|
 |
Newsgroups: misc.kids.pregnancy, misc.health.alternative, sci.med
From: Todd Gastaldo <tgasta...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:36:50 GMT
Local: Sat, Sep 17 2005 3:36 pm
Subject: Dents in babies' skulls (and SJ Doc)
DENTS IN BABIES' SKULLS (AND SJ DOC)
SJ Doc, see the very end of this post... Please help stop "the OB guys" (your phrase) from closing birth canals the PREGNANT WOMEN: It is easy to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up See RNs: 'Stitches, episiotomy, and postpartum complications' LADIES: By allowing your birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30%, you SJ Doc wrote: SJ Doc, > On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:42:57 GMT, Todd Gastaldo wrote > yet again about "closing birth canals the 'extra' up to 30%" > and some further stuff about *Williams Obstetrics* (McGraw- > Hill; which edition, I wonder?). > The first question - Jeez, I know I'm gonna catch it for this, When I use what you call the "repeated goddamn expression" "closing birth Just in case you missed them... Here are THE FOUR OB LIES... OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get > On those few occasions when I am sorry you got amniotic fluid all over your shoes; but sounds like - as > I had to sit there and get amniotic fluid all over my shoes in > the course of a normal spontaneous (or pitocin induced) > vaginal delivery, is customary for MDs - you had the woman semisitting or dorsal - closing her birth canal the "extra" up to 30%. Uteri can usually force babies through pelvic outlets closed the "extra" up > the fetal presenting part slid down the curve The fetal presenting part is usually the cranium - and when it's not the > of Carus like a goddam battering ram, shoving past the non- > generative contents of the pelvis with a "get-the-hell-outta-my- > way" impact... presenting part - there is the breech danger of "trapped after-coming head"... The fetal cranium is quite compressible/"mouldable" - and with the brain I am also concerned about the unexplained lesser motor and and perceptual There are also unexplained baby paralyses and unexplained baby deaths - Also noteworthy: In many births the fetal presenting part does NOT "slid[e] In many births, there is failure to progress "due to cephalopelvic Further regarding failure to progress - it is possible that there is > that Carol Burnett once characterized as being Pretty funny. > "...like taking your lower lip and forcing it over your head." > If that canal was anything *but* open, how the hell did I If the woman was on her back or semisitting, she was on her sacrum - you had > manage to get my Size-8˝-gloved hand into the uterus... her closing her birth canal up to 30%. The grisly birth-canal-closing biomechanics are simple. See The Four OB Lies above. You likely did not make a fist and try to shove it in. More likely, you You mentioned the Curve of Carus. There is also the Waste Space of Morris - Williams Obstetrics used to state that sometimes the pubic arch is so narrow "In obstructed labor caused by a narrowing of the...pelvic The pubic arch forcing the fetal head down the ischial rami is likely what "[M]oving backward of the tip of the sacrum...enlarges the The following was added to Williams Obstetrics at my "It should be noted...that the increase in the diameter of the BTW, here is the reference for my 30% figure... "[T]he outlet increases with moulding by approximately 20-30 per cent." NOTE: JGB Russell demonstrated a MINOR (transverse) sacroiliac motion then Also noteworthy: Russell promoted placing women semisitting/closing birth > on I am sorry your scrotum tightened. If some of the babies whose births you > certain rare and scrotum-tightening occasions to seek out > and gently remove retained placental cotyledons that were > responsible for excessive third stage bleeding? have attended were boys, it is possible that their scrotums tightened when you forced them through birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%. I am sure you never pulled on the umbilical cord to speed up third stage - > Are you referring to all the c-sections that the OB guys perform "The OB guys" are "promiscuously" closing birth canals up to 30% and KEEPING > so promiscuously, birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck. It's massive criminal negligence. See the Four OB Lies above. > or are you talking about episiotomy repair? "The OB guys" are slicing vaginas en masse (routine episiotomy) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing everything possible to open birth canals - even as they close birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. Shiono et al. at NIH demonstrated in 1991 that episiotomized women suffer 50 Yet "the OB guys" are STILL (in 2005) promoting the fraud that their See RNs: 'Stitches, episiotomy, and postpartum complications' > And what the hell is with this perpetual "extra" in quotation Yes, in medical