowa
You admit defeat again. OK. It's not like you have ever been
able to win any debate with me, what with your never posting anything
true. Ever.
--
"Excuse me. Have you seen a blowfish driving a sports car?"
"Bloody Torchwood!"
Deadrat
news:qnsn74dmr9rjpsvvc...@4ax.com:
Your little victory dances become tiresome.
Here's a hint: you're not even playing the same game. You're shouting
"Bingo!" at a chess match.
forevernitefan
> forevernitefan wrote:
> > On Jul 13, 2:50 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
> >> forevernitefan wrote:
> >>> On Jul 13, 12:19 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>
> >>> BTW I noted you crossposted this to the alt wicca newsgroup. Did you
> >>> also post your kerosine and bonfire for the " witch" story story?
>
> >> Stammer much you pig-ignorant retard?
>
> > Dumb enough to think if you do this crossposting that you might not
> > piss off a hacker, Jonesie?
>
> Oh no! Not a "hacker"! Anything but that you lying cunt.
You crossposted this crap to a new newsgroup. Basically because you
want to start another of your many online fights. And I never said I
was a hacker, Jonesie.. I was referring to the possibility that one of
these days you'll crosspost to a newsgroup and osmoene will be fed up
enough with your crap to do some damage to you. You're due for some
headaches.
> Would that be the same "hacker" that Kent *the felon* Wills
> claims he hired to insert his "false" criminal conviction record
> into the Iowa State Dept. of Corrections database?
When did he ever say it was a " hacker" Jonez? Do try to manage to
keep you many lies straight.
> Or the "hacker" that Kent *the lying asswipe* Wills claims
> he hired to "trace" those self-fabricated "threatening" posts
> he made via motz?
First off, the post TRACE was not by a hacker. Secondly NOW you are
claiming that the racist posts YOU made were " forged" BY Kent.
Interesting how you DIDN"T say that the first time you were nailed as
the originator of those posts. Funny how SILENT you were for awhile
after Knet came back from his vacation and revealed where the posts
were traced to AND a police visit to you. Youdidn't raise a howl THEN,
did you, claiing that it was forged. And now you claim it. What took
you so long, Jonesie?
It took you a year to create THAT lie, Jonesie? No wonder you can't
make new insults about me. SHEESH!!
Or would that "hacker" be one of your
> professors at that estemed "college" you claim you not
> only attended, but somehow mananged to graduate from?
> Please, you lying cunt, anything but the dreaded "hacker".
Mock all you want, jerk. You mouth off one too many times with your
crap and someone who CAN hack will decide to teach you a lesson. If
Kent's IP friend can trace teh white supremacist racist's posts to
your city, someone sure as hell can go a few steps further. Piss off
the wrong person, Jonesie.
Hell, I'll make a challenge to you. Your next crosspost should
include an active hacker newsgroup. How about it? Or is your bravado
just the usual bullshit? I mean here you are constantly calling me "
cunt" and a " liar" and so forth and you post incessantly news stries
about who you CLAIM are Christians committing child abuse and worse,
not to mention last year under your racvst white supremacist nym you
spoke against anyone who is of " mixed race", even saying they should
be killed. Gee Jonesie, who HAVEN'T you insulted yet? You use " pig
ignorant jew" and other insults, so why not insult hackers as well?
>
> Now go fuck yourself you lying cunt.
As a woman I don't have the equipment to accomplish that. But I am
glad you understand that a woman doesn't need a man to be sexually
satisfied.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/ Moe
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> Would that be the same "hacker" that Kent *the felon* Wills
>> claims he hired to insert his "false" criminal conviction record
>> into the Iowa State Dept. of Corrections database?
>
> When did he ever say it was a " hacker" Jonez? Do try to manage to
>keep you many lies straight.
>
I've never claimed it was a hacker. I think it was Greg who first
made the claim it was a hacker. It may have been tjab, but I'm
thinking it was Greg.
>
>> Or the "hacker" that Kent *the lying asswipe* Wills claims
>> he hired to "trace" those self-fabricated "threatening" posts
>> he made via motz?
>
> First off, the post TRACE was not by a hacker.
When has Jonezie ever let the truth factor in?
>Secondly NOW you are
>claiming that the racist posts YOU made were " forged" BY Kent.
He's been making the claim for a few months, actually. It's still
a lie, of course.
>Interesting how you DIDN"T say that the first time you were nailed as
>the originator of those posts. Funny how SILENT you were for awhile
>after Knet came back from his vacation and revealed where the posts
>were traced to AND a police visit to you. Youdidn't raise a howl THEN,
>did you, claiing that it was forged. And now you claim it. What took
>you so long, Jonesie?
He's found that no other lies worked, so he's desperately hoping
this one will.
As is the norm, Jonezie is failing.
>
> It took you a year to create THAT lie, Jonesie? No wonder you can't
>make new insults about me. SHEESH!!
To be fair, tjab was the first one to make the claim. Like
Jonezie, nothing was offered by way of proof.
All they have is that I, like many, have an account with Motz.
And that's not proof, unless they want to claim everyone who has an
account, as Jonezie once did, wrote the posts.
>
> Or would that "hacker" be one of your
>> professors at that estemed "college" you claim you not
>> only attended, but somehow mananged to graduate from?
>> Please, you lying cunt, anything but the dreaded "hacker".
>
> Mock all you want, jerk. You mouth off one too many times with your
>crap and someone who CAN hack will decide to teach you a lesson. If
>Kent's IP friend can trace teh white supremacist racist's posts to
>your city, someone sure as hell can go a few steps further. Piss off
>the wrong person, Jonesie.
Sadly, Jonezie is too stupid to understand.
>
> Hell, I'll make a challenge to you. Your next crosspost should
>include an active hacker newsgroup. How about it? Or is your bravado
>just the usual bullshit? I mean here you are constantly calling me "
>cunt" and a " liar" and so forth and you post incessantly news stries
>about who you CLAIM are Christians committing child abuse and worse,
While offering NOTHING to support his claims the religious
belief(s) of the accused.
The ONE time Jonezie did offer something, his evidence was proved
wrong.
>not to mention last year under your racvst white supremacist nym you
>spoke against anyone who is of " mixed race", even saying they should
>be killed.
He also use anti-Semitic terms against Larry and Doc Savage. Two
people known to be Jewish.
Judaism isn't a race, of course. It's a religion, but if one is
anti-Semitic, one is likely to be racist as well. They go together
more often than not.
>Gee Jonesie, who HAVEN'T you insulted yet? You use " pig
>ignorant jew" and other insults, so why not insult hackers as well?
