Industry: Technical Services - raw data
ausound
raw data
ACM CACI CICS.OB CVNS.OB EEI ENG ENSL.OB FRM IMCI.OB JEC KBR KTOS MIGL.OB
MG STN TEGR.OB TTEK TRIT URS VSR VSEC WYY WLDN
ausound
ranked with proprietary technical parameters
ACM+EEI+CACI+JEC+KBR+STN+TTEK+URS+VSR+VSEC+WYY+
ausound
ausound
------Technical Services --------
ranked with proprietary technical parameters
ACM
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 15.67
Price/Sales (ttm): 0.49 <<=====<<
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): N/A
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): N/A
Total Debt (mrq): 241.01M <--------4% of revenue ...ok
Shares Short (prior month)3: 2.08M
Shares Short (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 2.33M
Short % of Float (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 2.60% <---itty bitty short
EEI
Trailing Annual Dividend Yield3: 2.50% <---DIVIDENDS
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 12.00
Price/Sales (ttm): 0.43 <<=====<<
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): 23.10% <<=====<<
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): -2.00%
Total Debt (mrq): 815.27K <---1/2% of revenue...xlnt
CACI+
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 14.21
Price/Sales (ttm): 0.50 <<=====<<
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): 12.90% <<=====<<
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): 21.80% <<=====<<
Total Debt (mrq): 532.42M <----19% of revenue...fair/poor
Shares Short (prior month)3: 1.29M
Shares Short (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 1.40M
Short % of Float (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 5.40% <-------SHORTS
JEC+
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 11.40 <=====<<watch!
Price/Sales (ttm): 0.37 <=====<<
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): -20.10%
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): -30.70%
Total Debt (mrq): 47.81M <---less than half % of revenue...xlnt
Shares Short (prior month)3: 4.48M
Shares Short (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 4.83M
Short % of Float (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 4.00% <--small short interest
KBR+
Trailing Annual Dividend Yield3: 1.10%<----dividends
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 9.97 <<=====<<
Price/Sales (ttm): 0.25 <<=====<<
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): -5.50%
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): -14.10%
Total Debt (mrq): 0 <<=====<<
Shares Short (prior month)3: 1.87M
Shares Short (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 2.29M
Short % of Float (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 1.90% <----shorts
STN+
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 22.01
Price/Sales (ttm): 0.93 <<=====<<
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): 6.10% <<=====<<
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): N/A
Total Debt (mrq): 257.60M <----21% of revenue....fair/poor
TTEK+
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 18.37
Price/Sales (ttm): 1.16
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): 5.20% <<=====<<
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): 12.60% <<=====<<
Total Debt (mrq): 10.85M <-----3/4 of 1 % of revenues...xlnt
Shares Short (prior month)3: 2.18M
Shares Short (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 2.34M
Short % of Float (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 4.40% <----short
URS+
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 12.38
Price/Sales (ttm): 0.38 <<=====<<
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): -10.40%
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): -1.50%
Total Debt (mrq): 897.54M <-------9% of revenue...ok
Shares Short (prior month)3: 1.79M
Shares Short (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 1.48M
Short % of Float (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 2.10% <---short
VSR+
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 11.05 <<=====<<watch!
Price/Sales (ttm): 0.28 <<=====<<
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): -1.10%
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): -54.90%
Total Debt (mrq): 0 <-----xlnt
VSEC+
Trailing Annual Dividend Yield3: 0.40% <---dividends
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 9.11 <<=====<<
Price/Sales (ttm): 0.21 <<=====<<
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): -14.30%
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): 45.50% <<=====<<
Total Debt (mrq): 0 <----------xlnt
Shares Short (prior month)3: 97.07K
Shares Short (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 123.98K
Short % of Float (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 3.10% <----shorts
WYY+
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 134.98
Price/Sales (ttm): 1.30
Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): 12.20% <<=====<<
Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): N/A
Total Debt (mrq): 1.58M <-----4% of revenue...ok
Bill Reid
> ------Technical Services --------
>
> ranked with proprietary technical parameters
>
> ACM
> Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 15.67
> Price/Sales (ttm): 0.49 <<=====<<
>
> Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): N/A
> Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): N/A
> Total Debt (mrq): 241.01M <--------4% of revenue ...ok
>
> Shares Short (prior month)3: 2.08M
> Shares Short (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 2.33M
> Short % of Float (as of 30-Oct-09)3: 2.60% <---itty bitty short
>
> EEI
> Trailing Annual Dividend Yield3: 2.50% <---DIVIDENDS
>
> Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 12.00
> Price/Sales (ttm): 0.43 <<=====<<
>
> Qtrly Revenue Growth (yoy): 23.10% <<=====<<
> Qtrly Earnings Growth (yoy): -2.00%
> Total Debt (mrq): 815.27K <---1/2% of revenue...xlnt
>
> CACI+
> Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 14.21
> Price/Sales (ttm): 0.50 <<=====<<
>
I owned this stock several years ago, next thing you know
"ausound" trashed it as going straight down the toilet
because of miniscule subsidiary they had just bought
was implicated in some waterboarding type scandal
in Iraq. Of course, the stock continued to do well
until I sold it, because it wasn't quite the same stock
I bought in 2000 with a PE of about 6, a PS of about
0.25 or something ridiculously low like that, ZERO
debt (then they went on a debt-driven acquisition
spree that temporarily put a crimp in the stock price
rise that took it from like 4 to like 70 in three years),
and was breaking out from a LOOONG base...