school they are still teaching lies. See the Four OB Lies > marks? If there's any sense in this expression, it's sailing *way* > the hellangone past anything I ever read or heard in school or in > practice over the course of a fun-filled and occasionally terrifying > life in the ranks of Them Wot Got Betadyne Stains on Their > Sweatsocks. above. I put the word "extra" in quotes because obstetricians fraudulently behave > I know all about how the politically connected medicos You are a perhaps-not-so-innocent beneficiary of the political connections of organized medicine. > have As I indicated, in the California Supreme Court's 1974 Bowland decision, > done every damned thing they can to restrict patient access > to health care providers who charge lower fees for their services > than licensed physicians do, including nurse practitioners, physi- > cian assistants, and nurse midwives. nurse-midwives (and abortion) became a political mechanism to stomp homebirth midwives - both nurse and non-nurse. > It's the same with lawyers Again, you are a beneficiary. > and their hatred for paralegals providing "boilerplate" legal > services. Every form of professional licensure throughout the > history of civilization has been designed to allow established > practitioners to get a chokehold on market entry and either > create or preserve an oligopoly. That's what licensing is *for*, > government maundering about "quality of care" be damned. > No less an authority than Nobel laureate Milton Friedman stated: Yep. > "There is no occupation so remote that an attempt has not been > Not that I agree much with the socialist sucking-up of George Keeping in mind your "scientific" medical religion's penchant for senseless > Bernard Shaw, but - like the proverbial stopped clock being > right at least twice a day - he could occasionally catch the facts > of a matter and fix them upon the printed page. In his preface > to *The Doctor's Dilemma*, he wrote: "The effect...is to make > the medical profession a conspiracy to hide its own shortcomings. > No doubt the same may be said of all professions. They are all > conspiracies against the laity." infant penis and adult vagina slicing... I like this quote from Shaw: "That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply I also like this one: "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the > Politics aside, LOL! It's ALL politics! >what is it that's getting your freak on about It's just that I don't think babies should be asphyxiated and made to >> obstetricians...OBVIOUSLY ILLEGALLY severing >> umbilical cords by clamping/cutting immediately, > f'chrissake? breathe through their lungs before they are ready - or robbed of up to 50% of their blood volume. See Cord clamping baby asphyxiation: Pediatrician not cheering so loud I will always have "my freak on" as long as your religion is harming babies. My religion - chiropractic - is just as religious BTW - but far less In this regard to this latter point, it is sordidly FUNNY to see MDs ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal closed the "extra" > And (yet again) what d'you mean by See the Four OB Lies above. >> ...closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30% > so repeatedly that you seem to have a keyboard macro > configured to do the job for you? > Is there some kind of I don't know about federal law. State law though is pretty clear. The > federal statute (reflected in some Title of the U.S. Code > of Federal Regulations) by which the criminality of closing > an umbilical clamp at a particular moment has been estab- > lished? common law doctrine of informed consent indicates that even a good medical procedure performed without informed consent is a battery. The battery is pretty obvious. Here again (in case you missed it) is Dr. Morley's temporary baby "[T]he umbilical cord [is] immediately closed between finger and thumb...The I doubt very much that obstetricians trying this grisly baby asphyxiation PREGNANT WOMEN: To make sure your baby gets the "extra" up to 50% of blood > As for.... I am pretty sure it is political medicine's fault. >> Chiropractors used to be trained to deliver babies - above >> and beyond the didactic obstetrics course which most chiro >> students still take. >> Chiropractors trained and licensed in Oregon are trained and > I should sure as hell think so. Ever think that maybe the As soon as people start realizing how badly/criminally medicine has mucked We will then have the best of both worlds available to women - true choice. (If organized medicine had not anti-scientifically/anti-competitively hogged > I knew a You may be referring to the obstetricians' fraudulent "malpractice liability > GP down in Cumberland County (probably retired by now) > who used to do so many deliveries that he met with the > obstetrics section of the Department of Surgery instead > of with the rest of us in the Department of Medicine. The > joke was that the