>
He might. Time will tell.
>
>>
>> Now go fuck yourself you lying cunt.
>
> As a woman I don't have the equipment to accomplish that. But I am
>glad you understand that a woman doesn't need a man to be sexually
>satisfied.
To be fair, men don't need women to be sexually satisfied.
Fortunately for the human race, both tend to prefer the other
more often than not.
--
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
tjab
I was? Cite?
>Like
>Jonezie, nothing was offered by way of proof.
Pretty funny, coming from you, who has offered no evidence other than your
worthless word that it was Jonez.
forevernitefan
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:02:08 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
>
>
> [...]
>
> >> Would that be the same "hacker" that Kent *the felon* Wills
> >> claims he hired to insert his "false" criminal conviction record
> >> into the Iowa State Dept. of Corrections database?
>
> > When did he ever say it was a " hacker" Jonez? Do try to manage to
> >keep you many lies straight.
>
> I've never claimed it was a hacker. I think it was Greg who first
> made the claim it was a hacker. It may have been tjab, but I'm
> thinking it was Greg.
They don"t know the distinction between an " inside" job and an
outsider altering a web site without permision.
>
>
>
> >> Or the "hacker" that Kent *the lying asswipe* Wills claims
> >> he hired to "trace" those self-fabricated "threatening" posts
> >> he made via motz?
>
> > First off, the post TRACE was not by a hacker.
>
> When has Jonezie ever let the truth factor in?
Never. I doubt he even knows what the truth is.
>
> >Secondly NOW you are
> >claiming that the racist posts YOU made were " forged" BY Kent.
>
> He's been making the claim for a few months, actually. It's still
> a lie, of course.
>
> >Interesting how you DIDN"T say that the first time you were nailed as
> >the originator of those posts. Funny how SILENT you were for awhile
> >after Kent came back from his vacation and revealed where the posts
> >were traced to AND a police visit to you. Youd idn't raise a howl THEN,
> >did you, calling that it was forged. And now you claim it. What took
> >you so long, Jonesie?
>
> He's found that no other lies worked, so he's desperately hoping
> this one will.
> As is the norm, Jonezie is failing.
Jonesie lives by his lies.
>
>
>
> > It took you a year to create THAT lie, Jonesie? No wonder you can't
> >make new insults about me. SHEESH!!
>
> To be fair, tjab was the first one to make the claim. Like
> Jonezie, nothing was offered by way of proof.
> All they have is that I, like many, have an account with Motz.
> And that's not proof, unless they want to claim everyone who has an
> account, as Jonezie once did, wrote the posts.
Yeah I rememeber that now. One problem with their claim is that
ANYONE can use motz-- including Jonez. IOW their accusation does not
eliminate him. They might as well claim _I_ made those posts.
>
>
>
> > Or would that "hacker" be one of your
> >> professors at that estemed "college" you claim you not
> >> only attended, but somehow mananged to graduate from?
> >> Please, you lying cunt, anything but the dreaded "hacker".
>
> > Mock all you want, jerk. You mouth off one too many times with your
> >crap and someone who CAN hack will decide to teach you a lesson. If
> >Kent's IP friend can trace the white supremacist racist's posts to
> >your city, someone sure as hell can go a few steps further. Piss off
> >the wrong person, Jonesie.
>
> Sadly, Jonezie is too stupid to understand.
It's only his luck so far that he hasn't pissed one off enugh to be in
their virtual crosshairs.
>
>
>
> > Hell, I'll make a challenge to you. Your next crosspost should
> >include an active hacker newsgroup. How about it? Or is your bravado
> >just the usual bullshit? I mean here you are constantly calling me "
> >cunt" and a " liar" and so forth and you post incessantly news stries
> >about who you CLAIM are Christians committing child abuse and worse,
>
> While offering NOTHING to support his claims the religious
> belief(s) of the accused.
> The ONE time Jonezie did offer something, his evidence was proved
> wrong.
>
> >not to mention last year under your racist white supremacist nym you
> >spoke against anyone who is of " mixed race", even saying they should
> >be killed.
>
> He also use anti-Semitic terms against Larry and Doc Savage. Two
> people known to be Jewish.
> Judaism isn't a race, of course. It's a religion, but if one is
> anti-Semitic, one is likely to be racist as well. They go together
> more often than not.
I thought that Jewish was also an ethinc group as for millenia the
Jewish people have been a bit isolationistic and choosy in their
marriages. But I could have been mislead into believing that by years
of hearing about how the Nazis judged who was Jewsish and who was not.
To me bigotry like that is asinine. There are good and bad people in
every group and if you are going to be prejudiced against someone at
least be prejudiced on something they can change (( grins)).
>
> >Gee Jonesie, who HAVEN'T you insulted yet? You use " pig
> >ignorant jew" and other insults, so why not insult hackers as well?
>
> He might. Time will tell.
He's too chickenshit to risk it.
>
>
>
> >> Now go fuck yourself you lying cunt.
>
> > As a woman I don't have the equipment to accomplish that. But I am
> >glad you understand that a woman doesn't need a man to be sexually
> >satisfied.
>
> To be fair, men don't need women to be sexually satisfied.
Yeah, circle jerks and homosexuality come to mind. Also some of you
guys actually interact with inaimate objects in ways that make
someone like me scratch our heads. I heard one sory of a guy who had
to go to the hospital to get his privates detatched from a wrench. The
thought occcured to me he was adjusting his nuts. Light bulbs and
peanut butter jars up the anus is just too dumb for me to comprehend.
If you can't get it out, don't put it in in the first place.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
> Fortunately for the human race, both tend to prefer the other
> more often than not.
>
> --
> Jonezie:
>
> >> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
> >> the invading White Man ...
>
> Deadrat:
>
> > Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
>
> Jonezie:
> S for Savage.
>
> Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
> Message-ID: <6b3i56F2svfk...@mid.individual.net>
forevernitefan
> In article <18jq74dqlsd718q4j8k98leot0pmdf3...@4ax.com>,
Do you have any other possible culprits, Tjab?
It's very simple. Take a list of people online who have such a
detailed and personal interest in Kent Wills and go from there. As I
said some months ago, a total stranger who just passed by would not
have known about his wife and kids and that he and his wife were of
different ethnic groups. How many people are so focused on Kent to
spend the energy the white supremacist showed? And may I add that the
white supremacist knew I was female.
As for a person's word being worthless, you should talk, Tjab.
