On Jan 20, 1:58 am, Larry <
x...@y.com> wrote:
> Still awaiting your response to any of this, Dane....
>
> In article <
x-4DE98B.02153817012...@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
>
>
>
> Larry <
x...@y.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <
fabb82d7-5594-4484-94ef-cfbf2e719...@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> > For whom, exactly, is this supposedly background material?
> > I am not aware of this being a criminal act in New York State. In fact,
> > the link itself says it is legal.
> > This is simply a list of un-cited statistics, which is not evidence.
> > Further, nothing on this page relates to "autogenocide" as it was
> > defined in the other links you provided.
> > The only reference to NYC in that link is this passage:
>
> > "It could be New York City, where a woman begins screaming at the
> > landlord who evicts her and her several children. The Bureau of Child
> > Welfare takes her children, which distresses her all the more. She
> > herself is transported to a New York mental hospital crying angrilyonly
> > to be diagnosed and committed by the all-knowing psychiatrists as a
> > "paranoid schizophrenic.""
>
> > This appears to be a hypothetical, but even if it is true, it does not
> > appear to be a crime.
>
> > > If you won't prosecute these murderers, Larry, well, then, I see no
> > > reason any New York gangbanger shouldn't have equal protection of the
> > > laws to murder women and children as they see fit. Wouldn't they be a
> > > "suspect class" simply because they don't have the wealth to own all
> > > the media and therefore keep the public from knowing about their
> > > murders, and therefore, would not be guilty of alarming the public in
> > > consequence of those murders?
>
> > I don't see any evidence of a crime here, much less who the perpetrators
> > are.
>
> > I may be wrong, though. If you think I am, please provide me with the
> > following:
>
> > 1) The name(s) of the people you believe are committing the crimes; and
>
> > 2) The crimes they are committing (cite to the NY Penal Law or other NY
> > criminal statute, please, since that is the extent of my authority); and
>
> > 3) The time, date, and place the crimes occurred (which is necessary to
> > plead as to avoid double-jeopardy pitfalls, although approximations or
> > ranges are acceptable); and
>
> > 4) How any county in NYC has jurisdiction over these defendants and
> > these criminal acts.
>
> > > And, heck, they, as long as they keep their murders limited to women
> > > and children, would be also furthering the goals of your banker
> > > masters, wouldn't they?
>
> > Nobody's my master. Though at times I wonder who brainwashed you.
>
> > > Quite the novel legal theory, is it not?
>
> > Not at all. There has to be a theory for it to be a novel theory.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
No, Larry, I just wanted to see if you would attempt to rebut these
things occuring in America today. I found out:
You didn't.