Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Real Estate Funds Lose $13 Billion

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Lisa Lisa

unread,
Aug 17, 2007, 3:29:39 PM8/17/07
to

Fidelity, Franklin Hit as Real Estate Funds Lose $13 Billion

By Sree Vidya Bhaktavatsalam


A Fidelity Investments office in Boston Aug. 16 (Bloomberg) --
Fidelity Investments, Franklin Resources Inc. and Kensington
Investment Group Inc. are the biggest losers in a decline by U.S. real
estate funds that wiped out $13 billion in the past three months.

Property funds, the best performers in 2006, slumped 16 percent since
May 14, the most of any category tracked by research firm Morningstar
Inc. in Chicago. The $5.9 billion Fidelity Real Estate Investment
Portfolio, the largest among the group, fell 19.7 percent. The $718
million Franklin Real Estate Securities Fund and the $500 million
Kensington Strategic Realty Fund each dropped 20.3 percent, the most
among actively managed property funds with more than $100 million in
assets.

House prices will suffer their first annual decline since the 1930s as
rising mortgage rates hurt demand, according to the National
Association of Realtors in Chicago. Investors pulled $4.5 billion from
real estate funds in the past three months after a drop in commercial
property shares slashed returns.

``Even though the subprime crisis is mainly hitting residential real
estate, commercial is getting pretty hard hit on lower expectations
for U.S. growth,'' said Brad Durham, managing director of Emerging
Portfolio Fund Research.

Fund redemptions, combined with stock-market declines, reduced assets
to $66 billion as of Aug. 8 from a peak of $82 billion three months
earlier, according to Emerging Portfolio Fund Research, a fund market-
analysis firm in Boston.

Investors placed $3 billion into property funds so far this year,
following returns of 31 percent in 2006, twice that of the Standard &
Poor's 500 Index.

Housing's Pall

The U.S. housing slump is eroding the value of most real estate funds
and threatens to slow the economy, which grew 3.4 percent in the
second quarter after expanding 0.6 percent in the previous three
months. Consumers, whose spending accounts for the biggest part of the
economy, are taking less equity out of their homes to buy furnishings,
cars and other goods.

Home Depot Inc., the world's largest home-improvement retailer, on
Aug. 14 said profit fell 15 percent and revenue dropped for the first
time in four years on less demand for appliances and remodeling.

Jeremy Grantham, who helps oversee $150 billion as chairman of money
manager Grantham, Mayo & Van Otterloo in Boston, said declines in real
estate investment trusts are a result of the rout in the mortgage
market. Record defaults of subprime loans, given to people with little
or no credit history, have deepened the housing slump and decreased
demand for REITs, set up for individual investors to own commercial
property such as offices, malls and hotels.

``With REITs, the contagion is directly from the housing market,'' he
said. ``Recently, REITs have been acting atrociously.''

REIT shares have fallen 19 percent this year, and homebuilder stocks
have tumbled 43 percent.

Heebner Holds Gain

The best-performing real estate fund is the $1.7 billion CGM Realty
Fund, managed by Kenneth Heebner in Boston. The fund declined 6.6
percent during the past three months, reducing this year's gain to 4.8
percent. No property fund tracked by Morningstar posted a gain in the
past three months.

Heebner is helped by a flexible strategy that allows him to invest in
casino companies, commodities and non-U.S. holdings. BHP Billiton
Ltd., a mineral exploration company, is his second- largest position.
The Melbourne-based company's shares have risen 31 percent this year.
The fund's top pick is New York- based office landlord SL Green Realty
Corp., which has declined 22 percent on the New York Stock Exchange.

Fidelity's real estate fund, managed by Steven Buller in Boston, has
fallen 17 percent this year, trailing 90 percent of rival funds with a
similar strategy. The fund's biggest holding is White Plains, New York-
based Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc., whose shares have
fallen 14 percent this year as consolidation in the hotel industry has
slowed.

Blackstone Group LP, the New York-based buyout firm, in July said it
would buy Hilton Hotels Corp., Starwood's larger rival, for $20
billion.

Avoiding Homebuilders

Simon Property Group Inc., the largest U.S. shopping mall owner, is
the fund's No. 2 investment. Its shares have declined 15 percent this
year. The fund hasn't invested in any homebuilders. Buller wasn't
available for an interview, Fidelity spokeswoman Sophie Launay said.

``The fund's relative performance has been primarily affected by an
underexposure to companies that have been the target of consolidation,
M&A or privatization activities,'' Launay said. ``The fund has had
solid long-term performance.''

Over the past five years, the Fidelity fund has climbed 19 percent,
compared with 11 percent for the S&P 500.

Franklin's real estate fund, managed by Alex Peters and Sam Kerner in
San Mateo, California, fell 22 percent this year, more than all other
actively managed real estate funds tracked by Morningstar. The fund's
holdings include homebuilders D.R. Horton Inc. in Fort Worth, Texas,
and Miami-based Lennar Corp. D.R. Horton's stock has fallen 41 percent
this year, and Lennar's shares have dropped 43 percent.

Peters was not available to comment, Franklin's spokesman Matthew
Walsh said.

Subprime Holdings

Kensington Strategic Realty Fund has declined 17 percent this year, in
part because of companies that provide commercial mortgages such as
iStar Financial Inc. Shares of New York-based iStar have fallen 34
percent this year as investors became concerned that the subprime
crisis would spread to corporate borrowers. About 8.5 percent of the
fund is in companies with ties to commercial mortgages, said Paul
Gray, co-chief investment officer of Kensington.

``There is a general perception that all things real estate are bad,''
Gray said from his office in Orinda, California. ``It is overdone.
It's a great entry point for longer-term investors.''

To contact the reporter on this story: Sree Vidya Bhaktavatsalam in
Boston at sbhakt...@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: August 16, 2007 00:15 EDT
Advertisement: You've worked, you've saved, now PROTECT your nest egg.

FrediFizzx

unread,
Aug 17, 2007, 4:01:15 PM8/17/07
to
Blah, blah, blah. How much did they gain before the loss? I bet it was
more than $13 billion.

Fred

"Lisa Lisa" <mand...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:1187378979.2...@a39g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

GoForward

unread,
Aug 17, 2007, 4:27:31 PM8/17/07
to
On Aug 17, 4:01 pm, "FrediFizzx" <fredifi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Blah, blah, blah. How much did they gain before the loss? I bet it was
> more than $13 billion.

I bet that if you read the above carefully enough, and did a little
bit of arithmetic, you'd know the answer to that.

John Galt

unread,
Aug 17, 2007, 4:46:45 PM8/17/07
to

"FrediFizzx" <fredi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5imd36F...@mid.individual.net...

> Blah, blah, blah. How much did they gain before the loss? I bet it was
> more than $13 billion.
>
> Fred

A lot more. They've been hot for years. 35% last year, 12% in 2005, 31% in
2004, 36% in 2003.

As usual, as a component in an asset-allocated portfolio, they have
contributed strongly, and will contribute again after this year's
correction.

JG

0 new messages