Youlied about seeing the "actual court documents" I was requesting
from you Kent accusers.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
Kent Wills
[...]
>>> It took you a year to create THAT lie, Jonesie? No wonder you can't
>>>make new insults about me. SHEESH!!
>>
>> To be fair, tjab was the first one to make the claim.
>
>I was? Cite?
>
Yes.
>>Like
>>Jonezie, nothing was offered by way of proof.
>
>Pretty funny, coming from you, who has offered no evidence other than your
>worthless word that it was Jonez.
Yet you commented on part of the evidence by calling it, and I
quote you, "Bullshit."
Is there anything, anything at all, about which you will not lie?
Have you so completely abandoned all forms of honesty?
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> >Like
>> >Jonezie, nothing was offered by way of proof.
>>
>> Pretty funny, coming from you, who has offered no evidence other than your
>> worthless word that it was Jonez.
>
> Do you have any other possible culprits, Tjab?
He is, once again, flat out lying.
It's sad, but tjab can't comment honestly without admitting it was
Jonezie.
You may recall how tjab lied about the meaning of the word nym in
a pathetic attempt to deny the truth. He tried, for a few days, to
claim one's E-mail is one's nym. One can use their E-mail as their
nym, of course, but Jonezie has never, as far as I know, done this.
Now tjab lies and claims I offered no evidence. If I offered
none, how was he able to lie about it?
And it was a lie. If he misunderstood, he would have stated so as
soon as I pointed out his error.
>
> It's very simple. Take a list of people online who have such a
>detailed and personal interest in Kent Wills and go from there.
Doc Savage and Jonezie are it.
While it was *possible* that Doc would use anti-Semitic comments
directed to himself and Larry, it's wasn't real likely. It wasn't his
style. I doubt he's adopted it since, though I haven't seen a post
from him for several months.
Doc would have gotten the Common Wealth spelling of various words
correctly. He lives in England, after all.
I do have to give Jonezie props for getting Doc to admit his name
in real life is NOT Daniel Goldblum. Having Doc admit it's not his
real name made one women, whom Doc had threatened to sue, feel much
better.
it also served to prove he lied about contacting my parole
officer. Of course, my not having one already served to prove that,
but, well, having more proof never hurts.
>As I
>said some months ago, a total stranger who just passed by would not
>have known about his wife and kids and that he and his wife were of
>different ethnic groups. How many people are so focused on Kent to
>spend the energy the white supremacist showed? And may I add that the
>white supremacist knew I was female.
Which would further rule out Doc. I doubt he knew, or cared, your
gender.
Even tjab would have to admit Jonezie was, and is, the most
likely suspect. Of course, tjab has abandoned all appearance of
honesty.
>
> As for a person's word being worthless, you should talk, Tjab.
>Youlied about seeing the "actual court documents" I was requesting
>from you Kent accusers.
You exposed his lie on this.
--
"Hail imp," shouted Vlad, the Imp Hailer.
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Various snips for brevity and of items for which I have no comment]]
>> > When did he ever say it was a " hacker" Jonez? Do try to manage to
>> >keep you many lies straight.
>>
>> I've never claimed it was a hacker. I think it was Greg who first
>> made the claim it was a hacker. It may have been tjab, but I'm
>> thinking it was Greg.
>
>They don"t know the distinction between an " inside" job and an
>outsider altering a web site without permision.
>
I think they do.
Greg is unable to be honest. I'm certain tjab can, but has found
he can't win if he is, so he's using deception.
Sadly, tjab still loses every time.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> Or the "hacker" that Kent *the lying asswipe* Wills claims
>> >> he hired to "trace" those self-fabricated "threatening" posts
>> >> he made via motz?
>>
>> > First off, the post TRACE was not by a hacker.
>>
>> When has Jonezie ever let the truth factor in?
>
> Never. I doubt he even knows what the truth is.
If he can be honest, it's clear he doesn't want to be.
[...]
>>
>> > It took you a year to create THAT lie, Jonesie? No wonder you can't
>> >make new insults about me. SHEESH!!
>>
>> To be fair, tjab was the first one to make the claim. Like
>> Jonezie, nothing was offered by way of proof.
>> All they have is that I, like many, have an account with Motz.
>> And that's not proof, unless they want to claim everyone who has an
>> account, as Jonezie once did, wrote the posts.
>
> Yeah I rememeber that now. One problem with their claim is that
>ANYONE can use motz-- including Jonez. IOW their accusation does not
>eliminate him. They might as well claim _I_ made those posts.
Anyone with access *could* have done it. This is why the trace
was needed. Everyone who was able to go on-line nation was a
potential suspect at the beginning.
>>
>>
>> > Or would that "hacker" be one of your
>> >> professors at that estemed "college" you claim you not
>> >> only attended, but somehow mananged to graduate from?
>> >> Please, you lying cunt, anything but the dreaded "hacker".
>>
>> > Mock all you want, jerk. You mouth off one too many times with your
>> >crap and someone who CAN hack will decide to teach you a lesson. If
>> >Kent's IP friend can trace the white supremacist racist's posts to
>> >your city, someone sure as hell can go a few steps further. Piss off
>> >the wrong person, Jonesie.
>>
>> Sadly, Jonezie is too stupid to understand.
>
>It's only his luck so far that he hasn't pissed one off enugh to be in
>their virtual crosshairs.
>
I can assure him, and every one else, he's safe from me. The
best I could do is some script kitty work, and that would be rather
useless, really.
I am certainly not a hacker.
[...]
>>
>> >not to mention last year under your racist white supremacist nym you
>> >spoke against anyone who is of " mixed race", even saying they should
>> >be killed.
>>
>> He also use anti-Semitic terms against Larry and Doc Savage. Two
>> people known to be Jewish.
>> Judaism isn't a race, of course. It's a religion, but if one is
>> anti-Semitic, one is likely to be racist as well. They go together
>> more often than not.
>
> I thought that Jewish was also an ethinc group as for millenia the
>Jewish people have been a bit isolationistic and choosy in their
>marriages. But I could have been mislead into believing that by years
>of hearing about how the Nazis judged who was Jewsish and who was not.
Some claim it as an ethnic or racial heritage, however it's not
really accurate. One can stop being Jewish. They can convert to
Hinduism, for example.
If they fall under the "white" demographic, they can't stop being
white. If they are Asian, they can't cease being Asian. And so on.
>
> To me bigotry like that is asinine. There are good and bad people in
>every group and if you are going to be prejudiced against someone at
>least be prejudiced on something they can change (( grins)).
