I have about 5,000 dollars that I do not need at the moment and I was
looking to invest in a few stocks. I was looking at putting my money
in some companies that pay a dividend. Would companies like bank of
america, exxon, Coca-Cola, etc.. be good investments.
> Would companies like bank of
> america, exxon, Coca-Cola, etc.. be good investments.
They're good companies.......whether or not you eventually make a profit
when you sell them, nobody knows........
For 5000 dollars you can be on the board of directors of GCOG
704set
"joe" <joe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1185827584.7...@l70g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Buy one and only one share of Exxon-Mobil, Coca Cola and Bank of America
from a discount broker who will ship certificates for free. The only
discount broker who does that is Muriel Siebert & Co. www.siebertnet.com
After you pay for the stocks, drop an email to Siebert's customer service
saying you want your stock certificates shipped to you.
It will take about a month, but along with the certificates will be a
welcome letter from the corporations asking you to join their DRIP (dividend
reinvestment plan). Then you are on your way to financial success.
The secret to investing with DRIPs is that you dollar cost average which
many studies have shown to be an excellent investment strategy.
Not only is it a good strategy, it will save you money in commissions
because the corporations pay the fees for maintaining their DRIPs. To them,
it's good business because small investors become good consumers of their
products.
Every quarter you invest the same amount of money into your DRIP accounts.
Now the secret to getting the most out of your investments is to mail your
quarterly investments 45 days before dividends are paid. In this way you
will get 3 months worth of dividends when you new money is invested for only
one month. Yahoo Finance will show you when dividend payments are
scheduled.
If it sounds confusing, drop us another post to this newsgroup and I'll try
my best to help.
--
Lubow
"joe" <joe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1185827584.7...@l70g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
" YOU ARE EITHER WITH US, OR AGAINST US "
"lubow" <lu...@lubow-industries.com> wrote in message
news:Q9uri.6751$Q85.5971@trndny02...
Thanks, Dave and Mr. Comics. For a long time, the employees on the
pension committee called me, "The King of DRIPs." At one time we had
over 30 DRIP accounts. We're now down to five (SRE, REI-UN.TO, WTR,
XOM and COP). There are two reasons:
(1) Many free plans converted to paid plans.
(2) Interactive Brokers.
It's still a good strategy for people starting out. And don't forget
there are still a few like Rio-Can REI-UN.TO that give you 2% - 5%
more stock if you take your dividends in stock rather than cash.
There's an antithesis to this strategy too:
If your stock changes from a free DRIP (no charge to make voluntary
investments) to a fee based DRIP (like, say, $5 per investment) it
means things are going bad for your stock and you should sell. This
is a formula that worked for us with Bristol Myers, Harley Davidson
and Wrigley.
Bot HOG and WWY changed managements and recovered after the skid that
followed their respective conversions from free to paid DRIPs. BMY
has always been on the verge of recovery but never got there, IMO.
-- Lubow
However, if $5000 is all he has, and is likely to have
for some time, Vanguard's s&p500 fund will also get him
automatic dividend reinvestment, and a lot more diversity.
He can also set up monthly investment if he expects to
have small amounts extra to invest.
hi, thanks for the advice. I will get started with DRIPs. What is the
min. i need to put down? i have 25250 sitting in an emigrant direct
account earning 5% interest. This will never happen, but lets suppose
i had 25250 in a bunch of drip accounts. Would I earn more money in
the long run
As for the S&P fund, it's okay, but it's something I would not do when I
have other options. DRIP accounts are still the most efficient form of
investing because the companies pay the fees, not the small investor.
--
Lubow
"Alan Bowler" <atbo...@thinkage.ca> wrote in message
news:Q5Jri.20218$13....@nnrp.ca.mci.com!nnrp1.uunet.ca...
Actually we have six DRIP accounts. The sixth (how can I forget?) is Union
Pacific UNP. UNP is up 160.13% over the last four years which averages out
to 26.98% compounded annually.
Will you make money with DRIPs?
========================
I will go out on a limb and say that a diversified portfolio of three or
four DRIPs will do well for you. Mr. Comics has done very well with DRIPs.
Perhaps he will add his two cents to this discussion.
Statistically, our worst DRIP is Aqua America which has returned 1.68% over
two years. Union Pacific has been the best.
How much do you need to invest to start?
===========================
Joe, all you need is one share. For Exxon-Mobil and Conoco Phillips, you do
not even need the one share. You can start directly with their DRIP
custodian.
This is the DRIP info I got from their websites.
Exxon Mobil 1-800-252-1800 (within the U.S. and Canada)
Conoco-Phillips Within the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico: 1-800-814-0299
From memory, I think with Exxon and Conoco you need a minimum of $250 to
start without a broker.