In any event, it appears that "ausound" has forgotten
that he hated this stock...
---
William Ernest Reid
Post count: less than all the "proprietary" technical
indicators kept secret here
Lubow
Were your CACI holdings reported to Judge Emerson when you filed the
financial in which you SWORE that you didn't have a pot to piss in?
ausound
310168...@e31g2000vbm.googlegroups.com:
> I sold it, because it wasn't quite the same stock
> I bought in 2000 with a PE of about 6, a PS of about
> 0.25 or something ridiculously low like that, ZERO
> debt (then they went on a debt-driven acquisition
> spree that temporarily put a crimp in the stock price
> rise that took it from like 4 to like 70 in three years),
> and was breaking out from a LOOONG base...
>
> In any event, it appears that "ausound" has forgotten
> that he hated this stock..
you said it yourself... it isn't the same stock
I'm in the preliminary stages of all this research
(using google.groups servers as my storage)
so I've got nothing at this time about this or any of these stocks which
I'm posting by industry groups other than..THEY EXIBIT FAVORABLE SUPPORT
THAT STANDS OUT FROM THE PACK.
I would hypothesize that this support comes from large investors, perhaps
they/them or mutual fundies. dunno dont care. it izwhutitiz
Bill Reid
> Bill Reid <hormelf...@gmail.com> wrote in news:c28369a1-c12f-4902-b701-
> 3101683f6...@e31g2000vbm.googlegroups.com:
>
> > I sold it, because it wasn't quite the same stock
> > I bought in 2000 with a PE of about 6, a PS of about
> > 0.25 or something ridiculously low like that, ZERO
> > debt (then they went on a debt-driven acquisition
> > spree that temporarily put a crimp in the stock price
> > rise that took it from like 4 to like 70 in three years),
> > and was breaking out from a LOOONG base...
>
> > In any event, it appears that "ausound" has forgotten
> > that he hated this stock..
>
> you said it yourself... it isn't the same stock
>
> I'm in the preliminary stages of all this research
> (using google.groups servers as my storage)
>
At times "retrieval" of data from this "database" by
"keyword" has been all but impossible...but again
appears to be working well enough that "CAI ausound"
turns up the following, slightly edited for brevity, which
shows CACI was an "ausound" "pick" until AFTER
I stated I owned it (to be fair, they DID get some
bad press about some torture in Iraq by a
recently-purchased security firm that represented
about 1% of their business):
Newsgroups: misc.invest.stocks
Subject: Re: Homeland Security Stocks (ausound)?
From: ausound <ausoundREM...@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:43:03 GMT
"BCC" <br...@akanta.com> wrote in news:iTGLb.9064$9H4.8089
@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com:
> Anyone have a list of the current favorite stocks?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> B
>
Lifted the stocks from security stockwatch's website
might want to print it out
I've indicated with an arrow one's I like/watch/own
doesn't mean that they're particularly ready to buy if it has an arrow
doesn't mean they suck if they don't have an arrow either
I would love if you scoured them all and found me some winners!
...
Military Defense Watch List
...
CAI 48.83 -0.20
...
Physical Security Watch List
...
CAI CACI International <-------------
CCC Calgon Carbon
CANI Carreker <---------------believe it's CAI now
...
-ausound
From: "Bill Reid" <hormelf...@happyhealthy.net>
Newsgroups: misc.invest.stocks
Subject: Re: Homeland Security Stocks (ausound)?
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:08:04 GMT
ausound <ausoundREM...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:Xns946BAA16EB7AEa...@207.217.77.205...
> CAI CACI International <-------------
> CCC Calgon Carbon
> CANI Carreker <---------------believe it's CAI now
No, I think CAI is still CACI International, a systems integrator
specializing in defense/intelligence, and CANI is still Carreker,
whoever they are.