One can change their religion. This doesn't make religious
bigotry acceptable.
[...]
>>
>> >> Now go fuck yourself you lying cunt.
>>
>> > As a woman I don't have the equipment to accomplish that. But I am
>> >glad you understand that a woman doesn't need a man to be sexually
>> >satisfied.
>>
>> To be fair, men don't need women to be sexually satisfied.
>
> Yeah, circle jerks and homosexuality come to mind. Also some of you
>guys actually interact with inaimate objects in ways that make
>someone like me scratch our heads.
I was thinking masturbation, but you raise valid examples as
well.
>I heard one sory of a guy who had
>to go to the hospital to get his privates detatched from a wrench. The
>thought occcured to me he was adjusting his nuts.
<Giggle>
>Light bulbs and
>peanut butter jars up the anus is just too dumb for me to comprehend.
>If you can't get it out, don't put it in in the first place.
Why would anyone want to insert anything into their rectum?
Other than a medical exam, which one would hope is being done by a
qualified medical doctor, or a suppository for medical reasons, I
can't think of any reason to want anything inserted.
I realize some people engage in anal sex. I'll never understand
the interest in that.
--
"I'm a ten gov a day guy. It's all I know, and it's all
you need to know, gov!"
- Shouting George
Reality_CheckŠ
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9b0t74tc8o7kfntkf...@4ax.com...
It's script *kiddie* you stump-stupid stammering lying asswipe.
> I am certainly not a hacker.
Nor are you a christian.
tjab
Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 16 Jul 2008 09:53:54 -0400, tj...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>> It took you a year to create THAT lie, Jonesie? No wonder you can't
>>>>make new insults about me. SHEESH!!
>>>
>>> To be fair, tjab was the first one to make the claim.
>>
>>I was? Cite?
>>
>
> Yes.
Did you forget to include a cite?
>>>Like
>>>Jonezie, nothing was offered by way of proof.
>>
>>Pretty funny, coming from you, who has offered no evidence other than your
>>worthless word that it was Jonez.
>
> Yet you commented on part of the evidence by calling it, and I
>quote you, "Bullshit."
Bullshit is not evidence. Neither is simple assertion, which is all
you have to offer.
Kent Wills
>In article <j4vs7412dmqqqqrgv...@4ax.com>,
>Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On 16 Jul 2008 09:53:54 -0400, tj...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>> It took you a year to create THAT lie, Jonesie? No wonder you can't
>>>>>make new insults about me. SHEESH!!
>>>>
>>>> To be fair, tjab was the first one to make the claim.
>>>
>>>I was? Cite?
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
>
>Did you forget to include a cite?
No.
You have confused a lack of desire with a laps in memory.
>
>>>>Like
>>>>Jonezie, nothing was offered by way of proof.
>>>
>>>Pretty funny, coming from you, who has offered no evidence other than your
>>>worthless word that it was Jonez.
>>
>> Yet you commented on part of the evidence by calling it, and I
>>quote you, "Bullshit."
>
>Bullshit is not evidence. Neither is simple assertion, which is all
>you have to offer.
>
You commented on other aspects of the evidence.
Did you forget how you wanted his E-mail address to be his nym?
You may as well give up. No amount of your dishonesty will ever
alter the truth.
tjab
Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 17 Jul 2008 22:35:24 -0400, tj...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
>>In article <j4vs7412dmqqqqrgv...@4ax.com>,
>>Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On 16 Jul 2008 09:53:54 -0400, tj...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>>>> It took you a year to create THAT lie, Jonesie? No wonder you can't
>>>>>>make new insults about me. SHEESH!!
>>>>>
>>>>> To be fair, tjab was the first one to make the claim.
>>>>
>>>>I was? Cite?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>
>>Did you forget to include a cite?
>
> No.
> You have confused a lack of desire with a laps in memory.
You have confused a lack of ability with a lack of desire.
>>
>>>>>Like
>>>>>Jonezie, nothing was offered by way of proof.
>>>>
>>>>Pretty funny, coming from you, who has offered no evidence other than your
>>>>worthless word that it was Jonez.
>>>
>>> Yet you commented on part of the evidence by calling it, and I
>>>quote you, "Bullshit."
>>
>>Bullshit is not evidence. Neither is simple assertion, which is all
>>you have to offer.
>>
>
> You commented on other aspects of the evidence.
Pointing out that what you call evidence is not evidence is not
"commenting on the evidence."
> Did you forget how you wanted his E-mail address to be his nym?
A semantic quibble that is irrelevant to your assertion, given that the
poster in question forged numerous email addresses and nyms alike.
Incidentally, what is the source of your delusion that I wanted his/her
email address to be his/her nym?
> You may as well give up. No amount of your dishonesty will ever
>alter the truth.
No amount of projection will alter the simple fact that you are a
compulsive liar.
As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth to
alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in your posts.
Kent Wills
>In article <ko2084165ehudoiiq...@4ax.com>,
>Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On 17 Jul 2008 22:35:24 -0400, tj...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>
>>>In article <j4vs7412dmqqqqrgv...@4ax.com>,
>>>Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On 16 Jul 2008 09:53:54 -0400, tj...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>[...]
>>>>
>>>>>>> It took you a year to create THAT lie, Jonesie? No wonder you can't
>>>>>>>make new insults about me. SHEESH!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To be fair, tjab was the first one to make the claim.
>>>>>
>>>>>I was? Cite?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>
>>>Did you forget to include a cite?
>>
>> No.
>> You have confused a lack of desire with a laps in memory.
>
>You have confused a lack of ability with a lack of desire.
>
Not so. But do continue to lie, if it will make your life a bit
easier.
>>>
>>>>>>Like
>>>>>>Jonezie, nothing was offered by way of proof.
>>>>>
>>>>>Pretty funny, coming from you, who has offered no evidence other than your
>>>>>worthless word that it was Jonez.
>>>>
>>>> Yet you commented on part of the evidence by calling it, and I
>>>>quote you, "Bullshit."
>>>
>>>Bullshit is not evidence. Neither is simple assertion, which is all
>>>you have to offer.
>>>
>>
>> You commented on other aspects of the evidence.
>
>Pointing out that what you call evidence is not evidence is not
>"commenting on the evidence."
It is evidence. But feel free to continue lying, if doing so
brings you joy.
>
>> Did you forget how you wanted his E-mail address to be his nym?
>
>A semantic quibble that is irrelevant to your assertion, given that the
>poster in question forged numerous email addresses and nyms alike.