With Sempre (SRE) you will need to own just one share that you buy from a
broker. I had recommended Muriel Siebert for that www.siebertnet.com
--
Lubow
http://www.equiserve.com/shs/index_shs.htm
It doesn't look like they charge anything and they had 36 companies to
choose from that don't charge fees.
Fred
"lubow" <lu...@lubow-industries.com> wrote in message
news:INPri.9290$Kk4.6672@trndny09...
Not exactly true. Many of those DRIPs (particularly ADRs) listed in the
Computershare website are for-profit DRIPs. I call them pseudo-DRIPS. The
best DRIPs are those that are sponsored and paid by the company, like Exxon
Mobil, Sempra, etc. These are true DRIPs. The pseudo-DRIPs charge fees,
usually around $5 per investment have a lousy track record and participation
by a small investor is not advised. At least that's my experience with
pseudo-DRIPs.
The companies Joe gave us all have company sponsored DRIPs and are entirely
free. My advice is to go ahead with Bank of America, Coca Cola and Exxon
Mobil as DRIP accounts.
--
Lubow
Thanks for the info. Yeah, upon further investigation it looks like
there are fees via Computershare especially when selling shares. Do ya
think he should wait on BAC until it maybe hits a bottom? Dang stock
has been slowly sinking since last Nov. ;-)
Fred
No, Fred. The whole idea behind DRIP investing is that we do not need
to time anything, other than sending in your investment 45 days before
the dividend payment date, DRIPs are based on dollar cost averaging.
In lousy times, Joe will get more shares for his money. In good
times, fewer shares. Of course if Bank of America or XOM or KO go
belly up, then Joe will really have a problem. But, then again, if
stock investing could guarantee a safe return, we would be getting
max'ed out at 4 or 5% instead of, say, the 26% annual compounded
returns we got with Uncle Pete (Union Pacific UNP).
-- Lubow
That is why I prefixed my advice with:
"if $5000 is all he has, and is likely to have for some time"
I did not assume that he would never have more in the future.
I was pointing to a better strategy *if* he has not expecting
to have more in the foreseeable future.
>
> As for the S&P fund, it's okay, but it's something I would not do when I
> have other options. DRIP accounts are still the most efficient form of
> investing because the companies pay the fees, not the small investor.
It is a matter of scale. With only $5k you really are not
going to get very diversified, and there are initial set up costs
for each DRIP account. Once started they are very efficient,
but you do need a long time for that to pay off.
I particularly pointed to the Vanguard S&P fund because
it has an exceptionally low MER, and like all open-end mutual
funds dividends do get reinvested like a DRIP.
The Vanguard fund is cheap enough, that it wins over the setup
costs of multiple DRIP accounts, and gives more diversity.
There is the added consideration that US accounting rules
make the mutual fund less work since you need not track
individual share lots.
North of the border the situation is a bit different.
Canadian tax rules don't make DRIPs more complicated than
mutual funds, and the cheapest index fund is noticeably
more expensive than the Vanguard S&P500 fund.
In the category of expense ratios, you cannot beat XOM and COP.
They're zero. For a utility like SRE, the expense is the initial $15
commission.
DRIPs could be a pain in the neck when you do sell, but it is not as
bad as you would think. IRS allows the DRIP investor to list all long
term reinvested dividends plus cash infusions as a single amount with
the date as "Various." The short term investments and reinvestments
would need to be itemized. But, again, it is exactly the same
procedure as if it were a mutual fund.
Joe's example of a bank, a food/beverage and oil is diversified enough
for me and unlike a fund or ETF, he gets exactly what he wants without
having to subsidize a fund manager's new Ferrari. He gets the best of
both worlds. He pays for his investments like a mutual fund without
any of the overhead.
Canadian DRIPs can be rather painful for a US resident. Most Canadian
DRIPs are not approved by the SEC and US residents cannot participate.
But a few Canadian DRIPs are available to US residents and have worked
out very well for us (REI-UN.TO and SU). Canadian DRIP custodians
will reinvest the dividends without any heartburn. However, to add
new cash into a Canadian DRIP is, indeed, a pain in the butt. Under
Canadian law, the first investment into a Canadian DRIP has to be paid
by a check drawn on a Canadian bank located in Canada. The check
needs to have the name of the DRIP owners on it as well. To establish
a checking account in Canada, the depositor must physically appear at
the bank. We use the Bank of Montreal in Niagara Falls, Ontario.
Bottom line: if you want to invest in a Canadian DRIP, buy the stock
then take a trip to Canada.