I've owned CAI since it was CACI back in 2000/2001, the
first of about a handful of stocks I'm holding long-term as long
their business doesn't get screwed up. CAI at my purchase
had a P/E ratio of about 8 with a stable 20%+ growth
rate for years. Of course, they got a giant pop on 9/11/01,
were no longer a screaming bargain, and the price stalled out, but the
company continues to perform so I've gritted my teeth and
held on.
Feel free to buy it to keep my price propped up but don't say I
recommended it. I know I could have made at least five times
as much money by selling it six months ago and putting it into some
short-term fliers, but like my 401K plans I'm "doing the right thing"
and not screwing around with certain "investments" as an
experiment. So far the results of the experiment are that it's
better to screw around.
---
William Ernest Reid
Newsgroups: misc.invest.stocks
Subject: Re: CAI Short Story
From: ausound <ausoundREM...@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 01:05:11 GMT
bg...@yahoo.com (Nairb) wrote in
news:3340f31f.0409...@posting.google.com:
> I'm of the opinion this CAI will tank hard here over the next six
> months.
sure, after the chimp's back in office the rest of the Abu Grehb story
can
hit the fan
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts on CAI?
they can have earnings & revenue from here to tuesday and it won't
make no
nevermind if the CAI subcontractors were complicit in the nekkid
prisoner
flesh piles and the story grabs the headlines again.
>
> Does anyone here "like" CAI from here? And if so what is it that looks
> good to you?
>
again, revenue, ongoing contracts, renewing contracts, earnings, but
that
flesh pile thang. I've got a no touchy opinion on CAI
---end of archived slightly edited posts
> so I've got nothing at this time about this or any of these stocks which
> I'm posting by industry groups other than..THEY EXIBIT FAVORABLE SUPPORT
> THAT STANDS OUT FROM THE PACK.
>
> I would hypothesize that this support comes from large investors, perhaps
> they/them or mutual fundies. dunno dont care. it izwhutitiz
You do all this "by hand"? If it is merely a matter of
simple technical "support" wouldn't it be easier to use a
program that scours the entire universe of stocks and
finds those that meet that criteria, in a matter of seconds
or minutes?
---
William Ernest Reid
Post count: a few thousand less than listed
American stocks
ausound
4ax.com:
> Hey, ausound, did you notice my correct predictions last wk on apwr,
> cpqq and cga?
>
> Got 300 sh on apwr and 200 on cga before the the rally, but couldn't
> buy cpqq because I had a lower limit order. Oh well, keeping an eye on
> it.
>
> Your posts are appreciated here.
>
http://seekingalpha.com/article/174150-chinese-wind-power-plant-coming-
to-u-s-soil?source=yahoo
On Wednesday, A-Power Energy Generation Systems (APWR), a Chinese wind
turbine maker, announced (see New York Times article by Kate Galbraith
here) plans to start construction of a wind turbine production plant
somewhere in the U.S. next year.
A-Power has signed an agreement with private equity firm US-REG (U.S.
Renewable Energy Group) to locate a site for the new plant and to
participate in the development and construction of the facility.
Initially the plant is expected to to be 320,000 square feet and produce
1,100 megawatts of wind energy turbines annually, enough to power 330,000
homes. The facility is expected to employ approximately 1,000 American
workers. The announced plan calls for many of the key wind turbine
components to be sourced from U.S. manufacturers, further expanding the
number of jobs created in the United States. Of course, new construction
will also produce jobs of a less permanent nature.
"The decision to construct this wind energy facility in the United States
is the direct result of America's commitment to renewable energy and the
strength and skill of the American workforce," said Cappy McGarr, US-REG
Managing Partner. "This project expects to create thousands of American
jobs..."
A-Power is the turbine supplier for a planned wind farm in Texas that
will cover approximately 36,000 acres. The wind farm will cost about $1.5
billion, with a capacity of 600 MW. This project will use about 50% of
one year's production from the proposed plant. US-REG is also co-
developer, along with China's Shenyang Power Group (SPG), of the wind
farm. A-Power is a shareholder in SPG.
About 85% of the components of the wind turbines will be sourced in the
U.S. The nacelles (high value gearboxes) will be sourced in China, but
assembled in the U.S. To further complicate the internationalization of
these projects, A-Power has a Joint Venture partnership with GE
Drivetrain Technologies (GE) to produce wind turbine gearboxes (nacelles)
in Shenyang.
It is likely that political pressure has accelerated these moves to more
U.S. manufacture. The Texas project had been criticized by Sen. Charles
Schumer (D, New York) because it appeared to be proceeding with imported
turbines. According to the New York Times article, Schumer has welcomed
the new announcement.