To the best of my recollection, Jonezie always altered the
address. If, as you are now claiming, he failed to alter one or more,
please be kind enough to post the MID(s) and/pr Google link(s) to the
post(s).
It is possible he left his address, but I don't recall it, and
your word isn't anywhere near good enough.
>
>Incidentally, what is the source of your delusion that I wanted his/her
>email address to be his/her nym?
There is no delusion. When I stated his nym was used, you lied
and claimed his E-mail address was his nym.
Now you lie and present that you didn't make the claim.
>
>> You may as well give up. No amount of your dishonesty will ever
>>alter the truth.
>
>No amount of projection will alter the simple fact that you are a
>compulsive liar.
If your claim were true, you would have been able to prove at
least one lie from me.
>
>As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth to
>alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in your posts.
>
Yet you frequently try.
--
"Exterminieren! Exterminieren! "
-- The Daleks 'Doctor Who: Journey's End'
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
tjab
To find truth in your posts? See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
Kent Wills
[...]
>>>
>>>As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth to
>>>alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in your posts.
>>>
>>
>> Yet you frequently try.
>
>To find truth in your posts?
To lie about what I post.
>See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>
Nice try, but your lying about rule number one doesn't alter the
truth.
Kent Wills
[...]
>>>>> You're lying again, Kunt.
>>>>
>>>> Prove it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Let's pretend breathing is outlawed and everyone the world
>>>over ceases inhaling and exhaling.
>>>There will be NO change in CO2 levels since we exhale carbon
>>>monoxide, not carbon dioxide, stupid."
>>> - Kent Wills si-untist from Iowa
>>
>>
>> You admit defeat again.
>
>Your little victory dances become tiresome.
Jonezie's admitting defeat so early in the discussions is also
tiresome. Still, it's better than wasting time on a losing position,
as he used to do.
>
>Here's a hint: you're not even playing the same game. You're shouting
>"Bingo!" at a chess match.
That he nearly always takes the losing side doesn't mean we
aren't playing the same game. It only means he nearly always take the
losing side.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On 19 Jul 2008 11:03:25 -0400, tj...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>>
>>>> As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth to
>>>> alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in your
>>>> posts.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yet you frequently try.
>>
>> To find truth in your posts?
>
> To lie about what I post.
>
>> See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>>
>
> Nice try, but your lying about rule number one doesn't alter the
> truth.
There is no truth in what you post -- See Rule #1.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> I doubt anyone is fooled by anything he presents. Even tjab is
> aware of the truth.
> tjab wrote:
>> To find truth in your posts? See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
Yep.
tjab
Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 19 Jul 2008 11:03:25 -0400, tj...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>>
>>>>As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth to
>>>>alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in your posts.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yet you frequently try.
>>
>>To find truth in your posts?
>
> To lie about what I post.
>
>>See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>>
>
> Nice try, but your lying about rule number one doesn't alter the
>truth.
Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
Kent Wills
Prove it.
>See Rule #1.
>
>
Jonezie is a bigot who lies at every opportunity? I don't see how
this applies in this situation.
--
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
Kent Wills
Again, you're lying about rule number one doesn't alter the truth.
tjab
Kent Wills
Again, you can lie about rule number one, Jonezie is a bigot who
lies at every opportunity, as often as your mind requires. Doing so
will never alter the truth.
You need to come to terms with this and move on with your life.
Reality_CheckŠ
> On 19 Jul 2008 15:26:22 -0400, tj...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
>>In article <d8f4841qd8pmgrrru...@4ax.com>,
>>Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On 19 Jul 2008 14:49:45 -0400, tj...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <ik7484piqd3amaci5...@4ax.com>,
>>>>Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>On 19 Jul 2008 11:03:25 -0400, tj...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>[...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth to
>>>>>>>>alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in your
>>>>>>>>posts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yet you frequently try.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>To find truth in your posts?
>>>>>
>>>>> To lie about what I post.
>>>>>
>>>>>>See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nice try, but your lying about rule number one doesn't alter the
>>>>>truth.
>>>>
>>>>Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>>>>
>>> Again, you're lying about rule number one doesn't alter the truth.
>>
>>Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>>
>>
>
> Again, you can lie about rule number one,
You're lying again Kent.
Reality_CheckŠ
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g584841he3l9lhi9u...@4ax.com...
"You are in the Kill File. Have been for a while.
Note that I can only reply if I read someone else's
reply to you."
-- Kent B Wills vainly trying to curtail his OCD
"At this point Madeleine is equally alive and dead. "
-- Kent ignoramus Wills giving the Iowa version of Kwantum Mahkaniks
" Currently, we, citizens of the U.S., aren't allowed to go to
Venezuela or Cuba. My hope is that Venezuela's restriction will
be lifted after the next election."
- Kent Wills 2007, lying jackass
tjab
Reality_CheckŠ
> that you're a liar and a bigot, so that you would lie is to be
> expected.
See Rule #1 = Kent Wills ALWAYS Lies.
_ Prof. Jonez _
Rule #2: see Rule #1
forevernitefan
>
> - Show quoted text -
You talking about the truth in posts is akin to a hooker calling a
nun a whore. Jonesie, you llie a helluva lot, including your crap
about me.
The point is you have posted many copies and pastes of stories of
abuses including child abuse with the headers claiming the abuser was
a Christian, even when the story itself doe n ot mention the religion
of ithe accused. And OC you posted one story of a " witch" with the
header deliberately intending to upset me withthe implication of
burning " witches"
IOW Jonesie you post to incite and you lie considerably to stir up
the crap. In this case you are ironically parroting Tjab's accusation
to Kent.
(( SIGH)) If you or Tjab want " truth" in posts you both should stick
TO the truth once in awhile. Botho of youhave lied and decieved more
than I care to detail.
forevernitefan
> In article <ik7484piqd3amaci5l8i9v705bp89qo...@4ax.com>,
> Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 19 Jul 2008 11:03:25 -0400, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
> >[...]
>
> >>>>As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth to
> >>>>alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in your posts.
>
> >>> Yet you frequently try.
>
> >>To find truth in your posts?
>
> > To lie about what I post.
>
> >>See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>
> > Nice try, but your lying about rule number one doesn't alter the
> >truth.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hey if that is true then he lied about his criminal charges and
burglary conviction, didn't he? And he lied about his name being Kent
B. Wills and his birthdate.
And gee Tjab if he lied about his name and birthdate, then the so-
called criminal record you and Jonesie have been regurgitating for
months is ALSO A LIE!!!
If Kent " always lies" then he has no wife and kids nor does he have
a boat nor does he go on vacations.