only way for a patient to get into his practice > was to be born in it. I don't want to think what the annual > professional liability insurance premiums must be like for any > primary care "provider" who might be insane enough to seek > and secure obstetrical privileges at any hospital in any state > in the present union. The lawyers would be on the poor > bastard like barracudas on a boatload of refugees. insurance crisis" hoax. There is a good book about it, written by a lawyer/MD, Wachsman... The obstetric hoax was coupled in California with the largest obstetric After the midwifery licensing law was passed - surprise, surprise - there >> I recently talked to an old EMT who used to pray for I don't understand the phrase, "Jolly Volly Syndrome." >> maternity transports. > Ah, yes. That's symptomatic of something the EMT-P guys > We've got a bit of that in Understandable that they would document that. > the volunteer ambulance corps hitherabouts. "Good Sam- > aritan" laws provide something of a shield, but from what I've > been told the local corps are *very* particular about docu- > menting in each case that they have done bloody *everything* > necessary to get Mom to the nearest Emergency Department > rather than break out the L&D kit in the back of the truck. > And you say that... Hopefully you now know "just what the hell it means, too." >> He was astonished to learn that he had been closing birth >> canals the "extra" up to 30%. > ...eh? Well, jeez, I'll betcha he was astounded to learn that > anybody could keep spouting that phrase without specifying > And you're not familiar with Mencken's "Chiropractic" essay? You falsely assume that the Mencken quote was new to me. > The damned thing has been continuously in print (in Mencken's > first *Chrestomathy*) since before the man died in 1956. Just > how the hell deep was the hole in which you were raised that > you could not know about Mencken, or never have read that > essay before? You're a *chiropractor* and this little bit of prose > is new to you? Yeesh! It was not. Also, you snipped the part about your religion - medical "science" - denying Here is what I wrote again... Pretty funny "Chiropractic" quote from HL Mencken... > ---------------- LOL! "...badly wanted in heaven" (!) > If a man, being ill of a pus appendix, resorts to a shaved and > fumigated longshoreman to have it disposed of, and submits > willingly to a treatment involving balancing him on McBurney's > spot and playing on his vertebra as on a concertina, then I am > willing, for one, to believe that he is badly wanted in Heaven. Thank goodness for surgery and surgical skill when necessary (the Founder of But I wonder how many "shaved and fumigated" MDs unnecessarily relieved CURRENT "shaved and fumigated" MD craziness includes routinely asphyxiating DJ Doc's Mencken quote cont'd: > And if that same man, having achieved lawfully a lovely babe, Hmmmm... > hires a blacksmith to cure its diphtheria by pulling its neck, > then I do not resist the divine will that there shall be one > less radio fan later on. > -- H.L. Mencken, "Chiropractic" (1924) 1924... Massive numbers of lawfully and unlawfully "achieved" babes are being denied Science has discovered that breastfeeding women manufacture immunizations American MDs are mostly silent about this discovery - STILL denying massive What woman - explicitly informed that she can IMMUNIZE her baby daily and American MDs are ignoring a simple way to make both the breastfeeding Thanks for reading everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo I ALMOST FORGOT... DENTS IN BABIES' SKULLS... It will make a good subject line... For every dent that does NOT pop back out - there are probably many that do According to John Ogden, MD, "The developing skull, especially in an infant, may be deformed Note well Dr. Ogden's words "temporary" and "restoration"... "[Elasticity of the skull]...allows significant TEMPORARY indentation of the Dr. Ogden offers good news... "Despite considerable depression of the bone, there may be little brain And he offers bad news... "[D]espite the seeming absence of specific osseous injury, severe injury to Maybe obstetricians are causing some depression skull fractures with Olivier Dupuis, MD et al. wrote in 2005: "...A depressed skull fracture is an inward buckling of the calvarial bones ^^^Dupuis O, Silveira R, Dupont C, Mottolese C, Kahn P, Dittmar A, Rudigoz DENTS IN BABIES' SKULLS CAN BE SERIOUS.... MD-obstetricians should not be closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%. MD-obstetricans should not be KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to And they should not be lying to cover-up the massive crime. See The Four OB Thanks for reading everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo I say again to SJ Doc... Please help stop "the OB guys" (your phrase) from closing birth canals the You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||