Tjab, if Kent " always lies" then NOTHING you have on him based on
what he's posted can be true, now can it? If Kent Wills is not his
real name, because he " always lies" then the " criminal record" is
also a lie.
forevernitefan
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8d4584hk9m2osu28s...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 19 Jul 2008 15:26:22 -0400, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
> >>In article <d8f4841qd8pmgrrruejm2ch0ch4glg5...@4ax.com>,
> >>Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>On 19 Jul 2008 14:49:45 -0400, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
> >>>>In article <ik7484piqd3amaci5l8i9v705bp89qo...@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>On 19 Jul 2008 11:03:25 -0400, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
> >>>>>[...]
>
> >>>>>>>>As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth to
> >>>>>>>>alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in your
> >>>>>>>>posts.
>
> >>>>>>> Yet you frequently try.
>
> >>>>>>To find truth in your posts?
>
> >>>>> To lie about what I post.
>
> >>>>>>See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>
> >>>>> Nice try, but your lying about rule number one doesn't alter the
> >>>>>truth.
>
> >>>>Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>
> >>> Again, you're lying about rule number one doesn't alter the truth.
>
> >>Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>
> > Again, you can lie about rule number one,
>
> You're lying again Kent.
Gee you didn't call him " kunt" this time, like you usually do?
forevernitefan
> In article <8d4584hk9m2osu28s9v9vccetqu59co...@4ax.com>,
> Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 19 Jul 2008 15:26:22 -0400, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
> >>In article <d8f4841qd8pmgrrruejm2ch0ch4glg5...@4ax.com>,
> >>Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>On 19 Jul 2008 14:49:45 -0400, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
> >>>>In article <ik7484piqd3amaci5l8i9v705bp89qo...@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>On 19 Jul 2008 11:03:25 -0400, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
> >>>>>[...]
>
> >>>>>>>>As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth to
> >>>>>>>>alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in your posts.
>
> >>>>>>> Yet you frequently try.
>
> >>>>>>To find truth in your posts?
>
> >>>>> To lie about what I post.
>
> >>>>>>See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>
> >>>>> Nice try, but your lying about rule number one doesn't alter the
> >>>>>truth.
>
> >>>>Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>
> >>> Again, you're lying about rule number one doesn't alter the truth.
>
> >>Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>
> > Again, you can lie about rule number one, Jonezie is a bigot who
> >lies at every opportunity, as often as your mind requires.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
And you repeat this same post, Tjab. How many times will you repeat
this?
_ Prof. Jonez _
See Rule #1 you lying cunt.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Jul 19, 1:49 pm, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>> In article <ik7484piqd3amaci5l8i9v705bp89qo...@4ax.com>,
>> Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 19 Jul 2008 11:03:25 -0400, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>
>>>>>> As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth
>>>>>> to alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in
>>>>>> your posts.
>>
>>>>> Yet you frequently try.
>>
>>>> To find truth in your posts?
>>
>>> To lie about what I post.
>>
>>>> See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>>
>>> Nice try, but your lying about rule number one doesn't alter the
>>> truth.
>>
>> Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Hey if that is true then he lied about his criminal charges and
> burglary conviction, didn't he?
He has lied about them via his mendacious denials.
> And he lied about his name being Kent
> B. Wills and his birthdate.
Ibid.
>
> And gee Tjab if he lied about his name and birthdate, then the so-
> called criminal record you and Jonesie have been regurgitating for
> months is ALSO A LIE!!!
>
> If Kent " always lies" then he has no wife and kids nor does he have
> a boat nor does he go on vacations.
Which of course means both Kent and you have been lying about
the purported "racial death threats", you lowlife lying cunt.
>
> Tjab, if Kent " always lies" then NOTHING you have on him based on
> what he's posted can be true, now can it? If Kent Wills is not his
> real name, because he " always lies" then the " criminal record" is
> also a lie.
And of course you are also a lie, you lying cunt.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Jul 19, 12:34 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> On 19 Jul 2008 11:03:25 -0400, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>
>>>>>> As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth
>>>>>> to alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in
>>>>>> your posts.
>>
>>>>> Yet you frequently try.
>>
>>>> To find truth in your posts?
>>
>>> To lie about what I post.
>>
>>>> See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>>
>>> Nice try, but your lying about rule number one doesn't alter the
>>> truth.
>>
>> There is no truth in what you post -- See Rule #1.
>
> nun a whore. Jonesie, you llie a helluva lot, including your crap
> about me.
You're lying again you stammering lying cunt.
Reality_CheckŠ
"forevernitefan" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:153009b0-f691-4550...@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
forevernitefan
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jonesie, you have ceased to matter to me at all now. Your imbecilic
responses serve only to show how much of an immature fuck up you
actually are. And you constantly prove I'm right about you.
forevernitefan
Actually YOU wrote them and you damn well know it. I actually posted
a list of links to those death threats, Jonesie. If they didn't exist
as you are claiming, there would be no link TO ANY o fthem, now would
there, dumbass?
No matter how much you lie and cuss at me, you can't escape the
FACTS, ever. And you know damn well my response was in sarcasm, not in
" admitting" Kent supposedly lied. I got both of you in a logical
contradiction in claiming Kent "always" lies.
Bend over and take it like a man, Jonesie.
>
>
>
> > Tjab, if Kent " always lies" then NOTHING you have on him based on
> > what he's posted can be true, now can it? If Kent Wills is not his
> > real name, because he " always lies" then the " criminal record" is
> > also a lie.
>
> And of course you are also a lie, you lying cunt
(( YAWN)) You know, Jonesie,you shouldn't be so hard on yourself. We
know you live on your pathetic lies and that righ now, metaphorically
speaking, you are twisting in the wind. I'm just observing how long
you are going to squeal about it.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
forevernitefan
Hello racist, sexist, homophobic and anti-semitic loser......
Got a life yet? Apparently not.
The truly sad part is that you make Teddie look rational by
comparison. At least he sticks to the discussion at hand. Not to
mention I find it ironic that I can see Teddie Kaldis as a better
person than you are.
_ Prof. Jonez _
Here you go, Moe - http://tinyurl.com/forevernitefan
And I bet your family is real proud of this one too -
http://tinyurl.com/MoeTheLyingCunt
_ Prof. Jonez _
> responses serve only to show how much of an immature fuck up you
> actually are. And you constantly prove I'm right about you.
You're lying again, you lying cunt.
forevernitefan
>
> And I bet your family is real proud of this one too -
Is your family proud of you for what yu do online, Jonesie?
Wait, I'd bet you don't have a family.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
>
> http://tinyurl.com/MoeTheLyingCunt- Hide quoted text -
_ Prof. Jonez _
Open wider this time you shiteating lying cunt.
http://tinyurl.com/forevernitefan
http://tinyurl.com/MoeTheLyingCunt
forevernitefan
>
> - Show quoted text -
Now now, Jonesie we know you have a sexual orientation involving
eating ferces. You don't have to advertise it so blatantly.
I realize you think this is your attempt to try to come on to me, but
you should know I am not interested.
But do keep on trying the tinyurl posts. You seem to have a short
memory and a lack of understanding about certain things online.
forevernitefan
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Now now, Jonesie we know you have a sexual orientation involving
> eating ferces. You don't have to advertise it so blatantly.
>
> I realize you think this is your attempt to try to come on to me, but
> you should know I am not interested.
>
> But do keep on trying the tinyurl posts. You seem to have a short
> memory and a lack of understanding about certain things online.
>
> Moe
> Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
>
> - Show quoted text -
BTW Did yo manage to see the terms of use, Joensie?
Terms of use:
TinyURL was created as a free service to make posting long URLs
easier, and may only be used for actual URLs. Using it for spamming or
illegal purposes is forbidden and any such use will result in the
TinyURL being disabled and you may be reported to all ISPs involved
and to the proper governmental agencies. This service is provided
without warranty of any kind.
Gee dumbass, you seem to be violating that. And since you are
attacking ME, I now have some legal rights concerning you.
Man you are stupid!
Reality_CheckŠ
=======
Then bring it on you gutless lying cunt.
Deadrat
news:6b1d4d49-091e-4bd4...@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
No matter Jonez' violations of TinyURL's services, you have no standing
to assert TinyURL's rights. Whatever damage you claim that Jonez' has
done to you, your "rights" are independent of TinyURL.
>
> Man you are stupid!
I can't wait for the full explanation.
> Moe
<snip/>
Reality_CheckŠ
"Deadrat" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:0%6ik.5722$np7....@flpi149.ffdc.sbc.com...
>>>
She's a lying cunt as usual.
> your "rights" are independent of TinyURL.
>>
>> Man you are stupid!
>
> I can't wait for the full explanation.
Dumb cunts are as dumb cunts do.
forevernitefan
> "forevernitefan" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Now now, Jonesie we know you have a sexual orientation involving
> > eating ferces. You don't have to advertise it so blatantly.
>
> > I realize you think this is your attempt to try to come on to me, but
> > you should know I am not interested.
>
> > But do keep on trying the tinyurl posts. You seem to have a short
> > memory and a lack of understanding about certain things online.
>
> > Moe
> > Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
> > text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> BTW Did yo manage to see the terms of use, Joensie?
>
> Terms of use:
> TinyURL was created as a free service to make posting long URLs
> easier, and may only be used for actual URLs. Using it for spamming or
> illegal purposes is forbidden and any such use will result in the
> TinyURL being disabled and you may be reported to all ISPs involved
> and to the proper governmental agencies. This service is provided
> without warranty of any kind.
>
> Gee dumbass, you seem to be violating that. And since you are
> attacking ME, I now have some legal rights concerning you.
>
> =======
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jonesie, I am hardly gutless, as you will find out soon enough.
However I suspect you are the gutless one here. A face-to-face
meeting might be in order.....
Deadrat
news:9c087dc5-b461-4655...@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
> On Jul 24, 3:31 pm, "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote:
>> "forevernitefan" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:6b1d4d49-091e-4bd4...@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com
>> ... On Jul 24, 9:10 am, forevernitefan <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
<snip/>
>>
>> Then bring it on you gutless lying cunt.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Jonesie, I am hardly gutless, as you will find out soon enough.
>
> However I suspect you are the gutless one here. A face-to-face
> meeting might be in order.....
Yee ha! The charmless versus the clueless.
Maybe this one will be on Pay-per-View.
Hey, Ma! Put on the popcorn!
> Moe
<snip/>
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> > Nice try, but your lying about rule number one doesn't alter the
>> >truth.
>>
>> Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Hey if that is true then he lied about his criminal charges and
>burglary conviction, didn't he? And he lied about his name being Kent
>B. Wills and his birthdate.
I've asked numerous times for people to prove my name in real
life is Kent Wills. As of my writing this, no one has been able.
>
> And gee Tjab if he lied about his name and birthdate, then the so-
>called criminal record you and Jonesie have been regurgitating for
>months is ALSO A LIE!!!
Uh oh!
You just ruined one of tjab's deepest held beliefs.
>
> If Kent " always lies" then he has no wife and kids nor does he have
>a boat nor does he go on vacations.
We got back from a nice vacation late last night.
Pictures will be available on MySpace and photobucket. A few
videos as well.
>
> Tjab, if Kent " always lies" then NOTHING you have on him based on
>what he's posted can be true, now can it? If Kent Wills is not his
>real name, because he " always lies" then the " criminal record" is
>also a lie.
Pooooooor tjab. Whatever will he do now?
--
"I'm a ten gov a day guy. It's all I know, and it's all
you need to know, gov!"
- Shouting George
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> > If Kent " always lies" then he has no wife and kids nor does he have
>> > a boat nor does he go on vacations.
>>
>> Which of course means both Kent and you have been lying about
>> the purported "racial death threats", (( Snipped))
>
> Actually YOU wrote them and you damn well know it. I actually posted
>a list of links to those death threats, Jonesie. If they didn't exist
>as you are claiming, there would be no link TO ANY o fthem, now would
>there, dumbass?
Another of his many lies exposed.
You're getting very good at this.
>
> No matter how much you lie and cuss at me, you can't escape the
>FACTS, ever. And you know damn well my response was in sarcasm, not in
>" admitting" Kent supposedly lied. I got both of you in a logical
>contradiction in claiming Kent "always" lies.
Again, Jonezie is a bigot who will lie at every opportunity.
It's the real Rule Number One.
>
> Bend over and take it like a man, Jonesie.
>
He's too much of a coward.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Tjab, if Kent " always lies" then NOTHING you have on him based on
>> > what he's posted can be true, now can it? If Kent Wills is not his
>> > real name, because he " always lies" then the " criminal record" is
>> > also a lie.
>>
>> And of course you are also a lie, you lying cunt
>
>
> (( YAWN)) You know, Jonesie,you shouldn't be so hard on yourself. We
>know you live on your pathetic lies and that righ now, metaphorically
>speaking, you are twisting in the wind. I'm just observing how long
>you are going to squeal about it.
I'm wondering how you are a lie. It seems clear to most, maybe
all, that you're a real person.
--
Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>
Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?
Jonezie:
S for Savage.
Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F...@mid.individual.net>
Kent Wills
<the...@jonez.net> wrote:
[...]
>>> Which of course means both Kent and you have been lying about
>>> the purported "racial death threats", (( Snipped))
>>
>> Actually YOU wrote them and you damn well know it. I actually posted
>> a list of links to those death threats, Jonesie. If they didn't exist
>> as you are claiming, there would be no link TO ANY o fthem, now would
>> there, dumbass?
>>
>> No matter how much you lie and cuss at me, you can't escape the
>> FACTS, ever. And you know damn well my response was in sarcasm, not in
>> " admitting" Kent supposedly lied. I got both of you in a logical
>> contradiction in claiming Kent "always" lies.
>>
>> Bend over and give it like a man, Jonesie.
>
>Here you go, Moe - http://tinyurl.com/forevernitefan
You have a scat fetish. Old news.
>
>And I bet your family is real proud of this one too -
>
>http://tinyurl.com/MoeTheLyingCunt
>
Again, your scat fetish is well known. You don't NEED to keep
offering more documentation of it.
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> Open wider this time you shiteating lying cunt.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/forevernitefan
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/MoeTheLyingCunt- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Now now, Jonesie we know you have a sexual orientation involving
>eating ferces. You don't have to advertise it so blatantly.
>
> I realize you think this is your attempt to try to come on to me, but
>you should know I am not interested.
You're too old for him.
I'm sure you recall that when I stated it was unlikely that he's
a pedophile, he stated I was wrong. In fact, he claimed the Iowa
Supreme Court stated I was wrong.
Either he's sexual attracted to children, or he wants people to
think he is.
>
> But do keep on trying the tinyurl posts. You seem to have a short
>memory and a lack of understanding about certain things online.
His lapses in memory are more a convenient way to continue lying
than anything else.
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...\
> BTW Did yo manage to see the terms of use, Joensie?
>
>Terms of use:
>TinyURL was created as a free service to make posting long URLs
>easier, and may only be used for actual URLs. Using it for spamming or
>illegal purposes is forbidden and any such use will result in the
>TinyURL being disabled and you may be reported to all ISPs involved
>and to the proper governmental agencies. This service is provided
>without warranty of any kind.
>
>
> Gee dumbass, you seem to be violating that. And since you are
>attacking ME, I now have some legal rights concerning you.
I would expect that your legal rights in regards to tinyurl are
limited to having tinyurl remove the forward.
>
> Man you are stupid!
I doubt anyone would dispute that. However, given that Jonezie is
seen my most, if not all, as the lying bigot he is, I doubt you'll be
able to claim any actual damages against him with an expectation to
win anything.
--
"The Doctor is coming..."
-- Dalek Kan 'Doctor Who: The Stolen Earth'
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>> If Kent " always lies" then he has no wife and kids nor does he have
>>a boat nor does he go on vacations.
>
> We got back from a nice vacation late last night.
> Pictures will be available on MySpace and photobucket. A few
>videos as well.
For anyone interested in seeing some of the photos:
http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/
At this time I only have some of the digital pictures from Belize
available. Cozumel and Key West will be available in time, along with
scans of the standard camera pictures.
--
"Exterminieren! Exterminieren! "
-- The Daleks 'Doctor Who: Journey's End'
tjab
forevernitefan <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Jul 19, 1:49=A0pm, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>> In article <ik7484piqd3amaci5l8i9v705bp89qo...@4ax.com>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 19 Jul 2008 11:03:25 -0400, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>
>> >[...]
>>
>> >>>>As far as altering the truth, if I were *looking* for some truth to
>.
>>
>> >>> =A0 =A0Yet you frequently try.
>>
>> >>To find truth in your posts?
>>
>>
>> >>See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>>
>> >truth.
>>
>> Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>burglary conviction, didn't he? And he lied about his name being Kent
>B. Wills and his birthdate.
>
>called criminal record you and Jonesie have been regurgitating for
>months is ALSO A LIE!!!
>
>a boat nor does he go on vacations.
>
>what he's posted can be true, now can it? If Kent Wills is not his
>real name, because he " always lies" then the " criminal record" is
>also a lie.
Anything Kent Wills says that is factual is cover and/or camoflage for
and/or in service of a lie, and is hence merely the necessary factual
component of a lie.
tjab
forevernitefan <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Jul 19, 8:28=A0pm, "Reality_Check=A9" <Real...@Check.it> wrote:
>> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:8d4584hk9m2osu28s...@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 19 Jul 2008 15:26:22 -0400, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>
>> >>In article <d8f4841qd8pmgrrruejm2ch0ch4glg5...@4ax.com>,
>>
>> >>>>In article <ik7484piqd3amaci5l8i9v705bp89qo...@4ax.com>,
>> >>>>Kent Wills =A0<compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>On 19 Jul 2008 11:03:25 -0400, t...@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>[...]
>>
>to
>> >>>>>>>>alter (I'm not), I certainly wouldn't be looking for it in your
>>
>> >>>>>>> =A0 =A0Yet you frequently try.
>>
>> >>>>>>To find truth in your posts?
>>
>> >>>>> =A0 =A0To lie about what I post.
>>
>> >>>>>>See rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>>
> the
>> >>>>>truth.
>>
>> >>>>Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>>
>uth.
>>
>> >>Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>>
>>
>> You're lying again Kent.
>
> Gee you didn't call him " kunt" this time, like you usually do?
Disappointed?
forevernitefan
> In article <c13fbdd5-b292-438f-9a56-999b8ec6f...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
Heh Reminds me of the original Star Trek episode involving the
androids and what Kirk and his crew did to muck them all up.....
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> > Tjab, if Kent " always lies" then NOTHING you have on him based on
>> >what he's posted can be true, now can it? If Kent Wills is not his
>> >real name, because he " always lies" then the " criminal record" is
>> >also a lie.
>>
>> Anything Kent Wills says that is factual is cover and/or camoflage for
>> and/or in service of a lie, and is hence merely the necessary factual
>> component of a lie.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Heh Reminds me of the original Star Trek episode involving the
>androids and what Kirk and his crew did to muck them all up.....
Was that the one with Harry Mudd?
--
"Are you my mummy?"
-- The Doctor
forevernitefan
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:19:11 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
>
last I remember there were two OSTs with Harry Mudd, not countingthe
animated version. Yes that was one of the eps.